1

INDEX

S.NO DETAILS PAGE NO.

1. ABOUT 13th INTRA MOCK TRIAL IN THE 1

MEMORY OF DR DEEPTI KOHLI

2. EVENT SCHEDULE 2

3. RULES OF THE COMPETITION 3

4. REGISTRATION 4

5. ORAL ROUNDS 5-6

6. SCORING 7

7. GENERAL RULES 8-9

8. PRIZES 10

9. EXEMPLARY POWER CLAUSE 11

10. DISCLAIMER 12

11. ORGANIZING COMMITTEE 13

12. TRIAL PROPOSITION 14-20

2
 THE 13TH INTRA MOCK TRIAL
IN THE MEMORY OF DR DEEPTI KOHLI

ABOUT DR. DEEPTI KOHLI

Dr. Deepti Kohli was an Associate Professor and Convener, Advocates’ Legion, Moot
Court Committee at VSLLS, VIPS-TC. She was known amongst students as a passionate
and dedicated mentor for mooters. Many students brought laurels to the institute by
winning moot competitions under her able guidance. She inculcated moot culture into
the academic atmosphere of VSLLS, VIPS-TC. She, as the Convener, introduced a
variety of moot activities and helped organise training sessions to imbibe the necessary
skills in the students of the institution. Unfortunately, we lost this gem during the second
wave of COVID-19 in May 2021. Dr. Deepti Kohi’s contribution to the institution can
never be overstated, and we seek to honor her memory through the success of this
competition. The present edition of Intra Mock Trial Competition is a tribute offered by
all alumni and students and the entire VIPS-TC family to our beloved Professor.
ABOUT MOCK TRIALS
A mock trial is an act or imitation trial. It is similar to a moot court, but mock trials
simulate lower-court trials, while moot court simulates appellate court hearings.
Attorneys preparing for a real trial might use a mock trial consisting of volunteers as role
players to test theories or experiment with each other. At VIPS-TC, Mock Trial is the
name of an extracurricular program in which students participate in rehearsed trials to
learn about the legal system in a competitive manner. Interscholastic mock trials take
place on all levels including primary school, middle school, high school, college, and
law school. Mock trial is often taught in conjunction with a course in trial advocacy or
takes place as an after school enrichment activity. Some gifted and talented programs
may also take place in one. The current edition of the Intra Mock Trial Competition has
been dedicated to Dr. Deepti Kohli.

3
I. SCHEDULE

1. February 06, 2024 : Registrations Open

2. February 06, 2024 : Release of Trial Proposition
3. February 18, 2024 : Last date for seeking Clarifications (till 12
pm)
4. February 19, 2024 : Publishing of Clarifications
5. February 24, 2024 : Last Date for Registration
6. March 09, 2024 : Oral Rounds (time slots will be disclosed
later)

4
II. RULES OF THE COMPETITION

❖ Parties:- It refers to the parties to the matter as identified by

the moot problem as Prosecution and Defence.
❖ Team Code:- Team Code refers to the unique number allotted
to each participating team. In case of the Intra Mock Trial
competition, each individual participant shall be referred to as
the “Team.” The Team Codes shall be sent a week after the last
date of registration.
❖ Official Email ID: advocateslegionevents2023@gmail.com

A. Individual Participation Only

There shall be one (1) individual participant only. The
students of Second Year and up, i.e., Third and Fourth
Years, from B.A., LL.B and B.B.A., LL.B are eligible to
participate in the competition.

B. The Rounds
1. Mock Trial is a simulated criminal trial that pertains to
the Witness Examination. The trial includes the
following three stages:
a. Opening statements
b. Examination of witnesses (only Cross Examination)
c. Closing address

2. In the oral round, each participant shall be given a chance to argue

from only one side, which will be subject to the allotment made by the
organizers along with the team codes.
3. There shall be one round only.
4. In case a participant is unable to report to the designated Court room
at the starting of any Round, then the round will continue as per the
discretion of the organize

5
III. REGISTRATION

A. Registration process

1. The prospective participants shall submit the duly completed

registration form by 24th February, 2024. Early registrations are
encouraged.
2. All participants shall get an individual code by the committee a week
after the end of the registration process. Thereafter, the individuals
shall use their designated individual code for any further
correspondence with the committee.

B. For Participants

1. Registration for the 13th Intra Mock Trial Competition, 2024 will be
through online form submission via the link given further.

2. NOTE: Last date for registration is 24th February, 2024 by 11:59

pm.

3. The payment shall be made of Rs 250/- per person through the

Payment Link- https://forms.eduqfix.com/eventfee/add

4. Once the payment has been made, participants shall fill up the
Registration Form- https://forms.gle/LgaDkTodv9fL7Awg9.

5. In the link, while filling the details regarding “Course Name” and
“Activity”, type “VSLLS INTRA MOCK TRIAL 2024” in both.

6. Once payment has been made, it will not be refunded in any case.

NOTE: Proof of payment is to be attached along with the registration form

6
IV. ORAL ROUNDS

A. General Rules
1. Exhibits of the case are already submitted before the Court and are on record.
2. The participant counsel shall cross-examine the witnesses provided by
the organizers.
3. The participant counsel may examine all or any of the witnesses within
the time allotted to them.
4. The participant counsels shall, before the commencement of a round,
notify the court master as to which witness they would like to call for
cross-examination in the course of the trial since the witnesses would be
admitted one at a time.

B. Oral rounds
1. In the oral rounds, Counsels from both sides i.e., Prosecution & Defence,
shall be given a total of 20 minutes each to make oral submissions. Every
minute of extra time will attract automatic penalties for the speaker
crossing the limit.
2. The round would be divided among the following stages in the sequence
given below:
a) Opening statement by the Prosecution – 5 minutes
b) Opening statement by the Defence. – 5 minutes
c) Cross Examination by the Defence – 10 minutes
d) Cross Examination by the Prosecution – 10 minutes
e) Closing statement by the Defence – 5 minutes
f) Closing Statement by the Prosecution – 5 minutes

The time break up given above is a guideline and not a rule. The individual
is at liberty to use the allotted 20 minutes according to their convenience.
(Judges are requested to consider the time utilized by each speaker while
giving marks)

NOTE - All the aforementioned 6 stages are mandatory, although the

participant counsel is at liberty to skip the cross-examination of a
particular witness in order to adhere to these guidelines.

7
V. SCORING

A. Oral rounds
Participants will be marked out of 100 individually by both the judges.

B. Oral presentation
1. Marks shall be given on the basis of the following suggestive criteria’s:
a. Knowledge of facts
b. Logic, reasoning and clarity
c. Persuasiveness & deference to court
d. Proper, articulate and systematic analysis of the issues arising out of facts
e. Understanding of the laws involved including laws relating to
evidence and procedure
f. Ability to successfully conduct cross examinations in allotted time
g. Ability to elicit favorable facts from witnesses
h. Ability to deal with unreceptive, argumentative or hostile witnesses
i. Ingenuity (ability to argue by analogy from related aspects of law and facts)
j. Court craft (court manners, court language and body language in the court)
2. The participants would be marked in the oral rounds in the following manner:
Understanding of the Issues 20
Questions 60
Court Etiquette 20
Total 100

8
VI. GENERAL RULES

A. Eligibility and Individual composition

1. This competition is open to all the students of 4th, 6th, 8th and
10th semester of VSLLS for participation subject to following
conditions and fulfilling other requirements for registration and
participation.
2. The Competition is scheduled to be organised in offline mode.
3. There shall be individual participation. A team comprising more
than one person is not allowed.
4. There shall be no written submissions.
5. The main focus shall be on the art of cross-examination, which
involves the exercise of identifying leading and non-leading
questions..
6. There is no gender-based restriction on the role-play of witnesses.
(a male can act as female and vice-versa).

B. Assistance sought from third parties

Participants are not permitted to receive substantive assistance towards
preparation of opening/closing statements, arguments, framing of
questions etc. from any third parties, including members of the
organising committee etc. Any individual found to be indulging in such
untoward behavior shall be disqualified from the competition with
immediate effect.

C. Individual Codes
Upon confirmation of participation, each individual will be allotted a
“Code”. The individuals shall refer to themselves during the competition
using this Code only. They shall not disclose their identity otherwise to
anybody except as and when demanded by a member of the Organising
Committee. Any violation of this rule would result in immediate
disqualification.

D. Attire
The dress code for the participants shall be an advocate’s attire. All the
participants MUST appear in a formal dress. Black/Grey Tie is

9
 compulsory for all those who are wearing white shirts and black
trousers. Robes and collar bands are not permitted.

E. Clarifications to the problem

1. Any individual wishing to make a clarification to the problem
may do so by email, listing their questions in a “.doc” or “docx.”
document.
2. The email has to be sent to advocateslegionevents2023@gmail.com

F. Anonymity
The participants must not disclose their identity and names or any
such information during the oral rounds for the entire duration of the
13th Intra Mock Trial Competition 2024. The violation of this rule
will result in disqualification, as determined by the Competition
Administrator.

10
VII. PRIZES

The following will be awarded the Trophies/Mementos-

1. Best Prosecutor
2. Best Defendant
3. Best Witness

All participants will be given the Certificate of Participation.

11
VIII. EXEMPLARY POWER CLAUSE

The OC has the following powers and sole discretion to:

1. Enforce all the competition Rules and provide a definitive & final
interpretation of the Competition Rules;
2. Resolve any dispute that may arise during the Competition;
3. Change or supplement the competition Rules, if necessary. Changes or
supplements will be duly communicated to all participating individuals;
and
4. Take disciplinary action for any unethical, unprofessional and immoral
conduct by any participant/ participating individuals.

By participating in the competition, participants agree that the decision of the

Organizing Committee shall be final and binding.

Any clarifications regarding the competition can be sought from:

advocateslegionevents2023@gmail.com or Student Coordinators.

12
IX DISCLAIMER

1. All the characters in the Moot problem are fictional. Any resemblance to
any person living or dead is purely coincidental, unintentional and not
intended to hurt anybody’s sentiments.
2. All documents not provided but necessary for trial are deemed to be on the record.
3. Each side must examine the witnesses. However, the Counsels must
complete the cross- examination of the witnesses in the prescribed time
limit and the Counsels shall not be granted an extension of time to complete
the examination of all of their witnesses, though subject to the discretion
of the judges.
4. The jurisdiction of the various police stations, police beats and police
checkpoints are not subject to dispute.
5. Any usurpation of the below-given norms will lead to direct
disqualification from the competition.
6. Extrapolation of the statements of the witnesses is subject to the law of the land.
7. Any change in the statements of the witnesses which require additional
documents to be proved shall not be permitted.

13
 ORGANIZING COMMITTEE

FACULTY CONVENER, ADVOCATES’ LEGION, VSLLS, VIPS-TC

Dr. Gunjan M Ahuja

Convenor, Advocates’ Legion, VSLLS, VIPS-TC

FACULTY CO- CONVENER, ADVOCATES’ LEGION, VSLLS, VIPS-TC

Mr. Aaditya Vikram Sharma,

Co-Convenor, Advocates’ Legion, VSLLS, VIPS-TC
Dr. Sonali Sharma,
Co-Convenor, Advocates’ Legion, VSLLS, VIPS-TC

FACULTY MEMBERS

Ms. Samriti
Dr Avinash Kumar
Ms. Ayesha Gupta
Dr. Kusum Lata Bawalia
Dr. Abhishek Trivedi
Ms. Nitika Upadhyaya

STUDENT CONVENER, ADVOCATES’ LEGION, VSLLS, VIPS-TC

Ms. Arshia Jain
Student, Co-Convenor
Mr. Hardik Giri
Student, Co-Convenor
Ms. Kashish Gulati
Student, Co-Convenor

STUDENT COORDINATORS, ADVOCATES’ LEGION, VSLLS, VIPS-TC

Ms. Chinar Garg
Mr. Sarthak Kohli

14
 TRIAL PROPOSITION

1. Arizoa is a peaceful nation. In the State of Zena in Arizoa Mrs. Vijiya was living
happily with her two sons. In the year 2000 she purchased a house in Sigyan Vihar in
Zena. She was living in the house happily with her family. After two years in 2002, her
elder son, Rupesh got married. Vijiya built the first floor of the house and Rupesh
started living there with his wife. In 2004, her younger son, Sahesh got married. Vijiya
built the second floor of the house and Sahesh started living there with his wife. In
2006, both the sons purchased their own separate houses in Kuraj Vihar and started
living there with their separate families. In the year 2008, Mrs. Vijiya rented the second
floor of her house to Mr. Adesh. Mr. Adesh started living there with his wife Suma,
and two children. Mrs. Vijiya kept the first floor vacant. This floor was occasionally
used by her sons when they would come to visit her.
2. In the year 2010 a son was born to Rupesh. Mrs. Vijiya decided to throw a party
on 9th March, 2010 for all her relatives and friends for the naming ceremony of her
grandson. During the naming ceremony she expressed that she wishes to move in with
her sons and sell the ground and first floor of her house. Her sons were also happy with
this and agreed with her. This conversation was overheard by Mr. Adesh.
3. On 10th March, 2010 the very next day of the party, Mr. Adesh approached Mrs.
Vijiya in the morning around 10:00 AM. Mrs. Vijiya had just completed her puja and
was reading the newspaper. Mr. Adesh told her that he and his wife are interested in
buying the ground, first floor and second floors of the house. Mrs. Vijiya told him that
she is interested in selling the second floor of the house only to him. Mrs. Vijiya called
her sons and within three months the second floor was sold to Mr. Adesh.
4. On 10th September, 2010 Mr. Adesh called Sahesh around 10:00 AM and informed
him that he was going to pay his share of the electricity bill and asked if he should pay
the share of ground and first floor as well. Sahesh agreed with him and told him to take
the cash from his mother. He also told Mr. Adesh to take the signatures of his mother
on a blank paper and get the receiving on that for electric bill from the department. Mr.
Adesh immediately went to the house of Mrs. Vijiya and collected the cash for the bill
and signature for getting the receipt. Mr. Adesh left for the department to pay the bill.
Meanwhile Sahesh called Rupesh and told him about the same. Rupesh told Sahesh
that he should not have asked Mr. Adesh for signatures on a blank page as that could

15
be misused by him. Sahesh immediately called his mother to tell her to not sign on the
page and wait for him to come to her house. However, his mother told him that she has
already signed on the page and given it to Mr. Adesh. Sahesh called Mr. Adesh
however the phone was answered by his wife who told him that he had left his phone
at home and went to pay the bill. Around 4:00 PM, Mr. Adesh went to meet Mrs. Vijiya
and informed her that he had paid the bill. Mrs. Vijiya asked for the blank page on
which she had signed to which Mr. Adesh stated that he has submitted it in the office
as they said that the receipt will be given by tomorrow. On 11th September, 2010 Mrs.
Vijiya asked Mr. Adesh about the blank paper to which Mr. Adesh informed her that
the office had misplaced it and he could not get the receipt.
5. On 10th January, 2012 Mrs. Vijiya’s house-help Ms. Nirupa came to her house in
the morning at 7:00 AM for cleaning the house. She kept ringing the door-bell but
nobody answered. She called Mrs. Vijiya but no one answered. She called Rupesh
about the same. Rupesh told her that she should keep calling Mrs. Vijiya and
simultaneously keep ringing the bell till she answers. Meanwhile, Rupesh tried calling
Mr. Adesh to request him to look into the matter. Mr. Adesh did not pick up his call so
he tried calling the security guard to look into the matter. At the same time, he got into
his car and reached the colony around 8:00 AM. When he reached the house, he was
informed by Ms. Nirupa that somebody had killed Mrs. Vijiya. Rupesh called the police
immediately and when the investigating officer came, he told him that Mr. Adesh has
killed his mother because of his greed for the ground and first floor of the house. The
investigating officer asked Rupesh to report at the police station and at the same time
registered a FIR and arrested Mr. Adesh on the basis of this statement of Rupesh. The
case went up for trial in the Sessions Court of Sarvena in the city of Zena.

Note: The participants are required to frame the issues on their own. Refer to the
following statements and copy of FIR for the purpose of examination of the witnesses.
The laws of Arizoa are pari materia to the laws of India.

16
Statement of witness’s u/s 161 Cr.PC
PW 1 (Rupesh)
My name is Rupesh and I am the elder son of the deceased Mrs. Vijiya. On 10th
September, 2010 my younger brother Sahesh had called me and informed me that
Adesh was going to pay the electric bill for that month and I need not worry about it.
He told me that Adesh would also get a receiving and my mother has signed on a
blank page for that purpose. I got angry about that matter and told him that Adesh
was a greedy person. He had eyes on our property and was repeatedly asking me to
force my mother to sell the first and ground floor of the house to him. On 10th
January, 2012 I received a call from Nirupa that my mother was not opening the door.
I tried calling Mr. Adesh but he did not answer his phone. I immediately drove to my
mother’s house as I was afraid that she was not well. My mother was not keeping
well for quiet some-time. When I reached the house, I saw that Suma and Adesh were
already inside. Suma was putting a bed sheet on the body of my mother and Adesh
was talking to our neighbor, Dhimu. When I checked the CCTV footage of the
previous night, I saw that a person looking like Mr. Adesh was ringing the bell of my
mother’s house.
PW 2 (Nirupa)
My name is Nirupa and I have been working as a house-help for the past 10 years.
On 10th October, 2011 Adesh bhaiyya came to the house of Vijiya aunty. Rupesh
bhaiyya was already there. An altercation took place between them where Rupesh
bhaiyya had pushed Adesh bhaiyya. I do not know the reason behind their fight. On
10th January 2012 I reached Vijiya aunty’s house at 7:00 AM but nobody answered.
I called Rupesh bhaiyya and kept ringing the bell. After some time, I saw Suma
Bhabhi and Adesh bhaiyya coming downstairs and I told them about the matter. I
saw Bhabhi giving worried looks at bhaiyya. Bhaiyya asked me to ring the bell of
Dhinuji while he started calling Vijiya aunty. When Dhinuji came he and Bhaiyya
pushed the door and broke it. We all entered the house and found that Vijiya aunty
was lying on the floor with blood coming from the back of her head. I started crying
and bhaiyya started talking to Dhinuji in a hush hush manner. After 10 minutes
Rupesh bhaiyya came and called the police.
PW3 (Sahesh)
I am Sahesh and I am the youngest son of Mrs. Vijiya. On 10th September, 2010 Mr. Adesh
called me around 10:00 AM and informed me that he was going to pay his share of the

17
 electricity bill and asked if he should pay the share of ground and first floor as well. I agreed
with him and told him to take cash from my mother. I also told Mr. Adesh to take the signatures
of my mother on a blank paper and get the receiving on that for electric bill from the department.
Thereafter, I called my elder brother Rupesh and informed him about the same. Rupesh told me
that I should not have asked Mr. Adesh for signatures on a blank page as that could be misused
by him. I immediately called my mother to tell her to not sign on the page and wait for me to
come to her house. However, my mother told me that she has already signed on the page and
given it to Mr. Adesh. I called Mr. Adesh however the phone was answered by his wife who
told me that he had left his phone at home and went to pay the bill. On 10th January, 2012 my
elder brother informed me that our mother was no more. He told me that he suspected that Mr.
Adesh had killed our mother.

Final Report u/s 173 of Criminal Procedure Code

On 10th January 2012, I received information via DD no 4A that a woman was
murdered in her house and I was assigned the investigation of the present matter by
SHO concerned. Therefore, I reached the location with my team and found the dead
body. Meanwhile, Mr. Rupesh informed us that he suspected that Mr. Adesh had
killed his mother. I recorded his statement and prepared rukka on the same and sent
the rukka through Constable for registration of FIR. Constable went to the PS and
got the case registered and returned to the spot with the original rukka and copy of
FIR. Forensic team was called who collected the chance prints and blood samples
from the spot. The body was sent for post mortem. I prepared site plan and recorded
the statements of Ms. Nirupa, Mrs. Suma and Mr. Dhinu. Based upon the statements,
accused Mr. Adesh was arrested. He gave evasive replies qua his presence at the time
of incident. Then I checked the CCTV footage. In the CCTV footage of 9th January,
2012, I saw a blurred image of a man ringing the bell of Mrs. Vijiya at 9:10 PM,
entering the house and leaving hurriedly after 20 minutes. Mr. Rupesh identified him
as Mr. Adesh. Hence, he was arrested and taken to the PS. During interrogation, he
disclosed his involvement in the present matter and stated that he murdered Mrs.
Vijiya with a steel bottle in rage as she refused to transfer property in his name. After
his medical, he was produced before the magistrate and his PC remand was taken for
5 days for recovery of the steel bottle, scene recreation and further investigation.
However, the steel bottle could not be recovered. During the investigation, I collected
the CCTV footage of the crime scene. Mr. Rupesh also gave us the CCTV recordings

18
 of the past two years. In the CCTV footage of 10th September, 2010, I saw that Mr.
Adesh was leaving the house with folded paper. However, as in the footage of 9h
January, 2012, face of the man was not clear, therefore, the CCTV footage along
with the photographs and sample video footage of Mr. Adesh were sent to the
Forensic Science Laboratory. It was reported that due to low quality of CCTV
footage, conclusive opinions cannot be given. However, it was observed that the
person in the CCTV footage is of similar height and weight as Mr. Adesh.
Subsequently, I collected the post mortem report from the hospital which stated that
the cause of death was blunt force impact on the skull of the deceased causing it to
rupture. Thus, on the basis of investigation conducted and statement of witnesses,
and in view of the disclosure of the accused, the offence of murder was found to be
committed by Mr. Adesh.

-Sd.-
Mr. Samil
Investigating Officer
Statement of Accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C (Mr. Adesh)
My name is Adesh and I deny all the allegations that were made against me. On 10th January
2012, I along with my wife decided to go for a morning walk around 7:15 AM when we
heard that Ms. Nirupa was shouting Mrs. Vijiya’s name. When we reached the ground
floor, she told us that Mrs. Vijiya wasn’t opening the door. I called Mr. Dhinu and together
we pushed the door open. We entered the house and found Mrs. Vijiya lying in a pool of
blood. I have been falsely implicated by Mr. Rupesh in connivance with the IO due to our
previous fight. I was made to sign on blank papers in the PS and I never gave any statement
to IO about killing Mrs. Vijiya.

DW1 (Dhinu)
My name is Dhinu and I am the neighbor of Mrs. Vijiya. On 10th January 2012 around
7:30 AM I along with Mr. Adesh, Mrs. Suma and Ms. Nirupa entered the house of Mrs.
Vijiya and found her dead. We all were very upset about the matter and Mr. Adesh was
crying so I started consoling him. Meanwhile Mr. Rupesh came and started shouting at
Mr. Adesh that he was a killer and had killed Mrs. Vijiya. I was shocked to hear this as I
have always seen Mr. Adesh taking care of Mrs. Vijiya. In fact Mrs. Vijiya used to tell me
that he is like her third son. She also wanted to sell her properties to Mr. Adesh and live

19
with her sister in another state. I am not convinced that Mr. Adesh could kill Mrs. Vijiya
as on 9th January 2012 I was walking with my wife in the park of the colony. I saw a man
who looked like Mr. Adesh going out of the colony from the gate around 9:00 PM. I was
walking till 10:00 PM and I did not see him coming back.

DW2 (Suma)
My name is Suma and I am the wife of Mr. Adesh. On 9th march, 2010 my husband told
me that Mrs. Vijiya was willing to sell all the floors. We were overjoyed with this prospect
and immediately agreed on discussing with Mrs. Vijiya. I even told my husband that I can
request my parents to help us financially in buying the floors. To this my husband stated
that he has sufficient savings and does not require any help from his in-laws. Within three
months we bought the second floor. On 10th January 2012, I along with my husband
decided to go for a morning walk around 7:15 AM when we heard that Ms. Nirupa was
shouting Mrs. Vijiya’s name. When we reached the ground floor, she told us that Mrs.
Vijiya wasn’t opening the door. My husband called Mr. Dhinu and together they pushed
the door open. We entered the house and found Mrs. Vijiya lying in a pool of blood.

Annexure:
1. First Information Report shall be treated as Annexure-I

20
 Annexure I
First Information Report
Police Station: Sigyan Vihar Police Station
State: Zena
Year: 2012
FIR No: 245/2012
1. Date of occurrence: 10th January, 2012
2. Charges: Sec. 302 of the Penal Code
3. Occurrence of the Offense: Date: 9th January, 2012 Time: 9:10 PM
4. Information received at PS: Date: 10th January 2012 Time: 8:30 AM
5. General Diary Reference Entry No.: 4A
6. Information recorded by: Duty Officer
7. Type of Information: Oral
8. Place of Occurrence: Sigyan Vihar
9. Informant Name: Mr. Rupesh
10. Details of Known/Unknown/ Suspected/ Accused with particular: Mr. Adesh
11. FIR Content: Mr. Adesh was after the property of my mother Mrs. Vijiya therefore;
he has killed her.
Signature/thumb impression of complainant/informant: Rupesh

21