BeFORe THe R CauNCIL OF Te STATE OF

KERALA

he
Ducplnan; mmce b h a r Coun Ca
of the sla
Kercla
Cae No 23

BTLECN
e. N RATU

AND

MotAN LAL

Com PLAtNT- The om platnant alles ed hat lka

responden
ad voca sUkead ar up a ca relala molr Vekhu

ACeNdet and lalu did ndr

Puaua h CA

NOTI CE Upon a complaint s y K ComplamamF vida

cCR
nO *3, a nóhita as scued the
respondt, along ilh

comPlant coP, asRAm im

dLEprave the
alegain mada o
Aim
b Cormplanant be fore the
diipanany CommCllee.

RepLy To NUTICE The respondent acuoCal did nt respond Ca he

notie.

ract d h e cac Accerdnq the Complanant, he met uik

a n a c c d emt on a higha and aj ( acCaden, he as

under-gem rearment in a hosptal Meanuhle, K responden

advoce * a leffer ke Cnplainant 4 Hng har he l bie

a Cak for Compeniahion ond wll charge 107. h e Compencuiam

b e Lwardad as his eec and d render all egal assctlane

Therea Complanant enrus ed

his caK & e respondent

aduocat The Complainantlai ca

knou ha
no peHhion
in he Cout.
on behalb d Complahant
a
led
 SE t) * r ihe
espondent aduocokaiicid
aant e hi cae.
t) *her e
e n e faleá le ih a before h
vehati bural
1ote
a rens the nleest
Paper tom
tpi a

orde b oncumer Dspula rdreual forum twhe*e

o * * e mad cgainut e apond e t is the tnes: in

oBS ERVATiDN.
R NATION Bcitd on ha c Cumeantes ond alco on i orte

a m e Dp Redrawd fonum, where observakone hare ean

mad aaist * pe demt hi Compencation the Complainant,

te
Dre-plo C ie h apondet guitG potelonad
rtondunt

ADER T h e Dteeplnay Cnitke j K Ber unca db India

found het
*pendent adue cau otc
mon om the
Complanank
Pr< cb 9 ca a d n o ca lali bA by thc
ondent advo c a t . The DikT CammlRa held te ponden

adueCal gl rotesion m i i tendiust ond debered him om

Pr ach bete a ourt tor a Peno° a*

2o
 Be FoRE TUE BAR CoUNCIL OF THE
STnTE CF RAJP STHAN

he
Pnc Commillee cb te Par Couna of the slaT d

Regastha
Cee No 36

BeTWCC
BRAJENORA NATH BHARGAVA

AND

RAm CHANDR A KASLOL G OTHGRRS

ComLANT A Coplaint a bd aqaint Fe respondent aclvocat

or
theyplay on ocve pa n a uat
ProperEoner
G e ame c i relah bPa e Contiaeration d (heir

on, uha refpr c e n t n a te land lord .

NOTICO T Bar Couna on ha The cona aduccatu

' Violahan Ruu 12,o Clale har on agwocal shalnat

dar or indaect Dud

NoH The advoee: Grds Rar a proper a purchesed

by kis bemay membert out their o u fund.

rocr a he Cace The Cemplanan heppened b e a lenat

SheT oem * a n d ord fled O i an w Tor orarc Ent

od portetsi em A n d crd renk dut was bied by The landlord,

re a bk o ropondlent qainet the c o p i a n a n t . Therc a b i r ,

h a t e respondent q e shas room anslemd in

hi name

ssUES : - 0 ) hether e Ppeutone ouocat acaa in (haur personal

whtlu wak c l e t fult.

nere. deolna
(29 whether hit ConchGls probe ssional mltcondauak.
 adwocal le On
evid-rre hat he
oduntal o.d in *

p e n e na inlewit,

roe d te
to *nbert
c the
oduotal i s t ieg o rik.
OBStRATiON
CX**NATION

Ponde.nt here admllad ho tte

a 4 ir thH imati owm,

S nd hur ba ngd as an dvocst fr ia o r r

plaim" rd a'o e foeb Hia (Fe propet aHon un ea

ta
bytne fore saidl feny membem, but Ky Canfandad thot

aan turd.
purchaa out d h

e ant ie
Te diiuP&na
Cammta eld ha
repormci
CRDE Ri
ild
prob*eidnod
cconduek and
3ave an order pera
3uA
Pa*ent Coc quanibd aRe. 30o|-
p"mana and a
 BEFoRe TH CoUNL Or OeLH1

the
DiscAplnar Conmlec d he Bar
Gouna Deh
Cuil APpea no', 2G97 2638

5GTwCC

O.N MAHINDROO

AND

THC DiSTRICT JUpGE DGLH1 & OTHCRS

bm pLAINT. A
ComPlaint wai
bilad gansr h e odwocalu trr

muhlahm he oCumen[k
Cb Casele.
NOTIC. A n&tfce ei ent G e adwocau Bar CaunCAI
by E'an"a
that Tke a d ocaa had mun lacid
mportark docuumenli d k cos

bWle fov whith he ic puANtha.blu under

Adwo Gae Ack, i96
PLY T C NOTee The ppelam adwoca rplid har he

moda peihon aqaist the Dismct Jud8 about his miccondauch

and in
Kepmg mind, the Judqe creaka hes
tale allegalion.
RITTCN STATEmCNT In he rttlan slalument, a complant u a s

l a d again the adwoab. for mutilaknq the importak docunen

aCa« l a , tor ch te malr s nporlua o the Dishtt

Ja

kacl of the Cece : - Sarin, eadent dy Dethi, bad angnl a g r e

Ccch the daughte Ramlal Hent for B.A. Afce parsong, Sartn
ave a qa nottca G Ramiai Hans for he pagmen R, ,370 as

reuard for Ku Ramlal

aqrerd Succev ker daughl. Hant Arc
denced and lalur ogned o give K. 1ooG in tavor dy Sarin.

Immediatg. he alleged that Ihe appeliant muilera the impofan

documenlt y i Can ble ond he picked up the orn piecet from K ground.
the melTes was repord o the Dcmc Judge.
 ICcur-(1) uhe Iher ha oprellart ardvecala ulelarns h aa

io meni

ARGUmGNT An A"guwnent hehwean the r.li kes c t d crc

Adueca stalzs a t he adoca muilafid t a r fi do**

Were F
veyporlant ad BcI slats tFar ie i Le f

vID on PecEr O ate 5ec wee submul a

D i G i e y commillea ds an eviderce.
ObsevvaHoy

ExA TIONIAOE 6nm NATIONDunng enincion, te appciart

hr he
ad cab Carandes preuioury mada
pekkiom aqaintt th Dun et

Td abeut u micco ndau and kep t in mnd, the Judg

Cceu These
bo aHlgO

T h e Dicptnar Comifa did nt beliun Ke Conlënkion d

aawoo and ProCEAda4 c9aAtC b ddwo C pcr a orde tor

te removal d ha o me tem K« roile

 BEFORE THEBAR CoUNSIC OF TNDIA

The
OspLner Commtttee ob t e Bar coun a In dia
Case NO T64

Srnt. T E SH PRADH AN

AND

S ARVEsH GUPTA

Com pLAlNT: A Complaint wes l e d cqaint Fe appellant

aAvoCe Tor
reclng maner frorn (f complainanF a r d lan
nde
ce Pho aphE He
ormplainant o n h he would
mar
her

NOTICE: Noce ucs Cerd upon him G aPpear be före he

te
plcnen commcta on
*pee de.

KapLy To NOTICcC- M. sarve ch ápa, res

pondenE Submcttad his
rp deny he
allegatien made
egainst him ard submTed in
he
replp
ces
neerer
Councel, niher hca aken
ant mon from b,

FACTS OF THE CASE The omplainamt had eng d Hr: Saruesh

Gupa for frln Suut In (ke Cout on

hed
behal her. for which he
Taren
an aus the
Com plaiam on
blao
aken
pepers nd alc
decethu Re. So,0oo|- rom her, The
espondent advocab had
takco mdecent
phographs db h
Complainent 2ang har ke wuld
hes. Ana
mem e demandad Re.
a.50.coo- tom he Conpl ainant amd
hreelened her she Couldrt im
man he ould
publth
e
phsto in
ncw Pape no ouia
com he
Carnplainamt.
 TssuES () heher te
conplainamb the
her Counsel.
ngaged responae
t 2) heher omplainam Gmd
respondemt Toct photos.
whe Iker te
a
compaint s main tainable
EvIDGNC reaord As
F frsk issue, Hhe
comp lainar Pia
the Vakalafnama sproe ha she had
aduocatz as her counel.
engod the
repo
As
regerx he Sccond iesu
o akng phaos , he Complana
plece Pho slake copes Othe
phoographs wK he espoc
whc os te
Conduct d he cc &
rupondent wdR K complun am
and
phes o Cpies te
phstsqrapht placad ords. are n

ITNESs phetosfa copes a phatographs which shows ack dA

Can dunc d he
respend ent Cenci dered as winess.
observatio
ExamiNATiON CRoss exAm1NAT ON Mr. Servesh Gup in us
agan he allegahems 1aid that he 2c ever e coun e nOT
he oek
ant d nerom r.

ORDCR The Cornmlfee is o (Re vlw that (k

Cormplainant has
bu
Preves Compher laint that ke
respondent has
Com tIL poba«tloma
mis Gonduut.
Kul 24 the Bci nudes in chaple T, Part s t a s that an adueea
shad ndt do anyhng- shereh he abues or aks advanlage a the

bdenca repoks in him br the clent.

The
respo ndent ecwoca held
aud dr mic Cornduu and
suspemded
raPperrod d 2yeers wder Secien 35 (3) C¢) the aduoeai
Ac 96I al so (oshs dr
and
impesd K lo,ooo out a which
Re.5,coo-
has 6 e paid K Complainamt amd remainmg Rs. 5,0co1- shall be
poid the Aduoee t arr und Bar counca d Tndia.
BeroRG te
SR Cot NCIL of THo_ STATC
OF
UTTAR_ PRa DE SH

The
Dispuma Conm(llu d (he Par CounU GF e slal
O UEar pradeih

8GTGGN
ROHTAS SINAH

AND

comm)
SsioNR, AGRA DIISION.

CompLAINT:-A Compait was bld aqaintt te oppelant for

taknP K cases d citent, bumg am adwo ea for k sl

overnmenE.

NOTI CE A nóhiL as hven by he Commi csfomr s t a R

har t adbca as ialz aduocar and

a
qvenmeE bn
so, he uphela e canu in K Caurt and Bha ppelaE

is 3uy onlemp d Cou

RITTENSTATEmeNT Jn a wrTlen slalement, ke Conplaint uuas

for Cae d he ient

R1e against e aPpelant lakna p

bing on
advo Colu
For sla 2oemment.

Te appellant adaro cai

wat
ppoml~d
ACTS OF r CASe
So as Ehe
ar an advoaa on
behally o he slaz ovmmnt. ong
in e Oytea y he Advocal Generat
acwo ca
ls oninuing
ukar Prederh. Key Cannd ond shoauld nd chang Sida by °Ppea

and d e n d n g Conlem n o u , u e h is forbidden by law. In h i inslänt

shich is
aare, Fe advoca. hat aken uP t
cate s cWent, a

Conlenpt dcout.
Iurt 9Cn pp«llant acvo ca acd for ohe
ove nnent.

(2 Ooe hic GnEnuG

onltpt oy Curt.

ARG * agumen ls hat he advoca hai ta

T
cae dr a cat, u i isa
Conlompt do Coust.

EvIDo Nce The

P Ther
odwocel afrear on
beg *
caces oewnE
ovrnment is an wldenu thi Cak
obseruaEon
EXAmATON ROG XAmINAriON On queHon, Sn ****
addressd he cowt pleadm his tnkHement aPp ana o**

Ks Conlempt ond n
Suppoft o his
pleadm*, e Fiea on
v
for d o Y PRBI d all ConlempE cares n ha "

thus. he ic l g ad enti led G deend he present Canlmner

copeci
oC As e r t e provistons d cPe, once a counrel is e n a a a

tor sa, shall Cconhnuu

t h mmain alkod n for h
sra
unH A engagament deerm ned by he
duemE
 BcFOR E TuBAR COUNCIL oF TDA

The S p u nany omre G Le Bar counul Induo

CiMI apPta No 5o99

BoTWeN
Jn1pURVIKAs PRA DHI K RN

AND

AsHOR KOmAR CHoUD AY OTHCRE

CompLaiNT A Conplaint wc ralad on he appelant aalvoa tor

ConAC ak P°PE

soid he
NOTICE The ar
Counu Jndia ha aleaanonr were

not provd and hene dud n Pat an nshe & punih the advo cala.

wRITTGN STATE E NT k Cemplanant was nst i d w e omplaint

and he did nar PPear om court on behab o the Cornplainanb.

FacTs o F T R E CAE The r e s p o n d e n . Achok Kumar was nand

b y Me Coplainant nd cases |endang dobyerenb Cout

oy Taiur. The pondet we engaa dehend Tapur Vaka: Predikan

and hir a l f e n t m e land Ocquiscto ac cases. The fa amount

a enhancaa by n *a amoun Rs. Goo per m o n , buuk thee

nhr
oPpere
no Ttaa he rstlen staliment an
behal
respondenE
not intoma the Complainant.
Complainant.
T
The
same a t
te omplainant
UUimarel te land anqucehom a
a deCeoa
agoinct
nd on ausard Ks. 25 rores a anNONaA bhe Court

LSsuEs : 0) Lwhelher (Fe odwocal uas prolassion al

 ARGUe e ar3*t a lhat (F upondent a
1 a o " t lalkrnunt and alto he dd ro al

dma
Cas hc
a ripundent Cnrenien
pro*****
mig Condauet,

d voce dd nuE bile a wrifen taliment and he dd n Ppa"

the Cout on b h o l K tunplaanant.

ODeTva10
ExA o T C o i - GxamNATION The adwo c a did rdr b

a p* Cmploik, ror pro dutad any widerc p *

thc alegchm a rong.

oRDE The daeerlmart omm e s Bor couna sra

dispoe s Complain recevnd wder sechon 35 T d o

ana In eadn caR he Proteedn4 halle Cuncludud ehm apOA

o one a r rom he de o rept of Corrplaint or e da

slar Bar
iniiaion d be
poceedngs a he inst nea d te
Courc
os (e co« may be, Pailng sheth uech protesding' shall si nd

transemd he Bar Couril d Tndia ACh ma* dspoi< E

Same as ib were a Procedg uaaum fornqu wnder

Sckon 36.
Sub- Sechion (a) }

The present Case, due niranon d one aar, a t ran "bea

Blar CzuncA India from the B r Counc Rajathan. The BcI aial

tha he allegaiom a e ndt proved amd hunce, did ndt Pas any orde

PaNL E h n t adwecal.
B&FORe SR CUNEL OF TNDIA

The Dispna commclea of Ihe counal oy

Bar Inua

BeTsc
NARAIN PANDEY

and

PaNNALAL PaNDCY

CompLANT The applank f a amplaist again& ke

respond ent, on aavo ca praeiEn In Tahsct yarpu, allag a

he la invshved in a number fal cars by forgm and

f a b i cai documen incudsn teke memt doLume akout

the noNLa pafire,

A notie e s issued he epondenE Fa heas

NoTCG
e Cois toa and fabicakrg

documenl. The dispnar Commclie saTa h Comml

i debam him o m praeta for a period t **ars.

The ed a en siaEment
p he Not rponden
Bhe ntice amd dened e allegahons mede in ke name d

Camplaint Rted ogainft hinm. He se up a P l e a hat h Corplaint

ild aqaunst hum 1s du oenmi.

Ke
aes Case- Te
e Ppe llant Hd oplaint agan
in Tehal Gyanpur kfe I Bar
reopendent, an
adwocnpreeticna
counn Ukar preadesh. Te omplainant alle har besides

he cates dt olRer people in Re cas R cormplainank also

Loilkouk Ris knosleda and oher co- Khare dar , the pondent
 ie a
Comproe deea
forg ng and fabri caingr
SignaliS Ond obaana orclere from (Ke Consaud ahon
o

Lssuas 0) helhe he
responcdent cduoca. a a
co"Pr
ded hout he
knouwldia of Comp lanant.

ARGUMENT Hn
arAment wac
belwen Bhe
apellant and the

responant he pondeat hes

ues
PreviousPrhestenamiccanda
inoo In
v scrioAs
powona mlscendut ond ago a

hum ber " gC cases.

EviDENC The
Complai nanE Rled on
alhidawt ih
ppost oy
the
Compant led ond in he Course
nqu xaminea em
wimeit. The
Complainant also
prodmtud doumtn[ uidence.
Svatio
Examinanon DES- Examination The respond ent led a oun
.

sfal man s Compla ad denkdthe alle2aHone ane n *

Complaint Rboua *he respondent kled a uNTTen sl imerk, e neiher

erudor Croc- xaminahey ner lek any eidence ln kuppot d

rep

ORDER he Dipipenar m l , havn gard e regponden

PreviousProerona miscondu and upon ndang hak he we inudtved

in a enous
venr proeuional mis
Conduua, pasiad an order
debemine
hin from pradlce for a
penbd o 7
ar.
 n

BE FORG_ o R_UUtL of tw1

The
Dipo"e Comm-ll d te Bor aunil

BOTuE EN

VIRG NORA KumR

Ap

THG
C A ,vIECPLINARY Comm TICE

Carnplain: The Delk Go counu suo matissu a n

Mr. Virnaro kuna A o o ca ot uh Cann pra taa

ndt De canceled ac a he hme when he aPpl for enrdlmn

the Bar coun ul.

NOFa h e B a Couna o D e l h iscud a nstce Vorend ra

Kuma ha e chould
pot duy Immediaiy. but he did n r
joon beeau he had enslld alnady n Ike neme c d o ca

The bar Coun s saLd thar it e old n d J o the d u y h e n h

should be Canceld,
licene procic

Reply G N i c e : Mr. Verendra Kumar rquead n Ri npy her

h d Leanee Praeue should n o be cancelled,

Vrendro kumar jomd

O dhe Cae Mr.
arm ac a n

He Sutfaand He
Emergenu Commioned 6bt'e. wor
inju. uat

releaud fom he amy , haumq been placud in permanent la

hi ndea,he anrolla ii hame advoca

mecui cal calaqon At a an

R Bar Caunc dr India. L e r , Ike Arm* Commiitiom reuokud hi

releaie and Commistian cd rpot d Buk Virendra umar did

jotn
 Isue ( ) ehEr
M. VYndro
Kum Kumor
a r Conceal ed the i n f o n a a
tha he woed for he Concec
Arm ana q* leaA

(2) Jheher hee omealmar amOuntt

proeeion amio nduue.
Arguemne in hee
Case, the argument as behween he D

Councal d Dc ana
Virendro
kumar thak he
Concaal
'informahon arThe
Bar Councl (hat he workd fo (k
myG
g releat ed

Evidence The Ppcahon ilud by Verendra Kumar duum

enrullment as Cn adwocal does no mention any informafi o o *

havma Seviee in he múli tony. Thit serve as an widence.

oloservabio
Exorninahon ce-Examinahionmi Vendra Kumar subm(ilad

on plenakion ha a t redeae, he did n t epot d u . Ihoug

demanded be in Maib servte and thet e had been awarud

di sciplanan achom cgaine his Conduuct ,ccordng M l a n y rules.

The Bc e on order slaHng tha as o Servtces

ORDGR
M. Vrendra Kumar ee res tored by F Arm. he e rd Capele

oewecalio.
mu 6nceut Praet as an
 aG TH DCP ACY Com TTeG OP AR CO
I~DIA

Roesh Dutt e APPdlant

Surendra Guplä Kepgndent

K*

pmplaint omplainant alcquc hat a

pocF card ua
PPeAlaN
aduoC«u in hir oun hand wrthng puna7
a LbtgarE
and na hat d l o / . Shall be chargd for a cak
4cal

k addehion o claimc Tnbunal.

e fore

NHe TeAllen nátia hee ben c e a upon R adue

eppea be fore he commelL on specba oia

hat he
Kp od
n
rp nsti«,, Fe adwoce
all*gad
ndt O proiemd
s u micconduet
The Complainent in thie caca alla that
Fods Ob ee
ent aduvocat in ha oan
pot ard s
o * br oepetlant
hand rt" Pu*7 al and
ini ial F a T
e l o . shalt
the adduRona clain Tibunal. lo
be Char1a for a
co be fore
t h e hune dy he
Cae iHgant need
ant he'p Rs. 10, coo same

wdl be inended him and he was as ked G see F apptcant aduo caln.

raming y Iues
)whe FRer Ie appellant alvo calu
rd a
post card [ke cigant
he lems.
"Oposing his service as an advocat on
pecAHLd

work and
whether Ke act ay advoce anount
sd aion d
miscendiuet.
onsequerproessi ona
 No evidnte was
Evidan made out
againt tk o CA
cberva h a r s nt
appe
1s advs chi
for omm (l

cnuio" ppe"7 sagis Oum

F
diupnar
mfanson G hand T
ciall hen tw malee ls rdalid
p har Proteesiona misundaat

ORDR

The diPn Osla. Bar Counea decided ke ssue in

amahue and
intea R
Punighmt 4 Suupunslon for
h pero"
yas Cn
aPpea, e
diplianany Commat Bar counul n d a
tha te sai dar councl
oght G Snd IR
dispulia donet
for IF oPonion o
ad-rtn tpst. As no eutden uas made out

qaint he
pped nt aduwo ca,iF ues
hudd hat adve cat ac nor

9u r Probessional mu conduet.

Henca h
o-ppta uasloud and order
oy ( cla Bar Count
***SquOg hu.