GROUP4 CHAPTER4and5
GROUP4 CHAPTER4and5
Department of Education
REGION IV-A CALABARZON
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF LIPA CITY
SAN ISIDRO INTEGRATED NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
SAN ISIDRO, LIPA CITY
Chapter 4
Presentation, Analysis, and Interpretation of Data
In this chapter, the analysis and interpretation of data collected from both
questionnaires and interviews with solo parents in Barangay Munting Pulo and San
Isidro are presented. The information is presented in tabular, directly addressing the
outlined questions in the statement of the problem.
1. Demographic profile of the solo parents. The following tables reveals the
distribution of the respondents in terms of profile variables.
1.1. Age. Table 1.1 presents the distribution of the respondents in terms of age.
Table 1.1
Frequency Distribution of the Solo Parents’ Profile in terms of Age.
Age Frequency Percentage
26-30 0 0
31-35 0 0
36-40 4 12.9
41-45 8 25.8
46-above 19 61.3
Total 31 100
Table 1.1 illustrates the distribution of solo parents based on age. None of the solo
parents fall within the age groups of 26-30 and 31-35. However, 4 solo parents (12.9%)
are in the 36-40 age range, 8 (25.8%) are in the 41-45 age range, and the majority, 19
solo parents (61.3%), are aged 46 and above. The total number of solo parents
considered is 31.
1.2. Sex. Table 1.2 presents the distribution of the respondents in terms of sex.
Table 1.2
Frequency Distribution of the Solo Parents’ Profile in terms of sex.
Gender Frequency Percentage
Female 27 90.3
Male 3 9.7
Total 31 100
This table 1.2 displays the distribution of solo parents based on sex. It indicates
that 27 out of 31 solo parents are female, constituting 90.3%, while 3 solo parents are
male, representing 9.7% of the total.
1.3. Educational Level. Table 1.3 presents the distribution of the respondents in
terms of educational level.
Table 1.3
Frequency Distribution of the Solo Parents’ Profile in terms of Educational Level.
Educational Attainment Frequency Percentage
Less than High School 10 32.3
High School Graduate 16 51.6
College Graduate 5 16.1
Other 0 0
Total 31 100
1.4. Employment Status. Table 1.4 presents the distribution of the respondents
in terms of employment status.
Table 1.4
Frequency Distribution of the Solo Parents’ Profile in terms of Employment Status.
Employment Status Frequency Percentage
Employed 15 48.4
Unemployed 8 25.8
Other 8 25.8
Total 31 100
The table highlights the distribution of solo parents’ profile concerning their
employment status. Among the 31 participants surveyed, 48.4% are employed, totaling
15 individuals. Unemployed solo parents account for 25.8% of the sample, with 8
respondents falling into this category. Additionally, another 25.8% of solo parents are
classified under the “Other” category, also comprising 8 participants.
The provided data suggests a positive perception of resilience among solo parents.
Participants strongly agree that they have developed a strong ability to adapt to
challenges, as indicated by a weighted mean of 3.6. Additionally, there is an agreement
in feeling resilient in the face of adversities related to solo parenting, with a weighted
mean of 3.2. The third statement indicates strong agreement in having effective coping
mechanisms for life changes and uncertainties, with a weighted mean of 3.6. The grand
weighted mean of 3.5 reinforces an overall strong agreement that solo parents possess
resilience as an adaptation, reflecting a positive and adaptive mindset among the
participants.
The interviews strongly support the interpretation that solo parents exhibit a
positive and adaptive mindset, emphasizing their resilience in facing challenges.
Respondent #1's teamwork and proactive efforts align with the participants' reported
high scores for adaptability. Respondent 2's demonstration of personal resilience
supports the agreement in feeling resilient, as indicated by the survey. Additionally,
Respondent 4's resourcefulness corresponds to the reported effective coping mechanisms
among participants. These individual experiences reinforce the overall strong agreement
that solo parents possess resilience.
signify the potential success of existing support systems, contributing to the well-being
of solo parents in the face of adversities.
The survey results, with mean scores of 3.0 for life security, 3.3 for factors
enhancing protection, and 3.4 for a perceived safer community environment, indicate a
collective agreement among solo parents regarding the presence of protective factors in
their lives. These findings suggest that solo parents, as a group, feel a sense of security
and perceive protection from potential adversities.
