Ideal Vs Real Otto
Ideal Vs Real Otto
Mechanical department
ME 246
G.2
The Otto Cycle is named after Nikolaus Otto (1832–1891, German) who is
credited as the first creator of a petroleum fuel based internal combustion
engine operating under a four-stroke cycle. Otto’s engine work during the
eve of the industrial revolution was a critical development leading to the
dawn of the automotive industry in the late 19th century.
To a first order this Otto Cycle analysis can provide insights into how
engine efficiency is affected by changing operating and design parameters.
Engines operating under the Otto Cycle are the principal power-plants used
in automobiles worldwide at the present time, although in some regions of
the world the Diesel Cycle is a very close second in automotive
applications, engines operate under the Otto cycle are relatively
inexpensive to manufacture and provide reasonable power to weight ratios
with good efficiencies. In recent years engine design improvements
coupled with exhaust after-treatment have resulted in vehicles that produce
very low levels of pollutants.
The main differences between the actual and ideal Otto engine appear in
the figures above. In reality, the ideal cycle does not occur and there are
many losses associated with each process.
For an actual cycle, the shape of the PV diagram is similar to the ideal, but
the area (work) enclosed by the PV diagram is always less than the ideal
value.
Closed cycle
The largest difference between the two diagrams is the simplification of the
intake and exhaust strokes in the ideal cycle. In the exhaust stroke, heat
Q is ejected to the environment, in a real engine, the gas leaves the
out
In real engines the heat addition is not instantaneous, therefore the peak
pressure is not at TDC, but just after TDC.
No pumping work
Pumping work is the difference between the work done during exhaust
stroke and the work done during intake stroke. In real cycles, there is a
pressure difference between exhaust and inlet pressures.
No blowdown loss
No blow-by loss
No frictional losses.
These simplifying assumptions and losses lead to the fact that the enclosed
area (work) of the PV diagram for an actual engine is significantly smaller
than the size of the area (work) enclosed by the PV diagram of the ideal
cycle. In other words, the ideal engine cycle will overestimate the net work
and, if the engines run at the same speed, greater power produced by the
actual engine by around 20%.