We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10
MISSOURI ETHICS COMMISSION
Filed
BEFORE THE JANA 2 2024
Mesour Ethos
‘Commission
MISSOURI ETHICS )
COMMISSION, )
|
Petitioner, )
} Case No, 22-0048-I; 22-0051 |
v. ) |
> |
RON SCONCE, ) i
Candidate & Public Official, )
> |
and ) |
)
COMMITTEE TO ELECT RON ) |
SCONCE, ) j
Candidate Committee, ) |
) |
Respondents.) |
JOINT FINI F FACT.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER
The Missouri Ethics Commission (“MEC”), together with Ron Sconce and
Committee to Elect Ron Sconce (“Respondents”), collectively the “parties” jointly
stipulate and consent to action as set forth here (the “agreement”).
Respondents acknowledge their right to have this agreement reviewed by
counsel, Respondents further acknowledge they have received actual notice of the
legal complaint filed by the MEC in this case, have reviewed the contents of the
Complaint, and submit to the jurisdiction of the Missouri Ethics Commission.
Respondents further acknowledge they are aware of the various rights and
i
privileges afforded by law, including but not limited to: the right to appear and be
represented by counsel at a hearing before the MEC; the right to have all allegationsagainst Respondents proven upon the record by competent and substantial evidence;
the right to cross-examine any witnesses appearing at the hearing against
Respondents; the right to present evidence on Respondents’ behalf at the hearing;
and the right to a decision upon the record of the hearing, Being aware of these
rights, Respondents knowingly and voluntarily waive each one of these rights and
freely enters into this agreement and agrees to abide by its terme,
L
‘The parties mutually agree and stipulate, subject to adoption by the Missouri
Ethics Commission, the following shall constitute the Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law in this matter:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Respondent Ron Sconce was first appointed to fill a vacancy as Mayor of
Troy, MO, on January 28, 2020. He was elected to continue in the role in the April 6,
2021, special mayoral election. Further, he won a full term as Mayor at the regular
mayoral election on April 5, 2022. He continues to serve as mayor as of the filing of
this Petition.
2, Troy is a fourth-class city in Missouri.
3, Respondent Committee to Ron Sconce is a candidate committee first
registerod with the Missouri Ethics Commission on March 8, 2021.
4, Pursuant to § 105.961, the Commissions staff received two complaints
against Respondents. Upon investigation of the allegations, reports were presented
to the Commission,5. The Commission determined there was reasonable grounds to believe
violations of the Chapter 180 and §79.120 occurred and authorized a hearing
pursuant to § 105.961.5.
Count J - Failure to Report Expenditures
Candidate Ron Sconce & Committee to Elect Ron Sconce
6. Onat least three occasions, Respondents received in-kind contributions
in support of Sconce’s candidacy for office which were never reported.
7. In 2021, Respondent Sconce built a wooden sign in support of his
candidacy with materials he already had in his possession, which had a nonzero
monetary value. This in-kind contribution was never reported by Respondents.
8. On or about February 28, 2021, Respondent Sconce purchased $532
worth of campaign signs and yard stakes in support of his own candidacy. This in-
kind contribution was nover reported by Respondents.
9. During the 2022 election cycle, Respondent Sconce paid $250 for the
creation of ronformayor2022.com, a website supporting his candidacy. This in-kind
contribution was never reported by Respondents,
Count II
improper Conduct by Public Offi
Public Official - Ron Sconce
10, On April 4, 2022, a special board meeting of the Board of Aldermen was
called,
11. ‘The City of Troy Board of Aldermen special board meeting minutes for
April 4, 2022 shows that there was a motion made by an alderman for $20,000 a year
pay raise for the position of mayor, to take effect at the next term of mayor. Threealdermen voted “aye” and three aldermen voted “nay” resulting in the board
deadlocked at a 3-3 tie, The meeting minutes states, “Attorney Granneman advised
Mayor Sconce could vote to break the tie, Mayor Sconce voted aye to break the tie,
Motion carried.”
12, Respondent Sconce, pursuant to §79.120, broke the tie.
13. The next day, April 5, 2022, Sconce signed the bill into effect, the same
day as the general municipal election where Sconce was a successful candidate for
mayor.
14. Sconce took office, in a new term, thirteen (18) days later, April 18, 2022.
15. Sconce had a clearly recognizable stake in the vote where the close of
candidate filing for the mayoral race in which he was a declared candidate had long
passed and the vote was a mere day before the election,
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Count I - Failure to Report
Candidate Ron Sconce & Committee to Elect Ron Sconce
16. Section 180,011 defines a contribution to include:
12) "Contribution", a payment, gift, loan, advance, deposit, or donation
of money or anything of value for the purpose of supporting or opposing
the nomination or election of any candidate for public office... A
contribution of anything of value shall be deemed to have a money value
equivalent to the fair market value, "Contribution" includes, but is not
Limited to:
(@) A candidate's own money or property used in support of the
person's candidacy other than expense of the candidate's food,
lodging, travel, and payment of any fee necessary to the filing for
publie office;(b) Payment by any person, other than a candidate or committee,
to compensate another person for services rendered to that
candidate or committee[,]
17. Section 130,011(19) goes on to define in-kind contribution as a
contribution in a form other than money.
18, Section 180.041.1 requires campaign finance reports to be filed in
accordance with § 130.046, and requires them to include:
(8) Receipts for the period, including:
(@) Total amount of all monetary contributions received which
can be identified in the committee's records by name and address
of each contributor...
(@ Total dollar value of all in-
ind contributions received|.]
19. Where Sconce failed to timely report contributions received and
expenditures made, there is probable cause to believe he violated § 180.041.1.
ount I ~ Improper Condu
‘Public Official - Ron Sconce
20. Section 79.120 governs certain conduct of mayors of a fourth-class city,
stating:
‘The mayor shall have a seat in and preside over the board of aldermen,
but shall not vote on any question except in case of a tie, nor shall he
preside or vote in cases when he is an interested party[.]
21. Where Sconce voted to break a tie on a vote in which he had a
recognizable stake, there is probable cause to believe he violated the conilict-of-
interest prohibitions in § 79.120.m1.
Based on the foregoing, the parties mutually agree and stipulate, subject to
adoption by the Missouri Ethics Commission, the following shall constitute the Order
issued by the Missouri Ethics Commission in this matter:
CONSENT ORDER
‘The Missouri Ethics Commission finds probable cause to believe Respondents
violated §§ 79.120 and 130.041.1, and pursuant to § 105.961.4, hereby ORDERS:
1, Respondents shall comply with all relevant sections of Chapters 79 and 130.
2. It is the order of the Missouri Ethics Commission that a fee is imposed
against Respondents in the amount of $4,834.00, pursuant to Section
105.961.4(6), RSMo. However, if Respondents pay $2,000.00 within forty-
five days after the date of the Consent Order, the remainder of the fee will
be stayed. The foe will be paid by check or money order made payable to the
Missouri Ethics Commission.
8. Regardless of the stay in paragraph 2 above, if there is probable cause to
beliove that any Respondent commits any further violation of the campaign
finance laws under Chapter 79 or 130, RSMo, within the two-year period
from the date of this order, then the Respondent who committed the
violation will be required to pay the remainder of the fees. The fee will be
due immediately upon final adjudication finding that there was probable
cause to believe that such Respondent has committed such a violation.
4, Respondents shall be jointly and severally liable for all fees imposed under
this order.
UL.
‘The parties understand the Missouri Ethics Commission will maintain
this agreement as an open record of the Commission.2. ‘This agreement does not bind the Missouri Ethics Commission or
restrict the remedies available concerning any violations not expressly detailed here,
including any future violations,
3, Each party agrees to pay all of their own feos and expenses incurred as
a result of this case, its litigation, and/or its disposition,
4, Respondents, together with their heirs, assigns, agonts, reprosontatives
and attorneys, do hereby waive, release, acquit and forever discharge the Missouri
Ethics Commission, the Commission's respective members, employees, agents and
attorneys including former members, employees, agents and attorneys, of, or from
any liability, claim, actions, causes of action, fees, costs, expenses and compensation,
including, but not limited to, any claim for attorney's fees and expences, whether or
not now known or contemplated, including, but not limited to, any claims pursuant
to Section 536.087, RSMo, as amended, or any claim arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983,
which now or in the future may be based upon, arise out of, or relate to any of the
matters raised in this case or its litigation or from the negotiation or execution of this,
Joint Stipulation. The parties acknowledge that this paragraph is severable from the
remaining portions of this agreement in that it survives in perpetuity even in the
event that any court or administrative tribunal deems this agreement or any portion
thereof void or unenforceable,
5, ‘This agreement shall become effective immediately upon (1) the
signature of all parties; (2) adoption of the Joint Proposed Findings of Fact,Conclusions of Law by the Missouri Ethics Commission; and (8) issuance of a Final
Order by the Commission, without any further action of the parties,
SO AGREED:
RESPONDENTS RON SCONCE, MISSOURI ETHICS COMMISSION
COMMITTEE TO ELECT RON
SCONCE
ny
mn Seo1 Date
‘Attorney for DetftionerMISSOURI ETHICS COMMISSION Mlasour Ethics
‘Commission
MISSOURI ETHICS
COMMISSION,
Filed
BEFORE THE JAN 1 6 2024
} |
)
) |
Potitioner, |
) |
v. y |
) Case No. 22-0048-I; 22-0061-1
RON SCONCE, ) |
Candidate & Public Official, ) |
) |
and ,)
.
.
.
)
)
COMMITTEE TO ELECT RON
SCONCE, Candidate Committee,
Respondents.
CONSENT ORDER
The Missouri Ethics Commiesion finds probable cause to believe Respondents
violated §§ 79,120 and 130.041.1, and pursuant to § 105,961,4, hereby ORDERS:
1, Respondents shall comply with all relevant sections of Chapters 79 and 130,
2, It is the order of the Missouri Ethics Commission that a fee is imposed
against Respondents in the amount of $4,834.00, pursuant to Section
105.961.4(6), RSMo. However, if Respondents pay $2,000.00 within forty-
five days after the date of the Consent Order, the remainder of the fee will
be stayed. The fee will he paid by check or money order made payable to the
Missouri Ethics Commission.
3. Regardless of the stay in paragraph 2 above, if there is probable cause to
believe that any Respondent commits any further violation of the campaign
finance laws under Chapter 79 or 130, RSMo, within the two-year period
from the date of this order, then the Respondent who committed the |
violation will be required to pay the remainder of the fees. The fee will be |
due immediately upon final adjudication finding that there was probable |
cause to believe that such Respondent has committed such a violation.4, Respondents shall be jointly and severally liable for all fees imposed under
this order.
SO ORDERED, this 16th day of January, 2024.
ws: abttC Gd
Robert Cook, Chair
Missouri Ethics Commission
Dodd Insurance Services, Inc. and Tom Dodd, Jr. v. Royal Insurance Company of America, An Illinois Corporation F/k/a Royal-Globe Insurance Companies, 935 F.2d 1152, 10th Cir. (1991)