Scribd
Upload
79 views4 pages

Pre Service Teachers Evaluation Sheet

This document contains an evaluation sheet for assessing a pre-service teacher's actual teaching performance. It evaluates 6 criteria: teacher personality, lesson planning, content, teaching method, classroom management, and questioning skills. Each criterion is worth a certain percentage of the final grade. The mentor rates the teacher in each sub-category on a scale of 1 to 5, which corresponds to a grade and percentage. The average rating for each main criterion is calculated and multiplied by the percentage to determine the grade for that criterion. The final grade is the rounded sum of the grades for each criterion.

Uploaded by

Mark Adrian Borja IV
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
79 views4 pages

Pre Service Teachers Evaluation Sheet

This document contains an evaluation sheet for assessing a pre-service teacher's actual teaching performance. It evaluates 6 criteria: teacher personality, lesson planning, content, teaching method, classroom management, and questioning skills. Each criterion is worth a certain percentage of the final grade. The mentor rates the teacher in each sub-category on a scale of 1 to 5, which corresponds to a grade and percentage. The average rating for each main criterion is calculated and multiplied by the percentage to determine the grade for that criterion. The final grade is the rounded sum of the grades for each criterion.

Uploaded by

Mark Adrian Borja IV
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Southern Luzon Technological College Foundation, Inc.

College of Teacher-Education

Evaluation Sheet

Pre Service Teacher’s Actual Teaching

Name of Mentee: _________________________________ Name of Mentor: ___________________________________


Subject Taught: __________________________________________________ Date: _____________________________
School: ____________________________________________________________________________________________

Rating in Percentage Grade Per


Decimal Equivalent Criterion
I. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY – 10%
A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
B. The teacher is free from mannerism that tends to disturb the
student’s attention.
C. The teacher’s personality is strong enough to command
respect and attention
D. The teacher shows dynamism and enthusiasm
E. The teacher has well modulated voice
Average X 10% =
II. LESSON PLANNING – 20%
A. Lesson plan is well prepared
B. There is congruence between:
1. objective and subject matter
2. objective and teaching procedure
3. objective and formative test
4. objective and assignment
Average X 20% =
III. CONTENT – 25%
A. The teacher demonstrates in depth knowledge of the subject
matter.
B. He/She is able to relate lessons of actual life situations.
C. Keeps abreast of new ideas and understanding in the field
D. Gives sufficient and concrete examples to create meaningful
learning experience
Average X 25% =
IV. TEACHING METHOD – 10 %
A. Method/s used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities
of the students.
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to
the students’ capabilities.
C. Visual aids and other examples were sued to illustrate the
lesson
D. The made effective use of the formative test after teaching.
Average X 10% =
V. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT – 10%
A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking:
1. Attendance
2. Assignment/Homework/Agreement
3. Practice Exercise
4. Group work / project
5. Passing in out of the room
6. Correcting, disturbing, collecting paper
B. Order and discipline were present in the classroom.
C. Visual aids were within easy reach of the teacher during
his/her teaching
Average X 10% =
VI. QUESTIONING SKILLS – 25%
The teacher questioning skill stimulates discussion in different ways
such as:
1. probing for learner’s understanding
2. helping students articulate their ideas and thinking
process
3. promote risk taking and problem solving
4. facilitate and actual recall
5. encourage convergent and divergent thinking
6. stimulate curiosity
7. helps students to ask questions
Average X 25% =
Final Grade:
(Rounded to Hundredths and 2 decimal numbers) _________

_____________________________________________ ____________________________________________
Signature over Printed Name of Cooperating Teacher Signature over Printed Name of Supervising Instructor

_____________________________________________ ____________________________________________
Signature over Printed Name of Principal Signature over Printed Name of Department Head
Rating in Percentage Grade per
EXAMPLE Decimal Equivalent Criterion
I. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY – 10%
1. The teacher is net and well-groomed. 2.0
2. The teacher is free from mannerism that tends to disturb
2.5
the student’s attention.
3. The teacher’s personality is strong enough to command
1.9
respect and attention
4. The teacher shows dynamism and enthusiasm 2.5
5. The teacher has well modulated voice 2.2
Average 2.22 X 10% = 0.222

EQUIVALENT OF GRADES

ADJECTIVAL RATING GRADE EQUIVALENT (%)


1.0 99-100
1.1 98
Outstanding 1.2 97
1.3 96
1.4 95
1.5 94
1.6 93
1.7 92
Superior
1.8 91
1.9 90
2.0 89
2.1 88
2.2 87
Very Satisfactory 2.3 86
2.4 85
2.5 84
2.6 83-82
Satisfactory 2.7 80-81
2.8 78-79
2.9 76-77
Poor
3.0 75
Below 75 Conditional (lowest
Poor 3.1-4.4
possible midterm rating)
Failure (lowest possible final
5.0
rating)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy