Fall 2023 OB Chap09
Fall 2023 OB Chap09
Organizational Behavior
Chapter 9
Foundations of Group Behavior
9-1
Learning Questions
• A group is defined as two or more individuals, interacting and being interdependent, who
have come together to achieve particular objectives.
• Social identity theory proposes that people have emotional reactions to the failure or
success of their group because their self-esteem gets tied into the performance of the
group.
• Group effectiveness
– Groups proceed through the stages of group development at different rates.
– Those with a strong sense of purpose and strategy rapidly achieve high performance and improve
over time.
– Similarly, groups that begin with a positive social focus appear to achieve the “performing” stage
more rapidly.
The Punctuated Equilibrium Model
Group Properties: 1 Roles
• Role
– A set of expected behavior patterns attributed to someone occupying a given position in a social
unit.
– Role perception: one’s perception of how to act in a given situation.
– Role expectations: how others believe one should act in a given situation.
• Psychological contract
– Role conflict: situation in which an individual faces divergent role expectations.
• We can experience inter-role conflict when the expectations of our different, separate groups are in
opposition.
Group Properties: 2 Norms
• Norms
– Acceptable standards of behavior within a group that are shared by the group’s members.
• Status
– Differences in status characteristics create status hierarchies within groups (Status characteristics
theory).
– Status derived from one of three sources:
• The power a person wields over others;
• A person’s ability to contribute to group’s goals; and
• Individual’s personal characteristics.
Group Properties: 3 Status
• Status has some interesting effects on the power of norms and pressures to conform.
– Status and norms
– Status and group interaction
– Status inequity
Group Properties: 4 Size
• Size
– The size of a group affects the group’s overall behavior.
– Smaller groups are faster at completing tasks than larger ones.
– Large groups in problem solving do better.
• Large groups are good at gaining input.
• Smaller groups are better doing something with input.
– Social loafing: the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than
alone.
Group Properties: 5 Cohesiveness
• Cohesiveness
– The degree to which members are attracted to
each other and are motivated to stay in the
group.
– It is important because it is related to the
group’s productivity
• The relationship of cohesiveness and
productivity depends on the performance-
related norms established by the group.
– If performance-related norms are high, a
cohesive group will be more productive. If
cohesiveness is high and performance
norms are low, productivity will be low.
Group Properties: 6 Diversity
• Diversity
– Diversity in the group’s membership
• The degree to which members of the group are similar to, or different from, one another.
• Surface-level vs. Deep-level
– Research finds
• Benefits and costs of diversity
• More difference in values and option, the greater its conflict
• Diversity can be bad for groups, unless managed effectively
– The impact of diversity on groups is mixed.
• It is difficult to be in a diverse group in the short term.
• Over time diversity may help them be more open-minded and creative.
• Even positive effects are unlikely to be especially strong.
Strengths and Weaknesses
of Group Decision-Making
• Strengths • Effectiveness and efficiency of group
– Complete knowledge decisions:
– Diversity of views – Accuracy
– Almost always out performs individuals – Speed
– Increase acceptance of solutions – Creativity
– Acceptance
• Weaknesses
– Consume time
– Create conflict
– Generate conformity pressures
Strengths and Weaknesses
of Group Decision-Making
• Source of breath and depth of input
• Groupthink
– It describes situations in which group pressures for conformity deter the group from critically
appraising unusual, minority, or unpopular views.
• Nominal begins when a problem is presented, then the following steps take place.
– Members meet as a group but each member writes down his or her ideas on the problem.
– After this silent period, each member presents one idea to the group.
– The ideas are discussed for clarity.
– Each group member rank-orders the ideas.
– The idea with the highest aggregate ranking determines the final decision.
Interacting, Brainstorming,
Nominal, and Electronic Meeting Groups
• The computer-assisted group or electronic meeting blends the nominal group technique
with sophisticated computer technology.
– Early evidence, suggests electronic meetings don’t achieve most of their proposed benefits.
– Lead to decreased group effectiveness,
– Require more time to complete tasks,
– Result in reduced member satisfaction compared with face-to-face groups.
Interacting, Brainstorming,
Nominal, and Electronic Meeting Groups
• Exhibit 9-5 Evaluating Group Effectiveness
Type of Group
Effectiveness Criteria
Interacting Brainstorming Nominal
Number and quality of ideas Low Moderate High
Social pressure High Low Moderate
Money costs Low Low Low
Speed Moderate Moderate Moderate
Task orientation Low High High
Potential for interpersonal conflict High Low Moderate
Commitment to solution High Not applicable Moderate
Development of group cohesiveness High High Moderate
Implications for Managers
• Recognize that groups can have a dramatic impact on individual behavior in organizations, to either
positive or negative effect. Therefore, pay special attention to roles, norms, and cohesion—to
understand how these are operating within a group is to understand how the group is likely to
behave.
• To decrease the possibility of deviant workplace activities, ensure that group norms do not support
antisocial behavior.
• Pay attention to the status aspect of groups. Because lower-status people tend to participate less in
group discussions, groups with high status differences are likely to inhibit input from lower-status
members and reduce their potential.
• Use larger groups for fact-finding activities and smaller groups for action-taking tasks. With larger
groups, provide measures of individual performance.
• To increase employee satisfaction, make certain people perceive their job roles accurately.