5 1

6 1
6 2 8
6 3
6 4
7
6 5
6 6
6
6 7
7 1
7 2 5
7 3
8 1 4 Column B
9 1
10 1 3
10 2
10 3 2
10 4
10 5 1
11 1
11 2 0
11 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
11 4
11 5
12 1
12 2
Can you explain why this type of picture makes the most sense when the data values come from a small
range of whole numbers?

A histogram is a suitable choice when data values come from a small range of whole numbers because it
effectively displays the frequency, distribution, outliers, and gaps in a clear and concise manner.
Working Families Liberal Democrat Democrat Independent
Democrat Conservative Independent Democrat Independent
Democrat Conservative Liberal Liberal Independent
Republican Working Families Independent Democrat Liberal
Democrat Liberal Democrat Independent Republican
Liberal Democrat Conservative Democrat Republican
Working Families Liberal Democrat Democrat Democrat
Liberal Independent Republican Republican Republican
Liberal Liberal Democrat Independent Conservative
Liberal Democrat Working Families Liberal Liberal
Democrat Republican Liberal Liberal Independent
Independent Working Families Republican Republican Democrat
Liberal Independent Liberal Democrat Democrat
Independent Democrat Independent Democrat Republican
Republican Democrat Independent Conservative Independent
Independent Conservative Republican Republican Democrat
Independent Independent Republican Conservative Democrat
Democrat Republican Conservative Conservative Liberal
Liberal Working Families Independent Republican Independent
Republican Conservative Independent Democrat Democrat
 Conservative Party Frequency
Republican Working Families 7 Excel provides many options to allow
Independent Democrat 31 To display the relative frequency (pe
Republican Republican 21 Data Labels" option, customize the la
Conservative Independent 26 Can you explain why this type of pic
Democrat Conservative 12
Independent Liberal 23 A pie chart is better suited for catego
Working Families 120
Independent Which party has the largest number
Republican The largest party in the sample is De
Republican
Democrat
Liberal
Liberal
Frequency
Democrat
Liberal Working Families
Independent Democrat
Democrat Republican
Liberal Independent
Independent Conservative
Liberal
vides many options to allow you to format the chart you created. Try some of these. Can you display the relative frequency (percent) fo
the relative frequency (percent) for each slice of a pie chart in Excel, select the chart, enable "Value" or "Percentage" labels in the "Forma
ls" option, customize the label settings, and optionally add leader lines.
xplain why this type of picture is better suited for categorical data than numerical data?

t is better suited for categorical data than numerical data due to its visual representation and ability to showcase proportions.

rty has the largest number in the sample?

st party in the sample is Democrat.
lative frequency (percent) for each piece of the pie?
rcentage" labels in the "Format

case proportions.
 Data
Values
107 Sample Size: 200
54 Mean: 76.00
66 Std. Dev: 12.06
62
74 Minimum: 43
92 Median: 75 Histogram
75 Maximum: 116
65 50%
81
40%
83
78 Frequency Chart 30%
90 Range Frequency Percent
20%
96 41 to 53 3 1.5%
66 54 to 66 47 23.5% 10%
68 67 to 79 79 39.5%
85 80 to 92 52 26.0% 0%
41 to 53 54 to 66 67 to 79 80 to 9
83 93 to 105 17 8.5%
74 106 to 118 2 1.0%
73 Total 200 100%
73
73 Can you explain why the first and the last rectangles are slightly shorter tha
65
62 The first and last rectangles in the chart are slightly shorter than they should be b
116
85
78
90
81
62
70
66
78
75
86
72
67
68
91
77
63
68
71
 79
65
73
88
62
75
79
70
66
71
64
96
77
87
72
76
79
63
97
70
86
88
80
77
89
62
83
81
94
101
76
89
60
80
67
83
94
89
76
84
68
64
68
103
71
94
93
77
77
78
72
81
87
84
92
66
63
82
79
88
74
79
78
88
71
71
61
72
63
43
77
71
84
93
89
68
59
64
94
62
61
78
89
63
74
85
65
84
66
59
74
85
75
69
82
61
62
85
59
61
82
79
72
68
70
84
62
67
75
67
65
99
77
76
96
73
71
92
98
79
65
77
58
88
74
83
92
59
68
 61
82
59
51
89
77
72
81
64
57
98
98
86
69
81
70
63
65
58
76
71
86
92
45
75
102
76
65
73
 Histogram

53 54 to 66 67 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 106 to
105 118

es are slightly shorter than they should be. (Hint: compare the range of the data with the range of the number line in the

horter than they should be because the range of the data exceeds the range of the number line depicted.
the number line in the picture).
i xi xi - avg (xi-avg)^2
1 5 0.625 0.390625 1. Below are salaries of th
2 2 -2.375 5.640625
3 3 -1.375 1.890625
4 4 -0.375 0.140625
5 1 -3.375 11.390625
6 5 0.625 0.390625
7 6 1.625 2.640625
8 9 4.625 21.390625

avg: 4.375 sum: 43.875

variance: 6.267857143 sum/(n-1)
s: 2.503568881 sqrt(variance)
Use Excel to compute the
avg: 4.375 s: 2.503568881
1. Below are salaries of thirteen players on the Cleveland Cavaliers basketball team during the 2009−2010 season.

Use Excel to compute the mean and standard deviation of these sample values.

i (Players xi(Salaries) xi - avg (xi-avg)^2

1 $736,000 -$4,372,153.85 19115729253092.6
2 $6,364,000 $1,255,846.15 1577149562516.59
3 $1,429,000 -$3,679,153.85 13536173022536.6
4 $736,000 -$4,372,153.85 19115729253092.6
5 $855,000 -$4,253,153.85 18089317637744.6
6 $21,000,000 $15,891,846.15 252550774182405
7 $11,541,000 $6,432,846.15 41381509641032.6
8 $9,300,000 $4,191,846.15 17571574178804.6
9 $4,089,000 -$1,019,153.85 1038674561816.59
10 $4,254,000 -$854,153.85 729578792636.592
11 $2,644,000 -$2,464,153.85 6072054176756.59
12 $458,000 -$4,650,153.85 21623930791468.6
13 $3,000,000 -$2,108,153.85 4444312638404.59

avg/mean: $5,108,154 sum: 416846507692308

variance: 34737208974359
standard deviation: 5893828.041
43 107
45 54
51 66
54 Minimum 43 62
57 1Q 66.5 Lower Fence 0.75 74
58 Median 75 IQR 49.5 92
58 3Q 84 Upper fence 149.25 75
59 Maximum 116 65
59 81
59 Does the data contain any outliers? 83
59 Because no data was discovered below the lower fence or 78
59 above the upper fence, the data does not contain any 90
60 outliers. 96
61 66
61 68
61 85
61 83
61 74
62 73
62 73
62 73
62 65
62 62
62 116
62 85
62 78
63 90
63 81
63 62
63 70
63 66
63 78
64 75
64 86
64 72
64 67
65 68
65 91
65 77
65 63
65 68
65 71
65 79
65 65
66 73
66 88
66 62
66 75
66 79
66 70
67 66
67 71
67 64
67 96
68 77
68 87
68 72
68 76
68 79
68 63
68 97
68 70
69 86
69 88
70 80
70 77
70 89
70 62
70 83
71 81
71 94
71 101
71 76
71 89
71 60
71 80
71 67
72 83
72 94
72 89
72 76
72 84
72 68
73 64
73 68
73 103
73 71
73 94
73 93
74 77
74 77
74 78
74 72
74 81
74 87
75 84
75 92
75 66
75 63
75 82
75 79
76 88
76 74
76 79
76 78
76 88
76 71
77 71
77 61
77 72
77 63
77 43
77 77
77 71
77 84
77 93
78 89
78 68
78 59
78 64
78 94
78 62
79 61
79 78
79 89
79 63
79 74
79 85
79 65
80 84
80 66
81 59
81 74
81 85
81 75
81 69
81 82
82 61
82 62
82 85
82 59
83 61
83 82
83 79
83 72
83 68
84 70
84 84
84 62
84 67
84 75
85 67
85 65
85 99
85 77
85 76
86 96
86 73
86 71
86 92
87 98
87 79
88 65
88 77
88 58
88 88
88 74
89 83
89 92
89 59
89 68
89 61
 89 82
90 59
90 51
91 89
92 77
92 72
92 81
92 64
92 57
93 98
93 98
94 86
94 69
94 81
94 70
96 63
96 65
96 58
97 76
98 71
98 86
98 92
99 45
101 75
102 102
103 76
107 65
116 73
Minimum 43
1Q 66.75
Median 75
3Q 84
Maximum 116

Can you explain why it is OK if there is a slight difference between your quartile values and those created by ex

Quartile variations may be caused by variations in Excel's calculation algorithms, data

binding, accuracy, rounding, and algorithm. These variations are typically minor and
have little impact on how data is interpreted.
rtile values and those created by excel?