INFRASTRUCTURE UNIVERSITY KUALA LUMPUR (IUKL)

Laboratory Report Assessment Form – 11/2012(Issue 1)

RUBRICS FOR LAB ASSESSMENT (HIGHWAY LAB)

Date of Assessment :
Laboratory :
No. of Experiment/Title :
Group :

Instruction to report assessor

- Circle where applicable.

Rating Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Total

10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 (10 marks)
All three sections Only two sections Only one section Partial sections of Fail to No. of Experiment
of introduction, of either of either introduction, summarize
Introduction concept and introduction, introduction, concept and introduction,
; Concept theory with concept or concept or theory with concept and
relevant theory with theory with relevant theory with
and
background relevant relevant background relevant
Theory information are background background information are background
sufficiently information are information provided. information.
provided. sufficiently sufficiently
provided. provided.

Rating Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Total

5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 (5 marks)
Theory and Theory and Theory and Theory and Theory and No. of Experiment
purpose of work is purpose of work is purpose of work purpose of work purpose of work
well defined and still well defined is still fairly is still fairly is poorly defined
clearly mentioned. and clearly defined and defined and and mentioned
Objectives mentioned with mentioned with mentioned with with major
minor errors in minor errors in major errors in errors in
sentence structure. sentence structure. sentence structure sentence
structure.
Rating Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Total
5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 (5 marks)
List of apparatus List of apparatus List of apparatus List of apparatus Fail to No. of Experiment
and reagent are and reagent are and reagent are and reagent are summarize list
Apparatus sufficiently available but not half missing. mostly missing. of apparatus and
and Reagent provided. completely reagent.
provided.

Rating Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Total

20.0 16.0 12.0 8.0 4.0 (20 marks)
Methodology is Methodology is Methodology is Methodology is Methodology is No. of Experiment
sufficiently still sufficiently fairly provided poorly provided very poorly
provided and very provided and well and organized and organized provided and
well organized organized according to the according to the organized
according to the according to the conducted conducted according to the
Methodology conducted conducted laboratory with laboratory with conducted
/Procedure laboratory. laboratory with few major errors. major errors. laboratory with
minor errors. errors in most
sentences.
 Rating Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Total
10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 (10 marks)
Safety, health Safety, health and Safety, health and Safety, health Safety, health No. of Experiment
and precaution precaution are precaution are and precaution and precaution
are clearly clearly written with clearly written are written based are poorly
Safety, written and correct addition based on lab on lab manual written with
Health and elaborated with related to the manual related to but with minor major errors
Precaution correct own conducted the conducted errors related to related to the
addition related laboratory. laboratory. the conducted conducted
to the conducted laboratory. laboratory.
laboratory.
Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Total
Rating
30.0 24.0 18.0 12.0 6.0 (30 marks)
All required All required All required All required All required No. of Experiment
tabulations and tabulations and tabulations and tabulations and tabulations are
calculations are calculations are calculations are calculations are present but either
present and present but minor present but some present but calculation is
performed errors are present in calculations are calculations are missing, grossly
correctly within the calculations missing and / or grossly incomplete and /
the expected within the expected there are incomplete and / or incorrect.
Results, norms. norms. significant errors or incorrect. (6)
(15) (12) in the calculations. (7) No discussion is
Calculation
Discussion with Discussion with (9) Discussion given.
and reasoning is reasoning is lightly Discussion with without any (0)
Discussion clearly stated. stated. little/ without reasoning. All assigned
(10) (8) reasoning is stated. (5) questions are not
All assigned All assigned (6) All assigned answered.
questions (if any) questions are Some assigned questions are not (0)
are answered and answered and questions are answered.
discussed discussed lightly. answered. (0)
appropriately. (4) (3)
(5)
Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Total
Rating
10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 (10 marks)
Conclusion is Conclusion is Conclusion is not Conclusion is not Conclusion No. of Experiment
Conclusion clearly clearly mentioned clearly mentioned clearly and/or
mentioned and and related to the and partially mentioned and recommendation
and
related to the objectives but related to the partially related are not clearly
Recommenda objectives with without given objectives with to the objectives mentioned and
tion given recommendation. given without given not related to the
recommendation. recommendation. recommendation. objectives.
Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Total
Rating
10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 (10 marks)
Provide complete Provide references Provide references Provide Fail to provide No. of Experiment
references based not according to the not according to insufficient references,
References on the relevant relevant format, but the relevant references not and/or evidence
and format, and with sufficient format, and according to the on the laboratory
Appendix provide evidence evidence on the insufficient relevant format, works.
on the laboratory laboratory works. evidence on the and evidence on
works. laboratory works. the laboratory
works.

Total Marks 100

Marks Earn

Percentage
(%)