100% found this document useful (10 votes)
3K views82 pages

MMPI-3 Guidelines

The document provides an overview of the development of the MMPI-3, including: - Preliminary studies that informed revisions to items and development of new trial items. - Large-scale data collection from various clinical and non-clinical populations that was used to develop and validate new and revised scales. - The final MMPI-3 incorporates 52 scales, including new scales related to eating concerns, compulsivity, impulsivity, and self-importance. - The normative sample was designed to match 2020 US census projections on variables like age, race, education to provide appropriate norms.

Uploaded by

claudia carrera
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (10 votes)
3K views82 pages

MMPI-3 Guidelines

The document provides an overview of the development of the MMPI-3, including: - Preliminary studies that informed revisions to items and development of new trial items. - Large-scale data collection from various clinical and non-clinical populations that was used to develop and validate new and revised scales. - The final MMPI-3 incorporates 52 scales, including new scales related to eating concerns, compulsivity, impulsivity, and self-importance. - The normative sample was designed to match 2020 US census projections on variables like age, race, education to provide appropriate norms.

Uploaded by

claudia carrera
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 82

INTRODUCING

THE MMPI-3
Patrick Moran, Ph.D.
Pearson Clinical Assessment
Agenda
 MMPI-3 Development
 The MMPI-3
 Scales

 Norms

 Manuals and User’s Guides


MMPI-3 Development
Preliminary Studies
 A series of studies to explore ideas and questions for
MMPI-3 development
 Response Format (n=406):
 Dichotomous (T/F) versus Polytomous
◼ Definitely True
◼ Mostly True
◼ Mostly False
◼ Definitely False
 Polytomous response format:
◼ Small increases in reliability estimates
◼ No improvement in scale score validities
◼ Likely reflecting increased systematic error
 Conclusion: Retain T/F response format for MMPI-3
Preliminary Studies
 Item Improvement (n=552)
 Content clarification, simplification
 338 MMPI-2-RF items reviewed for
◼ Awkward/dated wording
◼ Potential simplification

I love to go to dances dancing.

I am apt to take likely to feel disappointments so keenly


strongly that I can't put them out of my mind.

 53 items reworded
 Following item analyses 43 revisions retained
 Empirical correlates unaffected
Preliminary Studies
 Item Development
 Objective: Identify content missing from, or
insufficiently represented by, the MMPI-2-RF
item pool
 Method:
◼ Consultationwith 12 MMPI-2-RF experts
◼ Review of existing measures
◼ Development of 135 Trial Items
Preliminary Studies
 Item Development Study (N=519)
◼ Internal item analyses and correlations with external
criteria
◼ 90 of 135 trial items retained
◼ 5 replacement trial items developed

 Outcome: 95 trial items, candidates for


inclusion on MMPI-3
Development Plan
 MMPI-2-RF-EX
 Brief Biographical Questionnaire
 338 MMPI-2-RF items (43 updated)
 95 Trial Items
 Booklet and answer sheet

 Q Local EX
 All new material translated into Spanish
 Garcia/Azan MMPI-2/RF translation starting point
 Rewritten and Trial items translated by Dr. Antonio E.
Puente and Team at UNC-Wilmington
Development Plan
 Data Collection:
 Field Data
◼ Sites represent settings in which MMPI is used
◼ Mental health, medical, forensic, public safety
◼ Used for:
◼ Scale Development
◼ Validation
◼ Comparison Groups

 College Studies
◼ Initial psychometric analyses
◼ Detailed Validation Analyses
 Normative Data
◼ English
◼ Spanish
◼ Bilingual
Development: Data Collection

 Field Data Collection (ongoing)


 Public Safety 9,221
 Mental Health 1,837
 Medical 1,770
 Forensic/Corrections 1,040
 Disability 611
 Community 376
 Total (to date) 14,855

 College Studies (ongoing) 8,000


Development: Data Collection

 Normative
 English 2,382
 English re-test 280
 Spanish 664
 Spanish re-test 60
 Bilingual 45
 Total 3,423

 Overall Total (to date) 26,278


Development: Scales

 Scale Development Process


 Using Field Data
◼ RC Scales shortened
◼ Some SP Scales lengthened and expanded
◼ H-O and PSY-5 Scales revised to address deleted items
and incorporate new ones
◼ Validity Scales updated

