Cable Sizing Calculation Compress
Cable Sizing Calculation Compress
Introduction
This article examines the sizing of electrical cables (i.e. cross-sectional area) and its
implementation in various international standards. Cable sizing methods do differ across
international standards (e.g. IEC, NEC, BS, etc) and some standards emphasise certain
things over others. However the general principles underlying any cable sizing
calculation do not change. In this article, a general methodology for sizing cables is first
presented and then the specific international standards are introduced.
The proper sizing of an electrical (load bearing) cable is important to ensure that the
cable can:
This calculation can be done individually for each power cable that needs to be sized, or
alternatively, it can be used to produce cable sizing waterfall charts for groups of cables
with similar characteristics (e.g. cables installed on ladder feeding induction motors).
General Methodology
All cable sizing methods more or less follow the same basic six step process:
1) Gathering data about the cable, its installation conditions, the load that it will
carry, etc
2) Determine the minimum cable size based on continuous current carrying
capacity
3) Determine the minimum cable size based on voltage drop considerations
4) Determine the minimum cable size based on short circuit temperature rise
5) Determine the minimum cable size based on earth fault loop impedance
6) Select the cable based on the highest of the sizes calculated in step 2, 3, 4 and 5
The first step is to collate the relevant information that is required to perform the sizing
calculation. Typically, you will need to obtain the following data:
Load Details
The characteristics of the load that the cable will supply, which includes:
Cable Construction
Installation Conditions
Current flowing through a cable generates heat through the resistive losses in the
conductors, dielectric losses through the insulation and resistive losses from current
flowing through any cable screens / shields and armouring.
The component parts that make up the cable (e.g. conductors, insulation, bedding, sheath,
armour, etc) must be capable of withstanding the temperature rise and heat emanating
from the cable. The current carrying capacity of a cable is the maximum current that can
flow continuously through a cable without damaging the cable's insulation and other
components (e.g. bedding, sheath, etc). It is sometimes also referred to as the continuous
current rating or ampacity of a cable.
Cables with larger conductor cross-sectional areas (i.e. more copper or aluminium) have
lower resistive losses and are able to dissipate the heat better than smaller cables.
Therefore a 16 mm2 cable will have a higher current carrying capacity than a 4 mm2 cable.
Table 1. Example of base current rating table (Excerpt from IEC 60364-5-52)
International standards and manufacturers of cables will quote base current ratings of
different types of cables in tables such as the one shown on the right. Each of these tables
pertain to a specific type of cable construction (e.g. copper conductor, PVC insulated,
0.6/1kV voltage grade, etc) and a base set of installation conditions (e.g. ambient
temperature, installation method, etc). It is important to note that the current ratings are
only valid for the quoted types of cables and base installation conditions.
In the absence of any guidance, the following reference based current ratings may be
used.
When the proposed installation conditions differ from the base conditions, derating (or
correction) factors can be applied to the base current ratings to obtain the actual installed
current ratings.
International standards and cable manufacturers will provide derating factors for a range
of installation conditions, for example ambient / soil temperature, grouping or bunching
of cables, soil thermal resistivity, etc. The installed current rating is calculated by
multiplying the base current rating with each of the derating factors, i.e.
For example, suppose a cable had an ambient temperature derating factor of kamb = 0.94
and a grouping derating factor of kg = 0.85, then the overall derating factor kd = 0.94x0.85
= 0.799. For a cable with a base current rating of 42A, the installed current rating would
be Ic = 0.799x42 = 33.6A.
In the absence of any guidance, the following reference derating factors may be used.
When sizing cables for non-motor loads, the upstream protective device (fuse or circuit
breaker) is typically selected to also protect the cable against damage from thermal
overload. The protective device must therefore be selected to exceed the full load current,
but not exceed the cable's installed current rating, i.e. this inequality must be met:
Where is the full load current (A)
Motors
Motors are normally protected by a separate thermal overload (TOL) relay and therefore
the upstream protective device (e.g. fuse or circuit breaker) is not required to protect the
cable against overloads. As a result, cables need only to be sized to cater for the full load
current of the motor, i.e.
Of course, if there is no separate thermal overload protection on the motor, then the
protective device needs to be taken into account as per the case for feeders above.
A cable's conductor can be seen as an impedance and therefore whenever current flows
through a cable, there will be a voltage drop across it, which can be derived by Ohm’s
Law (i.e. V = IZ). The voltage drop will depend on two things:
• Current flow through the cable – the higher the current flow, the higher the
voltage drop
• Impedance of the conductor – the larger the impedance, the higher the
voltage drop
Cable Impedances
The impedance of the cable is a function of the cable size (cross-sectional area) and the
length of the cable. Most cable manufacturers will quote a cable’s resistance and
reactance in Ω/km. The following typical cable impedances for low voltage AC and DC
single core and multicore cables can be used in the absence of any other data.
For AC systems, the method of calculating voltage drops based on load power factor is
commonly used. Full load currents are normally used, but if the load has high startup
currents (e.g. motors), then voltage drops based on starting current (and power factor if
applicable) should also be calculated.
For a DC system:
It is customary for standards (or clients) to specify maximum permissible voltage drops,
which is the highest voltage drop that is allowed across a cable. Should your cable exceed
this voltage drop, then a larger cable size should be selected.
Maximum voltage drops across a cable are specified because load consumers (e.g.
appliances) will have an input voltage tolerance range. This means that if the voltage at
the appliance is lower than its rated minimum voltage, then the appliance may not operate
correctly.
In general, most electrical equipment will operate normally at a voltage as low as 80%
nominal voltage. For example, if the nominal voltage is 230VAC, then most appliances
will run at >184VAC. Cables are typically sized for a more conservative maximum
voltage drop, in the range of 5 – 10% at full load.
It may be more convenient to calculate the maximum length of a cable for a particular
conductor size given a maximum permissible voltage drop (e.g. 5% of nominal voltage at
full load) rather than the voltage drop itself. For example, by doing this it is possible to
construct tables showing the maximum lengths corresponding to different cable sizes in
order to speed up the selection of similar type cables.
The maximum cable length that will achieve this can be calculated by re-arranging the
voltage drop equations and substituting the maximum permissible voltage drop (e.g. 5%
of 415V nominal voltage = 20.75V). For a three phase system:
For a DC system:
During a short circuit, a high amount of current can flow through a cable for a short time.
This surge in current flow causes a temperature rise within the cable. High temperatures
can trigger unwanted reactions in the cable insulation, sheath materials and other
components, which can prematurely degrade the condition of the cable. As the cross-
sectional area of the cable increases, it can dissipate higher fault currents for a given
temperature rise. Therefore, cables should be sized to withstand the largest short circuit
that it is expected to see.
The minimum cable size due to short circuit temperature rise is typically calculated with
an equation of the form:
The temperature rise constant is calculated based on the material properties of the
conductor and the initial and final conductor temperatures (see the derivation here).
Different international standards have different treatments of the temperature rise
constant, but by way of example, IEC 60364-5-54 calculates it as follows:
As a rough guide, the following temperatures are common for the different insulation
materials:
PVC 75 160
EPR 90 250
XLPE 90 250
The short circuit energy is normally chosen as the maximum short circuit that the
cable could potentially experience. However for circuits with current limiting devices
(such as HRC fuses), then the short circuit energy chosen should be the maximum
prospective let-through energy of the protective device, which can be found from
manufacturer data.
Step 5: Earth Fault Loop Impedance
Sometimes it is desirable (or necessary) to consider the earth fault loop impedance of a
circuit in the sizing of a cable. Suppose a bolted earth fault occurs between an active
conductor and earth. During such an earth fault, it is desirable that the upstream
protective device acts to interrupt the fault within a maximum disconnection time so as to
protect against any inadvertent contact to exposed live parts.
Ideally the circuit will have earth fault protection, in which case the protection will be
fast acting and well within the maximum disconnection time. The maximum
disconnection time is chosen so that a dangerous touch voltage does not persist for long
enough to cause injury or death. For most circuits, a maximum disconnection time of 5s
is sufficient, though for portable equipment and socket outlets, a faster disconnection
time is desirable (i.e. <1s and will definitely require earth fault protection).
However for circuits that do not have earth fault protection, the upstream protective
device (i.e. fuse or circuit breaker) must trip within the maximum disconnection time. In
order for the protective device to trip, the fault current due to a bolted short circuit must
exceed the value that will cause the protective device to act within the maximum
disconnection time. For example, suppose a circuit is protected by a fuse and the
maximum disconnection time is 5s, then the fault current must exceed the fuse melting
current at 5s (which can be found by cross-referencing the fuse time-current curves).
Where is the earth fault current required to trip the protective device within the
minimum disconnection time (A)
It can be seen from the equation above that the impedance of the earth fault loop must be
sufficiently low to ensure that the earth fault current can trip the upstream protection.
The earth fault loop can consist of various return paths other than the earth conductor,
including the cable armour and the static earthing connection of the facility. However for
practical reasons, the earth fault loop in this calculation consists only of the active
conductor and the earth conductor.
Assuming that the active and earth conductors have identical lengths, the earth fault loop
impedance can be calculated as follows:
and are the ac resistances of the active and earth conductors respectively
(Ω/km)
and are the reactances of the active and earth conductors respectively
(Ω/km)
The maximum earth fault loop impedance can be found by re-arranging the equation
above:
Note that the voltage V0 at the protective device is not necessarily the nominal phase to
earth voltage, but usually a lower value as it can be downstream of the main busbars. This
voltage is commonly represented by applying some factor to the nominal voltage. A
conservative value of = 0.8 can be used so that:
Worked Example
In this example, we will size a cable for a 415V, 30kW three-phase motor from the MCC
to the field.
Suppose the ambient temperature derating is 0.89 and the grouping derating for 3
bunched cables on a single layer is 0.82. The overall derating factor is 0.89 0.82 =
0.7298. Given that a 16 mm2 and 25 mm2 have base current ratings of 80A and 101A
respectively (based on Reference Method E), which cable should be selected based on
current rating considerations?
The installed current ratings for 16 mm2 and 25 mm2 is 0.7298 80A = 58.38A and
0.7298 101A = 73.71A respectively. Given that the full load current of the motor is
61A, then the installed current rating of the 16 mm2 cable is lower than the full load
current and is not suitable for continuous use with the motor. The 25 mm2 cable on the
other hand has an installed current rating that exceeds the motor full load current, and is
therefore the cable that should be selected.
Suppose a 25 mm2 cable is selected. If the maximum permissible voltage drop is 5%, is
the cable suitable for a run length of 90m?
A 25 mm2 cable has an ac resistance of 0.884 Ω/km and an ac reactance of 0.0895 Ω/km.
The voltage drop across the cable is:
The cable is operating normally at 75C and has a prospective fault capacity (I2t) of
90,000 A2s. What is the minimum size of the cable based on short circuit temperature
rise?
PVC has a limiting temperature of 160C. Using the IEC formula, the short circuit
temperature rise constant is 111.329. The minimum cable size due to short circuit
temperature rise is therefore:
In this example, we also use the fuse for earth fault protection and it needs to trip within
5s, which is at the upper end of the adiabatic period where the short circuit temperature
rise equation is still valid. Therefore, it's a good idea to also check that the cable can
withstand the short circuit temperature rise for for a 5s fault. The 80A motor fuse has a 5s
melting current of 550A. The short circuit temperature rise is thus:
Therefore, our 25 mm2 cable is still suitable for this application.
Suppose there is no special earth fault protection for the motor and a bolted single phase
to earth fault occurs at the motor terminals. Suppose that the earth conductor for our 25
mm2 cable is 10 mm2. If the maximum disconnection time is 5s, is our 90m long cable
suitable based on earth fault loop impedance?
The 80A motor fuse has a 5s melting current of 550A. The ac resistances of the active
and earth conductors are 0.884 Ω/km and 2.33 Ω/km) respectively. The reactances of the
active and earth conductors are 0.0895 Ω/km and 0.0967 Ω/km) respectively.
The cable run is 90m and the maximum length allowed is 108m, therefore our cable is
suitable based on earth fault loop impedance. In fact, our 25 mm2 cable has passed all the
tests and is the size that should be selected.
Waterfall Charts
Sometimes it is convenient to group together similar types of cables (for example, 415V
PVC motor cables installed on cable ladder) so that instead of having to go through the
laborious exercise of sizing each cable separately, one can select a cable from a pre-
calculated chart.
These charts are often called "waterfall charts" and typically show a list of load ratings
and the maximum of length of cable permissible for each cable size. Where a particular
cable size fails to meet the requirements for current carrying capacity or short circuit
temperature rise, it is blacked out on the chart (i.e. meaning that you can't choose it).
Preparing a waterfall chart is common practice when having to size many like cables and
substantially cuts down the time required for cable selection.
International Standards
IEC
IEC 60364-5-52 (2009) "Electrical installations in buildings - Part 5-52: Selection and
erection of electrical equipment - Wiring systems" is the IEC standard governing cable
sizing.
NEC
NFPA 70 (2011) "National Electricity Code" is the equivalent standard for IEC 60364 in
North America and includes a section covering cable sizing in Article 300.
BS
AS/NZS