BSMAt

Po

NTRODOLTION

BASIC QueSTLONS

I KemMedy y+pe CLVIL CRIMUNAL

2 Oheoe SURISDICLONJ
3 Ohen 2 LfraLLion

slal2a DiSPUIE UTIG ATON

Confiict e Legal eecourse

interes takeh hy duptte

CLASSR00M| Tdentity fhe slides pe

ACTIViry odispul and 8099es Yemedies

* uDE 1 Matimonfal Diapute

LADE 2 InvolvnG a culd

Remedies Resthuhon o_onjupal Rigiut Jud fetal

ÅepastaTl on Divorce MainlEnance
Counsellng
Custbdy s tue_clufld

SuDE 3 mblems uth pati'tion

SuDE DivLSLOD o family_aReiz
akte

SuDE S family_1alheritance Onegual

di'sti butfon
Rense dl 6uit for euitalole dfshibution
Mtaksuata Jao _patitton by
ather uauLd be au and_e4uitible )
 a

SDe 6 Dispute w tenant landlord

lenanthanls plumbing ed
kandlord days he Lan' contactu a
do
oblgated to
lenant Pant s lateagain
Landlord Evicts tenant

Remcdy- TLnantcan ue for breach o_Conkat.

Couut NWst decide_ based on the Autal
CQyee nMeNt.

LOhere these a Higul, thee uesa stnal.

tCAGE STODY Onegual dism bufton o nheaulande o

dauguter adoptÉd 'dauglutea

Tocheck 1g adopton valid

HasadoptoN_been 9egistered_
propetty de ocgultedor
anceAlaL

Nhile _dro fting a plain, it k mperahye o

Nenttononly mattnal fac_those doct
whik
Hetevanat to tue dispute)

RegLue menf p a sulhcien cauue o acho

bOMaiole caude

Co can e
delay-_discreHonay pou
 Poga

nda civi (aw , d o cumenlaty cvidencehold More

atue fhan nalcvdenceeyeitnessOs

1, DEEINITIONS

n plgint allcLedies must be tEattd in

acliejt_Compensation/camaqe
inteucst. You Lan add aD alttmahive
CsWtll Cox)
WATCHL XLiLOL MDney 01 he atcla

Locus SHand ANnor can be Lepezeuted b he

quiadian CPC_permik L

Dispute -_c0nflct_e inteest -(intingement_sfout_

whicl leada to ilng_a lawáLdE_
BLKKS LAL DCLONARY

nder Ssuance 4 notce is

pardiculaslagnlcasCs
Mandatomy befpie fiing e&u (9: Con8umea
AS pe CPCuuditáoy s thecépete auttuor

dtuwhatcicumslances doesa Colice becoES

di's putc - Cer tninntensrttt_1Laied 2 (NoP
ds pule npon laU or.
PoinE
Rpolith.ca dispute
leqatity
helhc 4ispuie 1Wo]vei
coLtie setetett
A di'spult a disegretment on potnt
Potnt
Lauw Jact, a contct "gal vw's
Po
OY fnttreats blu per6on6

GREECE V BRITALN
Mavoamats Palcstine.Conccssiens (PCLI)1124

Mcanina0 f di'spute explained dispuh

whicA_involve the dettminathon o dil algs
Heatuangument NoT a prr Atguiutte
eu a case
As6iGNIMENT 1 Bief nb onthe
mpor+anLe opLd

Trocedusal iaw lor adjechre lau stablshes

He aults i h CouutBystem4 and hou he
busingss he Cout is onducted- uck
Sules on ur'sdfthon
p- Mal pleadila,
admi'ssiol oevdence,
cehowwifhaz aue
uutbntd Lcro5s- examfned hou abecto
ae haisd and handled
apptal exeutiau
Judgntnz andALprezentaton by counsels.

ProLedukal athu pu f ntp +n substanfiv

au and uplemenK the Maxtm vbi [uihi
semzdivn Lohtre fre ts a gut, tere a
ntMdy). nLiterYaly nor takes awa4
a a u t Thtrefpre it u uportant_ to
enfoce Aubstante LaueHtck nty, p
tH ct J RAM MANDHARLALy NATIDNAL
BoycD INGMATERIAL PPLY (969) 1 SCC 269
 By establishung ula 9overnance Macuntry /
lcgal poccdurd proceduallau ensws
Jamciand fushèe.

22 FASM,
n Mavemaitmam disput was abut Theafe a
Laniching anceLbu fhe aupply ey uaIEA
as wu aL tlhe Aelaled
CLavau &_peLLAtal dovuetauty pu Palzhne
w n g h e 1ader - war_224Loc2.

Th Twih pLople _dekihe te establish

LAtien n tis hostile Me22U Ae
ord210@uiea_bath wal ud cleezLeig

DplZs Led to 3 M-P cenceLons Cadu

 elassAte
Data
Paga

SUBSTANTVÉ LAuw-
dehnu the suela tionsluip_lo the paties&
deals_wita otgus duthis &labllitis..
Ehtacy oubstanive lau dependk
La apocadual
ROCEDuRAL CA
goyinserns thepmcess ltpaton
s a Mtthod to_octatve- euigus
jushiCe
&_aid
TtLauws douon the ules do beolloudtd by

CPC To en force civi ighk SeMedies

Ciil_Couuts thloughu
V

The Najor Concem oLau 6 Conuct aesoluton

Procedual LauS aLe nportantor
enorc fplemeuin4
Righ L remedues providedin_
Aubs tantal Lau

CoDE A systematc_colle chion otaluts

body o Lauws80 aulanged_as to
bo dy o
avofd inconeis teny
DVertappi
 SSMALe.
Dat
Page
417122
s11122

whether nevance ord tk wed inCPC 7

No The uoid uwed i cause oaction.

CPC has 158 e.ckions

Contain Ode_and_ules
Section? 2ubstan Rre in naue but allo lay
doon he genal DLLLleA procedure

OBTECZVE Oe CP o n 30lidate &amend

Collect statutory aLDOk
9elaHng to pas tular lubjecla
To bring t up to date

FEATURCS DE CP PRegutatng access lo cout &_

uetice
Ensurng salmess ePC
Matntafning p r d y
fechve prDLesS
Acheiving just effective
0utcoms

LIEBACK MCDONALD'S_ResTAURANTS

NM Pist Aug 18 11GY_

FACTS 1 y/p
SeuaLecback thyouah
at McDonald's daive thyough,
N
and dopped coffte on her ap_ohichga ve her her
uird degiee busin ldeepe ssue busn> 67 0 skin_
dhe atpdred uLtiple Augeries & SkinraJS
lnse buRuA CM 6/.
RAYER Rtoy Hdial bils
Cempen.oton r Mtntal a
Lest tttgarien..

ARCUNENTS (ToRTS)
Naaunce dttchiie pzoduc ánct iobit
SRch impiid aiLanty ASsum ptlon a

iSTORYQF CPC-
fere this Code s htrewas a Code in 857.
B r 651, nopaHculas CPC preLut iomu-
ia poLOCEdue ltowea
559 CPC f ailanged ncompieteL
unsystenatc
677 CPC DEfecls ameKded 332 CPC

Tn prsut Code o 120s th_amenime

in 1916 L 2002 *

ESSGNTIALS ARTLES Legal 7 Platnt

OF A Persen Defecaut
CIVIL
5OLT Los 8taud

Whee J0RiSDICTLON

When7 LiMITATLON
CAUSE OF
AcnoN Hou 7
_Reue¬F
 assmte
Date
Page

Note LunaCY Mentally PAetaided

IDIOCY Inabfllty to communfcate

STAGES OF A CVIL SoIT

NOTCE when MandatDA)

2NS1ITUTION OF THE SoIT

3)TssUE OFSOMMONS
FlLuNG OF RLTTEN S7ATEMENT
S)fRAMING OF TssueS

6) TRIAL PEvtdence given by paguttes

Exanfnatton în-_ Cuief
Cros6 exaulat?on
MaaLing Q Documents

1) ARGUMENTS

e JUpaGMENT

)APPEAL, REVslonN REVIEUD

o) ExECU TLOAN
 Pog
Jy

INICRPRL1nnON OF PROCEDURAL LA

SOKHBIRSINaH ORS . BRIJ PAL dINAH LORS

&tt fo pectfhe ptfovnante)AIR 1916SC o
ACTS

Pltading that despilz 9cadtness L Tngues

had dkotded to ue potoptil.
DespleserLalegueslsthe defendant_-falead t
Lxeeutthe ale deed in 7he plainhfs
4favour.
The dlefen.dant Intentionally Avoided to extule.
The

The_plaintiffs effors tohare the_popu

Atconkeyned alled
ARCUMNTS OE DEFENDANT -

The defen danE agreed to have LXCuted an

cgreemCut o9 con veyance
Althoug they wereAeady,i
itWa Couteudd
ttat he_Alaiuhfs did nothave u
MLau lo pat

PROCEDORAL tiSToR

Tial Coat dfsmessed the 8uit ho ldPn

tat
the
plamti ailed to_pove that wee
the w ae

wlungtopay
 JeSmate
peg

On appcal to the Addl Disict Jodge allowed

and deUced tne &uit

s c o n d appeal to HC the
disfssed and 8uut uDO deeed

SuPREMÉ CoORT IssuES

S hther thePlainktf is nsguised to 3uo 2

Capacit4before e Colt

Legal SUBSTANTVE_CAUD SRA1963

Povfsuens RoceDURALCA S 1_C C o
Only en prces_Rib6: laud. CRA

Whtre a onbraut 1nvolves payment e mony2t is

not esstutaal forthe plafunp o actually tender
to the deftndant 6r to alepo guEn_eoeet any-
Nonty
xcapr hen 80 aurected by the Cout

Plainhf MU9 aver pefommance ofseadiukss and

yPufngness topes fom the conmact

INTCRPRETATON

The Lauw nvt_indoubt and it ie not

Condih'on thathe platnt slould have
HOdy ca wffh eMA

The fact that thty atteud ed ne ub Regsaa's

iceto executte Lale deed 1& a post ffve
 Date
Pag-

tact to pooVe hat they had neccsSaty

un ds to on conalderaton, and
pas
had he money ntededforpayme nE
Suficienr_er platnh D utabtist
that They had the CAPACITY +opay ue
&ale cousi duaton

neCChecc S5anyto auoays Cay Money witt

htm m the dateo &u to ale dole o

HeLD-

The peHtton_alas dls?ssedhoidinghat e

louutsbelou haveappopnutel ererccsed
tere ds caetton

AssLUNMENT 2 CDuL: 25/07/2

W h a t a e he ofher issuLAwhich ca be_ rameal
the luat 7

:) f fhe Respondent,due to unprdesn_arcumsanca

Jailedto attend before the &ub-Regisaas pie
DDthe &peccday is it a ngavejact-
topp Ve ueir pleacding s
Mete pre& en te at dub Regrsraa's
fce
Äupiientto provehe Mtenhtonand caprc
thepasky DiscuLss
 lasste
Date
(
18 ASsignmen 2
IssVESWtuct CowRr CovLD hAVE FRAMED

wheher naadinesswtlingncss has been Blhoon by

the Respondent thtougluout up to hedateq deisee
(at_alu hmes)7

REASON AsAs per_honathinayagam Pllat v. alanisuwami

Nadas (67) | SCR 227 / apaaty clalms
a decaeeorApaiftperJomualce, kt ruust establirla
fat it_was gmce fue date q the Ceuldact onkhuo
cad and wilng to prfomm patE y the ontact

The Judicial Conmmltee o he Rivy lounet_n

Ardeshlr MaMa . Aora danaon (129) SU OnlinePc 43
htld the u c poaty uut pove cophinvaus Meadfues
and illneness, fion the date q coutract ohe
fMC htaning
BWhtues the COnduct Rsponden
unblenushed 7

KEASON t is Necessay tuat the Paaulyoho

seeks Speaife_ perfomance s conduct
be exaniued Suckpasty's Conduct in
to uyfU ue couract uows
attephiM
NDOyealng fnteu HoL o uauting to pejonm
his capaty to perjom &uouldn't be_ dovbted.
his has been ueld In a gueceut Case_(kre
Ranlatua
preseut446 Case) i n Antglase Yohannan V:
2005) 1 SCC 534
 dssMat
Date
( Paga-

s 8Whetker the feoneoels_presONphon alltgatio

he
t e Res pondentk tncapaalu o pou
Consideatiou n the precent case ud
allegattou o blacknail sotgall
n d lahny
KEASON Athough io pasagraph 2 o he udgeintut
he fu dpe meutous thegeallegahou
Nade by he ittoners_no viden.ce haz bec
cittd oComoborcuLCe the daMe Ctn coutrast o
idence &ubnuited by Respondent> paper No: 4 A
Asper_basic pñnckpleso eyfdence Rau, the past
ho allegs alact_assuts the 4imatve and
hence ha he buideu to pove he LaMe_Negahve
Jatls cannot_be _proyedd ktnce tley ase deuted to
haye ever_ocumd he Pehitioners have seiply
Stated that fhey were wfling o sipy
peroma_añd
hat Hhe Respondenb stdn'thave Rs 47, 600/- o
be paidwitk no sound bacfng exidence
the Respondenk failed o alleud e deub-
AnsKegistrasus4ice 1t would ndeed be a
negative Jait, &fnce atgattve eaumat be peved
ed peh epa Satalhi, "Histbnical Bacgrouue ndiau
Eriden ce Act, 1812(1972) Joumal a u -jstor/
Acditonally auch ahsence wald be cousidered avsdakce
ttowever,such absencew not negakvely
m pa ct the' Res pondeh t" Case f "
O Respondent adduces poo0 the
he eyma
9eJuesg" ko execcuke tue l e de ed made ky uer
 Respode nt ale6o prove thotobsenteab
SRO due to onfbrseen ciunutanceg, and
ÁLuth absence hould not be habitual.

h e abovesaid we proven absence at SkO _ald

not be a negutve ac 1n the pleadings Thise
WOuld ghoo theCourt 1het u Responcdent Nas
WEtA to perfom h past of tne Contraut

Ahovgh Mere prsence at the SRO indlcates

the
patys Lingucss and: Capai to perfoma
h obl'gautuons Hae couttact,an 1ndisputable
PoD o6uch prcuence is egpuall iMportat In
hepresent Cae too, poudent provlded an SR's
endorsemeul" lpaper no: ai/cI to tuow porene
at SRO

Even h ttakim Stngh V. Ram anehi A Ors (204

HMAu/oP/ol68tt wa held mat non-apptakae
the dats nottes to extule Bale ded ar the
SRO IndlcaBes non- wfungutss to perfomm tuir
pant he toutract
Ihe because a per the casu uid 1
Ans No: 1, wfulngucss to peuorm Land capacly) is
establihed by couduct he pasty per
Kanthamani and
"aeati'ness
Nasren AhnMed (2on) 4 mstLp e654
uiftlinguess " can d'ffer cls7

"how and
Aho in ohat mannerthe plaintiff pves n
h tn ancial eadtues."
CASD
 Date
Pog

LOCUS STANDI plate 6 sland

the n'ght to bring an auto
abilty o a pauliy

LDus staudi Means a personaho appuDatlad j

the Count &hould skouo that ht

himself sudpsrd
a
ugal inuny (genually).
LocwsSTANDI

EGAL TURY CAUSATION REDRESS H3ILr

PersOn MUst've CBonafde [Should e on
Sullucd1 Reason 1 enforttobk kg
Noe Aterup not_a lU in CPC

uion /3) a SprénAe lout Act /23/_praviclzs That

no applicabou lhal be uade or ualcialLLiD
wles he applicat has asu4lteut intrest h
the Mai to whic he appltati.o aela tEs"
uid SHA NMOGAM Vs ARIYA k RKMNP SANLAM
o12) SCC
htro louslittgaton to gain ondue bene
Lous sauol
Duty of coun 1N pO1lance pleadngs auel
ahuse poes CLt Ckplaiied
FACIS
loperty in ques ttou belouged to e MuHu
Naikea who dtdlcaRd ue suit laud r
Censuction o a DhataMskala.
ANas to b e constucttd dor the benefet ofhe
Aya KswtryaCommunt
Appillantsatuer,Appuldauar Plor-a uwatchman
Rred on pEuisis along witthls famtly.
Nhen he_soity tmed to disposses he appellaut
by arceLn 1994) hey led a sui for
Dmanent in/unctou niatch Man' Aon ltd)
ROCEDURALSTORY
Trial Louut Disnfssed the áuit
*Appeal Alloed and deckeed
3 Appeal (Madeas tHc Filtd by soubl
pLnding duuh wc
l&oytd auit or declauation he Htte
and ecoxe of possession I
Trl Cous Decreed
Apptol Reyersed decnee_and di ned

a pea Fritd by socuty befone Hc.

TneMad HC cubbed both appeals togetues

TrAt aside he appeuate Coults judgemen
and dretd me u t n Javou 9 tue sok2y.