The interviews provide valuable supporting details to this narrative. For instance,
Respondent #1's emphasis on teamwork and proactive efforts aligns with the survey's
emphasis on factors enhancing protection, reinforcing the idea of a secure life.
Respondent 2's demonstration of personal resilience amid financial challenges supports
the notion that solo parents actively engage in enhancing their own protection, as
suggested by the survey. Furthermore, Respondent 4's emphasis on the significance of
government aid amid daily struggles aligns with the survey's emphasis on a perceived
safer community environment. These individual experiences substantiate the collective
agreement among solo parents regarding the presence of protective factors, underscoring
the importance of both individual and external factors in fostering a sense of security
and protection.
Notably, these insights resonate with Porta et al.'s (2022) research, highlighting
the crucial role of a perceived safer environment in contributing to the overall well-being
of solo parents.
The interviews offer insights into these perceptions. For example, Respondent
#1's emphasis on financial assistance and proactive efforts aligns with the
acknowledgment of stressful circumstances in the survey, implying that despite efforts,
stressors persist. Respondent 2's perspective on the substantial impact of financial
assistance reflects a nuanced view on security, recognizing that financial aid, though
helpful, may not entirely alleviate stress. Conversely, Respondent 3's high satisfaction
challenges the survey's indication of heightened stressors, emphasizing the adequacy of
existing support structures. Respondent 4's resourcefulness amid daily struggles aligns
with the survey's findings of perceived stressful circumstances, suggesting that despite
adaptive strategies, stressors persist. Additionally, Respondent 5's advocacy for program
expansion indicates a recognition of potential stressors faced by other solo parents,
supporting the survey's findings that community interventions could help alleviate
stress.
These findings align with existing literature; Stack (2018) emphasize the
heightened stressors faced by solo parents, challenging the idea of reduced stress and
increased security. Moreover, the agreement on community interventions supports the
recommendations of Wakai (2023), highlighting the importance of targeted support to
mitigate stressors for solo parents.
adaptation to the solo parenting role, aligning with the overall consensus on growth and
development. Additionally, Respondent #3’s resourcefulness in addressing financial
challenges and the successful graduation of their children from college indicate positive
changes in their life as a solo parent, reinforcing the alignment with the developmental
perspective in psychology. Furthermore, Respondent #5’s emphasis on the pivotal role of
financial assistance in prioritizing education and advocating for program expansion
indicates a proactive approach to growth, echoing the positive growth and adaptation
highlighted in the overall findings.
This result implies that, as a group, solo parents view their experiences in a
constructive light, emphasizing personal growth and successful adaptation to their roles.
These findings align with the developmental perspective in psychology, where individuals
actively engage in positive growth and adaptation to life circumstances (Erikson Theory,
2015)
outcomes in various
aspects of my life as
a solo parent.
Grand Weighted 3.3 0.53 Agree
Mean
This suggests that solo parents, as a group, recognize and affirm positive
developments in their lives stemming from their solo parenting experiences. For
instance, Respondent #1's emphasis on teamwork and proactive efforts aligns with the
survey's indication of positive growth and development. Similarly, Respondent 2's
demonstration of personal resilience and commitment to their child's education reflects
positive developments within the solo parenting journey. The successful graduation of
children, as highlighted by Respondent 3, aligns with the survey's emphasis on
recognizing positive developments across different life aspects. Moreover, Respondent 4's
resourcefulness in overcoming daily struggles and engaging in income-generating
activities contributes to the overall positive outcomes recognized by solo parents in the
survey. The emphasis on financial assistance in prioritizing education, as expressed by
Respondent 5, further underscores the positive impact of the solo parenting journey.
These insights not only offer real-life context to the survey results but also highlight the
active engagement of solo parents in fostering positive growth and development. These
findings align with resilience theory, emphasizing the capacity of individuals to thrive
and find positive outcomes in the face of challenges (Breda, 2018).
through financial
assistance.
Grand Weighted 3.1 Agree
Mean
The table evaluates the impact of financial assistance on the economic well-being
of solo parents. The mean scores, representing respondents' perceptions, indicate that
while there are areas of concern, overall, there is an agreement that financial assistance
positively influences economic well-being. Specifically, respondents express
dissatisfaction (Mean=2.6, Verbal Interpretation: Disagree) regarding the adequacy of
financial assistance to meet basic needs. However, there is a general consensus that the
application process is straightforward and efficient (Mean=3.1, Verbal Interpretation:
Agree). Additionally, solo parents perceive a positive impact on their overall economic
well-being (Mean=3.3, Verbal Interpretation: Agree), indicating that, despite concerns,
financial assistance contributes positively. The respondents also believe that the
financial assistance program considers the specific challenges faced by solo parents
(Mean=3.2, Verbal Interpretation: Agree). The satisfaction with the overall support
provided through financial assistance is reflected in a high mean score of 3.3 (Verbal
Interpretation: Agree) in the last statement.
Insights from the interviews add depth to these findings. Respondent #1's
acknowledgment of financial assistance's significant impact aligns with the positive
overall sentiment in the survey. The emphasis on teamwork and proactive efforts also
contributes to the perceived positive impact on economic well-being. Respondent 2's
emphasis on the substantial impact of financial assistance on their limited income
supports the positive overall sentiment in the survey, despite concerns about adequacy.
Their recognition of financial aid as helpful resonates with the perceived positive impact
on overall economic well-being. Respondent 4's appreciation for government aid amid
daily struggles reflects the positive sentiment in the survey, emphasizing the positive
impact on economic well-being. The respondent's resourcefulness in addressing
These findings resonate with studies by Legarde (2023) and Vyskocil (2018), which
highlight the importance of tailored financial assistance programs for solo parents to
address their unique challenges effectively. While acknowledging areas for improvement,
the positive overall sentiment emphasizes the potential of financial assistance programs
to enhance the economic well-being of solo parents.
In the case of Respondent #1, the emphasis on teamwork and proactive efforts
aligns with the lack of significant associations with resilience, implying that the effect of
financial assistance on resilience may be influenced by additional factors. Respondent
2's demonstration of personal resilience amid financial challenges adds complexity to the
relationship between financial assistance and resilience, emphasizing the multifaceted
nature of this dynamic. Respondent 4's resourcefulness in addressing daily struggles
aligns with the observed relationship between financial aid and reduced stressors,
indicating that financial assistance can play a role in alleviating specific stressors faced
by solo parents.
5. Significant difference between the financial assistance received by solo parents and
resiliency intervention when they are grouped according to age.
Table 5.1. Significant difference between the financial assistance received by solo
parents and resiliency intervention when they are grouped according to age.
Resilience As Adaptation
Source of SS df MS F P-value Decision
Variance
Between 0.105 2 0.053 0.708 0.501
Groups
Within 2.081 28 0.074 Accept the
Groups null
hypothesis
Total 2.186 30
Protective Factors
Source of SS df MS F P-value Decision
Variance
Between 0.065 2 0.032 0.194 0.824 Accept the
Groups Null
Hypothesis
Within 4.722 28 0.168
Groups
Total 4.788 30
Developmental Perspective
Source of SS df MS F P-value Decision
Variance
Between 0.029 2 0.014 0.607 0.941 Accept the
Groups null
hypothesis
Within 6.716 28 0.239
Groups
Total 6.745 30
Positive Outcome
The data analysis examines the relationship between financial assistance received
by solo parents and resiliency intervention when categorized by age groups. Across all
dimensions – resilience as adaptation, protective factors, stressors and vulnerability,
developmental perspective, and positive outcomes – the p-values consistently exceed the
conventional significance level of 0.05. Consequently, the decisions for each factor are to
accept the null hypothesis, indicating no significant difference in resiliency factors
among different age groups of solo parents concerning the financial assistance they
receive. This suggests that the variations in financial support do not play a statistically
significant role in influencing the levels of resilience, protective factors, stressors and
vulnerability, developmental perspective, or positive outcomes among solo parents of
different age brackets. The findings underscore the importance of considering other
potential factors beyond financial assistance.
Insights from the interviews provide context to these statistical findings. For
example, Respondent #1’s emphasis on teamwork and proactive efforts, irrespective of
age, aligns with the observed lack of significant differences in resiliency factors. It
suggests that the collaborative approach is consistent across age groups. Additionally,
Respondent 2’s demonstration of personal resilience amid financial challenges adds
depth to the analysis, reinforcing the notion that financial factors alone may not
significantly contribute to resilience among solo parents. Furthermore, Respondent 4’s
resourcefulness in addressing daily struggles, irrespective of age, resonates with the
study’s emphasis on the multi-dimensional nature of resilience, suggesting that socio-
emotional competence and coping strategies are crucial contributors.
Table 5.2. Significant difference between the financial assistance received by solo
parents and resiliency factors when they are grouped according to sex.
Demographic Factors t-Test P-Value* Decision
Profile Value
Sex Resilience as -1 0.422 Accept the
Adaptation null
hypothesis
Protective -0.632 0.572 Accept the
Factors null
hypothesis
Stressors and -0.875 0.445 Accept the
Vulnerability null
hypothesis
Developmental -1.908 0.152 Accept the
Perspective null
hypothesis
Positive -0.843 0.487 Accept the
outcome null
hypothesis
This aligns with literature, such as Johansen (2022), highlighting that gender
differences in resilience are influenced by complex factors beyond just sex. Assessing
resiliency in solo parents should consider a broader range of individual and
environmental variables.
Table 5.3. Significant difference between the financial assistance received by solo
parents and resiliency factors when they are grouped according to educational
attainment.
Resilience As Adaptation
Source of SS df MS F P- Decision
Variance value
Between 0.065 2 0.032 0.415 0.664 Accept the
Groups null
hypothesis
Within 2.2 28 0.078
Groups
Total 2.265 30
Protective Factors
Source of SS Df MS F P- Decision
Variance value
Between 0.117 2 0.058 0.352 0.705 Accept the
Groups null
hypothesis
Developmental Perspective
Source of SS Df MS F P- Decision
Variance value
Between 0.029 2 0.014 0.607 0.941 Accept the
Groups null
hypothesis
Within 6.716 28 0.239
Groups
Total 6.745 30
Positive Outcome
Source of SS Df MS F P- Decision
Variance value
The presented Table 5.3 explores the potential significant differences in resiliency
intervention among solo parents based on their educational attainment and the financial
assistance they receive. The analysis utilizes various factors: Resilience as Adaptation,
Protective Factors, Stressors and Vulnerability, Developmental Perspective, and Positive
Outcome. For each factor, the F-test and associated p-values are provided. The decisions
across all factors are to “accept the null hypothesis,” indicating that there is no
statistically significant difference in resiliency factors when solo parents are grouped by
their educational attainment concerning the financial assistance they receive. The p-
values for Resilience as Adaptation (p = 0.664), Protective Factors (p = 0.705), Stressors
and Vulnerability (p = 0.762), Developmental Perspective (p = 0.941), and Positive
Outcome (p = 0.866) all exceed the conventional significance level of 0.05. This aligns
with the findings in the table, suggesting that variations in financial support do not play
a statistically significant role in influencing the levels of these resiliency factors among
solo parents with different educational backgrounds.
background, supports the notion that resilience among solo parents is influenced by
factors beyond educational attainment and financial assistance alone.
These interview insights complement the statistical findings and align with
research by Berger and Qiu (2021), highlighting the intricate interplay of socioeconomic
factors and individual capabilities in shaping family resilience. Together, they
underscore the need for a comprehensive understanding of resiliency factors among solo
parents, recognizing the multifaceted influences that extend beyond educational
attainment and financial assistance.
Table 5.4. Significant difference between the financial assistance received by solo
parents and resiliency intervention when they are grouped according to
employment status.
Resilience As Adaptation
Source of SS df MS F P- Decision
Variance value
Between 0.442 Accept the
Groups null
hypothesis
0.128 2 0.064 0.839
Within
Groups
2.137 28 0.076
Total
2.265 30
Protective Factors
Source of SS df MS F P- Decision
Variance value
0.221 2 0.110
Within 4.566 28 0.163
Groups
0.680 0.514
Total 4.788 30
Stressors and Vulnerability
Source of SS df MS F P- Decision
Variance value
Between 0.479 2 0.239 1.337 0.278 Accept the
Groups null
hypothesis
Within 5.012 28 0.179
Groups
Total 5.491 30
Developmental Perspective
Source of SS df MS F P- Decision
Variance value
Between 0.252 2 0.126 0.545 0.585 Accept the
Groups null
hypothesis
Within 6.492 28 0.231
Groups
Total 6.745 30
Positive Outcome
Source of SS df MS F P- Decision
Variance value
These interview insights complement the statistical findings and align with
research by Riopel (2019), highlighting the diverse nature of factors contributing to
resiliency among individuals. It emphasizes the diverse nature of factors contributing to
resiliency among individuals, including employment status. Their findings suggest that
while employment can influence financial aspects, it may not be the sole determinant of
psychological well-being or adaptive capacities. The current data, by accepting the null
hypothesis, underscores the importance of recognizing the multifaceted nature of
resiliency factors and considering various influences beyond employment status when
assessing and supporting solo parents.
demands nt
relevant to opportuniti
each solo es.
parent’s Organize a
circumstan yearly
ces. skills fair
showcasin
g solo
parents’
achieveme
nts
Chapter 5
Summary, Findings, Conclusion, and Recommendation
This chapter presents the research summary, findings, and suggests
recommendation based on the findings.
Summary
The study asses the Financial Assistance among Solo Parents and its basis for brgy.
Resiliency intervention in brgy, San Isidro and Muntingpulo, Lipa city.
Specifically, the research sought to answer the following:
2. To what extent does the Barangay resiliency intervention in San Isidro and Munting
Pulo, Lipa City influence the perception of solo parents in terms of:
2.1 Resilience as adaptation?
2.2 Protective Factors?
2.3 Stressors and Vulnerability?
2.4 Developmental perspective?
2.5 Positive outcome?
3. To what extent does the provision of financial assistance impact the economic well-
being of solo parents in Barangay San Isidro and Munting Pulo, Lipa City?
4. How does the financial assistance received by solo parents in Brgy. San Isidro and
Munting Pulo, Lipa City, affect the resiliency intervention in the barangay?
5.Is there a significant relationship between the financial assistance received by solo
parents in Brgy. San Isidro and Munting Pulo, Lipa City, and the barangay resiliency
intervention?
7. What activities or programs might be put in place at a barangay that will strengthen
the resilience of solo parents with regards to their financial security?
Findings
1. Profile of Respondents
1.1 Sex. Twenty seven (90.3%) of the respondents are female and 3 (9.7% ) are male.
1.2 Age: Notably, none of the solo parents fall within the age groups of 26-30 and 31-35.
The majority (61.3%) are aged 46 and above, suggesting a significant concentration in
the older age brackets.
1.4 Employment Status. The majority of solo parents (67.7%) are employed, while
unemployed and others both have 25.8%.
2.2 Protective Factors. Solo parents collectively perceive a sense of security and
protection from adversities, highlighting the significance of a safer environment in
contributing to their overall well-being.
2.5 Positive Outcomes. Solo parents present an optimistic view, collectively recognizing
and affirming positive developments in various life aspects, aligning with resilience
theory's emphasis on thriving despite challenges.
Conclusion
1. The majority of solo parents are female, primarily in the older age brackets, with
diverse educational backgrounds. Employment status is predominantly employed
(67.7%).
6. The study finds no significant difference in resiliency factors among solo parents
across demographic profiles when considering financial assistance.
Recommendation
In light of the findings, the following are recommended:
1. Establish support groups and workshops specifically designed for older female solo
parents, addressing their unique challenges and providing a platform for sharing
experiences and solutions.
4. Introduce programs that empower solo parents to acquire additional skills or engage
in income-generating activities, promoting self-reliance while appreciating the ongoing
financial assistance.
References
Journals
Abu Talib, J. et al. (2020). Coping, Resilience and Stress Among Single Mothers in
Terengganu, Malaysia. International Journal of Management (IJM), 11(6)
Garcia, S.R. (2021). InangTatay: The Journey of Single Parents Amidst COVID 19
Pandemic. International Journal of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas in
Education, 7(1), 54-57.
Legarde, L.M. (2023). Impact of the Expanded Solo Parents Welfare Act on Single-
parent Household in Zamboanga City, Philippines: A Policy Analysis. SSRN.
Taylor, Z. E., Conger R.D. (2017) Promoting Strengths and Resilience in Single-
Mother Families. Child Dev. 88(2), 67-75.
Web Article
Watt, Asia, "Single Parent Households and the Effect on Student Learning" (2019).
Masters Theses. 4464. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/4464
Books
Porta, et al. (2022). Naturalistic Parent Teaching in the Home Environment During
Early Childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Volume 13.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810400
Qiu (2021). The Role of Socioeconomic Status, Family Resilience, and Social
Support in Predicting Psychological Resilience Among Chinese Maintenance
Hemodialysis Patients. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12(2).
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.723344