REP
PORT NO-V
VCCS/BLS//SOIL/MEIL
L-45/22-23

MEGHA
A ENGINE
EERING & INFRAS
STRUCTU
URES LIM
MITED.

GEO
OTECHN
NICAL IN
NVESTIIGATION
N REPO
ORT
NAME OF THE
E PROJECTS
S:- EXECUTIION OF 2NO
OS. INDIVID
DUAL RURAL
L PIPED WAT
TER SUPPLY
Y
PRO
OJECT PERT
TAINING TO THUAMUL RAMPUR
R & KOKSARA
K B
BLOCK OF KA
ALAHANDI DISTRICT
D
INC
CLUDING 5Y
YEARS O&M ON EPC COONTRACT UNNDER THE ONE
O PACKAGGE ( KALAHA
ANDI DIVISIION)
INC
CLUDING 5 YEARS
Y OF O&M
O C BASIS.
ON EPC

OCATION- PHUFGAON
LO P N GP- PHUF
FGAON, 40
00 KL 20 MT
TR STAGIN
NG.
BO
ORE HOLE NO:- 1 .

Da
ate of Tes
sting :-30..01.23 to
o 31.01.23
3

PR
REPARED BY-

VAWAANI CONST TRUCTIONN & CONS SULTANCY Y SERVICEES

A GOVT
G OF ODISHA
O AP
PPROVED LABORAT TORY
(An ISO 9001::2015 certtified)
At- Meghhadambarru,Po-Kuru
uda,Dist-Ba alasore,Piin-756056
Mob-78533886762/7
79784632664, email- vccsbls@g gmail.com
m
 PREFEACE

Sub soil exploration plays an important role in the design of the foundation of any
building and bridges. Before design the foundation for any civil Engineering
structure Sub-soil exploration is essentially required to study the character of the
Sub-soil strata as well as to determine the SBC of the foundation soil at different
depths. EXECUTION OF 2NOS. INDIVIDUAL RURAL PIPED WATER SUPPLY PROJECT PERTAINING
TO THUAMUL RAMPUR & KOKSARA BLOCK OF KALAHANDI DISTRICT INCLUDING 5YEARS O&M ON
EPC CONTRACT UNDER THE ONE PACKAGE ( KALAHANDI DIVISION) INCLUDING 5 YEARS OF O&M

ON EPC BASIS. LOCATION. PHUFGAON GP- PHUFGAON is decided to design the foundation

of the proposed structure on the basis of the Sub-soil exploration and accordingly
he entrusted the Sub-soil exploration work to VAWANI CONSTRUCTION & CONSULTANCY
SERVICES ,BALASORE with a direction to explore the Sub-soil at the proposed site.
CHAPTER
DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
NO.

1.0 INTRODUCTION 01

2.0 FIELDWORK AND LABORATORY TESTING 01

3.0 GEOTECHNICAL FOUNDATION REPORT 02

4.0 PROPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK 02-03

5.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION PROGRAM 03

6.0 METHODOLOGY OF INVESTIGATION & GROUND WATER TABLE 04-05

7.0 LABORATORY TESTS 05-07

8.0 ANALYSIS OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BORING DATA 08

9.0 ABSTRACT OF SAFE BEARING CAPACITY SBC & ABP OF SOIL 08

10.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 09

11.0 BORE-LOG DATA SHEETS 10-11

12.0 LABORATORY TEST RESULT 12-13

13.0 CALCULATION OF SBC SOIL 14-17

14.0 CALCULATION OF SETTLEMENT 18-21

15.0 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS 22-24

16.00 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 25-26

17.00 RECORD BORING 27-28

INTRODUCTION

This repo rt prese nts results o f “EXECUTION OF 2 NOS. INDIVIDUAL RURAL PIPED
WATER SUPPLY PROJECT PERTAINING TO THUAMUL RAMPUR & KOKSARA BLOCK OF KALAHANDI
DISTRICT INCLUDING 5YEARS O&M ON EPC CONTRACT UNDER THE ONE PACKAGE ( KALAHANDI
DIVISION) INCLUDING 5 YEARS OF O&M ON EPC BASIS. LOCATION. PHUFGAON GP- PHUFGAON

This work was perf ormed by VAWANI CONSTRUCTION & CONSULTANCY SERVICES,

BALASORE. Conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on

our current knowled ge of th e proposed loca tion, s ubsurface conditions

encountered at exploratio n locat ions, res ults of our laboratory test ing. These
conclusions a nd recommendations s hould not b e extrapolated to other area s
without our prior review.

