The document is a gap audit checklist for Nyagatare Maize Processing Factory assessing compliance with ISO/TS 22002:2009 food safety standards. It identifies several areas of non-compliance including lack of documented food safety policy, objectives, and procedures. Training records for personnel were also not available. The audit found that hazard analysis and control plans had not been properly implemented.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
294 views8 pages
Checklist - ISO 22000
The document is a gap audit checklist for Nyagatare Maize Processing Factory assessing compliance with ISO/TS 22002:2009 food safety standards. It identifies several areas of non-compliance including lack of documented food safety policy, objectives, and procedures. Training records for personnel were also not available. The audit found that hazard analysis and control plans had not been properly implemented.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8
Gap Audit – Nyagatare Maize Processing Factory
ISO/TS 22002:2009 Pre-requisite Programmes on Food Safety Part 1: Manufacturing
Gap Audit Checklist
Food safety management systems — Requirements for any organization in the food chain
Clause Requirements Observations In Compliance
No. Has the organization determined all external and internal issues relevant to its purpose and 4.1 Yes No direction?
What is the process for monitoring and review of Yes No
the external and internal issues? Has the organization identified all relevant interested party requirements that are 4.2 relevant to the food safety management system? Yes No
How is the information monitored?
Yes No Has the organization determined the boundaries and applicability of the FSMS to establish its 4.3 Yes No scope?
Availability of scope as documented information Yes No
Has the organization established,
implemented, maintained, updated and 4.4 continually improves a food safety management system, including the processes needed and Yes No their interactions, in accordance with the requirements of the standard? Has the organization defined, documented, and Yes No 5.2.1 communicated its food safety policy Food safety policy? 5.2.2 Is the established food safety policy: a. available and maintained as documented Yes No information. Yes No b. communicated, understood, d applied at all levels within the organization. c. available to relevant interested parties, as Yes No Gap Audit – Nyagatare Maize Processing Factory
ISO/TS 22002:2009 Pre-requisite Programmes on Food Safety Part 1: Manufacturing
Gap Audit Checklist
appropriate. Are the responsibilities and authorities defined and 5.3 communicated within the organization? Yes No Has the company established an organizational structure Yes No Availability of list of food safety team members 5.3.1 and their qualifications Yes No Is there a letter of appointment for the food safety 5.3.2 team leader who has the responsibility for: a. ensuring the food safety management system is established, implemented, Yes No maintained and updated; b. managing and organizing the work of the food safety team; c. ensuring relevant training of and competencies for the food safety team (see 7.2). d. reporting to the top management on the effectiveness and suitability of the food safety management system. Has the organization considered issues referred to in 4.1 and the requirements referred in 4.2 6.1 Yes No and 4.3 to determine the risks and opportunities that need to be addressed. 6.1.2 Has the organization planned a. actions to address these risks and Yes No opportunities; b. how to: 1. integrate and implement the actions into its food safety management system processes; Yes No evaluate the effectiveness of these actions. 6.1.3 Are the actions taken by the organization to Yes No address risks and opportunities proportionate to: a. the potential impact on food safety Yes No requirements, and; b. the conformity of food products and Yes No services to customers, and; Gap Audit – Nyagatare Maize Processing Factory
ISO/TS 22002:2009 Pre-requisite Programmes on Food Safety Part 1: Manufacturing
Gap Audit Checklist
requirements of interested parties in the food chain. 6.2 Has the organization retained documented information on the objectives of the food safety Yes No management system. 6.2.2 When planning how to achieve objectives of the food safety management system, has the Yes No organization determined: a. what will be done; b. what resources will be required; Yes No c. who will be responsible; d. when it will be completed; Yes No how the results will be evaluated. Yes No 6.3 Are procedures in place for planning changes to the food safety management system. When planning changes, has the organization considered: a. the purpose of the changes and their potential consequences for the supply and maintenance of safe food production; Yes No b. the integrity of the food safety management system; Yes No c. the availability of resources to effectively implement the changes; Yes No d. the allocation or re‐allocation of responsibilities and authorities. Yes No 7.1.2 Has the organization determined and provided Yes No the competent persons (7.2) that are necessary to operate and maintain an effective food safety management system. 7.1.3 Has the organization provided the resources for Yes No the determination, establishment, and maintenance of the infrastructure necessary to achieve conformity with the requirements of the food safety management system. (land, vessels, buildings and associated utilities, , equipment, including hardware and software, transportation resource, information and Gap Audit – Nyagatare Maize Processing Factory
ISO/TS 22002:2009 Pre-requisite Programmes on Food Safety Part 1: Manufacturing
Gap Audit Checklist
communication technology) 7.1.4 How will it be demonstrated that the organization Yes No determines and manages the work environment needed to achieve conformity to the food safety management system 7.1.5 Has the organization implemented applicable Yes No PRPs so as to maintain and continually improve its FSMS? Has hazard analysis been done. Yes No Is the hazard control plan in place. 7.1.6 Evidence for control of outsourced processes Yes No
Personnel competence records Yes No
7.2 Availability of training records for personnel whose activities have an impact on food safety. Availability of training programme Are persons doing work under the organization’s Yes No control aware of: a. the food safety policy; Yes No 7.3 b. the objectives of the food safety management system relevant to their task(s); c. their individual contribution to the Yes No effectiveness of the food safety management system, including the benefits of improved food safety performance; d. the implications of not conforming with the Yes No food safety management system requirements. 7.4.1 Has the organization determined the internal and external communications relevant to the FSMS Yes No including: a. on what to communicate; b. when to communicate c. how to communicate d. who to communicate 7.4.2 Is there an appointed personnel to communicate Yes No externally, are there food safety requirements from customers and statutory and regulatory authorities 7.4.3 Is there evidence of internal communication with Yes No Gap Audit – Nyagatare Maize Processing Factory
ISO/TS 22002:2009 Pre-requisite Programmes on Food Safety Part 1: Manufacturing
Gap Audit Checklist
the food safety team on issues related to food safety? 7.5 Are there procedures in place for control of Yes No documented information 7.5.2 Is there a procedure for creating and updating Yes No Documents that is fully implemented 7.5.3 Is there a procedure for control of Documents Yes No that is fully implemented? Are records controlled, is there a procedure 8.1 Are adequate actions in place to ensure effective planning, implementation and control of the FSMS processes. including, the methods needed to ensure criteria in place for the Yes No processes?
Retention of documented information to show
process effectiveness, and to demonstrate conformity of products Yes No and services to requirements? 8.2.2 Are the PRPs procedures in place Yes No
8.2.4 When establishing PRPs has the organization Yes No
considered a. construction and lay‐out of buildings and utilities; b. lay‐out of premises, including workspace and employee facilities; c. supplies of air, water, energy and other utilities; d. pest control, waste and sewage disposal and supporting services; e. the suitability of equipment and its accessibility for cleaning, maintenance and preventive maintenance; f. supplier approval and assurance processes (e.g. raw materials, ingredients, chemicals and packaging); g. receiving of incoming materials, storage, transportation and handling of products; h. receiving of incoming materials, storage, transportation and handling of products; i. cleaning and disinfecting; Gap Audit – Nyagatare Maize Processing Factory
ISO/TS 22002:2009 Pre-requisite Programmes on Food Safety Part 1: Manufacturing
Gap Audit Checklist
j. personal hygiene; product information/consumer awareness; 8.3 Is there an effective traceability system that is Yes No documented 8.4 Availability of an emergency preparedness and Yes No response programme. 8.5.1.1 Has a hazard analysis and assessment been Yes No carried out and control measures selected for all potential hazards 8.5.1.2 Characteristics of raw materials, ingredients and Yes No product contact materials 8.5.1.3 Description of end products to the extent needed Yes No conduct the hazard analysis 8.5.1.4 Has the intended use of the product(s) been Yes No identified 8.5.1.5.1 Availability of process flow diagrams, plant Yes No layouts, anddescription of process steps and control measures 8.5.1.5.2 Confirmation of accuracy of the flow diagrams Yes No
8.5.1.5.3 In conducting hazard analysis, has the
organization described; a. layout of premises including food and non‐ food handling areas, processing equipment Yes No and contact materials, processing aids and flow of materials; b. existing PRPs, process parameters, control measures if any and/or the strictness with which they are applied, or procedures that Yes No may influence food safety; c. external requirements (e.g. from statutory/regulatory authorities or Yes No customers) that may impact the choice and the strictness of the control measures.
8.5.2.2 Has the organization identified hazards and Yes No
determined acceptable levels? 8.5.2.2.2 Has the organization identified steps (e.g. Yes No receiving raw materials, processing, distribution and delivery) at which each food safety hazard can be present, be introduced, Gap Audit – Nyagatare Maize Processing Factory
ISO/TS 22002:2009 Pre-requisite Programmes on Food Safety Part 1: Manufacturing
Gap Audit Checklist
increase or persist. 8.5.2.3 Has the organization carried out (for each Yes No identified food safety hazard) a hazard assessment to determine whether its prevention or reduction to an acceptable is essential. Has the organization put in place control Yes No measures capable of preventing or reducing the identified hazards to defined acceptable levels 8.5.3 Has the organization validated control measure Yes No combinations 8.5.4 Is the HACCP Plan established Yes No
8.5.2.3 Have critical limits been determined and the Yes No
action criteria for each CCP Availability of records for monitoring OPRP and Yes No CCPs. 8.5.3 Has the organization specified corrections and Yes No corrective actions to be taken when critical limits or action criterion are not met 8.5.4 Has the organization implemented and Yes No maintained the hazard control plan 8.5.2.3 Has the information specifying the PRPs and the Yes No hazard control plan been updated? Are the monitoring and measuring methods Yes No and equipment verified or calibrated as necessary? Availability of the calibration schedule Availability of calibration records 8.8.1 Availability of results of analysis of individual Yes No verification results by the food safety team 8.8.2 Is analysis of results of verification activities done Yes No by the food safety team to establish performance trends 8.9 Are there documented procedures for Control of Yes No non- conformity (Corrections, corrective actions and handling of potentially unsafe products) 8.9.4 Availability of procedures for handling potentially Yes No unsafe products Gap Audit – Nyagatare Maize Processing Factory
ISO/TS 22002:2009 Pre-requisite Programmes on Food Safety Part 1: Manufacturing
Gap Audit Checklist
8.9.4.3 Availability of procedures for handling non- Yes No conforming products 8.9.5 Is there a procedure for withdrawal - Availability Yes No of results of mock recall 9.1 Are procedures in place for monitoring, Yes No measurement, analysis and evaluation Records on evidence of results Records on the performance and effectiveness of Yes No the food safety management system. Data analysis and evaluation of information Yes No arising from the monitoring and measurement, including results of verification activities related to PRPs and the hazard control plan 9.2 Are internal audits carried out as per the Yes No schedule and the findings discussed by the food safety team and management Availability of internal audit programme Audit criteria and scope defined List of competent auditors 9.3.2 Management review meeting minutes Yes No 9.3.3 Management review output minute Yes No Are procedures in place for handling of non- Yes No conforming products and corrective action(s) 10.1.2 Is documented information maintained to show Yes No the nature of the nonconformity and any subsequent actions taken, and the results of any corrective action taken? 10.2 Is the organization continually improving the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the quality management system? Are the outputs of analysis and evaluation, and Yes No the outputs from the management review process used to identify the areas of underperformances? How is it demonstrated that the effectiveness of the food safety management system is being continually improved?