CHAPTER – IV

4. DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

TABLE 4.1

AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

AGE NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Less than 21 years 4 3%

21 to 30 years 66 55%

30 to 40 years 38 32%

40 and above years 12 10%

Total 120 100%

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that 3% of the respondents are less than 21 years, 55% of the
respondents are 21 to 30 years, 32% of the respondents are between 30 to 40 years, 10% of the
respondents are above 40 and above years.

Majority 55% of the respondents are between 21 to 30 years.

CHART 4.1-AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

55%

32%

10%
3%
Less than 21 years 21 to 30 years 30 to 40 years 40 and above years

TABLE 4.2
 GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS

GENDER NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Male 62 52%

Female 58 48%

Total 120 100%

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that 52% of the respondents are male and 48% of the respondents are
female.

Majority 52% of the respondents are male.

CHART 4.2

GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS

48% Male
52% Female

TABLE 4.3

YEARS OF THE EXPERIENCE

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Less than one year 31 26%

1 to 5 years 46 38%

More than 10 years 43 36%

Total 120 100%

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that 26% of the respondents employees having less than one year, 38%
of the respondents are 5 -10 years and remaining 36% of the respondents are employees having
More than 10 years.

Majority 38% of the respondents are having 1 to 5 years of experience.

CHART 4.3

YEARS OF THE EXPERIENCE

Less than one year 1 to 5 years More than 10 years

26%

36%

38%

TABLE 4.4

EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS

 EDUCATIONAL NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

QUALIFICATION

Less than 10th Std 13 11%

10th Std 35 29%

12th Std 34 28%

Diploma 25 21%

UG 13 11%

Total 120 100%

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that, 11% of the respondents are less than 10 th std and under –
graduation,29% employees having their educational qualification are 10 th std, 28% of the
respondents are 12th std and remaining 21% of the respondents are Diploma.

Majority 29% of the respondents are having their SSLC education.

CHART 4.4

EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS

 UG 11%

Diploma 21%

12th Std 28%

10th Std 29%

Less than 10th Std 11%

TABLE 4.5

MONTHLY INCOME OF THE RESPONDENTS

 INCOME NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Less than Rs.10000 22 18%

Rs.10000 – 15000 45 38%

Rs.15000 - 20000 34 28%

Above Rs.20000 19 16%

Total 120 100%

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that majority of 18% of the employees having monthly income of less
than Rs.10000, 38% of the employees having income of Rs.10000 – 15000, 28% of the
employees having Rs.15000 – 20000and remaining 16% of the respondents are earning above
Rs.20000

Majority 38% of the respondents are having monthly income of Rs.10000 – 15000.

CHART 4.5-MONTHLY INCOME OF THE RESPONDENTS

38%

28%

18%
16%

Less than Rs.10000 Rs.10000 – 15000 Rs.15000 - 20000 Above Rs.20000

TABLE 4.6

LOCALITY OF THE RESPONDENTS

LOCALITY NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

 Urban 24 20%

Semi Urban 67 56%

Rural 29 24%

Total 120 100%

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that 20% of the respondents employees living in urban area, 56% of the
respondents are living in semi urban area and 24% of the respondents are employees are living in
Rural area

Majority 56% of the respondents are living in Semi Urban area.

CHART 4.6- LOCALITY OF THE RESPONDENTS

Urban Semi Urban Rural

20%
24%

56%

TABLE 4.7

MARITAL STATUS OF THE RESPONDENTS

 MARITAL STATUS NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Married 84 70%

Unmarried 28 23%

Divorced 8 7%

Total 120 100%

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that 70% of the respondents are married ,23% of the respondents are
unmarried and 7% of the respondents were divorced.

Majority 70% of the respondents are married.

CHART 4.7

MARITAL STATUS OF THE RESPONDENTS

70%

23%

7%

Married Unmarried Divorced

TABLE 4.8

DEPARTMENT OF THE RESPONDENTS

 DEPARTMENT NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Sales 13 11%

Finance 8 7%

Marketing 24 20%

Production 68 57%

Human Resource 7 5%

Total 120 100%

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that,11 percent of the respondents belongs to the sales department, 7
percent of the respondents were belongs to the finance department, 20 percent of the respondents
were belongs to the Marketing department, 57 percent of the respondents were belongs to the
production department and 5 percent of the respondents were belongs to the Human Resource
Department.

Majority 57% of the respondents are belongs to the Production Department.

CHART 4.8- DEPARTMENT OF THE RESPONDENTS

Sales Finance Marketing Production Human Resource

5%
11%

7%

20%

57%

TABLE 4.9
 LEVEL OF MANAGEMENT OF THE RESPONDENTS

LEVEL NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Low 84 70%

Middle 28 23%

Top 8 7%

Total 120 100%

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that 70% of the respondents are low level management employees ,23%
of the respondents are middle level management employees and 7% of the respondents were top
management .

Majority 70% of the respondents are low level employees.

CHART 4.9 - LEVEL OF MANAGEMENT OF THE RESPONDENTS

Low Middle Top

7%

23%

70%

TABLE 4.10
 COMPENSATION MANAGEMENT

OPINION NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Highly satisfied 14 21%

Satisfied 44 37%

Neutral 36 30%

Dissatisfied 8 7%

Highly dissatisfied 18 5%

Total 120 100%

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that opinion about the compensation management, 21% of the
employees are highly satisfied, 37% of the employees are satisfied, 30% of the employees are
neutral, 7% of the employees are dissatisfied and 5% of the employees are highly dissatisfied.

Majority 37% of the employees are satisfied with compensation management.

 CHART 4.10

COMPENSATION MANAGEMENT

40%
37%
35%
30%
30%

25%
21%
PERCENTAGE

20%

15%

10%
7%
5%
5%

0%
Highly satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly dissatisfied
COMPENSATION MANAGEMENT

SATISFACTION TOWARDS DIRECT COMPENSATION

TABLE 4.11
 SATISFACTION TOWARDS DIRECT COMPENSATION –HOURLY

SATISFACTION NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Very High 18 15%

High 36 30%

Neutral 38 32%

Low 14 12%

Very Low 14 12%

Total 120 100

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that satisfaction towards salary direct compensation. 15% of the
employees are said very high, 30% of the employees are said high, 32% of the employees are
said neutral, 12% of the employees are said low and 12% of the employees are said very low.

Majority 32% of the employees are high satisfaction towards salary Direct
Compensation.

CHART 4.11

SATISFACTION TOWARDS DIRECT COMPENSATION –HOURLY

 Very High High Neutral Low Very Low

12% 15%

12%

30%

32%

TABLE 4.12

SATISFACTION TOWARDS DIRECT COMPENSATION –SALARY

 SATISFACTION NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Very High 28 24%

High 40 33%

Neutral 30 25%

Low 12 10%

Very Low 10 8%

Total 120 100

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that satisfaction towards hourly direct compensation. 24% of the
employees are said very high, 33% of the employees are said high, 25% of the employees are
said neutral, 10% of the employees are said low and 8% of the employees are said very low.

Majority 33% of the employees are high satisfaction towards Hourly Direct
Compensation.

CHART 4.12

SATISFACTION TOWARDS DIRECT COMPENSATION –SALARY

 Very Low 8%

Low 10%

Neutral 25%

High 33%

Very High 24%

TABLE 4.13

SATISFACTION TOWARDS DIRECT COMPENSATION –COMMISSION

 SATISFACTION NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Very High 47 39%

High 34 28%

Neutral 19 16%

Low 12 10%

Very Low 8 7%

Total 120 100

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that satisfaction towards commission direct compensation. 39% of the
employees are said very high, 28% of the employees are said high, 16% of the employees are
said neutral, 10% of the employees are said low and 7% of the employees are said very low.

Majority 39% of the employees are very high satisfaction towards commission Direct
Compensation.

TABLE 4.13

SATISFACTION TOWARDS DIRECT COMPENSATION –COMMISSION

 Very Low 7%

Low 10%

Neutral 16%

High 28%

Very High 39%

TABLE 4.14

SATISFACTION TOWARDS DIRECT COMPENSATION –BONUSES

 SATISFACTION NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Very High 40 33%

High 28 24%

Neutral 30 25%

Low 12 10%

Very Low 10 8%

Total 120 100

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that satisfaction towards bonuses direct compensation. 33% of the
employees are said very high, 24% of the employees are said high, 25% of the employees are
said neutral, 10% of the employees are said low and 8% of the employees are said very low.

Majority 33% of the employees are very high satisfaction towards Bonuses Direct
Compensation.

CHART 4.14

SATISFACTION TOWARDS DIRECT COMPENSATION –BONUSES

Very Low 8%

Low 10%

Neutral 25%

High 24%

Very High 33%

TABLE 4.15

SATISFACTION TOWARDS DIRECT COMPENSATION –TIPS

 SATISFACTION NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Low 42 35%

Very Low 78 65%

Total 120 100

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that satisfaction towards tips direct compensation 35% of the employees
are said low and 65% of the employees are said very low.

Majority 65% of the employees are very low satisfaction towards tips Direct
Compensation.

CHART 4.15

SATISFACTION TOWARDS DIRECT COMPENSATION –TIPS

Low Very Low

35%

65%

TABLE 4.16
 SATISFACTION TOWARDS DIRECT COMPENSATION – SAVINGS PLANS AND
ANNUITY

SATISFACTION NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Very High 40 33%

High 28 24%

Neutral 30 25%

Low 12 10%

Very Low 10 8%

Total 120 100

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that satisfaction towards bonuses direct compensation. 33% of the
employees are said very high, 24% of the employees are said high, 25% of the employees are
said neutral, 10% of the employees are said low and 8% of the employees are said very low.

Majority 33% of the employees are very high satisfaction towards Bonuses Direct
Compensation.

CHART 4.16
 SATISFACTION TOWARDS DIRECT COMPENSATION –SAVINGS PLANS AND
ANNUITY

Very Low 8%

Low 10%

Neutral 25%

High 24%

Very High 33%

TABLE 4.17

SATISFACTION TOWARDS DIRECT COMPENSATION –PIECE WORK/PROJECT WORK

 SATISFACTION NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Very High 47 39%

High 34 28%

Neutral 19 16%

Low 12 10%

Very Low 8 7%

Total 120 100

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that satisfaction towards piece work/project work direct compensation.
39% of the employees are said very high, 28% of the employees are said high, 16% of the
employees are said neutral, 10% of the employees are said low and 7% of the employees are said
very low.

Majority 39% of the employees are very high satisfaction towards piece work/project
work Direct Compensation.

CHART 4.17

SATISFACTION TOWARDS DIRECT COMPENSATION –PIECE WORK/PROJECT WORK

Very Low 7%

Low 10%

Neutral 16%

High 28%

Very High 39%

TABLE 4.18

SATISFIED WITH PAID TIME OFF IN ORGANIZATION

 SATISFACTION NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Highly satisfied 47 39%

Satisfied 34 28%

Neutral 19 16%

Dissatisfied 12 10%

Highly dissatisfied 8 7%

Total 120 100%

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that satisfied with paid time off in organization. 39% of the employees
are said satisfied, 28% of the employees are said highly satisfied, 16% of the employees are said
neutral, 10% of the employees are said dissatisfied and 7% of the employees are said highly
dissatisfied.

Majority 39% of the satisfied with paid time off in organization.

CHART 4.18

SATISFIED WITH PAID TIME OFF IN ORGANIZATION

 45%

40% 39%

35%

30% 28%

25%
PERCENTAGE

20%
16%
15%
10%
10%
7%
5%

0%
Highly satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly dissatisfied
PAID TIME OFF IN ORGANIZATION

TABLE 4.19

SATISFACTION TOWARDS LEARNING AND DEVLOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES

 SATISFACTION NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Strongly agree 30 25%

Agree 36 30%

Neutral 39 33%

Disagree 10 8%

Strongly disagree 5 4%

Total 120 100%

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows the satisfaction towards learning and development opportunities. 25% of
the employees are said Strongly agree for the best methods of work, 30% of the employees are
agree, 33% of the employees are said Neutral, 8% of the employees are said Disagree and 4% of
the employees are said strongly disagree.

Majority 33% of the employees opinion are neutral towards learning and development
opportunities.

CHART 4.19

SATISFACTION TOWARDS LEARNING AND DEVLOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES

 35% 33%
30%
30%

25%
25%

20%
PERCENTAGE

15%

10% 8%

5% 4%

0%
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES

TABLE 4.20

MATERNITY LEAVE PROVIDE BY THE ORGANIZATION

 SATISFACTION NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Highly satisfied 34 28%

Satisfied 47 39%

Neutral 19 16%

Dissatisfied 13 11%

Highly dissatisfied 7 6%

Total 120 100%

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that satisfaction towards the maternity leave benefit. 28% of the
employees are said highly satisfied, 39% of the employees are said satisfied, 16% of the
employees are said neutral, 11% of the employees are said dissatisfied and 6% of the employees
are said highly dissatisfied.

Majority 39% of the employees are said satisfied about the monetary benefit provide by
the organization.

CHART 4.20

MATERNITY LEAVE PROVIDE BY THE ORGANIZATION

 45%

40% 39%

35%

30% 28%

25%
PERCENTAGE

20%
16%
15%
11%
10%
6%
5%

0%
Highly satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly dissatisfied
MATERNITY LEAVE

TABLE 4.21

MEDICAL AND MEDICAL WELFARE SCHEMES

MEDICAL AND FAMILY NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

WELFARE SCHEMES

Very good 19 16%

Good 41 34%

Neutral 47 39%

Bad 13 11%

Total 120 100%

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that rating towards the medical and family schemes. 16% of the
employees are said rating is very good, 34% of the employees are said rating is good, 39% of the
employees are said rating is neutral, and 11% of the employees are said rating is bad.

Majority 39% of the employees are said neutral for rating towards the medical and family
schemes.

CHART 4.21

MEDICAL AND MEDICAL WELFARE SCHEMES

 45%

40% 39%

35% 34%

30%

25%
PERCENTAGE

20%
16%
15%
11%
10%

5%

0%
Very good Good Neutral Bad
MEDICAL WELFARE SCHEMES

TABLE 4.22

SATISFACTION TOWARS COMPANY TRANSPORT

 FEEL ABOUT JOB NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Highly agree 25 21%

Agree 44 37%

Neutral 40 33%

Disagree 8 7%

Highly disagree 3 2%

Total 120 100%

Source: Primary data

INTERPRETATION:

The table shows that feel about satisfaction towards company transport. 21% of the
employees are said highly agree, 37% of the employees are said agree for adequate support
system, 33% of the employees are said neutral, 7% of the employees are said disagree and 2% of
the employees are said highly disagree adequate support system.

Majority 33% of the employees are said agree for adequate support system provided in
the company for doing their job.

CHART 4.22

SATISFACTION TOWARS COMPANY TRANSPORT

 40%
37%
35% 33%

30%

25%
21%
PERCENTAGE

20%

15%

10%
7%
5%
2%
0%
Highly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Highly disagree
COMPANY TRANSPORT

CHI – SQUARE ANALYSIS

TABLE 4.23
The table depicts the Monthly Income of the respondents and medical and family welfare
schemes.

Monthly Income /
Very
family welfare Good Neutral Bad Total
good
schemes
Less than Rs.10000 3 22
7 9 2

Rs.10000 – 15000 7 45
15 18 5

Rs.15000 - 20000 5 34
12 13 4

Above Rs.20000 3 19
6 7 2

Total 19 41 47 13 120
(Source: Primary Data)

NULL HYPOTHESIS

HO: There is no significance relationship between the Monthly Income of the respondents and
family welfare schemes.

ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS

H1: There is significance relationship between the Monthly Income of the respondents and
family welfare schemes.
 Observed Expected
Particular (O-E)2 (O-E)2/ E
Frequency Frequency
R1C1 3 3.4 0.16 0.047

R1C2 7 7.5 0.25 0.033

R1C3 9 8.6 0.16 0.018

R1C4 2 2.3 0.09 0.039

R2C1 7 7.0 0 0

R2C2 15 15.0 0 0

R2C3 18 17.6 0.25 0.014

R2C4 5 4.7 0.09 0.019

R3C1 5 5.3 0.09 0.016

R3C2 12 11.6 0.16 0.013

R3C3 13 13.0 0 0

R3C4 4 3.6 0.16 0.044

R4C1 3 3.0 0 0

R4C2 6 6.4 0.16 0.025

R4C3 7 7.4 0.16 0.021

R4C4 2 2.0 0 0

Calculated value 0.289

Degree of freedom :(r-1) (c-1)

: (4-1) (4-1)
:9
Level of Significance :5
Table value : 2.700
Calculated value : 0.289
RESULT
 Since the calculated value is greater than the table value. So we accept of the null
hypothesis. There is significance relationship between the Monthly Income of the respondents
family welfare schemes.

TABLE 4.24

CHI – SQUARE ANALYSIS

The table depicts the age of the respondents and Identify superiors of skills

Age/
Satisfaction
towards Very high High Low Very low Total
Compensation
management
Less than 21 1 4

years 1 1 1

21 to 30 years 16 66
20 22 8

30 to 40 years 10 38
11 13 4

40 and above 3 12

years 4 4 1

Total 30 36 40 14 120

(Source: Primary Data)

NULL HYPOTHESIS

HO: There is no significance relationship between the age of the respondents and satisfaction
towards compensation management
ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS

H1: There is significance relationship between the age of the respondents and satisfaction
towards compensation management
 Observed Expected
Particular (O-E)2 (O-E)2/ E
Frequency Frequency
R1C1 1 1 0 0

R1C2 1 1.2 0.04 0.033

R1C3 1 1.3 0.09 0.07

R1C4 1 0.5 0.25 0.5

R2C1 16 16.4 0.16 0.009

R2C2 20 19.8 0.04 0.002

R2C3 22 22 0 0

R2C4 8 7.7 0.09 0.01

R3C1 10 9.5 0.5 0.03

R3C2 11 11.4 0.16 0.01

R3C3 13 12.7 0.09 0.007

R3C4 4 4.4 0.16 0.04

R4C1 3 3 0 0

R4C2 4 3.6 0.16 0.04

R4C3 4 4 0 0

R4C4 1 1.4 0.16 0.11

Calculated value 0.861

Degree of freedom :(r-1) (c-1)

: (4-1) (4-1)
:9
Level of Significance :5
Table value : 16.919
Calculated value : 0.861
RESULT
 Since the calculated value is greater than the table value. So we accept of the null
hypothesis. There is significance relationship between the age of the respondents and satisfaction
towards compensation management

TABLE 4.24

CORRELATION

The table shows that the educational qualification of respondents and organization
learning and development opportunities

X Y X2 Y2 XY

13 30 169 900 390

35 36 1225 1296 1260
34 39 1156 1521 1326
25 10 625 100 250
13 5 169 25 65
2
X =120
2
Y =120 ∑ X 2=3344 ∑ Y 2=3842 ∑ XY =3291

r=
∑ XY
√¿ ¿ ¿

3291
r=
√ ( 3344 ) (3842)

3291
r=
3584.36

r = 0.91

RESULT
 This is a positive correlation. The factors influence relationship with educational
qualification of respondents and organization learning and development opportunities

TABLE 4.25
 CORRELATION

The table shows that the educational qualification and Salary.

X Y X2 Y2 XY

13 28 169 784 364

35 40 1225 1600 1400
34 30 1156 900 1020
25 12 625 144 300
13 10 169 100 130
2
X =120
2
Y =120 ∑ X 2=3344 ∑ Y 2=3528 ∑ XY =3214

r=
∑ XY
√¿ ¿ ¿

3214
r=
√ ( 3344 ) (3528)

3214
r=
204014.82

r = 0.016

RESULT

This is a positive correlation. The factors influence relationship with educational

qualification and Salary.

TABLE NO: 4.24

ANOVA
NULL HYPOTHESIS

Ho: There is no significant relationship between age of the respondents and types of reward for
good work.

ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS

H1: There is a significant relationship between age of the respondents and types of reward for
good work.

Descriptives
95% Confidence Between-
Age of the Std. Interval for Mean Compone
respondents Deviatio Std. Lower Upper Minim Maxim nt
N Mean n Error Bound Bound um um Variance
Appreciation 19 1.79 .419 .096 1.59 1.99 1 2
Promotion 52 2.02 .139 .019 1.98 2.06 2 3
By incentives 36 3.00 .000 .000 3.00 3.00 3 3
Others 13 3.92 .277 .077 3.76 4.09 3 4
Total 120 2.48 .722 .066 2.35 2.61 1 4
Mod Fixed
.209 .019 2.45 2.52
el Effects
Random
.466 1.00 3.97 .690
Effects

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS
Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
23.286 3 116 .000
 ANOVA

Sum of Mean
AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS
Squares df Square F Sig.

Between (Combined) 56.905 3 18.968 434.697 .000

Groups Linear Unweighted 44.920 1 44.920 1.029E3 .000
Term Weighted 52.308 1 52.308 1.199E3 .000

Deviation 4.597 2 2.299 52.678 .000

Within Groups 5.062 116 .044
Total 61.967 119

Robust Tests of Equality of Meansb

AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

Statistica df1 df2 Sig.

Welch . . . .
Brown-Forsythe . . . .

a. Asymptotically F distributed.
b. Robust tests of equality of means cannot be performed for AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS
because at least one group has 0 variance.

POST HOC

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable:AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS
95% Confidence Interval
(I) types of reward for good work
(J) types of reward for good work Mean Std. Lower Upper
Difference (I-J) Error Sig. Bound Bound
LSD Appreciation Promotion -.230* .056 .000 -.34 -.12
By incentives -1.211* .059 .000 -1.33 -1.09
Others -2.134* .075 .000 -2.28 -1.98
Promotion Appreciation .230* .056 .000 .12 .34
 By incentives -.981* .045 .000 -1.07 -.89
Others -1.904* .065 .000 -2.03 -1.78
By incentives Appreciation 1.211* .059 .000 1.09 1.33
Promotion .981* .045 .000 .89 1.07
Others -.923* .068 .000 -1.06 -.79
Others Appreciation 2.134* .075 .000 1.98 2.28
Promotion 1.904* .065 .000 1.78 2.03
By incentives .923* .068 .000 .79 1.06
Tamhane Appreciation Promotion -.230 .098 .166 -.52 .06
By incentives -1.211* .096 .000 -1.49 -.93
Others -2.134* .123 .000 -2.48 -1.79
Promotion Appreciation .230 .098 .166 -.06 .52
By incentives -.981* .019 .000 -1.03 -.93
Others -1.904* .079 .000 -2.15 -1.66
By incentives Appreciation 1.211* .096 .000 .93 1.49
Promotion .981* .019 .000 .93 1.03
Others -.923* .077 .000 -1.16 -.68
Others Appreciation 2.134* .123 .000 1.79 2.48
Promotion 1.904* .079 .000 1.66 2.15
By incentives .923* .077 .000 .68 1.16
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
HOMOGENEOUS
 AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

Types of reward for Subset for alpha = 0.05

good work N 1 2 3 4

Student-Newman-Keulsa Appreciation 19 1.79

Promotion 52 2.02

By incentives 36 3.00

Others 13 3.92

Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 22.655

MEANS

RESULT
 From the above analysis, we find that calculated value of the F value 434.697is a positive
value, so H1 accept. Since the P value less than < 0.05 regarding there is a significant
relationship between age of the respondents and types of reward for good work. The results are
significant at 4% level.