0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views9 pages

Set-I Answer

The document provides answers to various power system problems. It includes: - Current and voltage values for Problem 1. - Two possible voltage values for Problem 2. - Reactance diagrams and component values for Problems 3, 4, and 15. - Various line and transformer parameter values for Problems 6-9. - Voltage values and line parameters for Problem 10. - Model parameters for Problems 11 and 15. - Power values for Problems 12 and 14. - Ybus matrix and load flow solutions for Problems 17-19. - Suggestion to reduce Ybus matrix dimension by eliminating bus 4 for Problem 21.

Uploaded by

shivansh gandhi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views9 pages

Set-I Answer

The document provides answers to various power system problems. It includes: - Current and voltage values for Problem 1. - Two possible voltage values for Problem 2. - Reactance diagrams and component values for Problems 3, 4, and 15. - Various line and transformer parameter values for Problems 6-9. - Voltage values and line parameters for Problem 10. - Model parameters for Problems 11 and 15. - Power values for Problems 12 and 14. - Ybus matrix and load flow solutions for Problems 17-19. - Suggestion to reduce Ybus matrix dimension by eliminating bus 4 for Problem 21.

Uploaded by

shivansh gandhi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Answer keys for Problem Set-I

Q1. Current = 1.202∠2.95° p.u., Voltage = 0.9432∠-9.79° p.u.

Q2. (a) 0.995∠4.532° or 13.73∠4.532° kV, (b) 0.995∠4.532° or 7.93∠-25.468° kV

Q3. Reactance diagram of Problem no 3:

Xgen = 0.18 p.u ; XT1 =0.15 p.u ; Rline1=0.0164 p.u; Xline1= 0.1946 p.u;
XT2= 0.1652 p.u; XT3= 0.1785 p.u; Rline2= 0.0765p.u; Xline2=0.8107 p.u;
XT4=0.1714p.u; Xp=0.225 p.u; Rload1=0.937p.u; Xload1=0.703p.u;
Xs=0.575 p.u; Xt=0.775 p.u; XM=3.34 p.u; Rload2= 30 p.u

Q4. Reactance diagram of Problem no 4:


Q5. GMR = 5 mm, Ratio = 0.725

Q6. 0.6167 mH/km

Q7. 0.9035 mH/km

Q8. 0.0188 µF/km

Q9. Without ground effect = 9.74 nF/km, With ground effect = 9.765 nF/km

Q10. (i) Incident voltage at receiving end = 38.105∠0° kV


(ii) Reflected voltage at receiving end = 38.105∠0° kV
(iii) Incident voltage at sending end = 39.358∠8.01° kV,
Reflected voltage at sending end = 36.892∠-8.01° kV
(iv) Electrical length of the line = 8.01°

Q11. Nominal-π model


A = D = 0.9908∠0.2615°, B = 54.55∠63.89° Ω, C = 3.75 x 10-4∠90.1° S
For 250 Hz operation, it is long line. Corresponding parameters are
A = D = 0.7783∠1.54°, B = 227.6∠84.8° Ω, C = 1.742 x 10-3∠90.44° S

Q12. (a) 43.06 MW at power factor 0.9205 (lead)


(b) Line reactive power, QR = -19.66 MVAR,
Reactive power from capacitor, QC = 46.36 MVAR

Q13. 67.05 Ω

Q14. 48.2 MVAR

Q15. (a) Reactance Diagram:

Xgen=0.20 p.u; XT1=0.0857 p.u; Rline=0.0091 p.u; Xline=0.0681p.u; XT2=0.0732 p.u; XM1=
0.2745p.u; XM2= 0.5490 p.u; Xc= 42.701 p.u.

(b) VS = 236.125∠5.3° kV, VR = 227.562∠2.96° kV


(c) A = D = 0.9984∠0.012°, B = 12.106∠82.405° Ω, C = 2.654 x 10-4∠90.01° S
(d) Voltage regulation = 3.93%
Q16. (a)

(b)

Q17. (a) (i)


Bus no Total shunt Line Half line charging
admittance (p.u) admittance (p.u)
1 j0.03 1-2 j0.02
2 j0.035 2-3 j0.015
3 j0.025 3-1 j0.01

(ii)
(iii)

(b) Total no. of elements in Ybus (zero + non-zero elements) = 100 X 100 =10000
Total no. of non-zero elements inYbus= 0.1 X 10000 = 100
Total no. of off-diagonal elements inYbus=(1000-100) =900
900
Since Ybus matrix is symmetric, minimum number of inter-connections = 2
= 450 (ans)

Q18.
Bus No Bus Type
1 Slack bus
2 Load bus
3 Voltage controlled bus

Bus Voltage Magnitude Bus Voltage Angle (in degree)


Iteration (in p.u)
No | V1| | V2| | V3| 𝜃𝜃1 𝜃𝜃2 𝜃𝜃3
(deg) (deg) (deg)
1 1.04 1.0895 1.04 0 -1.3377 -3.7513
2 1.04 1.0806 1.04 0 -1.3911 -3.7625
3 1.04 1.0821 1.04 0 -1.3772 -3.7527

Iteration Mismatch Matrix Values (in p.u) Generation


No at bus 3
Δ𝑃𝑃2 Δ𝑄𝑄2 Δ𝑄𝑄3 𝑄𝑄𝑔𝑔3
(in p.u)
1 0.7353 -1.6224 1.9612 1.0678
2 -0.0714 0.0356 -0.1988 0.36
3 0.0123 -0.0036 0.0333 0.4663
4 -0.0022 0.0006 -0.0054 -

After iteration 3, maximum of the absolute values of the mismatch matrix becomes less than
the tolerance (=0.01) and hence the load flow converges after the 3rd iteration.
Active power losses in the lines = [0.0071 0.0137 0.0108]
Total active power loss = (0.0071+0.0137+0.0108) = 0.0316 p.u.
Q19.
Y_bus =
[0.9922 - 4.3925i 0 0 -0.5583 + 2.5820i 0 -0.4339 + 1.8275i
0 1.0214 - 1.9545i -0.4449 + 0.6461i 0 -0.5765 + 1.3085i 0
0 -0.4449 + 0.6461i 0.4449 - 8.1649i 0 + 8.2715i 0 0
-0.5583 + 2.5820i 0 0 + 8.2715i 1.1124 -13.9869i 0 -0.5541 + 2.3249i
0 -0.5765 + 1.3085i 0 0 0.5765 - 4.6418i 0 + 3.4153i
-0.4339 + 1.8275i 0 0 -0.5541 + 2.3249i 0 + 3.4153i 0.9880 - 7.6341i]
Jacobian =
[ 1.9936 -0.6590 0 -1.3346 0 -0.4538 0 -0.5881 0
-0.6590 8.9305 -8.2715 0 0 0.4360 0.0000 0 0
0 -8.2715 13.3075 0 -2.3249 0.0000 1.0845 0 -0.5541
-1.3346 0 0 4.7499 -3.4153 0 0 0.5650 0.0000
0 0 -2.3249 -3.4153 7.6591 0 -0.5541 0.0000 0.9663
0.4538 -0.4538 -0.0000 0 0 7.3992 -8.2715 0 0
0 -0.0000 -1.1403 0 0.5541 -8.2715 14.6663 0 -2.3249
0.5881 0 0 -0.5881 -0.0000 0 0 4.5337 -3.4153
0 0 0.5541 -0.0000 -1.0097 0 -2.3249 -3.4153 7.6091]
P_mismatch(1) = [0.3792 -0.5411 0.0279 -0.2885 -0.3783 ]’
Q_mismatch(1) = [0.6356 -0.6794 -0.0119 -0.0250]’
Mismatch(1) = [0.3792 -0.5411 0.0279 -0.2885 -0.3783 0.6356 -0.6794 -0.0119 -
0.0250]’
del_V(1) = [0.0141 -0.0539 -0.072 -0.0638]’
del_theta(1) = [-0.9511 -11.7284 -8.8006 -10.3648 -9.8835]’ (in radian)
Vbus(1) = [ 1.05 1.0199-0.0169i 0.9930-0.2062i 0.9350-0.1447i 0.9129-0.1669i
0.9223-0.1607i ]’
|Vbus|(1) = [1.05 1.02 1.0141 0.9461 0.9280 0.9362]’
Angle (Vbus)(1) = [0 -0.0166 -0.2047 -0.1536 -0.1809 -0.1725 ]’ (in radian)
QG(1) = 0.0999 p.u = (0.0999*50) MVAR = 4.995 MVAR < 6.5 MVAR (so lower limit is hit)
Q20.
Y_bus = [1.5999 -15.2488i -0.6098 + 5.4878i -0.9901 + 9.9010i 0
-0.6098 + 5.4878i 1.2994 -13.6337i -0.6897 + 8.2759i 0
-0.9901 + 9.9010i -0.6897 + 8.2759i 1.6798 -31.0719i 0 +12.7500i
0 0 0 +12.7500i 0 -12.5000i ]

B′ = [ 13.8889 -8.3333 0
-8.3333 30.8333 -12.5000
0 -12.5000 12.5000 ]

B′′ = [ 13.6337 -8.2759


-8.2759 31.0719 ]
Iteration # 1
P_mismatch(1) = [ -2.0000 0.5000 1.3]’; Q_mismatch(1) = [ -0.37 0.11]’
del_V(1) = [ -0.0298 -0.0044]’; del_theta(1) = [ -0.1181 0.0431 0.1450]’ (in radian)
Vbus(1) = [ 1.0000 0.9634 - 0.1144i 0.9947 + 0.0429i 1.0093 + 0.1474i]’
abs(Vbus)(1) = [1.0000 0.9702 0.9956 1.0200]’
angle(Vbus)(1) = [ 0 -0.1181 0.0431 0.1450 ]’ (in radian)

Iteration # 2
P_mismatch(2) = [ -0.0672 0.0873 -0.0179 ]’; Q_mismatch(2) = [ -0.3324 -0.0307 ]’
del_V(2) = [ -0.0307 -0.0092]’; del_theta(2) = [ -0.0037 0.0021 0.0007 ]’ (in radian)
Vbus(2) = [ 1.0000 0.9325 - 0.1142i 0.9854 + 0.0446i 1.0092 + 0.1482i ]’
abs(Vbus)(2) = [ 1.0000 0.9395 0.9864 1.0200 ]’
angle(Vbus)(2) = [ 0 -0.1218 0.0452 0.1457]’ (in radian)

P1inj(2) = 0.2406 p.u = 24.06MW; Q1inj(2) = 0.3493 p.u = 34.93MVAR


Q21. Yes, it is possible to reduce the dimension of the YBUS matrix.

As at bus 4 net current injection is zero, so the network can be reduced by eliminating node 4.
[Ybus_reduced is formed neglecting the off-nominal tap ratio of both the transformers.
Also the Qlimit on generation capacity has not been taken into consideration.]
Ybus_reduced =
[ 0.8078 - 3.8640i 0 -0.1966 + 1.5825i 0 -0.6113 + 2.3026i
0 1.0215 - 1.9545i -0.4449 + 0.6461i -0.5765 + 1.3085i 0
-0.1966 + 1.5825i -0.4449 + 0.6461i 0.8492 - 3.6444i 0 -0.2077 + 1.4277i
0 -0.5765 + 1.3085i 0 0.5765 - 4.6418i 0 + 3.3333i
-0.6113 + 2.3026i 0 -0.2077 + 1.4277i 0 + 3.3333i 0.8190 - 7.0424i ]

From bus To bus Resistance Reactance Half ONR


(r) (x) line_charging
1 3 0.0773 0.6223 0.0058 -
1 5 0.1077 0.4057 0.0153 -
2 3 0.7230 1.0499 0.0 -
2 4 0.2820 0.6400 0.0 -
3 5 0.0998 0.6859 0.0060 -
4 5 0 0.3000 0.0 1

Fast Decoupled Load Flow:

B′ = [ 2.5150 -0.9525 -1.5625 0


-0.9525 4.0174 0 -1.4579
-1.5625 0 4.8958 -3.3333
0 -1.4579 -3.3333 7.2561 ]

B′′ = [ 3.6445 0 -1.4277


0 4.6418 -3.3333
-1.4277 -3.3333 7.0424 ]
Iteration # 1
P_mismatch(1) = [ 0.3791 -0.5313 -0.2885 -0.3694 ]’
Q_mismatch(1) = [ -0.0262 -0.0938 0.0863 ]’
del_V(1) = [ -0.0063 -0.0187 0.0021 ]’
del_theta(1) = [ -0.0642 -0.2166 -0.2091 -0.1905 ]’ (in radian)
Vbus(1) = [ 1.0500 1.0179 - 0.0654i 0.9704 - 0.2135i 0.9599 - 0.2037i 0.9840 –
0.1897i ]’
abs(Vbus)(1) = [ 1.0500 1.0200 0.9937 0.9813 1.0021 ]’
angle(Vbus)(1) = [ 0 -0.0642 -0.2166 -0.2091 -0.1905 ]’ (in radian)
PG(1) = [0.0423 0.1209]’
QG(1) = [ 0.1807 0.0998]’
Iteration # 2
P_mismatch(2) = [ 0.0653 -0.0443 -0.0340 -0.0235 ]’
Q_mismatch(2) = [ -0.1654 -0.0999 -0.1612 ]’
del_V(2) = [ -0.0743 -0.0745 -0.0731 ]’
del_theta(2) = [ 0.0167 -0.0104 -0.0078 -0.0089 ]’ (in radian)
Vbus(2) = [ 1.0500 1.0188 - 0.0484i 0.8957 - 0.2069i 0.8856 - 0.1952i 0.9106 -
0.1840i ]’
abs(Vbus)(2) = [ 1.05 1.02 0.9193 0.9069 0.9290 ]’
angle(Vbus)(2) = [ 0 -0.0475 -0.2270 -0.2169 -0.1994 ]’ (in radian)
PG(2) = [ 0.8722 0.4347 ]’; QG(2) = [ 0.1026 -0.0016]’

Newton-Raphson Load Flow:

Iteration # 1
P_mismatch(1) = [ 0.3791 -0.5313 -0.2885 -0.3694]’
Q_mismatch(1) = [ -0.0262 -0.0938 0.0863]’
del_V(1) = [ -0.0636 -0.0781 -0.0540]’
del_theta(1) = [ -0.0434 -0.2057 -0.1912 -0.17701 ]’ (in radian)
Vbus(1) = [ 1.0500 1.0190 - 0.0442i 0.9166 - 0.1912i 0.9051 - 0.1752i 0.9313 -
0.1666i ]’
abs(Vbus)(1) = [ 1.0500 1.0200 0.9364 0.9219 0.9460]’
angle(Vbus)(1) = [ 0 -0.0434 -0.2057 -0.1912 -0.1770]’ (in radian)
PG(1) = [0.0423 0.1209]’; QG(1) = [ 0.1807 0.0998]’
Iteration # 2
P_mismatch(2) = [ 0.0118 -0.0484 -0.0315 -0.0258 ]’
Q_mismatch(2) = [ -0.0426 -0.0209 -0.0321 ]’
del_V(2) = [ -0.0268 -0.0234 -0.0252 ]’
del_theta(2) = [ -0.0366 -0.0301 -0.0352 -0.0253 ]’ (in radian)
Vbus(2) = [ 1.0500 1.0167 - 0.0815i 0.8844 - 0.2125i 0.8756 - 0.2016i 0.9021 -
0.1851i ]’
abs(Vbus)(2) = [ 1.05 1.02 0.9095 0.8985 0.9209 ]’
angle(Vbus)(2) = [ 0 -0.0800 -0.2358 -0.2263 -0.2023 ]’ (in radian)
PG(2) = [ 0.8243 0.4882 ]’
QG(2) = [ 0.3390 0.1190]’

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy