Scribd
Upload
41 views2 pages

ST Final Demo OBSERVER2 Februaruy 26 2020

The document contains a student teacher evaluation form that will be used to assess the student teacher's performance in 5 areas: personality, lesson planning, delivery of content and teaching methods, classroom management, and communication skills. Each area contains multiple criteria that will be rated on a scale of 0 to 6, with comments provided. The form collects information on the student teacher, mentor teacher, subject taught, and evaluation date. It will be used to provide descriptive feedback on the student teacher's performance.

Uploaded by

juvelynnavarro.7
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
41 views2 pages

ST Final Demo OBSERVER2 Februaruy 26 2020

The document contains a student teacher evaluation form that will be used to assess the student teacher's performance in 5 areas: personality, lesson planning, delivery of content and teaching methods, classroom management, and communication skills. Each area contains multiple criteria that will be rated on a scale of 0 to 6, with comments provided. The form collects information on the student teacher, mentor teacher, subject taught, and evaluation date. It will be used to provide descriptive feedback on the student teacher's performance.

Uploaded by

juvelynnavarro.7
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Name of Student Teacher:_________________________________________________________________________

Subject Taught:____________________________________ Name of Mentor:____________________________


School:___________________________________________ Demo Date:________________________________

NOTE:
Please read each criterion carefully. Use the rating scale below to effectively assess how well the student teacher
meets each criterion. It will be helpful to indicate your comments for each area to provide a descriptive feedback
for the student teacher’s performance.
6 Exceeds Expectations Criterion evidence is clear, appropriate and demonstrates “best practice.”

4 Meets Expectations Criterion evidence is clear and appropriate but there is still some room for
improvement.

2 Partially Meets Criterion evidence exists but needs to be presented/shown/manifested/worn


Expectations more clearly and/or further developed.

0 Does not meet No criterion evidence exists or is presented/shown/manifested/worn but in


Expectations an inappropriate manner.

AREAS RATING
A. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY (10%)
1. The teacher is neat and well-groomed.
2. The teacher is free from mannerisms that tend to disturb the students’ attention.
3. The teacher’s personality is strong enough to command respect and attention.
4. The teacher shows dynamism and enthusiasm.
5. The teacher has a well-modulated voice.
6. The teacher wears COMPLETE and well-pressed uniform (For men: formal black and
well-polished shoes; For women: formal black with heeled shoes).
Comments/Feedback:

B. LESSON PLANNING (15%)


1. Lesson plan is well prepared.
2. Learning outcomes/objectives are clear and measurable.
3. There is congruence between:
a. Objective and subject matter;
b. Objective and teaching procedure;
c. Objective and formative test;
d. Objective and assessment.
Comments/Feedback:

C. DELIVERY OF CONTENT and USE OF TEACHING METHODS (45%)


1. The teacher introduces the lesson by sharing its purpose and relevance.
2.The teacher demonstrates in depth knowledge of the subject matter.
3.He/she is able to connect/ relate lessons to actual life situations.
4. He/she gives sufficient and concrete examples to create meaningful learning experiences.
5. The teacher uses methods/strategies/techniques suited to the students’ capabilities.
6. The teacher uses instructional materials and technology to make the lesson interesting.
7. The teacher provides opportunity for guided and independent practice.
8. The teacher reviews essential concepts learned during the lesson.
9. The teacher makes effective use of formative assessment.
Comments/Feedback
NOTE:
Please read each criterion carefully. Use the rating scale below to effectively assess how well the student teacher
meets each criterion. It will be helpful to indicate your comments for each area to provide a descriptive feedback
for the student teacher’s performance.
6 Exceeds Expectations Criterion evidence is clear, appropriate and demonstrates “best practice.”

4 Meets Expectations Criterion evidence is clear and appropriate but there is still some room
for improvement.

2 Partially Meets Criterion evidence exists but needs to be


Expectations presented/shown/manifested/worn more clearly and/or further developed.

0 Does not meet No criterion evidence exists or is presented/shown/manifested/worn but in


Expectations an appropriate manner.

AREA RATING
D. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT (10%)
1. The teacher has a systematic way of checking:
a. attendance;
b. assignment/homework/agreement;
c. individual practice exercises/group works/group projects/projects;
d. passing in and out of the room; and
e. correcting, distributing and collecting papers.
2. Visual aids were within easy reach of the teacher during teaching.
3. The teacher emphasizes the following:
- classroom rules and expectations;
- procedures that minimize downtime
-maintenance of discipline/behavior; and
-maximization of student engagement in learning activities.
4. The teacher puts importance on:
- reinforcement of positive behavior;
-redirection of off-task behaviors/conversations;
-correction of disruptive behavior; and
-modeling of values (i.e. honesty, integrity and responsibility).
5. The teacher demonstrates/models sensitivity to all students; treats all students
respectfully and equitably.
Comments/Feedback:

E. COMMUNICATION SKILLS (20%)


1. The teacher exhibits good communication skills.
2. The teacher’s pronunciation, intonation, pace and voice modulation help him/her
illustrate concepts presented during the lesson.
3. The teacher is able to simplify concepts using language that students understand.
4. The teacher’s questioning skills stimulates discussion in different ways such as:
a. Probing for learner’s understanding;
b. Helping students articulate their ideas and thinking process;
c. Promoting risk-taking and problem solving;
d. Facilitating factual recall
e. Encouraging convergent and divergent thinking;
f. Stimulating curiosity; and
g. Helping students to ask questions.
Comments/Feedback

TOTAL SCORE

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy