FAE Notes
FAE Notes
Language is a tool utilised by people to gain access to power. This personifies language as an
object which can grant or retract power from individuals. However, the outcome is solely
dependent on how said tool is used and with what intended purpose. Most of the world’s
population engages in the dance for power through language in the form of swearing. In
many cases, the concept of power being given and taken away occurs simultaneously as the
corresponding situations always include two parties, one of which receives power and the
other where power is revoked. Those who engage in swearing are given power whilst those
who are victim to the words said are stripped of that power.
Swearing can be both beneficial and disadvantageous in terms of accessing power through
language. Swearing allows speakers to express their emotional frustration to listeners through
the use of taboo language. This is particularly beneficial to those who seek the development
of self-control from physical expression; swearing acts as an emotion platform that can be
as “anger, disgust or pain” that is comparatively more accepted within society. In terms of
pain, swearing has proven to increase one’s tolerance to emotional and physical pain. In 2009
a study was conducted where students were asked to place their hand in a bucket of ice water,
it was found that those who swore repeatedly lasted longer than those who did not.
Additionally, it had also increased their heart rates as a reaction to the swearing itself which
swearing provides a “readily available and effective relief from pain” earning its justified title
Swearing is both beneficial and/or disadvantageous dependent on the context and intent of
use which dictates whether power is given or revoked from others. As stated above, swearing
euphemisms for means of social harmony. However, as swearing is a social construct, it can
to the concrete nature of swearing, it is hard to redefine words as new generations are forced
into a continuous pre-defined loop of expectations as to what community standard is held for
swearing in society. Until social awareness and education occurs on the oblivious
language.
References
Allan, K. & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language.
Ecclestone, R. (2008, June 7). Warning: Contains coarse language. The Australian. Retrieved
from: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/life/weekend-australian-magazine/warning-
contains-coarse-language/story-e6frg8h6-1111116556611
Jay, T., & Janschewitz, K. (2008). The Pragmatics of Swearing. Journal of Politeness
https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2008.013
Stephens, R., Atkins, J., & Kingston, A. (2009). Swearing as a response to pain.
Neuroreport, 20(12), 1056–1060.
https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832e64b1
Stephens, R., & Umland, C. (2011). Swearing as a response to pain-effect of daily swearing
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2011.09.004
The Canadian Press. (2021). NBA hands Raptors coach Nurse a US$50,000 fine for throwing
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2504119909/fulltext/A3241D202A464D73PQ/
1?accountid=36155.
Wen, T. (2016, March 3). The surprising benefits of swearing. BBC Future. Retrieved from:
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160303-the-surprising-benefits-of-
swearing#:~:text=By%20swearing%2C%20we%20not%20only,to%20resort%20to
%20physical%20violence