Annex A

CABINET CLUSTER ON
CLIMATECHANGE ADAPTATION, MITIGATION AND
DISASTER RISK REDUCTION (CCAM-DRR)
PERFORMANCE AND PROJECTS ROADMAP (2018-2022)

A. Background

Section 10 of Executive Order (E.O.) No. 24 “Reorganizing the mandates of

each cluster to formulate its performance and projects roadmap. The Climate Change
Adaptation, Mitigation and Disaster Risk Reduction (CCAM-DRR) Cabinet Cluster
Roadmap for 2018-2022 was drafted by the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (DENR) and Presidential Management Staff (PMS).

This was based on the baseline data on climatic trends and disaster risk
provided by the DOST, thru PAGASA and PhiVolcs. Other references include the
international frameworks (Sendai and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
Disaster Risk reduction Framework) and the national plans (Philippine Development
Plan and the National Strategic Framework on Climate Change).
The roadmap was presented during the 2nd CCAM-DRR Cabinet Cluster
Meeting dated 31 August 2017. Inputs from the National Economic and
Development Authority (NEDA), Office of the Cabinet Secretary (CabSec), and the
Climate Change Commission (CCC) were considered for integration in the draft
roadmap.

This version of the CCAM-DRR Roadmap indicates the corresponding

indicators for each expected outcome, lists of program/activity/project (PAPs) for
2018 categorized as funded based on the National Expenditures Program (NEP) and
unfunded and the forward estimates for 2019 to 2022 for the potential PAPs (to be
initiated, continued, expanded and scaled-up).
B. Overall Goal

The overall goal of the roadmap is aimed at achieving “Climate- and

Disaster-Resilient Communities Supporting Equitable and Sustainable
Development”.

C. Outcomes

The roadmap has four (4) outcomes, namely: 1) Increased Adaptive

Capacities of Vulnerable Communities; 2) Ensured Adequate Supply of Clean Air,
Water, and other Natural Resources; 3) Increased Resilience of Critical Infrastructure;
and 4) Enhanced Knowledge, Access to Information and Institutional Capacities.
D. Focused Areas

The focus areas of the roadmap are the twenty-two (22) vulnerable provinces,
822 coastal municipalities and the major urban centers (Metro Manila, Cebu, Iloilo
and Davao). The prioritization criteria applied are as follows:
1
For vulnerable provinces and coastal municipalities:

➢ High poverty incidence;

➢ High susceptibility or exposure to hazards such as:

• Drought;
• Strong winds;
• Flooding;
• Rain-induced landslide;
• Strom surge; and

➢ Situated in critical and degraded watershed

22 Vulnerable Provinces

22 Vulnerable Provinces

2
 The RRP will focus on eight provinces for FY 2019”

1. Western Samar 5. Surigao del Sur

2. Negros Oriental 6. Dinagat
3. Saranggani 7. Sorsogon
4. Surigao del Norte 8. Masbate

822 Coastal Municipalities

3
For urban centers:

➢ Population ➢ Rain-induced landslides

➢ Floods ➢ Storm surges
➢ Landslides ➢ Earthquakes
➢ Winds from rains ➢ Beach erosion
➢ Sea level rise ➢ Tsunami

Major Urban Centers

Metro Manila

Iloilo

Cebu

Davao

Major Urban Centers

4
E. Outcome/Indicator/Program

The indicators and programs for each outcome are presented as follows:

Outcome 1: Increased Adaptive Capacities of Vulnerable Communities

Indicator Program
1. Percent reduced number of people 1. Community-Based Disaster Risk Reduction
and families affected by climate and Management (DRRM) Program
geologic hazards in target
communities. 2. Health Program for the prevention and
mitigation of Climate-related Diseases
2. Percent reduced incidence of
climate related diseases 3. Community Livelihood and Enterprise
Continuity Program
3. Percent increase in income and
employment from biodiversity- 4. Disaster Risk Transfer Financing Program
friendly enterprises and agriculture-
based industries in target
communities and households 5. Implement the National Spatial Strategy
(NSS) which seeks to address the challenges
4. No. of communities with access to of agglomeration economies, connectivity
environmentally-sound adaptation and vulnerability.
technologies

5. Increased number of families and

community organizations with
access to livelihood and enterprise
capital financing and insurance

5
Outcome 2: Ensured Adequate Supply of Clean Air, Water, and Other Natural Resources

Indicator Program
1. Increased number and percentage 1.) Air and Water Quality Improvement
of highly urbanized and other Program
major urban centers compliant to
the ambient air quality standards
2.) Integrated Water Resources Management
2. Percentage of priority water Program
bodies within water quality
guidelines increased

3. Quality and availability of water 3.) Coastal Resources Management Program

in water-stresses and drought-
prone areas improved

4. Solid waste diversion rate 4.) Development of sustainable resource-based

increased industries
5. Percent reduction in the area of
denuded and degraded forest
areas (M ha, cumulative) 5.) Sustainable Consumption and Production
Program
6. Percent increase in forest areas
under effective management
6.) Enhancement of green spaces in urban areas
7. Area of priority terrestrial
protected areas effectively
managed increased

8. Area (hectares) of priority 7.) Strengthening of Environmental and social

marine protected areas safeguards for mineral resources
effectively managed increased development

9. Area of priority wetlands

effectively managed

10. No. of incentive mechanisms and

market-based instruments for
enhanced ecosystem-based
management formulated and
implemented in priority areas

6
Outcome 3: Increased Resilience of Critical Infrastructure

Indicator Program
1. New and restored protective 1.) Resilient Water Supply and Distribution
infrastructures designed and System
implemented conforming to 2.) Resilient Food Supply and Distribution
existing legislation and Chain
guidelines (e.g. Structural Codes 3.) Resilient Energy Supply and Distribution
of the Philippines, DPWH System
Guidelines) 4.) Resilient Communication Infrastructure
Network System/ Program
2. Percent increase in disaster 5.) Resilient Schools and Other Educational
resilient investments Facilities
6.) Resilient Road and other Transportation
3. Percentage reduction in the Network System
number of infrastructures 7.) Retrofitting and Construction of Resilient
damaged during disasters (such Shelter
as water supply, energy, search 8.) Modernization of Government Hospitals
and rescue center,
communication and transport 9.) Resilient Fire Prevention and Response
facilities, public and private Infrastructure
offices, schools, shelters, 10.) Modernization of Search and Rescue
hospitals, and evacuation Center
centers) 11.) Establishing Emergency Government and
Financial Center
4. Percentage reduction in budget
utilization for infrastructure
repair and rehabilitation (cost-
benefit)

5. Percentage decrease of areas

prone to flooding in selected
River Basins with upgraded
infrastructure

7
Outcome 4: Enhanced Knowledge, Access to Information, and Institutional Capacities

Indicator Program
1. Percent of climate and hazard 1.) Easy Access to Real Time Understandable
information uploaded and and Usable Climate and Natural Hazard
accessible in digital platform Information and Data
Additional: Percent of LGUs
connected to the Philippine 2.) Inculcating Climate and Disaster Resilience
Geoportal Consciousness in the Communities
3.) Institutionalizing Climate and Disaster
2. Utilization rate of web Resilience-Oriented Laws and Policies
applications including those with
offline functions for climate and
natural hazard information

3. Percent of LGUs with VRAs

conducted
Percent and no of LGUs using
updated climate and hazard
information in local planning,
such as the enhanced CLUP,
CDP, LCCAP and LDRRM Plan

4. No of schools with curricula and

education materials that includes
CCAM-DRR concepts and
practices

5. Operational mechanisms and

resources for nationwide public
awareness plan to stimulate
CCAM-DRR developed and
implemented
Percent of LGUs adopting Early
Warning Systems for natural
hazards and plans

6. Percent of LGUs with CC-DRR

sensitive plans (CLUP, LCCAP,
DDRMP, and other relevant
plans)
Percent of LGUs with permanent
DRRM officers

7. Percent of non-government and

private sector organizations
8
 Indicator Program
adopting CC-DRR sensitive
plans (such as Business
Continuity Plans, others)

8. Compliance rate for CC-DRR

resilient housing, socializes
housing (covered by outcome 3)
Suggestion: No. and percent of
local government engineers
trained on the DPWH 2015
DGCS

9. Percent Increase in area

coverage of upgraded and
modern forecasting equipment
Suggestion: Percent of total
Philippine area covered by high-
resolution multi-hazards maps

10. No. of groundwater resource

assessments conducted by 2022

11. No. of water-related plans and

programs using the results of
water resource-related R&D
results

12. National protocol to improve

access to government scientific
researches and studies,
geospatial information, and
climate projection developed and
implemented
No. of seismic and earthquake
induced landslide R&D
knowledge products and
communication, education and
public awareness programs
implemented

13. Percentage coverage of

implementation of the
Monitoring and Detection of
Ecosystems Changes for
Enhancing Resilience and
Adaptation in the Philippines
(MODECERA)
9
 Indicator Program

14. Percent area coverage and

implementation of improved
Weather, Marine Meteorology
and Short Range Climate
Forecasting

The projects/activities identified under each of program per outcome are of

combination of existing (under GAA) and the proposed projects. Further, these PAPs
are categorized as on-going and ideal.

Attached are the annexes for the PAPs identified outcomes, PAPs for 2018 funded
and unfunded projects and the 2019-2022 PAPs forward estimates: those to be
initiated, continued, expanded & scaled-up and the working documents in finalizing
the CCAM-DRR Cabinet Cluster Roadmap.

10
1