Mitchell County TX Scftu Ordinance
Mitchell County TX Scftu Ordinance
WHEREAS, the Mitchell County Commissioners’ Court finds that human life begins at
conception; and
WHEREAS, the Mitchell County Commissioners’ Court finds that abortion is a murderous act of
violence that purposefully and knowingly terminates an unborn human life; and
WHEREAS, the Mitchell County Commissioners’ Court finds all unborn children are human
beings who are entitled to the full and equal protection of the laws that prohibit violence against
other human beings; and
WHEREAS, the Mitchell County Commissioners’ Court finds that Texas men and women are
being hurt and traumatized by abortion across our Texas–New Mexico border and sent back to
Texas for our county and our cities to deal with the aftermath in our homes, schools, churches,
and our hospital; and
WHEREAS, the Mitchell County Commissioners’ Court finds that in addition to the
life-affirming services which are already being provided by organizations in Mitchell County, the
Texas Alternatives to Abortion program is in place, which promotes childbirth and provides
support services to pregnant mothers and their families, adoptive parents, and parents whose
lives have been affected by miscarriage or loss of a child, finding the services provided as a part
of the Alternatives to Abortion program to include: counseling, mentoring, educational
information and resources including classes on pregnancy, parenting, adoption, life skills and
employment preparedness; material assistance covering basic needs, such as car seats, clothing,
diapers, and formula; care coordination help through referrals to government assistance programs
and other social services programs; call center for information and appointment scheduling; and
housing and support services through maternity homes, and finding that the program is available
to any Texas resident who is a United States citizen or legal immigrant and is: the biological
mother or father of an unborn child, the biological mother or father of a child, for up to three
years postpartum; the parent, legal guardian, or adult caregiver of a minor who is a program
client; a parent who has experienced miscarriage or loss of a child; or an adoptive parent of a
child of any age, for up to two years after adoption finalization, and finds these services clearly
accessible at the Texas Pregnancy Care Network website at www.texaspregnancy.org; and
WHEREAS, the Mitchell County Commissioners’ Court finds that the United States Supreme
Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, No. 19-1392, correctly
overruled the Court’s lawless and unconstitutional pronouncements in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113
(1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992),
which had invented and perpetuated a supposed constitutional right to abortion that cannot be
found anywhere in the language of the Constitution; and
WHEREAS, the Mitchell County Commissioners’ Court finds that the ruling in Dobbs restores
the prerogatives of state and local governments to regulate and prohibit abortion as they see fit;
and
WHEREAS, the Mitchell County Commissioners’ Court finds that in the 86th Legislative
Session, the State of Texas prohibited any political subdivision of the State of Texas, including
Mitchell County, from using taxpayer dollars to fund any abortion provider or any affiliate of an
abortion provider. In the prohibition the State Legislature made clear that the law may not be
construed to restrict a municipality or county from prohibiting abortion. See Tex. Gov’t Code
§ 2272.005. (“This chapter may not be construed to restrict a municipality or county from
prohibiting abortion.”); and
WHEREAS, the Mitchell County Commissioners’ Court finds that in the 87th Legislative
Session, the State of Texas explicitly allowed municipalities and political subdivisions to outlaw
and prohibit abortion, and to establish penalties and remedies against those who perform or
enable unlawful abortions. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 311.036(b) (“A statute may not be construed
to restrict a political subdivision from regulating or prohibiting abortion in a manner that is at
least as stringent as the laws of this state unless the statute explicitly states that political
subdivisions are prohibited from regulating or prohibiting abortion in the manner described by
the statute.”); and
WHEREAS, the Mitchell County Commissioners’ Court finds that federal law imposes felony
criminal liability on every person who ships or receives abortion pills or abortion-related
paraphernalia in interstate or foreign commerce, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 1461–62, and all such acts are
predicate offenses under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
(RICO), see 18 U.S.C. § 1961; and
WHEREAS, the Mitchell County Commissioners’ Court finds that the members of the county
commission are bound by oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, and
that the statutory provisions codified at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1461–62 are the “supreme Law of the
Land” under Article VI of the Constitution and must be obeyed and respected by every person
within Mitchell County. See U.S. Const. art. VI (“[T]he Laws of the United States . . . shall be
the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in
the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”); and
WHEREAS, the Mitchell County Commissioners’ Court finds that in order to protect the health
and welfare of all residents within the unincorporated area of Mitchell County, including the
unborn, and to ensure the federal prohibitions on the shipment of abortion pills and
abortion-related paraphernalia are obeyed, that an ordinance can and should be passed impacting
the unincorporated area of Mitchell County. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2272.005 and Tex. Gov’t
Code § 311.036(b); and
WHEREAS, the Mitchell County Commissioners’ Court recognizes their ordinance as only
covering the unincorporated area of the county, any incorporated municipality within Mitchell
County wishing to have similar protections for unborn children should make sure their cities
have ordinances covering the area within their city limits - as allowed by state law. See Tex.
Local Gov’t Code § 54.001(b)(1); Tex. Gov’t Code § 2272.005; and Tex. Gov’t Code
§ 311.036(b).
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSIONERS COURT OF
MITCHELL COUNTY, TEXAS:
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
(1) The purpose of this Ordinance is to prohibit abortion and abortion-inducing drugs in the
unincorporated area of Mitchell County and to make itself expressly clear that Mitchell
County has every intention to stand in full compliance with the state and federal laws on
abortion which Mitchell County is obligated to abide by.
(2) To protect public health, safety, and/or welfare, the provisions herein are to be recognized
and enforced to their full extent.
B. STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The intent of the Mitchell County Commissioners Court is that this ordinance is well within our
authority and in full agreement with Texas Government Code § 2272.005 and Texas Government
Code § 311.036(b).
C. DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this ordinance, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) “Abortion” means the act of using, prescribing, administering, procuring, or selling of
any instrument, medicine, drug, or any other substance, device, or means with the
purpose to terminate the pregnancy of a woman, with knowledge that the termination by
any of those means will with reasonable likelihood cause the death of an unborn child.
The term does not include:
(A) In vitro fertilization or fertility treatments of any type;
(B) The use, prescription, administration, procuring, or selling of Plan B,
morning-after pills, intrauterine devices, or any other type of contraception or
emergency contraception; or
(C) An act performed with the purpose to:
(i) Save the life or preserve the health of the unborn child;
(ii) Remove a dead unborn child caused by spontaneous abortion; or
(iii) Remove an ectopic pregnancy, the implantation of a fertilized egg or
embryo outside of the uterus.
(2) “Abortion-inducing drugs” includes mifepristone, misoprostol, and any drug or
medication that is used to terminate the life of an unborn child. The term does not
include:
(A) Plan B, morning-after pills, intrauterine devices, or any other type of
contraception or emergency contraception; or
(B) Drugs or medications that are possessed or distributed for a purpose that does
not include the termination of a pregnancy, such as misoprostol that is possessed
or distributed for the purpose of treating stomach ulcers.
(3) “Abortion doula services” include acts that aid or abet abortions by providing
informational, logistical, emotional, or physical support that would make someone an
accomplice to abortion under the principles of complicity set forth in section 7.02 of the
Texas Penal Code. The term does not include:
(A) The provision of truthful information regarding the availability of abortion
services that are legally permitted under the law of the jurisdiction in which they
offered; or
(B) The provision of emotional support to a woman who has completed an
abortion.
(4) “Abortion fund” means a corporation, organization, government or governmental
subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association, or any other
legal entity that exists for the purpose of aiding or abetting elective abortions, and that
pays for, reimburses, or subsidizes in any way the costs associated with obtaining an
elective abortion.
(5) “Abortion provider” means a person, corporation, organization, government or
governmental subdivision or agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association,
or any other legal entity that performs elective abortions.
(6) “Affiliate” means a person or entity who enters into with another person or entity a
legal relationship created or governed by at least one written instrument, including a
certificate of formation, a franchise agreement, standards of affiliation, bylaws, or a
license, that demonstrates:
(A) common ownership, management, or control between the parties to the
relationship;
(B) a franchise granted by the person or entity to the affiliate; or
(C) the granting or extension of a license or other agreement authorizing the
affiliate to use the other person’s or entity’s brand name, trademark, service mark,
or other registered identification mark.
(7) “County” shall mean the county of Mitchell County, Texas.
(8) “Elective abortion” means any abortion that is not performed or induced in response
to a medical emergency.
(9) “Fertilization” means the fusion of a human spermatozoon with a human ovum.
(10) “Governmental entity” means this state, a state agency in the executive, judicial, or
legislative branch of state government, or a political subdivision of this state.
(11) “Human being” means an individual member of the species Homo sapiens at any
stage of development beginning at fertilization;
(12) “Interactive computer service” means any information service, system, or access
software provider that provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a
computer server, including specifically a service or system that provides access to the
Internet and such systems operated or services offered by libraries or educational
institutions.
(13) “Medical emergency” means a life-threatening physical condition aggravated by,
caused by, or arising from a pregnancy that, as certified by a physician, places the woman
in danger of death or a serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function
unless an abortion is performed.
(14) “Unborn child” means an individual organism of the species Homo sapiens in any
stage of gestation from fertilization until live birth;
(15) “Woman” and “women” include (but are not limited to) any person whose biological
sex is female, including any person with XX chromosomes and any person with a uterus,
regardless of any gender identity that the person may attempt to assert or claim.
SECTION 2: UNLAWFUL ACTIONS
A. SEVERABILITY
(a) Mindful of Leavitt v. Jane L., 518 U.S. 137 (1996), in which in the context of determining
the severability of a state statute regulating abortion the Supreme Court of the United States held
that an explicit statement of legislative intent is controlling, it is the intent of the county that
every provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word in this chapter, and every
application of the provisions in this chapter to every person, group of persons, or circumstances,
are severable from each other.
(b) If any application of any provision in this chapter to any person, group of persons, or
circumstances is found by a court to be invalid, preempted, or unconstitutional, for any reason
whatsoever, then the remaining applications of that provision to all other persons and
circumstances shall be severed and preserved, and shall remain in effect. All constitutionally
valid applications of the provisions in this chapter shall be severed from any applications that a
court finds to be invalid, preempted, unconstitutional, because it is the county’s intent and
priority that every single valid application of every provision in this chapter be allowed to stand
alone.
(c) The county further declares that it would have enacted this chapter, and each provision,
section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word, and all constitutional applications of the
provisions of this chapter, irrespective of the fact that any provision, section, subsection,
sentence, clause, phrase, or word, or applications of this chapter were to be declared invalid,
preempted, or unconstitutional.
(d) If any provision of this chapter is found by any court to be unconstitutionally vague, then the
applications of that provision that do not present constitutional vagueness problems shall be
severed and remain in force, consistent with the severability requirements of Subsections (a), (b),
and (c).
(e) No court may decline to enforce the severability requirements of Subsections (a), (b), (c), and
(d) on the ground that severance would “rewrite” the ordinance or involve the court in legislative
or lawmaking activity. A court that declines to enforce or enjoins a state or county official from
enforcing a statute or ordinance is never rewriting a statute or engaging in legislative or
lawmaking activity, as the statute or ordinance continues to contain the same words as before the
court’s decision. A judicial injunction or declaration of unconstitutionality:
(1) is nothing more than an edict prohibiting enforcement that may subsequently be
vacated by a later court if that court has a different understanding of the law;
(2) is not a formal amendment of the language in a statute or ordinance; and
(3) no more rewrites a statute or ordinance than a decision by the executive not to
enforce a duly enacted statute or ordinance in a limited and defined set of circumstances.
(f) If any state or federal court disregards any of the severability requirements in Subsections (a),
(b), (c), (d), or (e), and declares or finds any provision of this chapter facially invalid, preempted,
or unconstitutional, when there are discrete applications of that provision can be enforced against
a person, group of persons, or circumstances without violating federal or state law, then that
provision shall be interpreted, as a matter of county law, as if the county had enacted a provision
limited to the persons, group of persons, or circumstances for which the provision’s application
will not violate federal or state law, and every court shall adopt this saving construction of that
provision until the court ruling that pronounced the provision facially invalid, preempted, or
unconstitutional is vacated or overruled.
SECTION 4: EFFECTIVE DATE
A. EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall go into immediate effect upon majority vote by the Mitchell County
Commissioner’s Court,
COUNTY SEAL
FURTHER ATTESTED BY "WE THE PEOPLE", THE CITIZENS and WITNESSES TO THIS
PASSAGE OF THIS ORDINANCE, THIS ________ OF __________, THE YEAR OF OUR
LORD 2023.
WITNESS: ___________________________________________________________________
WITNESS: ___________________________________________________________________