 Using Spanish Normative and Bilingual Samples


◼ All rewritten and new items selected for MMPI-3
examined
◼ One item dropped
Development: Scales
 Scale Development Outcome
 New Scales:
◼ Combined Response Inconsistency (CRIN)
◼ Eating Concerns (EAT)
◼ Compulsivity (CMP)
◼ Impulsivity (IMP)
◼ Self-Importance (SFI)
 Substantially Modified
◼ Anxiety (AXY) Anxiety-Related Experiences (ARX)
◼ Stress/Worry (STW) Stress (STR) Worry (WRY)
◼ Interpersonal Passivity (IPP) Dominance(DOM)
 Dropped Scales:
◼ Gastrointestinal Complaints (GIC), Head Pain Complaints (HPC)
◼ Multiple Specific Fears (MSF)
◼ Aesthetic/Literary Interests (AES)
◼ Mechanical/Physical Interests (MEC)
MMPI-3 (2020)
• 52 Scales
• 10 Validity Scales
• 3 Higher-Order Scales
• 8 RC Scales
• 26 Specific Problems Scales
• 4 Somatic/Cognitive
• 10 Internalizing
• 7 Externalizing
• 5 Interpersonal
• 5 PSY-5 Scales
MMPI-3 Validity Scales
 CRIN Combined Response Inconsistency – Combination of random and
fixed inconsistent responding
 VRIN Variable Response Inconsistency – Random responding
 TRIN True Response Inconsistency – Fixed responding
 F Infrequent Responses – Responses infrequent in the general population
 FP Infrequent Psychopathology Responses – Responses infrequent in
psychiatric populations
 Fs Infrequent Somatic Responses – Somatic complaints infrequent in
medical patient populations
 FBS Symptom Validity Scale – Noncredible somatic and cognitive
complaints
 RBS Response Bias Scale – Exaggerated memory complaints
 L Uncommon Virtues - Rarely claimed moral attributes or activities
 K Adjustment Validity – Claims of uncommonly high level of
psychological adjustment
MMPI-3 Higher-Order (H-O) Scales
 EID Emotional/Internalizing Dysfunction – Problems associated
with mood and affect
 THD Thought Dysfunction – Problems associated with disordered
thinking
 BXD Behavioral/Externalizing Dysfunction – Problems associated
with under-controlled behavior
MMPI-3 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales
 RCd Demoralization – General unhappiness and
dissatisfaction
 RC1 Somatic Complaints – Diffuse physical health complaints
 RC2 Low Positive Emotions – Lack of positive emotional
responsiveness
 RC4 Antisocial Behavior – Rule breaking and irresponsible
behavior
 RC6 Ideas of Persecution – Self-referential beliefs that others
pose a threat
 RC7 Dysfunctional Negative Emotions – Maladaptive
anxiety, anger, irritability
 RC8 Aberrant Experiences – Unusual perceptions or thoughts
associated with thought dysfunction
 RC9 Hypomanic Activation – Overactivation, aggression,
impulsivity, and grandiosity
MMPI-3 Specific Problems Scales

 Somatic/Cognitive
 MLS Malaise – Overall sense of physical debilitation, poor
health
 NUC Neurological Complaints – Dizziness, weakness,
paralysis, loss of balance, etc.
 EAT Eating Concerns – Problematic eating behaviors
 COG Cognitive Complaints – Memory problems, difficulties
concentrating
MMPI-3 Specific Problems Scales

 Internalizing
 SUI Suicidal/Death Ideation – Direct reports of suicidal ideation and
recent attempts
 HLP Helplessness/Hopelessness – Belief that goals cannot be
reached or problems solved
 SFD Self-Doubt – Lack of self-confidence, feelings of uselessness
 NFC Inefficacy – Belief that one is indecisive and inefficacious

 STR Stress – Problems involving stress and nervousness


 WRY Worry – Excessive worry and preoccupation
 CMP Compulsivity – Engaging in compulsive behaviors
 ARX Anxiety-Related Experiences – Multiple anxiety-related
experiences such as catastrophizing, panic, dread, and intrusive
ideation
 ANP Anger Proneness – Becoming easily angered, impatient with others
 BRF Behavior-Restricting Fears – Fears that significantly inhibit normal
behavior
MMPI-3 Specific Problems Scales

