0% found this document useful (0 votes)
89 views6 pages

Solution To Mid-Term Exam (CSE574 Drainage Design)

The document contains the solutions to questions from a mid-term exam on drainage design. Question 1 involves proving that the Gumbel distribution is a special case of the general extreme value (GEV) distribution. Question 2 involves calculating the peak discharge from a runoff hydrograph using given rainfall and catchment data. Question 3 involves calculating gully spacing and box culvert size using design methods and charts from a drainage guidelines document. Question 4 involves partially solved questions regarding freeboard height and culvert design.

Uploaded by

Tik Hon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
89 views6 pages

Solution To Mid-Term Exam (CSE574 Drainage Design)

The document contains the solutions to questions from a mid-term exam on drainage design. Question 1 involves proving that the Gumbel distribution is a special case of the general extreme value (GEV) distribution. Question 2 involves calculating the peak discharge from a runoff hydrograph using given rainfall and catchment data. Question 3 involves calculating gully spacing and box culvert size using design methods and charts from a drainage guidelines document. Question 4 involves partially solved questions regarding freeboard height and culvert design.

Uploaded by

Tik Hon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Solution to Mid-term Exam (CSE574 Drainage Design)

Semester 2 in 2021-22

Q1a: [Total marks: 10]


1
𝑥−𝐵 𝑘(𝑥−𝐵) 𝑘
−( )= [1− ]
𝑖𝑓 𝑒 𝐴 𝐴 (3 marks)
𝑥−𝐵 𝑘(𝑥−𝐵)
−𝑘( )= [1− ]
𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑒 𝐴 𝐴 (3 marks)
𝑥−𝐵 (0)(𝑥−𝐵)
−0( )= [1− ]= 1
𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑒 𝐴 𝐴 (4 marks)
Thus, Gumbel is a special case of G.E.V. when k = 0
Note:
Mathematical proof with complete steps and illustrations will get full marks.

Solution 1b: [Total marks: 15]


Given Data:
Duration of event = 10 min
imax = 12y + 40 (mm/hr)
imax for 50-yr return period =?
Required: Extreme rainfall intensity of duration 1hr with 50-year return period = ?
1
We know that, P = , (𝜆 is the average number of extreme events per year)
𝜆𝑇
Monthly data: 𝜆 = 12; Return Period = T = 50 (5 marks)
According to Gumbel distribution:
1
𝑦 = − ln(− ln(1 − 𝑃)) = −ln (−ln (1 − ))
𝜆𝑇
1
𝑦 = −ln (−ln (1 − (50×12)))
y = 116.8 mm/hr (10 marks)

1
Q2: [Total marks: 25]
Given Data: Area = 0.1 km2, time of concentration = 25min, runoff coefficient = 0.7
Required: Determine runoff hydrograph and peak discharge with design rainstorm profile
0.1 𝑘𝑚2 𝑘𝑚2
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 = = 0.004 → 0.004 × (5) 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑒𝑝𝑠 = 0.02 𝑘𝑚2 (5 marks)
25𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑚𝑖𝑛
(15 marks)
Incremental Rainfall Area Runoff Discharge
Time (min) intensity (km2) coefficient Q(m3/s)
(mm/hr) (c)
0 0 0 0 0
5 98 0.02 0.7 0.278(0.7*0.02*98) = 0.381
10 118 0.02 0.7 0.278*0.7(0.02*98+0.02*118) = 0.841
15 159 0.02 0.7 0.278*0.7(0.02*98+0.02*118+0.02*159) = 1.460
20 278 0.02 0.7 0.278*0.7(0.02*98+0.02*118+0.02*159+278*0.02) = 2.541
25 159 0.02 0.7 0.278*0.7(0.02*98+0.02*118+0.02*159+278*0.02+159*0.02) = 3.160
30 118 0 0 0.278*
(0*0*98+0.02*0.7*118+0.02*0.7*159+0.02*0.7*278+0.02*0.7*159+0.02
*0.7*118) = 3.238
35 98 0 0 0.278*
(0*0*98+0*0*118+0.02*0.7*159+0.02*0.7*278+0.02*0.7*159+0.02*0.7
*118+0.02*0.7*98) = 3.160
40 0 0 0 0.278*
(0*0*98+0*0*118+0*0*159+0.02*0.7*278+0.02*0.7*159+0.02*0.7*118
+0.02*0.7*98) = 2.541
45 0 0 0 0.278*
(0*0*98+0*0*118+0*0*159+0*0*278+0.02*0.7*159+0.02*0.7*118+0.02
*0.7*98) = 1.460
50 0 0 0 ……

2
The peak of hydrograph is 3.238 m3/s at time of concentration of 30 min at catchment outlet. (5 marks)
Notes:
1. Steps/approach are/is right (10 marks)
2. Numerical mistakes (3 marks)
3. Answer is correct/not-correct (3-5 marks)
4. If students did not show proper calculations steps, marks were also subtracted.
5. Runoff hydrograph is missing (10 marks)
6. Missing unit/units in solution leads to marks subtraction (1-2 marks)

3
Q3 (a) [Total marks: 15]
(i) Site 1: Flat road with normal bituminous wearing course,
𝑛 = 0.013, 𝑆0 = 0.48%, 𝑆𝑐 = 3%, 𝑊𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑛 = 5.5𝑚

Following GN035a (Article 3.7), for flat road 𝑆0 ≤ 0.5%:


𝐿𝑢 = 𝐿𝑜 × [1 + 𝐹(𝑅 − 1)] (4 marks)
where 𝐿𝑢 is unadjusted gully spacing in meter
𝐿𝑜 is gully spacing for roads of zero gradient in meter (check Chart 2A in GN035a)
𝐹 is the adjustment factor for different drained widths (check Chart 3 in GN035a)
𝑅 is multiplication factor for different crossfalls and gradients (check Chart 4A)

After checking: 𝐿𝑜 = [8 − 10]𝑚, 𝐹 ≈ 1.0, 𝑅 ≈ 1.2 (3 marks)


(Note: in the latest version of GN035a, 𝐿𝑜 = [8 − 9]𝑚], while in the former version GN035, 𝐿𝑜 =
[9 − 10]𝑚. For marking, any value between [8 – 10] m is considered to be correct choice)

Thus 𝐿𝑢 = 10 × [1 + 1 × (1.2 − 1)] = 12𝑚 (1 mark)


Correction for design: 𝐿 = 𝐿𝑢 × (1 − 𝑅𝐹𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 ) × (1 − 𝑅𝐹𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑠 ) Article 3.7 in GN035a)
where 𝑅𝐹𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 is reduction factor for gully efficiency (check Table 5 in GN035a)
𝑅𝐹𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑠 is reduction factor for blockage by debris (check Table 6 in GN035a)
After checking: 𝑅𝐹𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑠 = 20% (long gradient <0.5%), 𝑅𝐹𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 0% (assume the grating
type is GA1-450), thus 𝐿 = 12 × (1 − 0%) × (1 − 20%) = 9.6𝑚
(Note: this correction step is not included for marking for this time)

(ii) Site 2: Steep road with friction course,


𝑛 = 0.016, 𝑆0 = 10%, 𝑆𝑐 = 2.5%, 𝑊𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑛 = 7.3𝑚
Following GN035a (Article 3.6), for steept road 𝑆0 > 0.5%:
0.01 𝐴
𝐿𝑢 = ( 𝑛
)×𝑊 (4 marks)

Where 𝑛 is roughness coefficient (check Table 4 in GN035a); 𝐴 is drained area in 𝑚2 (check


Chart 1A in GN035a); 𝑊 is drained width in meter

After checking 𝑛 = 0.016, 𝐴 ≈ 150𝑚2 (2 marks)


2
(Note: if based on former version GN035, 𝐴 ≈ 180𝑚 is also acceptable)
0.01 150
Thus, 𝐿𝑢 = (0.016) × 7.3
= 12.84𝑚 (1 mark)

Correction for desgin: 𝑅𝐹𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑠 = 20% 𝑜𝑟 15%, 𝑅𝐹𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 0% (assume the grating type is
GA1-450), thus 𝐿 = 12.84 × (1 − 0%) × (1 − 20%) = 10.27𝑚.
(Note: this correction step is not included for marking for this time)

4
Q3(b) [Total marks: 10]

Given 𝑄 = 2.8 𝑚/𝑠 𝐷 = 2𝑚, 𝑆 = 0.002, 𝐻 = 2𝑚, 𝐿𝑒 = 0.5𝐷 = 1𝑚, 𝐾𝑒 = 0.2


𝐻
Due to 𝐷
= 1 < 1.2, this is the critical flow control (2 marks)

𝑄
Assume ( ) ≥ 0.4 (2 marks)
𝐷𝐵√𝑔𝐷

𝑄2 𝑄2
𝐻 + 𝐿𝑒 𝑆0 = 𝑦𝑐 + + 𝐾𝑒 (𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛. 1)
2𝑔𝐴2𝑐 2𝑔𝐴2
For a box culvert, the critical flow condition becomes:
2 1
𝑦𝑐 𝐷 3 𝑄2 3
= ( ) ( 5)
𝐷 𝐵 𝑔𝐷

2 1
𝐷 3 𝑄2 3
𝑦𝑐 = ( ) ( 5 ) × 𝐷
𝐵 𝑔𝐷

0.928
𝑦𝑐 = (2 marks)
𝐵 2/3

𝐴𝑐 = 𝑦𝑐 × 𝐵 = 0.928𝐵1/3
Substitute 𝑦𝑐 , 𝐴𝑐 into eq. (1):
0.928 2.82 2.82
2 + 1 × 0.002 = + + 0.2 ×
𝐵2/3 1 2 2 × 9.81 × (2𝐵)2
2 × 9.81 × (0.928𝐵3 )

𝐵 = 0.604𝑚 (2 marks)
𝑄
Check: = 0.523 > 0.4, the assumption is tenable. (2 marks)
𝐷𝐵√𝑔𝐷

5
Q4(a) [Total marks: 10]

(2 marks)

(2 marks)

(2 marks)

(2 marks)

(2 marks)

Q4(b) [Total marks: 15]

For given ,
(2 marks)

(2 marks)

(2 marks)

Assume
(2 marks)

(2 marks)

(2 marks)

D = [660, 700] mm for design purpose (3 marks)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy