The Journal of the Assembly for Expanded

Perspectives on Learning

Volume 4 Winter 1998-1999 Article 3

1998

Attitudes Toward Writing

Laurence E. Musgrove
University of Southern Indiana, Evansville

Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/jaepl

Part of the Creative Writing Commons, Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Curriculum and Social
Inquiry Commons, Disability and Equity in Education Commons, Educational Methods Commons,
Educational Psychology Commons, English Language and Literature Commons, Instructional Media
Design Commons, Liberal Studies Commons, Other Education Commons, Special Education and Teaching
Commons, and the Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons

Recommended Citation
Musgrove, Laurence E. (1998) "Attitudes Toward Writing," The Journal of the Assembly for Expanded
Perspectives on Learning: Vol. 4 , Article 3.

Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/jaepl/vol4/iss1/3

This article is brought to you freely and openly by Volunteer, Open-access, Library-hosted Journals (VOL Journals),
published in partnership with The University of Tennessee (UT) University Libraries. This article has been accepted
for inclusion in The Journal of the Assembly for Expanded Perspectives on Learning by an authorized editor. For
more information, please visit https://trace.tennessee.edu/jaepl.
Attitudes Toward Writing

Cover Page Footnote

Laurence E. Musgrove is assistant professor of English and Director of Composition at the University of
Southern Indiana in Evansville where he teaches courses in writing, American literature, and English
education.

This essay is available in The Journal of the Assembly for Expanded Perspectives on Learning:
https://trace.tennessee.edu/jaepl/vol4/iss1/3
 Attitudes Toward Writing

Laurence E. Musgrove

I take myself back, fear.

You are not my shadow any longer.
I don't hold you in my hands.
You can't live in my eyes, my ears, my voice,
my belly, or in my heart my heart
my heart my heart.

Joy Harjo

n Portfolios in the Writing Classroom, Kathleen B l ake Yancey ( 1 992) main­

I t a i n s that "portfo l i o s i n c o m p o s i t i o n c l a s s e s often e x h i b i t .
. . some
metacognitive work, that is, some exploration b y the writers of their o w n com­
posing processes and of their own development as writers" (p. I 04). As the term
"metacognitive" suggests, much of this exploration or self-evaluative writing takes
place after students have completed a series of writing assignments; they look
back to see what they've accomplished and the degree to which they' ve improved
as writers. Yancey also argues that portfolio reflections can "provide information
about what is going o n ' within' the writers to help them set their own agendas
and thus e xercise some control over their development i n appropriate ways"
(p. 1 04). What i s within writers i s quite different from what they' ve produced, or
even the knowledge and skills they've developed along the w ay. What i s within
student writers are heart-felt stories, narratives of success and failure played out
in the English classroom. Unfortunately, the most common of these stories are
filled w ith fear and despair-students fearing teachers ' comments and peer
response, students despairing of success or approval. Repeated again and again
over time, these narratives o f hurt become internalized and shape students'
attitudes toward future writing experiences. Even the most supportive teaching
practices will fail i n the face of such deep-seated resistances. In response, I be­
lieve we should give our writing students a vocabulary of attitude, help them use
this terminology to recount and revise their writing experiences, and provide them
with short narratives, parables, and poems that exemplify specific predispositional
attitudes which contribute to or i nterfere with their chances of success in the
writing class. In combination with a portfolio pedagogy that offers multiple op-

Laurence E. Musgrove is assistant professor of English and Director of Composition at the University
ofSouthern Indiana in Evansville where he teaches courses in writing, American literature, and English
education.

JAEPL. Vol. 4, Winter 1 998-1 999, 1-9

2 JAEPL, Vol. 4, Winter 1 998- 1 999

portunities to set learning goals and evaluate their progress in achieving them, I
believe attention to attitude will offer students the chance to see how what they
bring to writing influences what they can ultimately achieve in writing.

Defining Attitude

In "The A ffective Domain and the Writing Process: Working Definitions,"

Susan H. McLeod ( 1 99 1 ) maps out a v ariety o f terms most often used by
psychologists to name affective states of being so that she can suggest ways we
might extend our research into affect and the writing process. These affective
states include "emotion," "feelings," "attitude," "anxiety," "belief," and "moti­
vation." Here, I'd like to examine only the first three of these i n order to distin­
guish "attitude" from "emotion." "Emotions" according to McLeod are intense,
positive or negative conditions "where the organism i s aroused for a fairly short
veriod of time. Using this definition, grief, joy, fear, and anger are all emotions"
(p. 98). Less evident affective states would be "moods" such as "the blue s . " The
distinct physical responses to emotions and moods are "feelings": the shortness
of breath related to fear and the fatigue that may accompany sadness (98). From
the field of social psychology, McLeod takes "attitudes" to mean "psychological
states acquired over a period of time as a result of our experiences; these atti­
tudes influence us to act i n certain ways" (p. 98). In other words, an attitude i s a
learned state of readiness rather than the act or response itself. Synonyms would
include "tendency" and "predisposition." Finally, attitudes also have affective,
behavioral, and cognitive components: attitudes may be accompanied by posi­
tive or negative emotions, and we may act and think i n particular ways as a result
of our attitudes (pp. 9 8-99). Therefore, emotions and attitudes are distinct affec­
tive states, even though an attitude may lead to an emotional response and then
to a feeling or bodily response, as i n a student's negative attitude toward writing
resulting in anger and perspiration.
In "Social Cognition, Emotions, and the Psychology of Writing," Alice Brand
( 1 99 1 ) clai m s that "social-cognitive theories o f writing mask the emotional
experience of writing" (p. 396). Tracing the development of the term "attitude"
in the field of social psychology, Brand focuses on attitude's emotional compo­
nent- "a positive or negative valance and a level of intensity" (p. 398)-and
concludes with a call for a theory of writing that includes attention to the writer's
emotions (p. 403). In an earlier argument, The Psychology of Writing: The Affec­
tive Experience, Brand ( 1 989) develops the means to survey students' emotional
responses toward writing. When defi n ing her primary terms and assumptions,
she helps us further understand the relationship between attitude and emotion
when she discusses the difference between "state" and "trait" emotions. Accord­
ing to B rand, "state" emotions represent a person's affective experience at a
specific moment, while "trait" emotions "predispose people to particular state
emotions but do not have a locus in time" (p. 59). So, just as attitudes are one's
habitual tendencies toward a response or action, trait emotions are one's habitual
emotional display, one's regular temperament. Again, attitudes don ' t always pro­
duce emotions, but when an attitude does prompt an emotional response, the
emotional response may be trait, state, or a combination of emotional responses.
 Musgrove/Attitudes Toward Writing 3

Kinds of Attitudes

One of the difficulties that arises when discussing attitudes is determining

kinds o f attitudes. This i s evident i n McLeod' s essay mentioned already above.
While she readily offers names for kinds of emotions and feelings, she doesn ' t
name specific attitudes, except t o say that students have negative ones ( p . 99).
Cataloguing attitudes i s particularly difficult, I think, because the terms "atti­
tudes" and "emotions" and "feelings" are often used synonymously in our dis­
cussions of habitual emotional response and behavior. For example, what might
the attitude be called that prompts a student to have the emotion of despair? Would
the attitude be called "pessimism"? "Hopelessness"? Could it also be called "de­
spair"? If I am prone to emotional despair when faced with writing, do I have a
despairing attitude?
Interestingly enough, some help in this regard comes from Wayne C. Booth
who has an abiding interest i n the relationships between writers, their texts, and
their readers, as evidenced i n The Rhetoric of Fiction ( 1 983), The Company We
Keep: An Ethics of Fiction ( 1 98 8), and The Vocation of a Teacher ( 1 98 8 ) . I n the
last named volume, and in an essay titled "The Scholar in Society," B ooth criti­
cizes the ideal notion of objective inquiry and, instead, proposes the scholar who
accepts his or her social and thus value-laden role while practicing the habits of
honesty, courage, persistence, consideration, and humility (pp. 67-7 3 ) . For ex­
ample, scholars are persistent when they choose to investigate a "problem until it
is either solved or proved pointless" (p. 70); scholars demonstrating humility
"have tested their powers for discovering the truth and have discovered instead
vaster and vaster domains of ignorance" (p. 7 3 ) . In other places, he equates these
habits with "virtues," "powers," "traits," "strengths," "characteristics" (p. 67)
and "attitude" (p. 64). While Booth would probably see these five habits of
scholarship more readily as demonstrated behaviors or v irtues, they do provide
us with names we can attach to attitudes. By that I mean, if we can say that some­
one-a firefighter for example-is predisposed to act courageously, we should
also be able to claim that he or she has a courageous attitude.

A Pedagogy of Attitude

Thus, for my purposes in the writing classroom and in the context of a

portfolio pedagogy, I introduce a vocabulary of attitude, provide l iterary examples,
and assign self-evaluative writing to prompt students to account for their own
attitudes toward writing. My purposes are, of course, to help students write and
think well, to feel confident when faced with a variety o f writing tasks and
rhetorical situations i n and outside school, to effectively plan, draft, revise, and
edit their writing, to be capable readers of other students' writing, to develop the
independent ability to evaluate the appropriateness of their own writing, and to
find personally and publicly significant purposes for writing. In terms of atti­
tudes, I want students to understand how specific predispositions influence what
they can achieve and how they can improve as writers.
At the beginning of the term, I give my students a definition o f attitude,
making i t synonymous w i th o n e ' s predi spositions toward particular tasks,
4 JAEPL, Vol. 4, Winter 1998-1 999

ideas, or people. Then I take B ooth's terms for the five scholarly habits, add
the a t t i tude o f hope to h i s l i s t , and i n troduce s i x pairs o f p o s i t i v e and
negative c ri tical attitudes, l is ted in the figure below, that contribute to or
interfere with learning.

honesty/dishonesty
courage/fear
persistence/procrastination
consideration/narrow-mindedness
humility/arrogance
hope/despair

Then in a series of mini-lessons, I share with my students short pieces of

l i terature exemplifying these attitudinal pairs. While I prefer short l i terary
examples because of their intensity and because they take less class time, longer
stories, novels, essays, and plays may also be appropriate at other times to
demonstrate attitudes i n conflict. The table below lists some poems, parables,
and short stories that correspond to specific attitudes.

honesty/dishonesty "A Ritual To Read to Each Other,"

William Stafford

courage/fear "Fear," Stephen Dobyns

persistence/procrastination "To B e of Use," Marge Piercy

consideration/narrow-mindedness "Those Winter Morni ngs,"

Robert Hayden

humility/arrogance "Eclipse," Augusto Monterroso

hope/despair "Drouth," Wendell B erry

Wendell B erry ' s poem is an excellent example of how opposite attitudes are cued
by the same event.

Drouth
All day the crops burn in the cloudless air,
Drouth lengthening against belief. At night
The husbands and the wives lie side by side,
Awake, the ache of panic in their bones,
Their purposes betrayed by purposes
 Musgrove/Attitudes Toward Writing 5

Unknown, whose mystery is the dark i n which

They wait and grieve. All may be lost, and then
What wiii they do? When money i s required
Of them, and they have none, where wiii they go?

Many wiii go i n blame against the world,

Hating i t for their pain, and they will go
Alone across the dry, bright, lifeless days,
And thus alone into the dark. Others
In grief and loss wiii see more certainly
What they have loved, and wiii belong to it
And to each other as i n happiness
They never did-hearing, though the whole world
Go dry, the hidden raincrow of their hope.
(Berry, 1 997, p. 54)

In my classes, as we talk about this poem and try to understand why some despair
and why some remain hopeful when confronted with the same failure, the poem
also gives us the opportunity to talk about the failures that we all face i n writing,
how failure and error are natural and necessary for growth, and how difficult i t i s
for u s t o remain hopeful when faced with the hard work of writing.
In my writing classes, students also keep portfolios designed to help them
track their attitudinal development, along with their progress as more knowl­
edgeable and skiilful writers. Portfolio ingredients include a resume, an initial
attitudinal survey, learning goals, a personal grammar and usage handbook, in­
class writing, homework assignments, essays, and portfolio self-evaluations writ­
ten at midterm and at the end of the semester. A sample midterm self-evaluation
assignment i s included below.

Part I
Copy the questions below and compose a short paragraph response
to each.
1 . Of all the reading, writing, and thinking goals you set for your­
self, which were the most important to you?
2. To what degree have you been able to achieve them during the
first half of the term?
3. Which ones do you s tiii need to work o n ?
4. What new goals would you now s e t for yourself?
5. Of all of the writing you 've accomplished, which was the most
meaningful?
(i. Of all of the reading you ' ve accomplished, which was the most
important to you?
7. If you had an opportunity to change thi s class, what would you
do?
8. Of all of the ways you ' ve progressed i n this class, which one are
you most proud of?
6 JAEPL, Vol . 4, Winter 1998- 1 999

Part II
Review your responses to Part I above, and then compose a four­
page essay i n which you reflect upon the growth you ' ve experienced
so far this term as a result of what you' ve accomplished i n this class.
Describe the person you were at the begin n i ng of the term, espe­
cially that person ' s attitudes toward writing. Then, describe the per­
son you are now and contrast your present attitudes with your ear­
lier attitudes . How have the activities in thi s class contributed to
that contrast?

I am especially interested in how you might use the six pairs of

attitudes we've discussed i n c lass to think about your "attitudinal"
progress i n thi s class . These six pairs include hope/despair, cour­
age/fear, perseverance/procrastination, humility/arrogance, honesty/
dishonesty, and consideration/narrow-mindedness. It should not be
necessary to discuss all six pairs, but I would like you to concen­
trate on at least three of them.

The first part of this assignment is designed to prompt students to reflect on their
learning goals, the degree to which they ' ve achieved those goals, and what they've
accomplished during the term. The second part of the assignment asks students
to focus on the person they've come to be and, more specifically, on how their
attitudes about writing have changed.

Student Stories

While I ' ve included excerpts from midterm self-evaluations below in order

to demonstrate how students think and write about their attitudes, I want to admi t
that as of this t i m e I have used t h i s approach i n only t w o of m y classes, i n an
English education course for English maj ors who are prospective teachers and i n
a first-year writing class, both i n the fall of 1 997 at the University of Southern
Indiana i n Evansville. The school draws a homogeneous population of students,
most first generation college students, and most from Evansville and the imme­
diate tri-state region, including Illinois, Indiana, and Kentucky. All of the stu­
dents represented here are white, female, and between the ages of eighteen and
twenty-two.
Sharo n , a s tudent i n the first-year writing class, describes in her self­
evaluation her experiences in high school, but also her concerns about writing i n
college:

Imagine a young girl who is just starting college. She is eager to

learn, but also afraid that she won ' t be able to handle her new chal­
lenge. The girl you are picturing is the person I used to be. Before
school, I was hopeful, but also despairing and fearful when it came
to this English class.
 Musgrove/Attitudes Toward Writing 7

Writing had never really been a problem for me. I always had
positive experiences with writing in high school. However, I knew
my teachers were more lenient i n high school than my professors
would be i n college. I also imagined that I would be writing ten
page essays. These reasons combined made me fearful about writ­
ing i n college.

Sharon has a good writing history, but still she doubted her ability because she
was unsure what to expect from college writing assignments, as well as fearing
what she didn ' t know: how her writing will be evaluated in college. Most stu­
dents in the class also feared writing, a common and tragic cultural attitude to­
ward writing, and one we, as teachers, should address directly in our classes and
in our professional organizations.
Ashley, from the same writing class, reveals another attitude toward writing
and learning:

Despite being i n this class only a few months, I have noticed a

change in my attitude toward English already. I never thought that I
would feel any different toward the reading, writing, thinking, and
learning skills i ncorporated into an English class. But the attitudes
I had at the beginning of the semester are totally different than those
I have now.
I was a very narrow-minded person when e ntering this class. I
had my beliefs and would very seldom l isten to anybody else ' s . I
also had a hard time taking the criticism and the advice peers had to
give me. I like the way my essay was, and I did not want to change
anything.

Ashley makes a significant judgment about herself and her way of responding to
others' ideas. Realizing her narrow-mindedness, and perhaps her arrogance, she
has an opportunity to see the limits of her knowledge and to recognize the value
of considering other perspectives. Her response also reminds us that terminology
and self-evaluation won ' t affect attitudinal change by themselves. Because the
primary text in the course emphasized critical thinking and because the class
included multiple opportunities for peer response to writing, Ashley was able to
connect writing to thinking and negotiation, and learn the benefits of consider­
ation and humility.
I also asked English majors who 9were prospective secondary teachers to
reflect about their predi spositions toward writing and teaching writing. The
following excerpt by Shana may be surprising:

As I began this semester, my atti tude toward writing was very

negative. I had not had many good experiences in writing during
high school ; therefore, my attitude toward writing was despairing
and fearful which led to procrastination.
I did not want to have this negative attitude, but all I had experi­
enced i n high school writing classes was failure . Because the teach-
8 JAEPL, Vol. 4, Winter 1998- 1 999

ers never told me what I could do differently to improve my writ­

ing, I was not given the opportunity to improve or view myself as a
writer.
My attitude toward teaching writing was just as despairing. When
I decided to maj or i n Secondary Education, I only focused on teach­
ing literature. I guess I thought that I could teach writing as mini­
mally as was required, and the main focus of my classes would be
on learning the great works of literature. With this attitude, I would
not have been very helpful in producing writing students who were
confident and good writers.

Perhaps this response isn ' t so surprising after all, but Shana obviously writes
better than she thinks she does. In addition, the opportunity to reflect about her
attitudes and the reasons for them helped her see the degree to which she was
already successful and allowed her to make new goals for developing her skills
further. The last paragraph of her self-evaluation demonstrates a changing se­
quence of attitudes from despair, fear, and procrastination to hope, courage, and
persistence:

As I look through my portfolio, I see that I was not a bad writer.

I just needed to develop the positive attitude that I could become a
writer, and with some practice and guidance, I have become a
better writer. The best example of my writing improvement is my
personal essay. B y learning that I needed to change my sentence
structures and comma usage, I learned how to use them correctly in
my writing. I now know how to use sentence variety, and I feel
more confident about commas. I will probably struggle with com­
mas for a while longer, but i n the second half of the semester, I will
continue my positive attitude as I courageously attempt to become
a good writer.

Conclusion

As a teacher of writing, I believe I ' ve had some initial success in helping

these and other students connect their histories as writers to how those histories
affect their attitude s . B y giving them a vocabulary of attitude, providing them
with works of literature that demonstrate or model particular attitudes, and ask­
ing them to reflect about how their writing experiences have shaped their atti­
tudes toward writing, I hope that students are better able to re-shape themselves
into successful writers. Writing this essay has also helped me think about way s I
might extend my research into the relationship between attitude and writing, such
as focusing o n the particular attitudes of hope and fear i n future surveys of stu­
dents and teachers. For example, what is the relationship between an English
teacher 's age and his or her hopefulness toward students of writing? To what
degree do teachers believe student attitudes of despair and fear can be changed?
Finally, returning to the relationship between attitude and emotion, revisions
 Musgrove/Attitudes Toward Writing 9

of attitude frequently result in revisions of emotional experience related to writ­

ing. To demonstrate, I conclude with the final paragraph from another one of my
first-year students' self-evaluations. In this case, Nicole reveals how a focus on
attitude affected other aspects of her life and notes the emotional objective of her
improved attitudes.

I have used what I learned i n this class both inside and outside of
school . I use my persistence techniques in my chemistry class. This
is an attitude I am aware that I should have toward all of my classes.
Outside of school, I have become more hopeful and courageous in
attempting all of my goals i n my life . These goals include making
myself happy while being successful in all that I do. c9

I'd like to thank my students Sharon, Ashley, Shana, and Nicole for giving me
permission to use their work in this essay.

References

Berry, W. ( 1 997). Drouth. Entries (p. 54). Washington, D. C . : Counterpoint.

Booth, W. C. ( 1 988). The company we keep: An ethics offiction. Chicago: U of Chicago
Press.
Booth, W. C. ( 1983). The rhetoric offiction. (2nd ed.). Chicago: U of Chicago Press.
Booth, W. C. ( 1 988). The vocation of a teacher: Rhetorical occasions 1967-1988. Chicago:
U of Chicago Press.
Brand, A. ( 1 99 1 ). Social cognition, emotions, and the psychology of writing. Journal of
Advanced Composition, 11, 395-407.

Brand. A. G. ( 1 989). The psychology of writing: The affective experience. Westport:

Greenwood Press.
Harjo, J. ( 1 983). I give you back. She had some horses (pp. 73-74). New York: Thunder's
Mouth Press.
McLeod, S. H. ( 1 99 1 ). The affective domain and the writing process: Working definitions.
Journal ofAdvanced Composition, 11, 95-1 05.

Yancey, K. B. ( 1 992). Portfolios in the writing classroom: A final reflection. In K. B . Yancey

(Ed.), Portfolios in the writing classroom (pp. 1 02- 1 1 6). Urbana: NCTE.