Scribd
Upload
232 views2 pages

IA To Condone Refiling Delay

[1] Manoj Kumar Shrivastava has filed a special leave petition against a judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court from March 2022. [2] The Supreme Court registry found defects in the filing and requested original records and verification of facts. [3] The petitioner did not have the original records and had to retrieve them from their advocate, resulting in a delay in re-filing. The petitioner is seeking condonation of the delay, arguing it was bona fide and unintentional.

Uploaded by

Ravindra Nath Pareek
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
232 views2 pages

IA To Condone Refiling Delay

[1] Manoj Kumar Shrivastava has filed a special leave petition against a judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court from March 2022. [2] The Supreme Court registry found defects in the filing and requested original records and verification of facts. [3] The petitioner did not have the original records and had to retrieve them from their advocate, resulting in a delay in re-filing. The petitioner is seeking condonation of the delay, arguing it was bona fide and unintentional.

Uploaded by

Ravindra Nath Pareek
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction


Crl.M.A. No. ________/2023
IN
Transfer Petition (Crl) No. ______/2023

IN THE MATTER OF :

MANOJ KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA ……..PETITIONER


Versus
STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS …….RESPONDENTS

Application for condonation on delay in Re-Filling of


Special Leave Petition

To,
The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India
and His Companion Justice of
Supreme Court of India
The Humber Petition on behalf of
the petitioner above named:
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. That the petitioner has filed a Special Leave Petition


arising out of the Impugned Judgment and final order
dated 22.03.2022 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of
Madhya Pradesh Principal Bench at Jabalpur in W.P.
No. 14162/2019 (D.B.).

2. That after scrutiny of the paper books of the e-filling,


of defects were pointed out by the registry.
3. That the petitioners were asked to get the original
record of the case for filing documents and for verifying
some facts stated in the special leave petition.
4. That petitioners did not have the original record and
had to go the High Court advocate for collecting the
original record.
5. That the defects were cured immediately after the
petitioners arrived at the advocate office.
6. That the petitioners could not get the record in time
and delay occurred. The delay is bonafide and
unintentional.
7. That the delay may be condoned in the interest of
justice.
Prayer:-
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble
Court may be graciously pleased to:-
(a) Condone the delay of………days in Re-filling the
Special leave petition filed against the Impugned
Judgment and final order dated 22.03.2022
passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Madhya
Pradesh Principal Bench at Jabalpur in W.P. No.
14162/2019 (D.B.).
(b) Pass such other and further order or orders as
this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in
the facts and circumstance of the present case.

DRAWN ON – 28.11.2022 Filed By;


Filed on : .11.2022
Place : New Delhi PRAVEEN SWARUP
Advocate for the petitioner

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy