#1. Working Principle of Each Systems
#1. Working Principle of Each Systems
Disadvantages
• Ironically, hydrogen which is of such benefit environmentally when
used in a fuel cell, is also its greatest liability in that it is
difficult to manufacture and store. Current manufacturing processes
are expensive and energy intensive, and often derive ultimately from
fossil fuels. An effective hydrogen infrastructure has yet to be
established. Gaseous hydrogen storage systems are large and heavy to
accommodate the low volumetric energy density of hydrogen. Liquid
hydrogen storage systems are much smaller and lighter, but must
operate at cryogenic temperatures. Alternatively, if hydrogen is
stored as a hydrocarbon or alcohol and released on demand by way of
an on-board reformer, the storage and handling issues simplify, but
some of the environmental benefits are lost. • Fuel cells require
relatively pure fuel, free of specific contaminants. These
contaminants include sulfur and carbon compounds, and residual liquid
fuels (depending on the type of fuel cell) that can deactivate the
fuel cell catalyst effectively destroying its ability to operate.
None of these contaminants inhibit combustion in an internal
combustion engine. • Fuel cells suitable for automotive applications
typically require the use of a platinum catalyst to promote the power
generation reaction. Platinum is a rare metal and is very expensive.
• Fuel cells must not freeze with water inside. Fuel cells generate
pure water during the power generating reaction and most fuel cells
suitable for automotive applications use wet reactant gases. Any
residual water within the fuel cells can cause irreversible expansion
damage if permitted to freeze. During operation, fuel cell systems
generate sufficient heat to prevent freezing over normal ambient
temperatures, but when shut down in cold weather the fuel cells must
be kept warm or the residual water must be removed before freezing.
This normally entails bringing the vehicle into a heated facility or
the use of a localized hot air heating device. • Fuel cells that use
proton exchange membranes must not dry out during use and must remain
moist during storage. Attempts to start or operate these fuel cells
under dry conditions can lead to membrane damage. • Fuel cells
require complex support and control systems. Fuel cells themselves
are solid state devices, but the systems required to support fuel
cell operation are not. Of particular note is the requirement for
compressed air; this necessitates a high-speed compressor that
imposes a large parasitic load on the overall system. System
complexity increases significantly when the fuel cells are operated
in conjunction with an on-board reformer. • Fuel cell systems are
heavy. Fuel cells themselves are not excessively heavy, but the
combined weight of the fuel cells, their support systems and their
fuel storage is presently greater than for a comparable internal
combustion engine system. Systems that include an on-board reformer
are heavier still. Fuel cell systems are generally lighter than
comparable battery systems even though the battery systems require
less support equipment. System weight will likely continue to
decrease as the technology develops. Despite their weight, existing
fuel cell prototype vehicles have shown that systems can be made
sufficiently compact for automotive use. • Fuel cells are an emerging
technology. As with any new technology, reductions in cost, weight
and size concurrent with Key Points & Notes increases in reliability
and lifetime remain primary engineering goals.