OBJECTIVES OF SUB SOIL EXPLORATION

The objective of this Geo- technical invest igation is to optimize the Fou ndation
system f or prop osed Projec t with in th e safe bearing c apacity of the soil a nd
allowable settlement, it consists of the following:-

• D etermination o f type, s ize a nd depth of foundation- s ystem by a nalyzing t he

soil properties.

• To suggest a conclusive recommendation for the type of foundation system to be

adopted which would be economically viable and structurally safe for the proposed
structures of the projects.

FIELD WORK AND LABORATORY TESTING:

The boring of 0 1 no s. of b orehole was condu cted at Phufga on Gp-

Phufgaon . JAN.of 2023. Field testing was conducted and samples were col lected
during boring. Fi eld sta ndard penetration te sts ( SPT) w as co nducted i n the
boreholes during dri lling. Geotechnical la boratory tes ts on co llected soil s amples
were conducted at our laboratory in Balasore.

Page 1 of 28
GEOTECHNICAL FOUNDATION REPORT:

A general description of the strata encountered during boring, the soil

properties, ant icipated behavior of soils during constru ction and m easured
groundwater levels are pro vided in thi s report. Geotechnical recommendations for
shallow foundations and other general ge otechnical eng ineering parameters
related to the pro posed stru cture are provided in thi s report. Th e foundation
design parameters were derived f rom calculations based on Indian standards and
some standard geotechnical books.

PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES

The purpose of th e cu rrent geotechnical investi gation was to explore and

determine the existin g sub- strata conditio ns s uch as stratific ation, den seness or
hardness of the strata, p osition of gr ound water table at the location etc. and to
evaluate approximate range o f safe bear ing capacity for the proposed stru cture
using e mpirical f ormulas pr ovided in t he relevant IS cod es. The goal of ou r
investigation was to i dentify the key ge otechnical i ssues that cou ld poten tially
impact the p roposed projec t and t o develop geotechnical recom mendations fo r
design and construction of the project.
The scope of Geo-technical exploration is confined
within limitations of the framework of agreement drawn between MEGHA
ENGINEERING & INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED AND VAWANI CONSTRUCTION & CONSULTANCY

SERVICES , All the field and laboratory experiments have been carried out as per the

technical specification of the client and the relevant Indian Standard Code of
practice.
However the directions issued by Engineer-in charge in this respect has been
given due emphasis during the sub soil exploration work.

Page 2 of 28
Our scope of services included the following tasks:
 Boring of 1 n umbers of bore h ole (BH-1) of the propo sed depth b elow the
respective existing groun d level in orde r to know the sub surface stratification,
conducting necess ary fiel d tests and c ollection of s ub-strata sam ples for
laboratory testing.
 Testing of soil samp les in th e labo ratory to determine i ts physical and
engineering properties and analyzing all field and la boratory dat a to evalua te
bearing capacity of the sub-strata for given foundation sizes.
 Preparation of this report con taining ou r f indings and reco mmendations
including:
 Brief description of the proposed project;
 Description of the field exploration and laboratory testing programs;
 Discussion of the site surface and subsurface conditions;
 Preliminary geotechnical parameters for design of foundations, including the
allowable bearing capacity and estimated settlements with type and depth of
foundations for structural support.

FIELD INVESTIGATION PROGRAM

Field investigation work was in accordance with IS: 1892 -1979.

Field works include

 Boring in the sub-strata by Wash Boring/Rotary Drilling Method.

 Conducting SPT in soil as per IS: 2131 and collection of SPT samples.
 Collection of disturbed samples from bore holes.

Page 3 of 28
METHODOLOGY OF INVESTIGATION

Wash Boring
By using Wash Boring/rotary dri lling rigs, the boreholes were progressed up
to required depth of boreholes. This method of boring is most widely used method
of advancing a boreholes. This method along with u se of drilling mud to stabilize
the side of t he borehole is likely to give the least disturbance to soils beneat h the
base o f the bore hole a nd permit t aking near to tru ly un disturbed s amples.
Diameter of boreholes w as 150 mm. Where caving of boreholes occurred, casings
were used to keep the boreholes stable.

Standard Pe netration Test s (S PTs) were conducted in t he bo reholes

alternate to UDS. By connecting a split spoon sampler to ‘A’ rods and driving it by
45 cm u sing a 6 3.5 kg hammer fal ling freely from a hei ght of 75 cm. The tests
were conducted in accordance with IS: 2131-1981(Reaffirmed 1987).
Number of blo ws required for each 15 cm penetration of the split spoon
sampler was recorded. First 15 cm p enetration is ign ored. The cumulative no. of
blows required to penet rate the rest 30 cm of th e 4 5 cm s ampling in terval is
reported as the SPT value (N value).
For collection of un-disturbed sample thin wall samplers have been used. In
order to reduce wa ll fric tion, su itable precaution s suc h a s oiling the surface shall
be taken.
Bore logs showing field data of each borehole has been attached to this report.
Ground water
After completion o f d rilling and s ampling ground water l evel was measured
in the borehole. In BH-1 the ground water level wa s found average 5.00 m de pth
within the drilling depth below the existing ground level.

Page 4 of 28
Logging and Sample collection.

During explorat ion for each bore hole log of borin gs sh owing details about
the exploration were prepared.
Disturbed samples w ere colle cted from the sp lit spo on sa mpler afte r
conducting SPT. Th e samples were preserve d in transparent p olythene bags with
proper identification mark.
In case of undis turbed samples, tube s were sealed w ith wax at both th e
ends. Th en samplers were wrapped with moist ju te bags to preven t loss of
moisture.
Summary of field work

The table below shows the total no. of boreholes with max explore d depth
and concerned water table.
BH Reference Max. depth of Ground water table below
exploration in mtr. O.G.L in Mtr.

BH No. 1 10.50 5.00

LABORATORY TESTS
The laborator y-tests w ere co nducted on selected re presentative disturbed /
undisturbed soil samples collected from d ifferent Borehole drilled at the p roposed
site. The tests in clude G rain size analys is, Natura l m oisture con tent, D.F. S,
Specific Gravity an d Liqu id limit, Pl astic li mit, Plasticity i ndex, Shear test, and
Particles size distribution tests on repres entative soil . sample were also carried
out. All th e tests conducted conf irming to the requirements of I.S specification.
The results of all these tests have been annexed separately.

Page 5 of 28
FOR SOIL STRATA

i. Grain Size Analysis:

The grain size analysis of different soil samples were done as per the requirement
of IS: 2720 (Pt-IV) 1985 – method of test for soil, Grain size analysis. The details
of the test results are shown test result sheet separately. The results of grain size
analysis are used to classify the soil in various depths of boreholes. The results of
all these tests have been annexed separately.

ii. Natural Moisture Content:

The natural moisture content was determined from different undisturbed samples
of different Boreholes at different depths, as per IS: 2720(Pt-II)-1973: Method of
test for soil, determination of Water content.
iii. Determination of Specific Gravity:
The specific gravity of the UDS / DS samples have been determined at different
levels as per IS: 2720 (Pt-III) - 1980. It is used for determining void ratio,
porosity, saturated density, S.B.C, settlement of foundation system. The results of
all these tests have been annexed separately.
iv. Determination of Void Ratio:
The void-ratio of the UDS / DS samples has been determined at different levels
and the results are shown separately. It is used for determining specific gravity,
optimum moisture content, S.B.C, settlement of foundation system. The results of
all these tests have been annexed separately.
v. Determination of Liquid Limit / Plastic Limit:
The liquid and plastic limits of soils were other index properties of soil have also
been determined as per the relevant as per IS: 2720(Pt-v)-1985 Code of practice.
The liquid and plastic limits of soil samples have been determined in the laboratory
and it is used for determining S.B.C, settlement of foundation system etc. The
results of all these tests have been annexed separately.

Page 6 of 28
FOR ROCK STRATA

i. Core Recovery:
Rock core samples are kept in the same order as recovered from bore hole run
wise (marked arrow on cores in the increasing order of depth). The length of all
core samples is measured. Core recovery is the ratio of the sum of the lengths of
all the cores recovered from drilling per run.
Core Recovery (%) = (Total length of core pieces recovered/Length of run x 100 It
is expressed in percentage (%).
ii. RQD:

Rock Quality Designation indicates the quality of the rock. RQD is defined as the
ratio of the sum of the total length of the cores of length 10cm and longer
recovered from the drilling of the total length of the borehole is 1.5m.
RQD = (Total length of cores in pieces of 10cm length or longer/length of the run)
x 100 It is expressed in percentage (%).
iii. Unconfined compressive strength of rock specimens:
As soon as the rock core samples were received in the laboratory, Core Recovery
percentages and RQD percentages were determined. Then core samples which
were longer than the diameter that was 54mm were selected for preparation of
specific specimens as per IS: 9143-1979 in the ratio of length : diameter = 1:1
and correction factors applied ( since limited intact rock core sampling was
possible). Then the specimens were tested for unconfined compressive strength.

Page 7 of 28
 ANALYSIS OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BORING DATA
The an alysis of the sub-surface inves tigation test resu lt of the soil
samples collected during boring

BH: 1

1. From 0.00m to 4.00m depth, it is seen that, non plastic, non expansive
Poorly graded Gravel (Morroum) A Field N value from SPTs was found 55, >50
at 1.50m 3.0m, respective depth.

2. From 4.00m to 10.50m depth, it is seen that, non plastic, non expansive
Sandy stones Particles (D.I),A DS collected at & 9.00 &10.50m depth. A
Field N value from SPTs was found >50 >50 >50 ,at 4.50m,6.0m7.50m respective
depth.

ABSTRACT OF SAFE BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL

The safe bearing capacity (SBC), N et safe bea ring ca pacity (NSBC) & Settlement
has been calculated as per I.S. 6403: 1985.
Notes: All the SBC calculations are done considering square footing 2.0m X 2.0m
The safe bearing capacity (SBC), N et safe bea ring ca pacity (NSBC) & Settlement
has been calculated as per I.S . 6403: 1985 & as per I.S. 8 009: 1976.Accordingly
at differe nt depth from the existing ground level .The Allowable b earing Pressure
(ABP) of 50mm & 75mm Settlement gi ven. The details of the calculation a re
annexed separately.

Allowable Allowable
Net Safe Safe
Bearing Bearing
Location Type of Field Bearing Bearing
Depth Settlement Pressure Pressure
/ Bore sample SPT Capacity Capacity
in mtr. in mm (ABP)(T/m²) (ABP)(T/m²)
Hole collected Value (NSBC) (SBC) in
for 50mm for 75 mm
Reff. in T/m2 T/m2
Settlement Settlement

1.50 SPT 55 25.99 27.49 24.00 54.14 81.20

BH-1 3.00 SPT >50 53.66 56.66 42.00 63.88 95.82

4.50 SPT >50 78.56 83.06 58.00 67.72 101.59

Page 8 of 28
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
This report describes the information obtained through geotechnical investigation carried
out for the “EXECUTION OF 2NOS. INDIVIDUAL RURAL PIPED WATER SUPPLY PROJECT
PERTAINING TO THUAMUL RAMPUR & KOKSARA BLOCK OF KALAHANDI DISTRICT INCLUDING
5YEARS O&M ON EPC CONTRACT UNDER THE ONE PACKAGE ( KALAHANDI DIVISION) INCLUDING
5 YEARS OF O&M ON EPC BASIS. LOCATION- PHUFGAON GP- PHUFGAON The data incorporated

has been obtained and processed using procedures specified in various codes of practices,
good engineering norms and conventions. The field / laboratory results and records reported
here are relevant for the test locations and time at which the tests have been conducted.
The following conclusions, suggestions and remarks are made basing on the available
test data and sub-soil profiles as per bore logs contained in the reports.
At this site, for geotechnical investigation 1 nos borehole was conducted.
The design soil parameters for borehole derived from the field testing as well as lab
testing works are presented in this report.
This is the general recommendation & not based on the knowledge of structural details
for proposed structures. So designer may change the recommendation & he may decide the
depth of the foundation and type of foundation of the structure as per the structural details.
The test reports & suggestions contained in this report are based on the engineering
characteristics of the sub-soil of the test locations and shall vary in cases of varied
characteristics of soil.

Vawani Construction & Consultancy Services. For Vawani Construction & Consultancy Services.

(Sr.Manager Q.C) (Geotech Enginner)

Page 9 of 28
 

    
                                 BORE LOG 
   

Page 10 of 28
Page 11 of 28
 Test Result Sheet
   

Page 12 of 28
 LAB TEST RESULT OF BH-1
TEST CONDUCTED AS PER IS: 2720(Pt. I, Pt.II, Pt.III, Pt.III, Pt.III, Pt.IV, Pt. V, Pt.XI/ Pt.XIII, Pt. XXXX) AND IS: 1498-1970

Natural Moisture Content

Sieve Analysis Atterberg's Limit

Angel of Internal Friction

Soil Sample Collected at
Location/Bore Hole Ref.

Free Swell Index In %

Bulk Density In g/cc

as per IS : 1498- 1970

(0.425mm to 0.075mm)
( 2.00mm to 0.425mm )

Dry Density in g/cc

Cohesion (Kg/Cm )
Medimum sand in %

Plasticity Index in %

Soil Classification
(4.75mm to 2.00mm)
(20 mm to 4.75mm)

Liquid Limit in %

Specific Gravity
Coarse Sand in %

Plastic Limit in %
Type of Sample

Fine Gravel in %

Silt & Clay in %

SPT (N) Value

Fine Sand in %

Void ratio (e)

depth(m)
SL NO

(%)

(Ø)
1 1.50 SPT 55 9.67 62.80 4.30 15.00 13.00 4.90 15.0 Np Nil 0.0 -- -- 2.65 -- -- -- GP

2 3.00 SPT >50 9.41 65.76 8.12 14.30 8.40 3.42 14.0 Np Nil 0.0 -- -- 2.65 -- -- -- GP

3 4.50 SPT >50 12.23 14.23 37.50 39.10 6.00 3.17 16.0 Np Nil 0.0 -- -- 2.65 -- -- -- SP

4 BH-1 6.00 SPT >50 12.41 11.40 35.60 33.10 14.00 5.90 19.0 Np Nil 0.0 -- -- 2.66 -- -- -- SP

5 7.50 SPT >50 13.00 12.85 39.60 27.00 14.12 6.43 21.0 Np Nil 0.0 -- -- 2.66 -- -- -- SP

6 9.00 DS -- 12.80 14.50 32.23 43.00 6.00 4.27 18.0 Np Nil 0.0 -- -- 2.66 -- -- -- SP

7 10.50 DS -- 12.37 9.56 31.40 39.60 16.00 3.44 19.0 Np Nil 0.0 -- -- 2.66 -- -- -- SP

**Test results relates only to the above tests & the samples received by this organization.

Page 13 of 28
 Calculation of Safe Bearing Capacity of Soil
   

Page 14 of 28
CALCULATION OF SBC FROM FIELD SPT VALUE AT 1.50m DEPTH OF BH-1

SQUARE FOOTING
SIZE =2.0MX2.0M

Field SPT value at 1.50m depth N= 55

Total Submersible density sub ( Assumed) = 1 g/cc
Depth of foundation Df = 1.5 m
Let us assume Square footing B = 2.0 m
Effective over-burden pressure
q = (Df x sub) / 10 = 0.15 Kg/cm2
Bx sub) / 10 = 0.20 Kg/cm2
Over-burden correction factor as per fig.1 of IS: 2131-1981 = 1.0
After over-burden correction N' = 55
After Dilatency correction N" = 35
Angle of shearing resistance  35 0
'  25.1 0
Condition of Soil = Dense
Bearing capacity factors
' Nq & Nq' N & N'
35 33.3 48.03
25.1 10.8148 11.1104

Sc = 1.3 Sq = 1.2 S= 0.8

dc = 1+ 0.2 x (Df/B) x Tan (45+) = 1.288

dq = d= 1.144 ic = iq =i = 1 w' = 0.5

Strength Criteria (Water correction consider in worst condition)
In case of General shear failure for Square footing ( Clause-5.1.2)
qd = q(Nq ‐1)sqdqiq + 0.5BNsdiW'

=
0.150 x ( 33.300 - 1) x 1.200 x 1.144 x 1.000+0.500 x 0.200 x 48.030 x 0.800 x 1.144 x 1.000 x 0.500
= 6.651 + 2.198 = 8.849 Kg/cm2
In case of Local shear failure for Square footing footing ( Clause-5.1.2)
qd = q(Nq' ‐1)sqdqiq + 0.5BN'sdiW'

=
0.150 x ( 10.815 - 1) x 1.200 x 1.144 x 1.000+0.500 x 0.200 x 11.110 x 0.800 x 1.144 x 1.000 x 0.500
= 2.021 + 0.508 = 2.529 Kg/cm2

From inter polation qd' = 7.796 Kg/cm2

Net Safe Bearing Capacity using a factor of safety of 3.0 = 2.599 Kg/cm2
NSBC = 25.99 T/m2

Safe Bearing capacity SBC = 27.49 T/m2

Page 15 of 28
CALCULATION OF SBC FROM FIELD SPT VALUE AT 3.00m DEPTH OF BH-1

SQUARE FOOTING
SIZE =2.0MX2.0M

Field SPT value at 3.00m depth N= 50 Actual N>50

Total Submersible density sub ( Assumed) = 1 g/cc
Depth of foundation Df = 3.0 m
Let us assume Square footing B = 2.0 m
Effective over-burden pressure
q = (Df x sub) / 10 = 0.3 Kg/cm2
Bx sub) / 10 = 0.2 Kg/cm2
Over-burden correction factor as per fig.1 of IS: 2131-1981 = 1.0
After over-burden correction N' = 50
After Dilatency correction N" = 32.5
Angle of shearing resistance  35.4 0
'  25.5 0
Condition of Soil = Dense
Bearing capacity factors
' Nq & Nq' N & N'
35.4 35.772 52.9404
25.5 11.434 12.032

Sc = 1.3 Sq = 1.2 S= 0.8

dc = 1+ 0.2 x (Df/B) x Tan (45+) = 1.581

dq = d= 1.291 ic = iq =i = 1 w' = 0.5

Strength Criteria (Water correction consider in worst condition)
In case of General shear failure for Square footing ( Clause-5.1.2)
qd = q(Nq ‐1)sqdqiq + 0.5BNsdiW'

=
0.300 x ( 35.772 - 1) x 1.200 x 1.291 x 1.000+0.500 x 0.200 x 52.940 x 0.800 x 1.291 x 1.000 x 0.500
= 14.545 + 2.734 = 17.279 Kg/cm2
In case of Local shear failure for Square footing footing ( Clause-5.1.2)
qd = q(Nq' ‐1)sqdqiq + 0.5BN'sdiW'

=
0.300 x ( 11.434 - 1) x 1.200 x 1.291 x 1.000+0.500 x 0.200 x 12.032 x 0.800 x 1.291 x 1.000 x 0.500
= 4.849 + 0.621 = 5.470 Kg/cm2

From inter polation qd' = 16.098 Kg/cm2

Net Safe Bearing Capacity using a factor of safety of 3.0 = 5.366 Kg/cm2
NSBC = 53.66 T/m2

Safe Bearing capacity SBC = 56.66 T/m2

Page 16 of 28
CALCULATION OF SBC FROM FIELD SPT VALUE AT 4.50m DEPTH OF BH-1

SQUARE FOOTING
SIZE =2.0MX2.0M

Field SPT value at 4.50m depth N= 50 Actual N>50

Total Submersible density sub ( Assumed) = 1 g/cc
Depth of foundation Df = 4.5 m
Let us assume Square footing B = 2.0 m
Effective over-burden pressure
q = (Df x sub) / 10 = 0.45 Kg/cm2
Bx sub) / 10 = 0.2 Kg/cm2
Over-burden correction factor as per fig.1 of IS: 2131-1981 = 1.0
After over-burden correction N' = 50
After Dilatency correction N" = 32.5
Angle of shearing resistance  35.4 0
'  25.5 0
Condition of Soil = Dense
Bearing capacity factors
' Nq & Nq' N & N'
35.4 35.772 52.9404
25.5 11.434 12.032

Sc = 1.3 Sq = 1.2 S= 0.8

dc = 1+ 0.2 x (Df/B) x Tan (45+) = 1.872

dq = d= 1.436 ic = iq =i = 1 w' = 0.5

Strength Criteria (Water correction consider in worst condition)
In case of General shear failure for Square footing ( Clause-5.1.2)
qd = q(Nq ‐1)sqdqiq + 0.5BNsdiW'

=
0.450 x ( 35.772 - 1) x 1.200 x 1.436 x 1.000+0.500 x 0.200 x 52.940 x 0.800 x 1.436 x 1.000 x 0.500
= 22.17 + 3.041 = 25.211 Kg/cm2
In case of Local shear failure for Square footing footing ( Clause-5.1.2)
qd = q(Nq' ‐1)sqdqiq + 0.5BN'sdiW'

=
0.450 x ( 11.434 - 1) x 1.200 x 1.436 x 1.000+0.500 x 0.200 x 12.032 x 0.800 x 1.436 x 1.000 x 0.500
= 8.091 + 0.691 = 8.782 Kg/cm2

From inter polation qd' = 23.568 Kg/cm2

Net Safe Bearing Capacity using a factor of safety of 3.0 = 7.856 Kg/cm2
NSBC = 78.56 T/m2

Safe Bearing capacity SBC = 83.06 T/m2

Page 17 of 28
 Calculation of Settlement of Footing
   

Page 18 of 28
 CALCULATION OF SETTLEMENT OF FOUNDATION OF BH-1
AT 1.50 M DEPTH
(As per IS:8009 (Part -I)-1976)
Depth of foundation in Mtr. 1.50

Field SPT N value 55

Corrected N Value 35

Settelment from Fig No.9 of IS: 7.5 mm (For 10 T/m2 )

8009-1976

Effect of water table (W') 0.5 For Worst Condition

Corrected Settlement 15.00 mm (As per cl. No. 9.1.4 of IS 8009(P-1)-1976)

Imposed load = NSBC = 25.99 t/m2

Settlement for imposed load (Sf) = 38.98 mm

Depth factor = 0.785 (As per Fig No.12 of IS 8009(P-1)-1976)

Sfd = Sf x Depth factor = 30.60 mm

Rigidity factor = 0.8

Final settlement ( S ) = (Sfd 24.0 mm

x Rigidity Factor)

For 50 mm settlement 54.14 t/m2

For 75 mm settlement 81.20 t/m2

Page 19 of 28
 CALCULATION OF SETTLEMENT OF FOUNDATION OF BH-1
AT 3.00 M DEPTH
(As per IS:8009 (Part -I)-1976)
Depth of foundation in Mtr. 3.00

Field SPT N value 50

Corrected N Value 32.5

Settelment from Fig No.9 of IS: 7.5 mm (For 10 T/m2 )

8009-1976

Effect of water table (W') 0.5 For Worst Condition

Corrected Settlement 15.00 mm (As per cl. No. 9.1.4 of IS 8009(P-1)-1976)

Imposed load = NSBC = 53.66 t/m2

Settlement for imposed load (Sf) = 80.49 mm

Depth factor = 0.66 (As per Fig No.12 of IS 8009(P-1)-1976)

Sfd = Sf x Depth factor = 53.12 mm

Rigidity factor = 0.8

Final settlement ( S ) = (Sfd 42.0 mm

x Rigidity Factor)

For 50 mm settlement 63.88 t/m2

For 75 mm settlement 95.82 t/m2

Page 20 of 28
 CALCULATION OF SETTLEMENT OF FOUNDATION OF BH-1
AT 4.50 M DEPTH
(As per IS:8009 (Part -I)-1976)
Depth of foundation in Mtr. 4.50

Field SPT N value 50

Corrected N Value 32.5

Settelment from Fig No.9 of IS: 7.5 mm (For 10 T/m2 )

8009-1976

Effect of water table (W') 0.5 For Worst Condition

Corrected Settlement 15.00 mm (As per cl. No. 9.1.4 of IS 8009(P-1)-1976)

Imposed load = NSBC = 78.56 t/m2

Settlement for imposed load (Sf) = 117.84 mm

Depth factor = 0.61 (As per Fig No.12 of IS 8009(P-1)-1976)

Sfd = Sf x Depth factor = 71.88 mm

Rigidity factor = 0.8

Final settlement ( S ) = (Sfd 58.0 mm

x Rigidity Factor)

For 50 mm settlement 67.72 t/m2

For 75 mm settlement 101.59 t/m2

Page 21 of 28
 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
 

Page 22 of 28
 LABORATORY TEST RESULT OF GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS BH-1

Sample % of Passing through I. S. Sieve in mm

Borehole
Sl.No. Depth in
Reference 20.00 4.75 2.00 0.425 0.075 0.010
Mtr.
1 1.50 100 37.20 32.90 17.90 4.90 0
2 3.00 100 34.24 26.12 11.82 3.42 0
3 4.50 100 85.77 48.27 9.17 3.17 0
4 BH-1, 6.00 100 88.60 53.00 19.90 5.90 0
5 7.50 100 87.15 47.55 20.55 6.43 0
6 9.00 100 85.50 53.27 10.27 4.27 0
7 10.50 100 90.44 59.04 19.44 3.44 0

BH-1, 1.50
100 100
90
80
70

Finer Than (%)

60
50
37.20 40
32.90 30
17.90 20
10
0 4.90 0
0.01 0.1 1 10
Grain Size (mm)

BH-1, 3.00
100 100
90
80
70

Finer Than (%)

60
50
40
34.24 30
26.12
20
11.82 10
0 3.42 0
0.01 0.1 1 10
Grain Size (mm)

BH-1, 4.50
100 100
85.77 90
80
70

Finer Than (%)

60
48.27 50
40
30
20
9.17 10
0 3.17 0
0.01 0.1 1 10
Grain Size (mm)

BH-1, 6.00
100 100
88.60 90
80
70
Finer Than (%)

60
53.00 50
40
30
19.90 20
5.90 10
0 0
0.01 0.1 1 10
Grain Size (mm)

Page 23 of 28
 BH-1, 7.50

100 100
87.15 90
80
70

Finer Than (%)

60
47.55 50
40
30
20.55 20
6.43 10
0 0
0.01 0.1 1 10
Grain Size (mm)

BH-1, 9.00
100 100
90
85.50
80
70

Finer Than (%)

60
53.27 50
40
30
20
10.27 10
0 4.27 0
0.01 0.1 1 10
Grain Size (mm)

BH-1, 10.50
100 100
90 44
90.44 90
80
70

Finer Than (%)

59.04 60
50
40
30
19.44 20
10
0 3.44 0
0.01 0.1 1 10
Grain Size (mm)

Page 24 of 28
 Site Photographs
   

Page 25 of 28
   

Page 26 of 28
 

RECORD OF BORING

Page 27 of 28
  

Page 28 of 28