INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: DAVE A. PATIGAYON Name of Rater: JOY E. LETRAN – SINGSON, E.M.D.
Position: Engineer III Position: Chief Education Supervisor, SGOD
Review Period: JANUARY – DECEMBER, 2023 Date of Review: __________________________
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SDO of Zamboanga del Norte / Education Facilities Section
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
MFO’S KRA’S OBJECTIVES/ ACTIVITIES TIMELI WT . TO BE FILLED
NE PER
KRA
DURING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
EVALUATION
( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness )
Q E T Ratin Score
g

 Supports and I. Site Inspection To Provide technical services for schools, Jan – 30% QUALITY
capacitates and Final learning centers, and the schools division Dec
schools and Inspection for office to have a physical environment that 2023 5– 100% Targeted projects & site inspected.
Learning 2023. is conducive to effective teaching, learning 4– 90 - 99% Targeted projects & site inspected.
Centers in  BEFF and working by ensuring access to adequate, 3– 80 - 89% Targeted projects & site inspected.
ensuring a REPAIR structurally and physically safe buildings,
2– 70 - 79% Targeted projects & site inspected.
conducive  QRF grounds and facilities according to the
requirements and standards of an education
1– 69% Targeted projects & site inspected.
learning NEWCON
environment  QRF and work facility that is environmentally
and in sustainable, hazard free, gender sensitive EFFICIENCY
REPAIR
compliance to  LMS and friendly to people with disability.
quality 5 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
standards of 1. SITE INSPECTION inspected.
Governance and 4 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
Operations. inspected.
(1.1) To Conduct site inspection and
3 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
appraisal through ocular inspection and
inspected.
assessment against standards, in order to
2 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
determine the topography and availability of
inspected.
buildable space and volume of cut and fill to
1 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
be included in the program of work.
inspected.
(1.2) To Conduct site inspection of areas
affected by disasters to determine extent of
 damage and repair needed. TIMELINESS
(1.3) To Prepare school site appraisal
reports on 5– Target projects & site inspected before time
-new construction, and repair of needed
educational facilities 4– Target projects & site inspected on time needed
-preservation of heritage school
3– Target projects & site inspected after time
buildings
(1.4) Inventory of existing school buildings
needed
for planning and budgeting purposes. 2– Target projects & site inspected after 6 months
1– Never at all
2. FINAL SPECTION

(2.1) To Conducte punchlist to projects with

95% status of accomplishment for
rectification so that defects can be corrected
before issuing the Certificate of Completion
and Turn Over.

(2.2) To Issue “Certificate of Completion

and Acceptance” on construction projects
that are finished and meet quality standards.

QUALITY
1. CONSTRUCTION
5– 100% Targeted projects & site inspected.
II. Construction, Jan- 30% 4– 90 - 99% Targeted projects & site inspected.
(1.1) To Conduct “Pre-Construction
Facilities Repair
Conference Orientation” with School Heads Dec. 3– 80 - 89% Targeted projects & site inspected.
and 2023 2– 70 - 79% Targeted projects & site inspected.
Preservation of and Contractors
Heritage
1– 69% Targeted projects & site inspected.
Buildings (1.2) To Conduct testing of delivered
(GABALDON) materials to check for adherence to EFFICIENCY
standards and report to concerned parties to
take corrective action as needed. 5 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
inspected.
(1.3) To Assess on a periodic basis the 4 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
progress of construction work and report to inspected.
concerned parties to take corrective action 3 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
as needed to ensure adherence to program of inspected.
works, quality standards, and time schedule 2 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
for completion. inspected.
1 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
2. REPAIR inspected.

(2.1) To Prepare program of works for

minor facilities repair to guide the activities TIMELINESS
and procurement of materials and labor.
5– Target projects & site inspected before time
(2.2) To Guide the procurement of materials needed
and labor for the repair work to ensure 4– Target projects & site inspected on time needed
adherence to cost and quality requirements. 3– Target projects & site inspected after time
needed
(2.3) To Evaluate the repair work made and 2– Target projects & site inspected after 6 months
recommend payment upon completion of 1– Never at all
work according to work and cost
specifications

3. GABALDON

(3.1) To Conduct appraisal and create an

inventory of Heritage Buildings through
actual inspection to determine the status of
structure for preservation and required
intervention of the Central Office for
budgeting purposes.

(3.2) To Document preservation initiatives

and prepare progress and accomplishment
reports to inform management of utilization
of resources and additional requirements.
QUALITY
1. OPENING OF BIDS
5 – 100% Targeted projects & site inspected.
(1.1) To Examine the accuracy of the
4 – 90 - 99% Targeted projects & site inspected.
technical documents to determine the lowest 3 – 80 - 89% Targeted projects & site inspected.
 bidder by calculating the amount of bids 2 – 70 - 79% Targeted projects & site inspected.
using the program of works and 1 – 69% Targeted projects & site inspected.
III. BAC specifications. Jan – 15%
Procurement Dec
Activities for 2.PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING 2023
2023 EFFICIENCY
 BEFF (2.1) To Conduct pre construction
REPAIR conference to all the contractors and school 5 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
 QRF heads to iron out problems that may arise in inspected.
NEWCON the implementation stage. 4 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
 QRF inspected.
REPAIR 3.SBRMS POW 3 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
 LMS inspected.
(2.1) To Provide Technical Assistance to the 2 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
School Heads in the procurement process of inspected.
School Based Repair and Maintenance 1 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
Scheme by providing the Program of Works inspected.
as guide in the implementation.

(2.2) To Conduct monitoring on the TIMELINESS

implementation of the SBRMS to recipient
schools through ocular inspection. 5– Target projects & site inspected before time
needed
4– Target projects & site inspected on time needed
3– Target projects & site inspected after time
needed
2– Target projects & site inspected after 6 months
1– Never at all

QUALITY

5– 100% Targeted projects & site inspected.

(1.1) To Appraise buildings identified for 4– 90 - 99% Targeted projects & site inspected.
demolition and recommend demolition
3– 80 - 89% Targeted projects & site inspected.
of such by submitting a “Building
Inspection Report”. 2– 70 - 79% Targeted projects & site inspected.
(1.2) To Monitor the demolition work and 1– 69% Targeted projects & site inspected.
IV. ensure adherence to safety standards
Demolition by workers. Jan – 5% EFFICIENCY
and Condemnation (1.3) To Prepare and submit demolition Dec
documents to the SDS Office and keep 2023 5 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
inspected.
 a copy in file for future reference. 4 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
inspected.
3 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
inspected.
2 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
inspected.
1 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
inspected.

TIMELINESS

5– Target projects & site inspected before time

needed
4– Target projects & site inspected on time needed
3– Target projects & site inspected after time
needed
2– Target projects & site inspected after 6 months
1– Never at all

QUALITY

5– 100% Targeted projects & site inspected.

4– 90 - 99% Targeted projects & site inspected.
3– 80 - 89% Targeted projects & site inspected.
(1.1) To Coordinate the drafting of 2– 70 - 79% Targeted projects & site inspected.
School and Vicinity Maps with 1– 69% Targeted projects & site inspected.
technical staff and check for
accuracy to serve as reference for
EFFICIENCY
school improvement plans.
(1.2) To Consolidate data on school
inspection gathered from site 5 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
inspections and ensure accurate inspected.
encoding into the education data 4 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
V. Jan – inspected.
information system.
School Mapping/ Dec 10% 3 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
(1.3) To Gather updated data as
NSBI 2023 inspected.
requested for planning and
2 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
implementation purposes.
inspected.
(1.4) To Identify needs of schools with
1 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
regard facilities and input into the
inspected.
technical assistance plans of the
SDO technical assistance teams.
 TIMELINESS

5– Target projects & site inspected before time

needed
4– Target projects & site inspected on time needed
3– Target projects & site inspected after time
needed
2– Target projects & site inspected after 6 months
1– Never at all

QUALITY

5– 100% Targeted projects & site inspected.

4– 90 - 99% Targeted projects & site inspected.
3– 80 - 89% Targeted projects & site inspected.
2– 70 - 79% Targeted projects & site inspected.
(1.1) To Create and maintain a databank 1– 69% Targeted projects & site inspected.
of all constructed, repaired,
demolished, preserved buildings EFFICIENCY
for inventory purposes and
compiling all bidding documents, 5 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
orogram of works, inspection inspected.
reports, deed of donations, Titles 4 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
Certificate of Completion and inspected.
Acceptance of projects 3 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
implemented. inspected.
(1.2) To Maintain data on educational 2 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
VI. facilities for DRRMC reference Jan – inspected.
Files and (1.3) To Maintain copies of POW, Dec 5% 1 – 5 systems established to implement, monitor and
Records inspection reports and Bidding 2023 inspected.
Documents of all DepEd projects
(1.4) To Maintain duplicate copies of
Deed of Donations, Acceptance of TIMELINESS
Educational Facilities and other
such documents needed for 5– Target projects & site inspected before time
reference in future building and
needed
construction and repair projects.
4– Target projects & site inspected on time needed
3– Target projects & site inspected after time
needed
2– Target projects & site inspected after 6 months
1– Never at all
 5 – 100% ( Outstanding: Role Model )

Performance represents an extraordinary level of

achievement and commitment in terms of quality
and time,technical skills and
knowledge,ingenuity,creativity and initiative.
Employees at this performance level have
demonstrated exceptional job mastery in all major
1. SPORTS COMMITTE
areas of responsibility. Employee achievement and
2. WINS TWG member.
contributions to the organization are of marked
3. Division DRRM responder team
excellence.
4. Brigada Eskwela Committee
4 – 85% ( Very Satifactory: Consistently
demonstrate )
Performance exceeded expectations. All goals,
objectives and targets were achieve above
established standards.

3 – 70%-84% ( Satisfactory: Most of the time

Demonstrate)
VII. Other Jan –
related functions. Dec 5% 2 – 55%-69% ( Unsatisfactory: Sometimes
2023 Demonstrate )

1 – 54% and Below ( Poor: Rarely Demonstrate )

 To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned Overall Rating for
Accomplishment

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority:

JOY E. LETRAN – SINGSON, E.M.D. DAVE A. PATIGAYON MA. JUDELYN J. RAMOS, CESO VI
Chief, SGOD Engineer III Assistant Schools Division Superintendent