 Externalizing
 FML Family Problems – Conflictual family relationships
 JCP Juvenile Conduct Problems – Difficulties at school and at home, stealing
 SUB Substance Abuse – Current and past misuse of alcohol and drugs
 IMP Impulsivity – Poor impulse control and nonplanful behavior
 ACT Activation – Heightened excitation and energy level
 AGG Aggression – Physically aggressive, violent behavior
 CYN Cynicism – Non-self-referential beliefs that others are bad and not to
be trusted
MMPI-3 Specific Problems Scales

 Interpersonal
 SFI Self-Importance – Beliefs related to having special talents and abilities
 DOM Dominance – Being domineering in relationships with others
 DSF Disaffiliativeness – Disliking people and being around them
 SAV Social Avoidance – Not enjoying and avoiding social events
 SHY Shyness – Feeling uncomfortable and anxious in the presence of others
MMPI-3 PSY-5 Scales

 AGGR Aggressiveness – Instrumental, goal-directed aggression


PSYC Psychoticism – Disconnection from reality
DISC Disconstraint – Under-controlled behavior
NEGE Negative Emotionality/Neuroticism – Anxiety, insecurity,
worry, and fear
 INTR Introversion/Low Positive Emotionality – Social
disengagement and anhedonia
Development: Items

 Scale Development Outcome


 72 new items added
 75 MMPI-2-RF items dropped

 MMPI-3: 335 items


 220 original MMPI (47 revised for MMPI-2 or
MMPI-3)
 43 MMPI-2 items (5 revised for MMPI-3)
 72 new MMPI-3
 Reading level remains grade 4.5 (Flesch-Kinkaid)
Development: Norms

 English-Language Normative Sample


 Selected to approximate 2020 census
projections for
◼ Race
◼ Education
◼ Age

 Final
Sample N=1,620 (810 men, 810
women)
Race/Ethnicity Composition of MMPI-3
Normative Sample

Race/Ethnicity MMPI-3 N MMPI-3 % 2020 Projected % MMPI-2-RF %

Asian 82 5.1% 6.0% 0.6%

Black 201 12.4% 12.2% 11.6%

Hispanic 227 14.0% 16.8% 2.9%

White 977 60.3% 62.5% 81.8%

Other 60 3.7% 0.9% 3.1%

Mixed Race 73 4.5% 1.6% 0.0%

Total 1620 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%


Education Composition of MMPI-3 Normative
Sample

Education Groups MMPI-3 N MMPI-3 % 2020 Projected % MMPI-2-RF %

No High School or 139 8.6% 11.1% 5.0%


GED
High School or GED 469 29.0% 29.0% 24.3%

Some College 449 27.7% 28.6% 25.0%

Bachelors Degree or 563 34.8% 31.4% 45.8%


Higher
Total 1620 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Have the Norms Changed?
Have the Norms Changed?

 Yes, however less than the changes from the


MMPI to MMPI-2 norms
 Largest Validity Scale changes (5-6 T score points
difference in means) on F-r, Fs, FBS-r (women) and L-r
◼ However these are offset, to some extent, by the larger SDs (12-
14 versus 10)
◼ Nevertheless, T scores are lower on the updated and re-normed
F, Fs, FBS (women) and L scales
 Largest Substantive Scale changes (6-8 T score points
difference in means) on BXD (men), RC1 (women), RC4
(men), RC6 (men), MLS, NUC (women), DISC (men)
◼ These are less offset by larger SDs
◼ T scores are lower on updated re-normed Somatization scales
Spanish-Language Norms
Spanish-Language MMPI-3 Normative Sample Scored Using English-Language
MMPI-3 Norms
Men (n=275) Women (n=275)
120
Validity

110

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20
CRIN VRIN TRIN F Fp Fs FBS RBS L K
CRIN VR IN T R IN F Fp Fs FBS R BS L K

M - Men 55 52 51 F 51 57 51 50 54 61 53
SD 13 12 16 12 16 10 9 9 12 10
M - Women 53 52 52 F 50 55 52 51 55 60 53
SD 12 12 14 12 15 10 9 10 12 10
Spanish-Language MMPI-3 Normative Sample Scored Using English-Language
MMPI-3 Norms
Men (n=275) Women (n=275)
120
Higher-Order Restructured Clinical

110

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20
EID THD BXD RCd RC1 RC2 RC4 RC6 RC7 RC8 RC9
EID THD BXD R Cd R C1 R C2 R C4 R C6 R C7 R C8 R C9

M - Men 47 53 45 46 50 49 45 51 48 53 46
SD 7 10 8 7 9 9 8 10 9 11 9
M - Women 47 52 42 46 51 49 41 50 48 51 45
SD 9 10 7 9 10 10 7 9 9 11 9
Spanish-Language MMPI-3 Normative Sample Scored Using English-
Language MMPI-3 Norms
Men (n=275) Women (n=275)

120
Somatic/Cognitive Internalizing

110

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20
MLS NUC EAT COG SUI HLP SFD NFC STR WRY CMP ARX ANP BRF

MLS N U C EAT COG SU I H LP SFD N FC ST R W R Y CMP ARX AN P BR F


M - Men 43 52 49 47 46 51 47 50 50 47 51 47 49 59
SD 9 11 9 9 7 9 7 9 7 8 10 8 9 12
M - Women 44 52 50 48 47 52 47 50 50 48 51 49 49 63
SD 9 11 10 9 8 9 8 9 9 9 11 10 9 14
Spanish-Language MMPI-3 Normative Sample Scored Using
English-Language MMPI-3 Norms
Men (n=275) Women (n=275)

120 Externalizing Interpersonal

110

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20
FML JCP SUB IMP ACT AGG CYN SFI DOM DSF SAV SHY

FML JCP SU B IMP ACT AGG CYN SFI D OM D SF SAV SHY


M - Men 46 47 46 47 48 49 53 52 50 47 50 49
SD 8 9 7 10 9 9 11 10 8 8 7 9
M - Women 46 43 44 45 48 47 50 51 49 47 50 48
SD 9 6 6 10 9 8 9 10 7 9 6 9
Spanish-Language MMPI-3 Normative Sample Scored
Using English-Language MMPI-3 Norms
Men (n=275) Women (n=275)

120
PSY-5
110

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20
AGGR PSYC DISC NEGE INTR
AGGR PSYC D ISC N EGE IN T R

Mean 49 53 45 48 50
SD 8 11 7 7 7
Mean 48 52 42 49 50
SD 7 10 7 8 7
Spanish-Language Norms

 Most means fall within 5 T score points of English


language Normative Sample
 Exceptions:
 L (10 T score points higher – both genders)
 BXD, RC4, JCP, DISC (7-9 points lower – women only)

 MLS (6-7 points lower – both genders)

 BRF (9-13 points higher – both genders)

 Somewhat reduced variability


 Separate norms are needed
MMPI-3 Manuals and User’s Guides
MMPI-3 Manuals

 Administration, Scoring and Interpretation


◼ Similar to MMPI-2-RF
◼ User Qualifications
◼ Normative Sample
◼ Administration and scoring
◼ Comprehensive interpretive guidelines
◼ Case illustrations
◼ Scoring keys and T score conversions
◼ Item metrics
Manuals

 Technical Manual
◼ Test Development
◼ Reliability and SEM Data
◼ Empirical Correlates (Appendix D)
◼ Comparability with MMPI-2-RF Correlates
(Appendix E)
◼ Mental Health
◼ Medical
◼ Forensic
◼ Public Safety
MMPI-3 Manuals
 Technical Manual
◼ Test Development
◼ Reliability and SEM Data
◼ Empirical Correlates (Appendix D)
◼ Comparability with MMPI-2-RF Correlates
(Appendix E)
◼ MMPI-2-RF findings apply to MMPI-3 versions of MMPI-2-
RF scales
◼ Including:

◼ Findings from MMPI-2-RF Technical Manual (~54,000


empirical correlates)
◼ 450+ peer-reviewed publications
MMPI-3 Manuals
 Technical Manual
◼ Test Development
◼ Reliability and SEM Data
◼ Empirical Correlates (Appendix D)
◼ Comparability with MMPI-2-RF Correlates
(Appendix E)
◼ Comparison Groups (Appendix F)
◼ 20 at release
MMPI-3
Standard Comparison Groups

 MMPI-3 Normative (Men & Women)


 Outpatient, Community Mental Health Center (Men & Women)
 Outpatient, Private Practice (Men & Women)
 College Counseling Clinic (Women)
 Sexual Addiction Treatment Evaluee (Men)
 Spine Surgery Candidates (Men & Women)
 Forensic, Disability Claimant (Men & Women)
 Prison Inmate (Men)
 Sex Offender Evaluee (Men)
 Personnel Screening, Police Candidate (Combined)
 Personnel Screening, Corrections Officer (Combined)
 Personnel Screening, Dispatcher Candidate (Combined)
 College Student (Men & Women)

 MMPI-3 Spanish-Language Normative Sample (Men & Women)


MMPI-3 Case Illustrations

 Ms. N
 33-year-old, married, woman
 Assessed at intake for outpatient treatment

 Prior mental health treatment for depression following birth


of second child 5 years prior to current intake
 Responded well to 12 sessions of CBT plus antidepressant

 Discontinued medication within a year

 Family history of inpatient treatment for depression for both


father and older brother
MMPI-3 Case Illustrations

 Ms. N
 Reported that during the preceding 3-month period she
had begun to feel increasingly despondent and anxious
 No identifiable precipitating event

 Husband supportive, taking on increased child-care


responsibilities
 Husband insists she return for treatment – leading to
current intake
MMPI-3 Case Illustrations

 Ms. N
 Intake worker describes Ms. N as presenting with
marked sadness and depression, anhedonia, and
fatigue
 Also noted to be feeling overwhelmed, experiencing
decreased sleep, reporting difficulties with attention
and concertation, and being socially isolated
 Worker also noted Ms. N was experiencing heightened
anxiety level, excessive worry, and feeling nervous
 No thoughts about self-harm
MMPI-3 Case Illustrations

 Mr. S
 26 year old, single, man
 Presented at mental health outpatient center at the
insistence of his employer
 Referral made following co-workers’ complaints about
Mr. S’s increasingly erratic behavior during weeks
leading to the evaluation
 Intake worker reported that Mr. S’s presentation
included a very labile mood, ranging from elation to
tearfulness, pressured speech and agitation, and
difficulty maintaining attention and concentration
MMPI-3 Case Illustrations

 Mr. S
During intake interview, Mr. S. acknowledged
experiencing suicidal ideation, but denied having any
specific plans or desire to harm himself or others
 His father died by suicide 10 years prior to the
current evaluation, following ears of outpatient and
occasional inpatient treatment for “manic depression”
MMPI-3 Case Illustrations

 Mr. A
 42 tear old, divorced, man
 Assessed at intake to a crisis intervention unit

 Brought to the facility by local law enforcement,


after his father reported that Mr. A had become
paranoid and was threatening to harm family
members, whom he believed were plotting to kill
him
 Long-established diagnosis of Schizophrenia with
paranoid features
MMPI-3 Case Illustrations

 Mr. A
 Several prior hospitalizations, typically following
discontinuation of medication and resulting
exacerbation
 Unemployed most of his adult life

 Living with elderly parents

 Married for a short time during his early 20s

 Wife sought dissolution after Mr. A began showing


early signs of his mental illness
 No children
MMPI-3 Case Illustrations

 Mr. A
 At intake, described as presenting with paranoid
delusional beliefs and ppossibly responding to
internal stimuli
 Also demonstrated signs of disorganized thinking,
frequently losing his train of thought
 Speech marked by clang associations
Q&A
New Norms?
 Why was a new version of the MMPI needed?
 MMPI dates from 1940s.
 MMPI-II Revision in 1989 based on norms from
1980s.
 MMPI-II-RF used the old norms and reduced the
content and altered the structure but norms were out
of date in 2002.
 40 years on the population has changed
How do you begin to interpret the
new MMPI-III?
 Guidelines, Normative Comparison group?
 Protocol Validity
 Cannot say? Validity measures? Over-Reporting,
Under-Reporting
 Substantive scales
 Higher-Order scales?
 Clinical Scale Elevations? Specific Problems?
 Diagnostic & Treatment?

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy