Group Project DESIGN CASE STUDY FOR POWER TRANSMISSION
Group Project DESIGN CASE STUDY FOR POWER TRANSMISSION
AME 302
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
MECH 3505
Case study
“DESIGN CASE STUDY FOR POWER TRANSMISSION”
Marks:
1|Page
DESIGN CASE STUDY FOR POWER TRANSMISSION
ASSUMPTIONS
The force and stress acting on the shaft and gears does not change its geometry.
The gears are operating initially at zero wear condition
The shafts are perfectly circular in cross section with no disruption in shape.
There is an idle gear if required to change the direction of the speed.
3|Page
Required Objectives from Case Study
i. Change the power requirement to 30 horsepower.
ii. Design the intermediate shaft, including complete specification of the gears, bearings,
keys, retaining rings, and shaft.
iii. Produce the schematic layout and assembly drawing of the transmission system, and the
final drawings for the shafts, with dimensions and tolerances.
iv. Use spur gears only.
Solution;
𝑓𝑡
𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 = 𝑃 = 30 ℎ𝑝 = 30 ∗ 550 = 16500 𝑙𝑏
𝑠
𝑟𝑒𝑣
𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑦 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑑 = 𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑡 = 82 − 88
𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑡 = 12000 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠
GEAR SPECIFICATIONS
Torque Calculation
𝑃 16500 60
𝑇2 = = ∗ = 90.03 𝑙𝑏𝑓 𝑖𝑛
ω2 1750 2π
ω2 1750
𝑇 3 = 𝑇2 ∗ = 90.03 ∗ = 405.15 𝑙𝑏𝑓 𝑖𝑛
ω3 388.9
ω2 1750
𝑇5 = 𝑇2 ∗ = 90.03 ∗ = 1823.10 𝑙𝑏𝑓. 𝑖𝑛
ω5 86.42
Load Transmitted
𝑃 30 = 809.48 𝑙𝑏𝑓
𝑊𝑡 = 33000 ∗ = 33000 ∗
23
𝑉23 1223
𝑃 30 = 3646.40 𝑙𝑏𝑓
𝑊𝑡 = 33000 ∗ = 33000 ∗
45
𝑉45 271.5
Gear Specs.
Stress
4|Page
𝐶𝑓
σ𝑐 = 𝐶𝑝 √𝑊𝑡 ∗ 𝐾0 ∗ 𝐾𝑣 ∗ 𝐾𝑣 ∗ 𝐾𝑚 ∗
𝑑𝑝 ∗ 𝐹 ∗ 𝐼
1.18
σ𝑐 = 2300√3646.40 ∗ 1.21 ∗ = 198043.31 𝑝𝑠𝑖 = 198. .04 𝑘𝑝𝑠𝑖
2.67 ∗ 2 ∗ 0.1315
Teeth Calculation;
𝑁2 = 𝑁4 = 22 𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑡ℎ
𝑁3 = 4.5 ∗ 𝑁2 = 4.5 ∗ 22 = 100 𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑡ℎ 𝑁3 = 𝑁5
ω2 1750
𝑇3 = 𝑇2 ∗ = 90.03 ∗ = 545.5 𝑙𝑏𝑓. 𝑖𝑛
ω3 385
ω2 1750
𝑇5 = 𝑇2 ∗ = 120 ∗ = 2479.3 𝑙𝑏𝑓. 𝑖𝑛
ω5 84.7
Pitch and diameters
Pitch =p =8
𝑁2 22
𝑑2 = 𝑑4 = = = 2.75 𝑖𝑛
𝑝 8
𝑁5 100
𝑑3 = 𝑑5 = = = 12.5 𝑖𝑛
𝑝 8
Velocity
ω2 1750 𝑓𝑡
𝑉23 = π ∗ d2 ∗ = π ∗ 2.75 ∗ = 1259
12 12 𝑚𝑖𝑛
ω2 84.7 𝑓𝑡
𝑉45 = π ∗ d5 ∗ = π ∗ 12.5 ∗ = 227
12 12 𝑚𝑖𝑛
Dynamic Factor
5|Page
𝐵 0.73
𝐴 + √𝑉 65.1 + √227
𝐾𝑣 = ( ) =( ) = 1.8
𝐴 65.1
Face Width
π π
𝐹 = 4∗ = 4∗ = 2 𝑖𝑛
p 8
GEAR 4 BENDING
𝐽 = 0.35 𝑌𝑁 = 0.9
Factor of Safety
𝑌𝑁 0.9
𝑛 = 𝑆𝑡 ∗ = 75000 ∗ = 1.63
σ𝑐 41301
GEAR 5 BENDING
𝐽 = 0.42 𝑌𝑁 = 0.97
Factor of Safety
𝑌𝑁 0.9
𝑛 = 𝑆𝑡 ∗ = 75000 ∗ = 1.96
σ𝑐 34417.5
6|Page
Gear 2 Wear
Dynamic Factor
𝐵 0.73
𝐴 + √𝑉 65.1 + √1259
𝐾𝑣 = ( ) =( ) = 1.37
𝐴 65.1
Face Width
π π
𝐹 =4∗ = 3∗ = 1.5 𝑖𝑛
p 8
Gear 5 Bending
Factor of Safety
𝑌𝑁 0.87
𝑛 = 𝑆𝑡 ∗ = 65000 ∗ = 3.08
σ𝑐 18328.704
Gear 3 Bending
7|Page
σ = 𝑊𝑡 ∗ 𝐾 ∗ 𝐾 ∗ 𝐾 ∗ 𝑃 ∗ 𝐾 ∗ 𝐾𝐵 = 809 ∗ 1.18 ∗ 8 ∗ 1.26 = 15273.92 𝑝𝑠𝑖
𝑐 𝑂 𝑣 𝑠 𝑑 𝑚 𝐹∗𝐽 1.5 ∗ 0.42
From table, Max. Allowable stress
𝑆𝑡 = 65000 𝑝𝑠𝑖
Factor of Safety
𝑌𝑁 0.87
𝑛 = 𝑆𝑡 ∗ = 65000 ∗ = 3.70
σ𝑐 15273.92
8|Page
𝑊𝑟 = 𝑊𝑡 tan 20 = 809.48 ∗ tan 20 = 294.626 𝑙𝑏𝑓
23 23
𝑊𝑟 = 𝑊𝑟 tan 20 = 3646 ∗ tan 20 = 1327.03 𝑙𝑏𝑓
45 45
∑ 𝑀1 = 0
−𝑊𝑟 ∗ 2 − 𝑊𝑟 ∗ 7.25 + 𝑅2𝑦 ∗ 10 = 0
23 45
𝑟
𝑊23 ∗ 2 + 𝑊45
𝑟 ∗ 7.25
294.62 ∗ 2 + 1327.03 ∗ 7.25
𝑅2𝑦 = = = 1021.02 𝑙𝑏𝑓
10 10
∑ 𝐹𝑦 = 0
−𝑊𝑟 − 𝑊𝑟 + 𝑅2𝑦 + 𝑅1𝑦 = 0
23 45
𝑅1𝑦 = +𝑊𝑟 + 𝑊𝑟 − 𝑅2𝑦 = 294.626 + 1327.03 − 1021.02 = 600.63 𝑙𝑏𝑓
23 45
9|Page
Reactions at Bearings
∑ 𝑀1 = 0
𝑊𝑟 ∗ 2 − 𝑊𝑟 ∗ 7.25 + 𝑅2𝑧 ∗ 10 = 0
23 45
𝑅2𝑧 = (−𝑊𝑟 ∗ 2 + 𝑊𝑟 ∗ 7.25)/10
23 45
∑ 𝐹𝑧 = 0
𝑅1𝑧 + 𝑊𝑡 − 𝑊𝑡 + 𝑅2𝑧 = 0
23 45
𝑅1𝑧 = −𝑊𝑡 + 𝑊𝑡 − 𝑅2𝑧 = −294.62 + 1327.03 − 903.17 = 129.14 𝑙𝑏𝑓
23 45
10 | P a g e
𝑏 = 2.7 ∗ (68000)−0.265 = 0.88
𝑘𝑎 = 𝑎 ∗ 𝑆𝑢𝑡
DE-GOODMAN CRITERIA
1/3
16 ∗ 𝑛 2 ∗ 𝐾𝑓 ∗ 𝑀𝑎 𝐾𝑓𝑠 ∗ 𝑇𝑚 ∗ √3
𝑑=[ ( + )]
π 𝑆𝑒 𝑆𝑢𝑡
1
16 ∗ 1.5 2 ∗ 1.7 ∗ 7317 1.5 ∗ 5056 ∗ √3 3
𝑑=[ ( + ) ] = 2.05 𝑖𝑛
π 27000 68000
𝑟
= 0.1
𝑑
𝐾𝑡 = 1.7, 𝑞 = 0.8
32 ∗ 𝐾𝑓 ∗ 𝑀𝑎 32 ∗ 1.56 ∗ 7315
σ′𝑎= = = 12124.08 𝑝𝑠𝑖
π ∗ 𝑑3 π ∗ 2.1253
16 ∗ 𝐾𝑓𝑠 ∗ 𝑇𝑚 16 ∗ 1.32 ∗ 5056.5
σ𝑚′ = √3 ∗ = √3 ∗ = 5417.93 𝑝𝑠𝑖
π∗𝑑 3 π ∗ 2.2153
1
𝑛𝑓 = = 1.626
0.615
11 | P a g e
Factor of safety for design is safe, so design parameters are as follows;
𝐷1 = 1.5 𝑖𝑛
𝐷2 = 1.80 𝑖𝑛
𝐷3 = 2.125 𝑖𝑛
𝐷4 = 2.5 𝑖𝑛
Bearing Design
Bearing 1 life
Key Design
𝑇 6551.5
𝐹= =2∗ = 6165 𝑙𝑏𝑓
𝑟 2.125
Length of key
2 ∗ 𝐹 ∗ 𝑛 2 ∗ 6165.9 ∗ 2
𝑙= = = 0.9 𝑖𝑛
𝑡 ∗ 𝑆𝑦 0.5 ∗ 57000
12 | P a g e
SHAFT LAYOUT
Discussions
Deflections must be kept within acceptable limits while designing hafts. For example, excessive
deflection can reduce gear performance and produce noise and vibration. The critical speed,
minimum deflections required for gear function, and bearing requirements are commonly used to
determine the maximum allowed deflection of a shaft. Deflections should not separate mating-
gear teeth by more than 0.20 mm, and the slope of the gear axis should not be more than 0.05
degrees. In compared to the oil film thickness, the deflection of a shaft's journal section through
a plain bearing should be modest. Shafts should be built to avoid operating at or near critical
speeds, as previously stated. This is usually accomplished by providing enough lateral rigidity so
that the lowest critical speed is well above the operating range. The torsional natural frequencies
of the shaft must be significantly different from the torsional input frequency if torsional
fluctuations are present, as they are in engine crankshafts, camshafts, and compressors. This can
be accomplished by increasing the torsional stiffness of the shaft to the point where the lowest
natural frequency of the shaft is substantially higher than the highest torsional input frequency.
13 | P a g e
Conclusion for Safe Design
Keep shafts as short as possible and bearings as close to the applied stresses as
practicable. Shaft deflection and bending moments will be reduced, and critical
speeds will be increased.
Locate stress raisers away from high-stress areas of the shaft if at all possible.
Consider using local surface strengthening procedures like shot peening and cold
rolling, as well as large fillet radii and smooth surface finishes.
14 | P a g e