15SUES Ln Co by waichman's so J

htther plainHf hu the ntgut to PossessLOA 4

enjoymen.t the 4ult pYmpesy
 Date
Page

father_hake
dainh?#_and ha
2Nheher the ntnjoymeat
thougt
obtainead tme
enoymèut
adverse

Zs enfitld tb a u l i y
hethtr the plainh
PMAneu munctou :
doeuily)
h&uit or declaaatiod by
Coupeliut
Jalhether the plaintiff associalton
ie t h case 7

to te
Nhetker the plaint pmperty belog
patnHf kacuèly
3 hen thtre a &ecsnd appeal pRnding,
whetter ths Suit 8uLsta fnable 7

Whet he ouuk competent to. y is

Case 7
7
Bepotue dupcenie Out

Bopeatiy_oLedby Cocrelg tC lJully

ushfid ainte Watcuonhas o ulgu
o ae infunction.The Case
ente
dnspoked

lo CPC dtay o dust

 Tn deang with civil nass, pltadngs 11e
douments and uele vont MCCDUd poy4 Z2
ode n e Hhey ordtn assty drie he att
the Ca
The pleadings nerd to be oifrolly e1astu by
udicol offrcersbefe fiuutng h sU
Duty oudges o dscoyer he h fosn eo
pleadingsdouuntna 0gusneuts osi4
CP o u d oo help n hsder1atntng
Seclion 30 he fut

Watchman Cayea key O a n t p l o d lok

le o1o pCaly Can neye acune
inepoOpealay 1SEpt(fT/e

The (P talks toD dieAsut khh q pauttis

ONeC54a0 paty deponts on or
Pxoppay
Jofnde 9/paslles and otnea pash
9311

HLCCoSauy pauy Dne Vehice_lcoupensafc

Popra pouu tniend uaus dove veuicle

NeCeitny pou dlyar JuicLc_[rose p2ni

Pmupee,"pat4
reLgag pony 1dhout uitn, ydgnUT
Phop tie ed mple omple
 Data

JauwsuilG be b
Coels negecike that civfl
ihfnlteos/
bLDUOt
paulg
hy the t a l Closglaudi)
NrEsSALY PRTY
A NCCCSSay pasty4On
heP1C8en
n ds pennatble t he COSittfNOh of_the ui
agatnst Lallom n0eficzVe_de 'oa.

Passed
In the_absence c/_necessasypaslay, Ho decer
Can_be_pasSEl_

ROPERPARTY -
A_LOpESPa pne fn_DuDse abBence au
effechve odesCan beped , buf
lusepreelte
nccessanypr_a_CONplete dnd al deoiu
hequstieu fnvolved Pn he uiE
Tn the alpsenCe
pioperpaiT, adecLE
Can_KUU ebe passed
Stat Assam OoT0rs (20L R SO
3124= UpreMe Coust platued necessay k
puOpe pauln

DRDER1 of CPC
Peal pth
pauties to he Stui
NLns poo vistong
fvr additton deletied
and 2ubstbultou
oiud
opasties Soludes e
mis jeludise_paontës ndebjiTieud
t
Mbjoindee and Aoh-bindes.
 dssaute.
Date

Pag

AZIES

iot'nde panlyaise
elen cu ACE dottbyluoo 09
PeseL Ci aCCstuo LOTC2

NEaNLs oing a perSona8 pasls a

ain Odeendaut

ihee Common_gltvance Y Clam

&ybejofucd in QMe u E

platn hA MO Hle a2- dluiE

More djend aut

neLLes an aLLse Ouf o Hue

`E2tt BaNsacHOn_or4eueS e acls_&
nkaLtCA aleged to be dene Pydonue
iilerfo fAtly deVeAally_DR alternahVely.
platntiffs'
Order
oRule RLle 3
pLISON&pYDUgut stpanale otud
delaudaslk|
A any commenJAeAtion
aue
Dhd Rle2
CaurJala that olnder a al aLS
ttalo_ud Co a y pO_
totlueir elec honor flea
Paate ALi
 Date.
Page
MidSeny

KAMCSH RACHAND KUNDAN MAL

MONICLPAL CoRPORATION GREArCR &CRs
12MANU/se/o493 ) 2 SCC 524

CASE Pauiesto Auit Mallte 1elaled

y
NDTE pauHes
Drdes Rule LoCP
pmufde hat_ 9ny ntcessao oa pDpiRpaL-
ALO be added to &uit addihou opatz
a aliou a1nittal ueisdttou
LOLOlt but o udlial dscritzo dek
be ëxerCRSedd itth a yo oall-
dacs Crcuatances fhe pahlos

SSUE_ Nhethtr R2 1 a CLLauLy e phope

pastu to De foîntd as "deleudaut
unde Drdey Rule lo CPCn the u i
fnsiilEd byappellaut agatust RLL
R22

FATS
de
(esset)
the Dealeeakuip Agareement,appellanE 6 n
PossAsion the_seivtte Statton esetd on
land held by 2 Hindustan_Petoleum Cop.
tol) as Lessée
Gttatty
Montclpal Cotpotallon Bonbau_ssued notfce to
appellant

o demoli hoD to &_ chatel_n ue

terace - RoUnda uauloyize4_
Losuchong
 dasSMate
Date
Pag

Aprellant fnshhuted Suir challengcd valtdts o

nctice &fr inonctton o1estrainn Monicrpal
Lep u n dtmollshing the stnucthcs

actiou
DORING PeNDENCY OF 6U1T R2 applted to be
ihplcadcd 0s addihonal_ddendanE on Hhe
u n d thatthty have mateuial, o 3hou
hat consEuuchoNaucunauttuonized
Si)tnat they aoe necessaL pasutues tD the tigation.

RAL CoORT

HPCL ue lesxees& plainh s is meaeLs

a deales they have a afght title A 0t rest
n Suit preMfLLL
Impeddment__allouoed.
R2 aue prope & necLLLALL PaL ince they
have an_ntcALSÍ _nthe Bubiect uattes-o igatòr
and pUeNCe_ needed to detemne CaLLde aiion

HGt (oORT=
+HCCoAJËmed +he 09dee 2& Sald hat noti ce
HC
6ult 8cueduled popeatybelongs to R2&
P2 presence necestay foradfudicaton
mpleadment Con/tmmed.

SUPREME CooRT

Reverse decisonA eRowe Coura d

allowed e appeal
 lSSMAte
Date
Pog

T afn he

lgaon-
Aellant dominus 1tts NQulu e sui
plaini & entited to deuedewhol be added to aje.
and heAefove Cannot be tocedo jofn_K2
as dendant; cout CannofCompel
A2 1s neiihe1necessa0yAc pmPAPaA
R2O0uLd also enlaige the ËSue h_Aiuil

The Couwu ( dinct addiHon o pasutiis agaws

the wfsues o the plaini ho e
CompelLed to PLOLeed againsE a pisOu aai
uohom he doesnot clatmALdkeJ.
HoMeveA pasi_Can be o1nedd a
Auendaut exen houghHe Platnh des
AD th0 he has any cauLe ol aLtiod
aaainsthi ORDER1 ROLE LO clcasuly poUTaus
thot i 6 0pen the Cout_to add
at any Bage the &uit a neCeKay paH}LL
OL puhon bhose plesence
Mu_be NecELAiu
enabe an ete
chve COMplete adiudica ión
by the Cowt b Rettle all
quesl[Oug nvo wed
LD the&uit

ubjec Mot
2 has no nteLesk in he Rubject
the itigathon Lpremiss)E Mattu
notfce by Monfcip al
hi_pMseNce
tohtho tt s qustffedCap1)
sAcguuisLed
de cide
valuddy othe etfee
 JASMAte
( Page

Legal Jnttneaf
PCL Nants tu sppDIt MCGB1n 2tatnuna
heactien Appeltant But that ()
auainsl
am.cLunt to cgalntncslÎnthcAubec
Nattta
anordis aiven n 4avour / agalust 1Pp
theCLdt 0ould bebinding on R2
Aadiiion pauutis 2 gucatuon ef inittal
dlcrion oauthut ofudiod disucton
Lbasca Cn aiLs k_ CIuMstanciL eeach (aye

Resp
Lea Langua ge
As pe Kule lo It is open to appellaut
Conaha h a t R2 added as_paA4 Loen
ne2resEnCL R2 i necesay toenable te_
decede tue Mattez Lvely

yidence
P2i LeSLL 10possession e he
the penuises
ha Muto'ol evidence to ALAEhiat tue
ppellont ha Madr an nautluonzed_onsmLcton.

uen u t ude
tu nuctueea bLt t
hatltlsttritd byppellaut unautla iziliy
hspuappellafit, the 2 hattels ae movables on

Lheels2
2plalts ed for Odxincinq pa
3)S9M.ge
 elSSe
Date.
Page

has no inteyes n the AubielE-Matzis

Chattels &demolition the Same Loeuld
aect taal alglz o
R2 hax diut_ntinest in the Aubjec-
maltu ga.tode _adduh k2 olid
Cause pe Yudike oaDpellat

Addlton LODuld Laden R2 L

the appeal and A2 L6
necessay or poper paaly InGLfore appeal
OOK_ alloube
11
KASTURL yYAMPERULAL 20056 5CL 133
Nce9s auy_andpocopeo prutiis
e poafion that they
explaiutd-eilaatzi
canbeimpleadud a
Bult or8pecilperfammance
The_allowlng personsQ neCSsalsPasties
Paetie iohe Contacthfc i 600ght to
be
ennyceda theiugal 1epreaentafi
2) transferuee hepropulwhich é the ubec
Nattta he Conac
The Couet_ako txplafned
hata putou olo
has a dleec nteeesF in
tue &ubjectualla
the &ul h
8pecihcpepmance
Sale uay be a
a peopEA pal GO ÎNpleaole a s
applica.fion Unoltapl
Kule 10_
 ut

STRIK OUT AND ApD A PMRrY

Whec a
0cng perAcn include as apauy
Loukd Lan Lat any sta9 u l t) upon &atsfaLtin
orde any otteA KOu td be ubstituted
addcd

Addn necCSsanLy _popes pauis-d Rule lo

Wherc name qpaaly_iimproprl foinec
Platnh7t defndanr on ihe appliCahonCowt
may L ee out &uC Paslu

NpA-OINDER MI6TOINDER
Non-ofndee Whena peLLsOn no+ Joiut
pacyLo +he&utt

Mfctofn des-When a pRLAOY neithe

pope2
but pdined to +he

Order Rule 9 A 6uit ofll be_dejeatzd

by non-fofn.dee cusofndes epaahis
and he Couut may n e atte
0AeLpeCI p HESpeforeThe

Order Rule lo AL cbjections cn the

ghbund n f dex e ALEpodndea
poeliesBuall Je takes
 Date
Page

*
Essenhals
Thee Mwt_be Some eie QgafmsE ucpauly
P'n Lespect o the Matte nvolved in he
0ceedin9s and it i 2 p0ssible to pa
effectve 0deu fn absence o uCh paAlay-

REPRESENTATIVE doT ORDER1 RuLE 8 CPC

Uhe_peuOn May Bue D deend n bekal
all in KaMe_ inteuest

One 09 1DLe o &uc PeLOLUL May LOofi Hhe

ue
LLenpCkNLP& s?on ohe Couut ue o be
BLuCd M.y deend auch Auit pn belual
Dsorhe- bene q alpsetus
ntereted
fOr this 8pclal_paoceduue ha heen_envfsa_ged
unde CPC,aDd pr inshtutlon o 8tul, Theee
MusE be nmneeouA Paubes

8uch
Buch pautie uS have dame 09 CoMMOL
in tEues 10 the ui.
They must have a_commou euance but ir
necess
aey hat hey haVea the Sane
lauue aLttón

Dnce Couut qank pnsston, tH u esue

potice to all PersOus uTIe3 tedt at e ped
O hePlaEntiL
 lassMate
Data
Paga

Suck nodiceMauhe personal 8AVICe

Sved fn uD wayS Public advetfsement

The Suuthen
hep pOLOCeed_a6a epesentatyve
Aut

(AUSE AcTION JORISDICTION Where)

LIMITATION (when)
nundaton o the Bui RELLEF Hhat)
BLndle_o 4senHal_lad whfch giue Cause to
enfnicethe legalLnjuy or9edecess in_a out
au AAtccedent to the instituhon a &uit
Theseacs aae necessaAs_ to be proved by_the
platntLte toe 9uelie in

Ia_planEdoes not disclosehe CoA the

ExAMPLE Caee#led for claim CoMpensahon fep_

NEG1GENCE Elemenk
O ktstence oduy ProxfMate Cause
Baucac o hat duty Dama

Place o LontactE
JORLSDICTLON
Ferfomanceo Lonsac
Ploce O
Place e tranSachono Money

*SEc 1 CPC oneis_wsdfction to ciui coula

Junsdicfton b The Quttogulq to decide Matte
Dr a u d fcaton
baed
ou aA civil 8uuG_unless
 Dafe

Page

JURISDICTLOA peotiod

Tewitonal
Punia
the Bubiec Matfts ReLLeF
DependelDy upcn
BoundaLLES

peunOA
ACosdMg
Mattees KoMe
1ncude
Valueq te
Áet b4 Lou _a
Cows-bu- &uut.
ht
statiute
Ongenal the p
Appellate
No liml to
Relgncu
HADC.
BAR OFSUIT ASpea-
Expreseluy oLeLfej
Tmpliedly baoeucd
baed May
AHEn
Bauetc by any o BaueLed by geneoal excesS

enactment=_pa 5Sed pincples q la

2 ilke
by_the egfslatue Laanilay
dayRu judiota
Baohed by lPmitat.on SIDRAH
clauseg alsueoOy Taterp
detded
CAN4E CE ACTON
FACTS
Jisdlelioa Limitaton Reite
PeHtfon
LiMITATloN elatel peeLLOdor
bauing legalact°on pmpe
Obiecshould be atnait totigaton
ContveeLAles ALtfcted fzed p02Ld
p02sd
Rme
tle
he
Remedy only n.ceasd 2p40 a ceglaIn
 alassmate
Date
Page

peeLod not dubsegeny

ReLEF
AccosdfMg to Ode 2
Rule 2 eveouy uit shal
inctude heLohale O the claim
peson_ omuZ to ue any portion o
hG clafM he shatl not afterwasds 3ue n
He pooutians0 amtted Od 2 Rule 22)
Relpneurshiment_ o paut O clafM Rule 2/3)
omission O eles
AS Pe Ordee 7 Rule 7 +he
oLeLe claimedmust be &pecHcallyAtated
May eely upon teocald'ffeaent afgus
May
AlHernative suelfe-ls can be Q8ked prand
excess eLfefotheroclie
( g Melral agany Costs o t4athon
ile Coutegs La104eLeestravel e t c

SIDRAMAPPA RAA SHETTY ORS 127zo) s

Toterpretaton o Cauee o Ation D

FACTS at kettttta
aPpteatfen gage
PeRtfones kled an t hefore the xecuttng
OueLE to eopen pocesdngs LOot_certaln
pmpeutuLs andto fmplead the eg9al rèpresentatiue
t h e One the pmpert[himáeY.
(Necessaoy paou
He clcfmec hat s e ethe adopted Son
he
he as antiHted to deltveuy pesseLLON
 Date,
Poge

RoCEDO RAL tlSTORY

Ihe Cout_df'sNÉssed the applteatio yin

Hhat tnis acuet should beclainaed aya
aepatuate Suit

Hefled a i t br decdasuaticn that he

be Made pa ko the eaeulie i t at
the eXeutionPmceediNGs
CoA far this disMissalo eadies applicaton
corfmpledfnq n the_exe cuhon_prodn9s
Ihs sQs d'enfssed due to 42 o SRA
Pao Cannot be addtd ONCON TO RORM
to SLit diects at he NEGA1VE GRELMÉNT
Xeution Stog
paeuts to sut pnceedngs pauty to_proreeolNgg

NouO he ledanother &uit On the basis

Q He to declase hi as ue LR
SH the0LOn
The ial coet dlafssed HheSuit, o
te A GAound
o u n d hat the relieIn uesho

baued by ORDER 2 RuLe 2

HC Whe Hues platiiffk clam bcAed by

Cdeh 2 Rule 2 -AfHCmat've
jtceL o defendant Can be ued o_yeed_wi-
9egaond to the8ame_Cause aliziu
Plarahiff 8p clains{_ aMag
 alssnte
Date
Page

SuPREM1¬ CoURT HeLD

Tial&Hgh pocecded on_euoneaus ounds

Tha pmeh áuiE _wlas r declaation aHHe
to the puopctiLs 1n quCAaon

Cauke e acttonMeansthe eason_or which

Buit alas buougut-on what basis 7
be katdthat the loA on_whith oresent suit
NOS boLOLglut_ the aMe as that th tihe pHevlo
ut.
LDA on _bass ohtch he prevtou sut Oa brUut
fomm the foundaon_of thepresent &ui n _
that Auit he COuld_not have clatmed he 9uelioL
whfch he ougut in tuts 6uit.
declareunu as
pauty Lo RXeutton_proccedtng egal epeseuta fiVe o tu

BHARAT RAT ALUMINUM Co: ALSER ALUMINU M

ECHNCAL SeRVICESNC NC(2012) 9 sCC 552
ntd-&enus
FACTS
Agreement bluo the paonttes to Supply & fnstall a omp-
u t besed hystem b r Aucltta Modeuntsation at
Balcole korba_uelte
Agrnemtut had an aublttaton clause toy dispules
wAt Contpac Conseguently_dspulzs auose ort

perfomanLe of the agreeuent

ARBITRATION
Claim for9CtTLoun i 6 Avestment in e
MOdeunlsatnou pm91aMmLe, oss q pmZ etc
 p-g

sTORY HELD
ROCCDORAL
proceecdiigs, the
aocbitration
uzbraining
Duaun pndtniy nlunctfon
patnYi fltd a uit pr o f t h uc
ue Ma'rabi
pasuhn uolth
he
dcfendanz fom dsconKctin tue
defendaulswee

pLOpacty,
conpuutrs etc) CRD
haye
notmafntainable by Tn'al Ccuwit:
Held be qun1ed deptucll
injwnction only the
a nhteolncubey BonMe_ppcerdina
pmqress
On h e nstituitonal
9elie thetu sould be
Aubsiantta ele
hons utehyo ca fele nlziuju Ca
as&uit

actn brany Sui uLs

luhte pLay
the CausL
a Aubstanhfve nelie.
P

Subs eliel he axked Ar snce disptR 0RD

to be decided by aubftiatnr, the onLy gLelie

hot Lould beasked o LO0uld be to 29Jeguael Audjec
okic theplanhff May aY e u conces
poLopa
nD be entfted o pr Ceed Q2afnst
autut DTILA
depending entiely n h e outCome a
proLerdngy in anoftesPueufsdction. STATE
AIR
vb a 2uit thesue wOuld oe no peexrstia
give 6 to CLSe o octtou V
Dut the
oiCut cnly conttneutspeCulative ded
Jn he ab sence an
exfstihgALhStiaq Cous
Cause actt'on a ÄtLil CcaDnot be fld
plaio In Sh a 8ut cau be
 Date

Pegd

pE ORTER YII RULE Ila.

Refecien o plafn t Whoe disclosin
nine the cauue acfion
Mafnubiliit ca Cvil
Hhe Cxs1Cnce_CoA in favoua e tue
ORD
ORD IL RULE 1 lst o _ paut°Culasue Lohel
havc to be mandatoaily în cluded tn te plaint
ORD MI ROLELe) mandals plctntif to 3tate
the aclconstitoffng cause eaction_4 ahen
asOse

ACause acton abundle ofactz uc 2ae

To pnked jo cbtaIning tte uelie

pLO yeg hîn ttae Sut

ui u r be amednaCLoIdance i t t QRD _T
R D Rule eYCY SuiLtAhall be ramed
D0ffoid ound Anol decision_upon the
ubjecin dispute L prerennt fedtuesLitgaticn
cCpcecunhg them. 0ad nith ORD R t e (2)
(whole olatm OmLB to &ue
LAB Al then ue baied on daC
STATE OF MP CoA
AIR 78

uir
Auir tled for lax appeal Monty legally deducted
y17Dept Crvil Case or Iecovety legally
deducted mon agatnst the ConslitÓWon
Cou uitable onum is T Toibunal + ax Lau.
L 0Oust & Competent autooaly
 elbn
Date
Paga-

LASE JURI3DCTlON OF ClVILCoURIS-

gaaphulcal auta 092 SubjectMatttuto
Lohich_auttuol applie4 _ciutl cou has
has
nheelted POuwe to_decfde i Ou0 oLdcho,

Whee the statute ves nality o e

Odent o 8pecial ti bunals czil cou6 K)_
e dictPon
B822
VoCTRINE OF KEG SUBJUDICE
LAsEss
TwnMoL Lases Same Passies
(faoes agkfng sor
&aMe uele)
darne kubjc
Matttu

CompetenE Couut

Vouwe o so

The tntenl o he legtslatue

1 ) To avoid 2 Pasalel Lakons - Slla in
Causo achon
subjec Nattee fn 2 COl at u e

relit Saue ine

2)Paodeckpersons froM Ulkpltcil o pcealy?
3 )Peueyents Cousuts oCon cuiuent Juwusdciion
om&fmulkantotsly adiudicahng upon 2
paallelligations uoE Same CoA
V
 lnssmate
Date
Page.

SECTION 0 o CPC Stay of SuuE

ba o Kutaosut
Applitsto the bual, not he insiitUtton 4 suit
Saysthat_no COULt shallpDceed th tiol
any 8uLt în dhfeh the mattta i n 1 s s ue
is dire cty 8ubstanfially same naPrevioul
nsiHutetd &Lit buo he &anMe paties.
Tral udtcial examinaton_detemfnatton_
the issue
Mattta in Issue disputeel attufal quetions
Avoid unNtCESLauy delays a conjiict declsfons=
any_decice PakedLD Violation o ' s 1O ePC is
Considtntd be null and volddg

NATIONAL INETIIUTE OE M&NTAL HlEALTH AND

NEJRD
NeORD6CLENcES C PARAMESHUWARA (20D5) AIR
8 e n s

SC 242
FALTS
The Rzspondent W a seulor phaeumacis_io Phe
Appellant nsttulENIMSs
tle wOs Chaugesuteltd foNÍSappmriahon e daugs

to thetxtent o Rs 1,7, 663 46.

As ptr he engiay offfcs nepoet , R was&
oAeAPon5fble_for VAortages o! doLgi.
A Odeoed LMOVal 8Eavfce& dPre cted
R to MetmbLAY Se A to tueextenE _pt Luniay
LoSs Quffeued. Agguleved Rapprnached he
the
appellaE autuolt-
9tennoval DA AA habou HC (WP)(nitoutn)
out elASSt
Data
pecunian C 8ut APP lo
HC (¢RP) -» Sc Paga

ROC EDORAL lTORy

(AA)
Dhusng the pendeny o appcal the A 4ld e
CVSuil fD CCoVRY_o Rs l,19, 66R: 46 N
COAF ntescest, on JalluLe o Rto 2iMbue e lo

DuOLngpendenty o cRIduit, the AA - GLovt

sucfenddthe Matlta to ihe Labouy Lowt r
adfudtta tton. Tssue hether euemoval R

Ssue hctha A cau pDVe Hc peLu}aLY-

(civCoLalt
LCV CoLat Suflknd-CausLd byk

Labous Cowt 0ides dhected Ae-inslatDMeu

DA Ode overtumed without bactuaqes
Apellaut HC
LOLlt_petiliou
H inteiM ord stayedopeatiwu o
sIcinstatenleut ord
fled an _appl s 1O
t stay the cuil Suit unHi WP uwas dismsd.
Cot diSsSed the applicatton
eled CRP benre C
HC Btayed the civ'l Suit.
Also odeeed capstilious dispasal a/ P
before 3 months._
Falluere t odisposal: gtven Ltheau t
proceedAult vp to stage oaal_Orders,
tlodeKe Cgistuy divecktd doaa)dtan) p de
l2nal decaeeuntll wP _dtsposal.
 elAGSMALe
Date
Poge
(CRP aPpeal)

Seuhethes the staapplfcotfon fledby P

us 0tS151 CPC Nas Mafntatnable 7
(fnheutnt power
the COwt

HECD
The langua ge 6(0 appltcable to a 8it in
civi CoLLt n d applicable to procecdings D
anothey natiueunde_anolher statula d f fuunsd:
(A)tnstHuttd. de.ciplfnay prmceedings tor misappiopatior
dugs fouundgilky lnss ascutained Rs L12,
Hmoval hom_&ewfce
fasntuttd civil &ui oY uecoVly oLoss
Duca uelie _ bath poceedtnG epcouoted fn
difucut dphu
Lebou Cout A CR Camt aee ndt Cols
(oncu t juLdicto
IO cPCNA HeLD

C (e Cerne 2 Hospital yOPaRe fut Lta

C2004) AIR SC 239
l0 BausBubsquenf: auil, not the previouU one
CPC
133 AssiGNMeNT 3 AsE AALYSI1S

ArsDURAa RAMCHANDAAMADUK (SNCE DEAD)

By HIS LeaALREPS Ar R
SMI:SHAN TABAI RhMCHtArDRA
ORS 1989)AIR 2240
 Paga

ANSLOER AssiqnmenE3-
1382
+er
FACTS land ased A
Lheappellanls_asue the ooneL
_and hiuabaud q
husbaud
o RLL R2_ana W
thefalher
aut to
R3_RR4 in 1 5 0
n r te0 yeaks
th

posiLeu
( 1 6 4 ffnr poKKOu, P
CRP_in hr
Appellanle klkd a Ex-pault ddeace
EXpautiedeace

damages-
M LSnePia
MLSne
and Hpndeut
tuialCout
ghanted by
as AF
appo.a.clk tHe
to_Mal_couut WIL
AeMandedCaseback Ar
HC neceKauy Bsueg u -e
a
do atse
directon
Make feaence to T

o hepasta
pleadings mptanrauttuoily_usRSA he
he
the ands_Act 19uR A
AçslulhuLal
RNa0Ly
BOmba
Bombay

to be deided by
Ony Issues eqAirNd
the competeutautosui_urda tue
Ce the Cu
ere en toberelimd o n
Couut ecelved fndengs s 1t was to speie
he duit acCordinnal o law.

PROCEDURAL STORY

Appeilantspekned sptcial lkave hom es

udgamet approacud Sc._

ISSU Whttherthe High Couut wa Conett

in dlrectin9 Mal eouout o
Heferthe ssue uelafing
 elassmate
Date.
Page

enan cc
enan to the Competent authosuty nder the
At7
2Nhether the order o enancy autapLit, holding
hoding
that Tt had
noJuisdtctton to deltver
possessfono he Land is 9LE3 judfcata
ohteere refeuing sue o compeBent autuoity
by Hc weuldbe bauhed:7
ARGUMENTS O ARTLES

Appelans_agued that theyapplication 22/2)

and á272) the Act was dismissed by the
enantyauttuortlesthat they had no jiadichon
Appellanz asgued that this nding oaufuoities
shouldd act as udica la RAec houldDot
Aemit h e Cake to tue tfal Colt for
fssuesto be decided by CoMpetanf autDosty st
Respondenkr &ubuftted hatUs 8sA n a
Suft
Invalufng any tssu to bedeutdes/
dealt f t h y a Competent_ autuoRtu under
the AcE he cvt couot should
S t t e &ultoble issues and
9eferother ssues to uc authosifyo
detemlnatf on

They also PLed hat appellauts RaulueyY

poceedngi dtensed
oeue Pate
Could2 Dt act as 9es udfoata CHELD _
a ban)
 Datu
Pas.

1UaaC0nCN
The flon'ble 5C dealdecdhat thue Cauld be
00 9ucstion o C udtcaa SCCTLON U_p
Woul d notbe a baso tha al Cou
in redenfng issueswhich to se-
Xclusiveudetemtned e a Copeiu
autuosi undu the Act t o that ufugri

Iheseore he appeal Was disSLd.

INTERPREATiON OE HeCoURT=
1SsU Refrace tb Conpetent_autuoryManiatodt
The Couit hlld that the mpardant pmcple
Consmuctfon s hat a_&ta lidia
pUaports xclude he ordinauy usduthon
oaLi Coust ft Must do eiher
xpressb teuMs o r
00uld necess.asiy leadto hy &uch ttou

Auck
e nfeeN
xclusion
8S KSA S)
seotoy_o tat¢ y MalkR Co
MANO/pRIDo22U0
exclusion JususdicHon xpressfnLplied)

In S ShtndeV
tt 3 held
ABJosaf MANOSlp 372
that
Ssues to
tchon8SA
Compeltnt Mandales etere
autLo

ISS0E 2 -Ks
Judicata
 R e u d f c
n

a t a
o l e t o u l
elsate
tlon'ble sC
Data

SINIRCANCE
Cplafned
page
e
by

As po 8L CPC No Cout 8hall y anu

&uit1ssue n shch the Mattts arectly
ubstanfally tn 1ssue haa Been heAaLd and
nally dectde d n a omer6uit bettoeen
both the pauts

The Couut ne-1ttjattd thedefnition uit' as

pes 26 CPG pr2ceeding to beinstituted by
a plaint
An application to Mamlatdas 21/2 2 2s[2
he_ALT_ S not Catled aSult' Lven thoah
Mamlatdu's Cout Is qCut cout s 2A
D the_Act

AHthough Couut ecoontzed that planahons o

PCCPC include any pioceedng ta a
COust o usttceby whfch an fadtvidual_pusueL
Pusue
that remedy whfchthe lauo atprds" to be aa
"Suit o purpadu e&1 t htld that a
poceedng AummasAy nauue would not_all
wifufn tue deython o Suit er all
Tn a &ut ywheLe decee iSpassed ex- p a s l e -
he Only Matte hat can be dirccty and
öubslankfally' n ssue hf cl 1s uort 'that
Heltef hos been clauintd by the platntif n the
platnt previous deusion on poxseKonNA to decide
qestiot Renany.
Heasd &fhaly deoded
CPC Mtang s
Qmattea on which Couwut has exercese udscial
Mindand dedtded after argument 4 Consfderaton.
 Date
Paga

EXCEPnONS oRES-Sue1uDICE
Sult pending tnfortign Cot
Inttrtm OYders
SUMMasLy Suúr CPC-Ord 37

ERltd whenherc hansachion itely _not Ind

Whena ult 'sfled on the bass a
ACtH U xchange opDAÍSsDLY Note oen te
Sult is autatng on a wite LnnactGukaute
Frltd with 3 yeaas o_CoA aetsng liaittntion
peeuuod b e cond.oned.

Sammauy Suit y Ordinauy Suir

Cot 14LS Notce Detn.danr can delend sut

o dteldent o aMattiu at,npyi
Khow cQuse oly te 30d
8uir thauld hot be_decrred
Defndant ust appeal hefnre fhe Couut wf
lo_days

Junsdi cto0 igh

PCk Ctui Con
Coues o dmaCause
Dishict
Cousts CompeteNt to tyi unna
suils

Objechves-

dummaeyA t Mtended Ho actltal

 elasSMAte
Data
Porg

Spcedy dlsposalof Casts.

The objec is to guard agatnst_delaying tachcs

e defendanbwho NQyhave no pnuine defune

Defendant s not peiMttled to tle t e n

&tattment otthoutE leave e the Couct Pemmlien_
to fle lcndtfonal $s
vS Coet cannot mpose conditlon j but
to be fled sithin áptcahed pefod

pOvisions o Geneoual AppiCo.tfon

KuMMa pIDCzduLe

Leave to deftnd fltd ailhfn tfMe

be u t d by louht- penied Couat ryRC
Jur's dichon Drd XxxvIL A civicoLLS
original/uuisdi non

INDLAN BAN MAHARASHTRA STATE Co-OP

FEPERATLON LD_948) ALR SC 1952

FACT
Bank filrd suwnmay ultr against. /ederatnn b
ACLDVI of Rs 4; ?6, 31, l60/
Fduaion appeaid before Cout 2 sougut stay
say
of &ummany suit ls cPC_ stating that a
10
prev1ous6it Was Aledbefore hy the Bank
ak
SumMa
dasste
Date
&ulr. d Poge

tederation agatnst Bank fo Rs 5,Tb 52, 217 R

prior doss fling
Sfngle Judge- Bombay HIC s10 CPCapplicable
only to aLgulaz01df'nauy &it. Apal by fidaiu
D - Bonmbay He'tial' uls lD CPC d
n_a nauD ense applits to SS also
tay oSui
Stay granttd Apptal by Bank.

J$SVES before9
6 hchtr he bar to prDceedwththt a l
a subsegutnthy nstituttd auit contatnrd in
applicable to duMMasy &uit vlprd 37 CP

HeLD

SIngleJudge was Corec 1 s:0 dPC E1

appli.cable fo MMary &uir the Very ob
of Naking a RpauatepIDvisionp s wiU
hurattd.

The isno Mal pmcedute py suaiy Sul

do O ueAluon o slay o Sur Qeuds'

6 l0 eneral provision pmeides t to

proceed otf rial o a Sul WHLLE
ofd 37 Certatn classes SLutr to_qyanh24
ulck ntlief.

Bath mesepnvisiong fntrpreted hanloniolul

 elsste
Data
Paga.

So that obj¢cls_o: both fmushated Appeal

as allowed
7 22
Kes JpiCATA
usration -inaAles
case clain in Jafly poputy -disustd
WRETHER Dr delault
CACE 2 5 CaAe 2: latm gr Maulas expenses
BARRED 6
RES JUDICATA ?|- NO OTesues n uestion ae
diffeneut
s u e s în ease was wot deuded-
RES
TODICATA aPpltcauon o fudiial mfud.
SeCTLDN - PC
Betiween the
Bo too Efnally decided

Dn Mesilg
TnsHulon_qdut
favties& Ttte by competenr auot

A madea issue whic has been alueady Med

by a compefent caut bas a neSult Ho fhe
amepaMHLS t the Same mattea allolled

Reyets 91L-LHgation when 1ssu been

have been
udeia detumtned appeal is the &ultablo_
PFundamental Cbncept under CPC
BTECTIVE Enacts that onceMattu fnallyddta
allouwed to r-open by Aubsegueut
Ltt gation.
 Date
Page

enstanEmuble
Atms to dtect p a n h e s o m
causedby mulietptte
harLasnment & cxpenses
pDceedings
Absence ule no end to tga tto

FRE REgSTES To
QMust be a tnal udgumell
Dectded onMtils
Claims MUst be &ame tn the hst and
átLondBuils

BA61GBAS1 LeGAL MAXIMS- Mut be mentontd an

Nmo dtbi bis VXaut pm una t eadue (2u

Cauu
No MaN should be vexéd huice_or he áaML

ntnt uepublt cae us ÁLE hi litizm

in the htëust_ the dala that ttne
laud b n_nd to [Hiaahon.

3Rejuditalapo yeoctitai? occopilae

udlcial decklou u t e_acceptid at CO

SAYAIAMH k ANR SAROTATM AN 2022) LiveLan

LTA
caeudtcata
Qu or REad ca
*FALIS +Procedusallaw
Plainti tled a Buit agest uspandent

pallhna aunt
 AC

nrearsteRed adophon elasSMAte

dee not vaitd Appellauts caueud tuat, 1t po
proprty; ancertal
NOTE Respondent-Buebagut t n au
WCFUA,-
Patnal aunt - Buit in 003- deceed valrtody.
The claim Was to declace appellont, ak absoute
OwnRs the duit propealiy hey aldo dougut
apermanent înjunctien oesbrafhfna the deendant
and theis agents npeacehulpossculon

* HEA EPeEENDADNT - Suit ishit by 9Muditt ala

-Deendant fled_an application od VIRule I1br

ueActionn platnt
PTumtstamce
his as digMigsed by nal cousE to epct
Sui-platnt
Lonseguenty, shufltd _an_applitatton to_rame
prelmtnay u s undey Ord XIV Rule 2/2)
CPCa and detumine themfst
7h apPlicatuouwas aluo dismissed. ranthy 135uE

Defendant no led a LvistÒN_peHtoh befnre HC

HCordetd the framfng o sfuclicata a a pe-
1mfnasuy PsSue
Aggretvid,platni/h appealed to Hon ble s .
APPELLANNT
Relioncewplaced on Otd Xiv. Rule 2 ikteby
Coustb_Mandattd to pDAOunced sudgemen on
al fssues , even thovgh he ui can be dispoRd
na prettminauy 1ssue

Thewdore to enuwexpeditious_disposal
proceeding2 &to avold possthllftye eand
bytheappellate rvisional ueisdecton
 Date
Paca

it Naz
Was Mod
Mode
make lowey couout to amesue
CotoMCcord
easo
mandatouy pr the
On al ues

duthhnding_pould oblivtate he
posstbil
9tCmamdat appellate/aCuisionl aulhoonl.
ueR wee
n ifhndingon_ preltitnay
be 9ersed

ORD XIV RULE 2 Baze Act

Lf 1916 ktance ohen Buit has 3su a u
sut
act, Jact, thepm Mst b defemuud

Louut wanls to y an Bsue olauo frs

ub-ule can lly } hat iu 0elatzg_ 'to
2 a)_fuoes.dtckon Cou
b)bau to the &uit taeattd by_any lai r
the tme being n prce

LEG1SLATVvE INTENTION
.

AppellatloutMay ame Tssue rej en

Tdal Cout wh0se decgee as
appealed.
Exaprion Jnftuntions perceived oY Watau
wnd Bub sule (2) [01d xv Rule
Hare issues oQu ony to 2[L ouet
and postpone
tLLe frst
rst ut
un
Sctttemedt q oftaer Leg i
 elassmate
Data
Paga.

Undu &ub-ouule Ct) - whee Couut hau framed

ramed
all sues toqetuerboth o fact &_lao togeluer
band has aluo tied all ssuc togettue
ft not Open t o Hhe Couut in Aucha
&tuation: to adopt the_pnhctple o dveabilt
to decicde beueS0 LaLD rstiwlthout takik
op &tmutantously offaer_sEALLSfor deetou

*NTeRPRETATON 228 22
+
n_suespect of_he mattas comfn p adjudicahion kepre
the Ctvi bu

Lauls aaocedue_ave mant to egulat eftcfvety,

asslst andaid the objectio£ dpfng Aubstantfal
and Heal jushiceand not to foreclose even Aan_
on
adivdication mez AubstanHial aulgusq
ccHzenundes Perkonal popeaty and otec laus_

Kroceduoe has aluoaye been viewed as the hancdmaid

ofusttc and hot meant to hamper te Cause
usfce or Sanchy the Miscauiage
stlee.

The provisioneo AV Rue2acepat 9

procedual Rau but'he act TemaPna 4uat
-udQS enected to ensue epeditiouu dispo sal q
the s a n d in the tven oLHng aside
ndingg on preltmtna ssue the possfhi1P
o eMand can be aVeided
 Mfxed BSue
ssue is a UPC
depundsPO
the
lawdepud
lauo
s u e Buclh ssue Cam
aun d act Or
decrslon joc BUCA
the deciston ien Pnauy
p r e
f n f n a y B s u L

be teuled a s a

can be Aose
frelimin.auy Tssu the beIL
basi gY
seguuiued Qnd e n H e
eurden.ce appliable ,
fhep l a l n t o Y
Stading the Couut ba
Pfthe_utedichon thei Cout Moi
Ous
the B i t M a d e 8ole hitchve
pssues 4he 8ole
asfth_ he
decide Buch
rexpedlzous declsio

hat the Bsue

6 a nan admltd t udical
udteala n d o-consirlchve He4
HA
Lan beaduditattdasa preliAfuaY iu

acf 1canne2t
KaidHhat_ he pnncipe lauo has bee
e iatTd tat a plea q uLs udicala
be decided ag aprelinuPnal ue

OBSERVATloN-

The plea 94udteatauegirs cousiderato

o0 heplendin9s1ssues
The and_dec'stoA D
the prwtous Biit and Buc pleaw0ld be
beyoud ttue Cape 0/ Urder YI Rule

Tial Couut kall ConSfdes whettuee a Pel niu

peliw
1ssueshouldbeaMed n dte OrderX
 Res udca a elasSMAte
a prelf'ruPuay Data
Ss ue. Poga

and 80 to dectde t wiluen a pouod o

thrce
MOntts o 040faPn the prelênPAoy 13sue
The Hon'ble s held hat the platnt was nut liable
be écted under Order 7 Rule ld)
exprssed opinion whetuer ubs@guentat
baiicd by tueprfnciples LJudicat
t_gauteo besty40 ue dppellant uo
claened to be bonaJide PucaLeAO
the But_propuztoSAaLse te pope Peeué
behr_he AD Belagam

while indualingan anatysiso uditata2

Sapsto be followed by. theCouut
O ueulrements _1CPcpet falf#lled
Detemmfne ih ha een any Matual
alttraton 9n lao a ass0cetheerst
3uit as dtceLeed If yes Ac udicata
Wouldbe nopplicable.

Ord o HL Joo uenandNatte to ial Couot

prelMfUauy Pssues Dot&LS-latuable
home

Tr'al Cout ghould AeCDdJfndngs on all issues

30 fhe fst 'appelate Couot as tue advantage
deckding doesnlt have to maa ue
Nattes bokk to maal cout i f only preltutkaoty .

9sue wO detded
 Dato
Paga

KiNDS OE Res TopICATH

Actual AD issue has heen attd allege
past
by one pauty and he oruiy
ELthu denied or adutted.

Coneteuucttye 0ugut to have been Made

goiundoclaim er de/uie
n_jommr guut but a p a u a

322 uresif._

3Ubseueut bavuaro
APPLLCABLUTY
Zprienu

dut isnfLsed t Delault X aHer aPprota

E-panR Tudgement o_deuda
Weut Pooceedins

Exeuuian Petttion
ConproMike De cee eztappel wau
OYeAr 23
Rule 3A B
DISMSAL DE 6UI UN DeEAULT
Ord X CPC iMposes duty on
in CouultL ahen fhue pauitsdoaPpa
decton_om Couti
day is fxed pr appeastance /
ust atteud atienadance i_pat
Out PUnctually
Provisions 1ntended to ensure fha
ase
pauly u ohled he
fuat he
e
uit ta kes' di?aiit
pusue
pngess t ui inuttd.
 alASSAte
Date
Page

Appeaance at leastthoogh thtir_pleades_when

appotnttd , 1f 0ot in Person
Kule 3 non appeamanca by paouies Couet has
POueto disNiSS the kuit

- Rule 4-Restoratión o &uitta}ttr 8houofnn9

ufHciwut case or absence m case o
Plafnhf olhose duitt dismissed at
Prel'ufnay tape account e allue
t o Aeave AuMmong Cpmess fte Paid),or
defen dant is Auved _alone, appeaK and
8uu disgs sed
Rule 4 fresh buit subject to lauo o emitation-
Pemmils O ekhorahon petitton

Rule procedune oken defendant appenuk

admi &ult claim platniff appeas- he
áuit would be disntssed.
deputdant _aduz fae 5upadty or ouoly,
dechee wolld ptloto acoyduely.

Rule 9 bas hegu &uut wit &aMe Cauue o -

actinbecausehe eeedy ib 8 -Contaihed;_
dereeagaud platnhy delault bass he
sult
 Dare.
Pag

4522 RES JODICATA - WRLTL PROCECDIN4S

DARYAD&_DRSy.He TATE OE UP A es
AIR C1961) Sc_lS

In this Castdhe dCplaced the dochiue 4

91es udtcata o a htgluea0oHngs -
Lonstdesung and hiattng 1he Ladagchasuc
ugeutspronouhced by a cdunpeten
COLLt tobe an keutal uule laus

FACTS
PetHtionerg htir anceshos had been kuau
oLamdOuutd by 3R4 LR5 e last
yeas
Du to commuual dehuzhancesthey leyt Hai
VrLageduuingTuly 1941 ktctumed
NOVeubu& 1947.
Dusing this 1eaupoLa ah&tnce fuyfOun
tDRg
Rg inunaojiu 0ssesiou o Huur

*PRoCE DURAL HSTORY

Petttouestld Sults eftctrueut_ude

s 180 0 OP Tenan ty Act 939
In 948, Mak cdusut dtcAeed dhe &ui
Boud deee wa3 Coninmed n appeal

The petittoues A0uO obta ne dposs eLsiOu

he LandsPuosuauto ue appellate des
 clasmate
Data
Poge

Kupondtnts Preftmd tcoud appeal fore e

Boasud o Revenue undo 267 UPTA1131
Jn 1954 appal wasallowed and the But
diSssed- htld)
OPZamin dasuyAbol tion and Land Refoma
(AmcndnMeut)ACt, 1153 enHHed R3 to R5 to ppsesloR

Agsuitvtdpehtioucss appuoacked ALauabad HC

waut 226 Secking a n ceotouau
Tuis was disNtssed.

Nou pctidioners Dedto 5Ceeking

0ut Ulast 32 COT
aa

*ToDaEMENT
HC disNfssed wult altes keauingit on Mesit
ongouwld that0o FR was Contravened
Contraventuon nlas Constitotionally_jushfiead

A Bubseguent pehitton to SCa 32 CoI,

on the aMeac Aeekng e aame aeuief by
t e BOre pasly would be baedby te tue
genuolpfnciple Hc6udicata

*NTERPRETATON (nLLRLLS Lacunae,

he poinr to consldeeis tue natuse

decscou poonounced by a Cout e CoNpeltn/
fursdicktou and effect 9 te &ane.
 Date.
Pag

nAOYaIP_disulsstd by He 00MERIZS
ipastics 1his Ca
udgenucut_is bindlng on_he
C c u m v e u t e d P A L s e d t o t a k e

ACOLse vast 32 o ol
gioud
apaty is 0t Satished h e
altnahve VaenMedies_
well- punded.

notbe 0pen to aPau 0 lau

NOld
Cauat
the ud iuogentut & Moe this
8aME Jacts&
_an Onjlualpehhon on
32-bya
nly ifNP i disussednor on_MteLLisbu
þecase Jauuar in applyinaY n
alttanai n d y would e avaflable He

pasl
This disNÍS`al o prrvfous WP Outd nor
coushu a bae s30Me acte -Matea
to ntu WP Vaut 32 - baued

LAP dsnusstd la lintue- bas ox bak

depeds on the nalaus theQudes J_oxita
ou oullg fae n bauLed. _

Gulam sauwaV Coz AIR 167 SC 73Z

Latlulakai y UoiAIR 1981_6 1R

uwa Dut V Land AcguisitionCollecloa

AR 2005 SC 3165
 nssMate
Date,
Page.

SATYADHYAN GHoSAL V. DEORJNDEB1 (1160)

AIR SC94
Need
ogtung Jenality to
Sudfceal deCestoug
258 22
=

HAR CAND FARIDABAD CoMPLEX ADMIN

(200S ALR SC 2429

Wheeqe an eaules &tuit avatling benelt pensiou

AChendewas dtcseed_by a_céy?l; CouLt
Rubsequtat &uu _for thedanue suclie by
aPpellauts pauty in tauliu suit), thoug
SLilaa plated, not bassedky uca /udicala.
ord iX Rul
BHANU JALN V ARCHAN kuMAR Ord IRt3-
(2c0) ALR S6 624 Cex-paeLte)
tod-tput)
When an expaute decee 6 passed dejeudaut
has two eptos Oue to le an apptaa p p t a l44
anotues to fle an applicafionfpr setttng Qs1de

applcationis dlsmisseddefendanot can only_

f an apptal

* REE SORYA DeveLOPERS PeOMOTERS V.

N.
SAL£GH PRASAD & ORS(2022) LiveLaw se
CCompromise deckee)_
ord 23 Rule 3A
FACTS CbauusJuuT ailegP
COuLpauaRae deeieé

buit scueduled pmpet

&uit was gifted to Reap.
 Dale
Poy

when he was a Minor by palemal qandmae

uer
- E _

2003

Gift sAHemeut Deed Nas LeNoked in 2004.

GrandmoHher PevelopmenE_AgsLeMLDE= M -
GPA 2008 9ranted o Appellaut

Vndt PA -Cum -GPA candmotutA_as euhfid

3s 000 s: ft .ej2 fxd sallalble builE yp
aea proportlongteno ocaspaEIng
Apaces+_undfvidled guaue ce

rd32le case father A l iled sy

CPC bekay oY cltclauatton oH
ather CVOcakop o Gif Du
2004to k leg.al NJA plalnhfA LR)
peo1petual nanctton

2015 oMpIDMLLL P pasuicsdt-

Deed 30:12 IS

ORIentHtled o 35 000 sg ft e
eonstoucRd auea agRLd'to be allbcakd
unde the Developmenf Agyeenuet

Develope entitted to
a3sign develop ueul
tlguts to: furd
panHR&
Ord XXHL led along_LU COupromuse
Rule 3 Memo pruye deuee i
 lMSmAte
Dafe.
Paga

Trial Cott Compronise deace

Appcllaut began devetoping Hhe 90bject
pOpcot
29 22
* n n attainfngage mafooutty, R huneiin frled fe
pC&tut &uft dor dectaatn entgt, Hte a
he tuitscluedulcd propew
declaeCopDNise decAte and for declarattou
qalff Deed as null and
Sif Votd.

DErENDANT PLEÁ
EAong_with wsulteu satemeu tled IA
sjLho platnt Ord Vn RuLle l (Pe

Suit _fpr eting astde ComproMKe decue wetld b e

baed hy Draea XXlU Rule 3A CeL (Comp:onuise
dLALe Buit atlowed o declae i vote caying.
i nuu and vordwnlauiul:

AOCEDURALHIETDRY
TRIAL CoURT Aloused uDYd xu Rul3A
Sut di'snlesed

tHIGH CoORT Appeal_allowed

uasued Set aside ordecá
held Remaudled, Mattec to Tmal Couet.
ffect o 0d Xxxu Rules to 7_(vit on bekalf of
Muhor ) Conefdeoed by Cout Oude had
a diuec beauinp valkattyq CP.
 Pog

uecfed platutin (kenuijo

Whetac IC 1iguty Pe
kl RulL u
0 poOu Onde Ord
Pudepudeut_Suit
alleu
chat

tat baneddue
d to
to
Ouud baed
would be
tue bechee

X l Aule 3A PCL
Otd
NTERPRETATION
3A CPc-
ORDER XXllL Rule ? 79LY76
6
ameudnutut n CPC

icous kau beu hat

expeènceq petio
Zhe PauisavgH'kd

Ocassio
Ma
Mauy
o autrls dLaus a
ULe_on basu
COupD
prepakecl

ieasouauofuer pastuis choll

Lales p ohe
tue validity- Suclk compronuSe.

auide CdeCrees kuuG iled_wld (

For Betling t
e draed ou fo yeass ncluudmg appeala
t o d rHentnt Causuts

Kee pingin VD tue Pprcclactmet q

Co L fue public &tresal anmlualule
haye hee uoduceol

OBJECTVE Kult 3 Aplanaton AvoidMulhpl

y guit prolonged itagatiau Rule zA
specche ba toBeffastale Sui chaleupi
 alasSMte.
Date
Page

The pueupoe effectng a CD blu_Pautles is3

to put au d to Vasuious dis putes pendin4
bee the Couut aConupeteul uuis dicio onee
on
and dor a l l

IMEMENT

PreseutCase platntif
explicitly ask for
settiug aside CD By _asking_ Mulhple. eltes
platntifE_by eleyeu 'dmglting
Auit mafnta Prolble

ALL alordatd aeliefk wee &ubjectmattee o

Lauluesi &uis TC as absbluutely justihëd_n
Icectrghe plaint pa plau reain Ord
xx Rule 3A

HC has eusLd by entteing_fnto Meuils aud

consfdeed Ord xxIl: Rul to 7

(g CD based by ACs udicat" /

CD n a _dkcsio by a Cout
1t ts an acceptanceby Coua OA SomMeting
pahesagreement MeAe &eal
=( Baaued
SUjudleata Malllu on uuls heauo or
nally dtceted

You cou 80 hat CD bauedby the

oule o estappel slL5 TA 1t
fmposes a apaaty to
to
 Date
Page

StafemeuT _aKd
TO 4Heate istaulie
PrVNEdaying Contadictpry statenent_

s RESJUDICAZA
TDRAwL OF SLT
APPLLCABLe No

1udicala
Howeye,eren inot haurtd by
fhe May be a ba to 0siitu4ino AL M
dui

hy 9uulte 0 instiiute a
TIDA I2 CPL- Ba
eacheu.
ULtatgsuit wut_pahiculau cauuL
exceph.on
ADER_23-Rude 13) LPc lon qyah5 pCinAi
towidoausAlt_Lpt e/ claim lif i LiBERo
to instikute a_fes Auit drr tue 2ubjecE
Mattu o 0c uitPaeut of_clauM

DRDER 23
Rule LCL or ddudougulfn Aut by minoypele
o benay
ord 82)
Aule 1/3) LIBERTYPSut jaik en mmal dt
allo plaiuhd tos i t
Sut
Rule 14)

f platail# abaudoud Auit undey 1)

withdeaws Bur without pemisslon (3)
BARTo FRESHSUIT # CDSTS.
 lasmaie
Tue
po

ssenee at time o withdsauwinga UL

with fntentton to file a fesh onë on tue
SaMe
SAMe Cause o actuou must keep inb
mPnd
, plalnhiff
guLLenmeu o ORD 23. Rule 1C3)

lomal defect-as s00on QA discoyLed tle

o/LdAausl applteah on:asaP
Specxfte prayet 0 Couut's eave tofle f t
kut a4egulrec
Ctvil suit& Ps SLPs
Re Tudicota in ¬xecuTOAPeTITON fRocEEDINL
PRIOR
RIOR To CPc 1976 aneudnaeut
A
APta1976 Applfcable O Kane ekecuiioou
petidton befiled pr awe case agalu-

* ExcEPTLONS to Kes ODICAH

RARAJU RAMSIN& VASAVE V MÁesH DeORAa
BHIYAPURKAR 2003) 9sCC S4
BClafd douon 3 excepttonsto 9C8 judicala

judgenneut s essed aittlout ususdichon

Matte Malea nvolve a puse uesttouu

Lad (6alyuath daouopano 202 lass)

Wleu uolgeutut has been obtafued

Commftt rd w CQuud.