0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views2 pages

MCAT - Cost of Quality Analysis (1) .XLSX Ks

The document analyzes the cost of quality for an MCAT preparation process. It found that 66.7% of the 18 samples analyzed were defective, missing the target specification of 100 with a lower specification limit of 98 and upper limit of 102. The process was only achieving 33% of its shift production target of 10,000 units due to the high defect rate. This resulted in a total cost of poor quality of $20,000,000 based on the production target and a per unit rework cost of $10.

Uploaded by

Muhammad Jazib
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views2 pages

MCAT - Cost of Quality Analysis (1) .XLSX Ks

The document analyzes the cost of quality for an MCAT preparation process. It found that 66.7% of the 18 samples analyzed were defective, missing the target specification of 100 with a lower specification limit of 98 and upper limit of 102. The process was only achieving 33% of its shift production target of 10,000 units due to the high defect rate. This resulted in a total cost of poor quality of $20,000,000 based on the production target and a per unit rework cost of $10.

Uploaded by

Muhammad Jazib
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

MCAT Cost of Quality Analysis

Prepared by: Khalifa Salem


Date: 02/04/2021

CTQ Dimension being analyzed:


SPECIFICATIONS
Target: 100
LSL: 98
USL: 102
Fraction Defects Able to be Reworked: 1.00
Fraction Defects Not Reworkable: 0.00

% DEFECTIVE
Number of Samples: 18
Number Defective: 12
Fraction Defective: 0.667
Precent Defective (Fraction x100) 66.7%

PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS (are we meeting demand?)


Average Cycle Time: 2.75
Work Hours Per Shift 8
Total Break Time Per Shift (non productive) 0.5
Productive Hours Per Shift 7.5
Minutes Per Shift: 450
Seconds Per Shift: 27000
Annual Production Days 300
Shift Production Target 10000
Actual Units Produced Per Shift (based on cycle time) 9818.18
RFT (Right First Time Units) = Units Produced * (1 - Fraction Defective) 3272.73
Percent of Shift Target Achieved 0.33

COST OF QUALITY ANALYSIS (based on production target)


Per Unit Rework Cost $ 10.00
Per Unit Scrap Cost $ -
Realized Rework Cost (based on target) $ 20,000,000.00
Realized Scrap Cost (based on target) $ -
TOTAL COST OF POOR QUALITY $ 20,000,000.00
(units)
inches
inches
inches

# Samples
# Defects
Fraction Defective
Fraction Defective

seconds
Hours
Hours
Hours
Minutes
seconds
Days / yr
units
units
units
Ideal = 1.00

dollars
dollars
dollars
dollars
dollars

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy