RP - A1 - Final Report - S2 - 2223
RP - A1 - Final Report - S2 - 2223
Student name
Plagiarism is a particular form of cheating. Plagiarism must be avoided at all costs and students who break the rules, however
innocently, may be penalised. It is your responsibility to ensure that you understand correct referencing practices. As a
university level student, you are expected to use appropriate references throughout and keep carefully detailed notes of all
your sources of materials for material you have used in your work, including any material downloaded from the Internet.
Please consult the relevant unit lecturer or your course tutor if you need any further advice.
I certify that the assignment submission is entirely my own work and I fully
Student declaration understand the consequences of plagiarism. I understand that making a false
declaration is a form of malpractice.
Student(s) name(s) /
Date:
Signature
Page 1 of 5
Instruction to The Students:
Assignment 1, which covers all the four Learning Outcomes, is an individual assignment. By the end of the
class, each individual will need to submit a written report and do a presentation (time and room will be
confirmed later).
● Plagiarism is totally unacceptable. Students must cite all sources and input the information by
paraphrasing, summarising or using direct quotes. A Fail Grade is given where Plagiarism is
identified in your work. There are no exceptions.
● Your evidence/findings must be cited using Harvard Referencing Style. Please refer to Reference
guiding posted on Moodle.
● This assignment should be written in a concise, formal business style using font size 12 and single
spacing.
● The word limit of 4,500-6,000 words would be appropriate. However, if you exceed the word
limit, your grade will not be penalised.
● Students MUST complete and submit a softcopy of your work on the due dates stated on
Assignment brief. ALL late work is not allowed to submit. This rule is not waived under any
circumstances. The softcopy must be submitted to Turn-it-in via Moodle.
Read ALL Instructions on this Page and review the Pass, Distinction, Merit and Referred Criteria attached to
meet the criteria and tasks correctly. Your work should be neatly typed and bonded. Presentation is
important and evidence of quality and business ethics.
Page 3 of 5
- What have been done in the extant literature (previous research) related to your research topic?
- What are the gaps that the extant literature has not helped explain?
- What theori(es) or analytical framework(s) can be used to explain your research topic?
- What are the hypotheses (research questions) you can develop to test or explore in your research?
3. Methodology
- What method should be applied to test your hypotheses or to answer your research questions?
- How data should be collected? From whom? By what means?
- What are the questions (or questionnaire) you would use to collect your data?
4. Finding
- How your measures have been tested with reliabilities and validities (if applicable)?
- What have been found from the data collected? Or are your research question(s) supported?
5. Discussion
- Discuss if the data analysis results help answer your research questions?
- What would be the contributions of the research theoretically and practically?
- What are the limitations of your research that can be improved in the future for further research?
6. Conclusion
In the final week, everyone will have to do a final presentation to report on what you have done for your
research project and the key findings from the research. The presentation should be prepared in PowerPoint
and carried out in no more than 15 minutes. Students will receive comments after the presentation to revise
the final paper.
Page 4 of 5
LO1: Examine appropriate research methodologies and methods to LO1 and LO2
identify those appropriate to the research process D1 Justify chosen research
methodologies and processes
P1 Examine alternative research M1 Evaluate alternative research supported by a credible
methodologies. methodologies and data collection academically underpinned literature
methods and justify choices made review.
P2 Explore alternative methods and based on philosophical/theoretical
tools used for the collection of frameworks.
research data that consider costs,
ethics and access.
Page 5 of 5