0% found this document useful (0 votes)
66 views37 pages

Cohomology of Groups: Brita Nucinkis

This document discusses free modules and projective modules. It defines what it means for a module to be free or projective. A free module is free on a subset, meaning there is a unique homomorphism to any other module. A projective module is one where the functor Hom(P,-) is exact. Every free module is projective but not vice versa. Projective resolutions and projective dimension of modules are introduced. The Eilenberg swindle and Schanuel's lemma are also summarized.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
66 views37 pages

Cohomology of Groups: Brita Nucinkis

This document discusses free modules and projective modules. It defines what it means for a module to be free or projective. A free module is free on a subset, meaning there is a unique homomorphism to any other module. A projective module is one where the functor Hom(P,-) is exact. Every free module is projective but not vice versa. Projective resolutions and projective dimension of modules are introduced. The Eilenberg swindle and Schanuel's lemma are also summarized.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 37

Cohomology of groups

Brita Nucinkis

September 26, 2007

Free modules

Denition
Let F be an R-module and X be a subset of F . We say F is free on X if for every R-module A and every map : X A there exists a unique R-module homomorphism : F A such that (x) = (x) for all x X .

Free modules

Lemma

Let F and F be two modules free, on X . Then F F . =

Free modules

The follwing exercise gives us a way of constructing free modules:

Free modules

The follwing exercise gives us a way of constructing free modules: Let X be a set and consider the R-module M E = R.
xX

Free modules

The follwing exercise gives us a way of constructing free modules: Let X be a set and consider the R-module M E = R.
xX

For each x X consider the following map sx : X sx (y ) Let S = {sx | x X }. = R (

1 0

x=y otherwise

Free modules

The follwing exercise gives us a way of constructing free modules: Let X be a set and consider the R-module M E = R.
xX

For each x X consider the following map sx : X sx (y ) Let S = {sx | x X }. Show 1. E is free on S. 2. For every free module F on X there is an isomorphism : E F , such that (sx ) = x for all x X . 3. F is free on X if and only if every element f F can be written uniquely P as f = xX ax x where ax R and all but a nite number of ax = 0. = R (

1 0

x=y otherwise

Examples of free modules

1. Let k be a eld. Then every k-module is free. This is nothing other than saying that every k-vector space has a basis. (For the innite dimensional case we need Zorns Lemma).

Examples of free modules

1. Let k be a eld. Then every k-module is free. This is nothing other than saying that every k-vector space has a basis. (For the innite dimensional case we need Zorns Lemma). 2. A free Z-module is the same as a free abelian group.

Examples of free modules

1. Let k be a eld. Then every k-module is free. This is nothing other than saying that every k-vector space has a basis. (For the innite dimensional case we need Zorns Lemma). 2. A free Z-module is the same as a free abelian group. 3. Q is not a free Z-module.

An important lemma

Lemma
Every R-module M is the homomorphic image of a free R-module.

Projective modules

Proposition
Let P be an R-module. Then the following statements are equivalent:

Projective modules

Proposition
Let P be an R-module. Then the following statements are equivalent: 1. HomR (P, ) is an exact functor.

Projective modules

Proposition
Let P be an R-module. Then the following statements are equivalent: 1. HomR (P, ) is an exact functor. 2. P is a direct summand of a free module.

Projective modules

Proposition
Let P be an R-module. Then the following statements are equivalent: 1. HomR (P, ) is an exact functor. 2. P is a direct summand of a free module. 3. Every epimorphism M P splits.

Projective modules

Proposition
Let P be an R-module. Then the following statements are equivalent: 1. HomR (P, ) is an exact functor. 2. P is a direct summand of a free module. 3. Every epimorphism M P splits. 4. For every epimorphism : A B of R-modules and every R-module map : P B there is an R-module homomorphism : P A such that = .

Denition of projective modules

Every R-module satisfying the conditions of the previous Proposition is called a projective R-module.

Free vs projective modules

Every free R-module is projective, but not every projective is free.

Free vs projective modules

Every free R-module is projective, but not every projective is free. Take, for example R = Z/6Z Z/2Z Z/3Z and P = Z/2Z but (0, 1)P = 0, = which contradicts uniqueness of expression of elements in a free module.

Direct sums of projectives

Lemma
A direct sum P = L
iI

Pi is projective i each Pi , i I is projective.

A remark

Let k be a eld and V a vector space of countable dimension. Then there is a k-vector space isomorphism V V V. =

A remark

Let k be a eld and V a vector space of countable dimension. Then there is a k-vector space isomorphism V V V. = Hence, for the ring R = Endk (V ) we have the following chain of isomorphisms: R = Endk (V ) = Homk (V , V ) Homk (V V , V ) Homk (V , V )Homk (V , V ) = = = R R.

A remark

Let k be a eld and V a vector space of countable dimension. Then there is a k-vector space isomorphism V V V. = Hence, for the ring R = Endk (V ) we have the following chain of isomorphisms: R = Endk (V ) = Homk (V , V ) Homk (V V , V ) Homk (V , V )Homk (V , V ) = = = R R. Hence there are free modules on a set of n elements which are isomorphic to free modules on a set with m elements where n = m.

The Eilenberg Swindle

Lemma
[Eilenberg-Swindle] Let R be a ring and P be a projective module. Then there exists a free module such that P F F. =

Projective resolution

Denition
Let M be an R-module. A projective resolution of M is an exact sequence

/ Pi+1

di

/ Pi

di+1

d 1

/ P1

d 0

/ P0

/M

/ 0,

where every Pi , i 0, i Z, is a projective module.

Projective resolution

Denition
Let M be an R-module. A projective resolution of M is an exact sequence

/ Pi+1

di

/ Pi

di+1

d 1

/ P1

d 0

/ P0

/M

/ 0,

where every Pi , i 0, i Z, is a projective module. We also use the short notation P M.

Schanuels Lemma

Lemma
[Schanuels Lemma] Let K P and K P M be two short exact sequences such that P and P are projective. M

Schanuels Lemma

Lemma
[Schanuels Lemma] Let K P and K P M be two short exact sequences such that P and P are projective. Then K P K P. = M

Schanuels Lemma

Lemma
[Schanuels Lemma] Let K P and K P M be two short exact sequences such that P and P are projective. Then K P K P. = In particular, K is projective if and only if K is projective. M

The long Schanuel

Proposition
Let P M and P M be two projective resolutions of M and denote by Kn = ker (Pn Pn1 ) and K = ker (Pn Pn1 ) the n-th kernels respectively.

The long Schanuel

Proposition
Let P M and P M be two projective resolutions of M and denote by Kn = ker (Pn Pn1 ) and K = ker (Pn Pn1 ) the n-th kernels respectively. Then, for all n 0 Kn Pn Pn1 ... Kn Pn Pn1 .... =

The long Schanuel

Proposition
Let P M and P M be two projective resolutions of M and denote by Kn = ker (Pn Pn1 ) and K = ker (Pn Pn1 ) the n-th kernels respectively. Then, for all n 0 Kn Pn Pn1 ... Kn Pn Pn1 .... = In particular Kn is projective i Kn is projective.

Projective dimension

Denition
Let M be an R-module. We say M has nite projective dimension over R, pdR M < , if M admits a projective resolution P of nite length. M

Projective dimension

Denition
Let M be an R-module. We say M has nite projective dimension over R, pdR M < , if M admits a projective resolution P M

of nite length. In particular, there exists an n 0 such that 0 Pn Pn1 P0 M 0 is a projective resulution of n.

Projective dimension

Denition
Let M be an R-module. We say M has nite projective dimension over R, pdR M < , if M admits a projective resolution P M

of nite length. In particular, there exists an n 0 such that 0 Pn Pn1 P0 M 0 is a projective resulution of n. The smallest such n is called the projective dimension of M.

Two nal remarks

The long Schanuels Lemma implies that if pdR M n for some n, then in every projective resolution Q M, the kernel Kn1 = ker (Qn1 Qn2 ) is projective.

Two nal remarks

The long Schanuels Lemma implies that if pdR M n for some n, then in every projective resolution Q M, the kernel Kn1 = ker (Qn1 Qn2 ) is projective. Projective modules have projective dimension equal to 0.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy