Siege Notes - Windows To The Past Part I
Siege Notes - Windows To The Past Part I
PART I
John E. Sandrock
Since warfare began, combatants have built structures to defend their towns
against the enemy. From the Middle Ages onward strong castles protected the
lands of the lord from attack. When threatened, the peasantry collected within the
fortification to resist assault. Gradually this concept was expanded to encompass
entire towns where fortifications were expanded to protect the entire population
within. These defenses consisted of high city walls constructed with massive
stones replete with an occasional guard tower, or perhaps, a surrounding moat with
which to make attack all the more difficult. During the sixteenth century this type
of fortification had become obsolete. This was brought about with the advent of
artillery, which made castles and city walls easily penetrable.
To meet this new threat, the Italians commenced constructing forts that
incorporated artillery into their own defense. The typical plan for this type of
protection was called the “bastion”. These fortifications were designed so that no
way existed that the attacker himself would not be subjected to artillery fire. The
bastions were angular forts with sections jutting out from the corners from which
the defenders would have a clear line of artillery fire with which to sweep any
attackers attempting to scale the walls. Often dry moats were constructed at the
base of the walls, which served as a deadly trap, making it more difficult for the
Typical seventeenth to nineteenth century bastion.
attacker to climb the walls. This type fortification, with modification, was used
well into the mid-nineteenth century when the advent of the rifled cannon with its
greater accuracy and firepower made them, in their turn, obsolete. One example of
this type structure may be found in Baltimore. Fort McHenry, a typical masonry
star fort surrounded by a dry moat, provided the principal defense for the city from
attack by sea. This fort was instrumental in repelling the British fleet, which
attacked the city during the War of 1812. It was here on the morning of September
14, 1814 that Francis Scott Key, seeing that the fort had not surrendered during the
night’s bombardment and still flying the American flag, was inspired to jot down
the words to our “Star Spangled Banner”.
defenders sought to build the impregnable fortress, while the besiegers sought to
develop a method to overcome these defenses. Vauban’s system involved parallel
approaches using trenching as a technique to gain closer access to the bastion under
siege. The basic plan was to dig a trench parallel to the enemy fort just out of range
of his artillery. These ditches were approximately four feet deep. When the dirt
removed was piled up in front of the ditch, a parapet was formed providing the
attacker with six to eight feet of protection from the enemy artillery. This
earthwork was known as the first parallel. From this ditch zigzag trenches were
dug toward the fortification. Protected by the parapet the attackers were immune to
enemy fire, as the enemy was not able to fire directly down the approaching trench.
When the zigzags reached a point at which the fort was within the attacker’s
artillery range, a second parallel was dug. From this point siege artillery was used
to batter the walls of the defenders. If surrender wasn’t imminent, a third parallel
would be built bringing the artillery within point blank range. A breach of the
fortress walls would be followed by an infantry assault, known as the forlorn hope,
to gain access to the interior. This system proved extremely effective and was used
repeatedly in the many wars fought by the European powers during the eighteenth
and nineteenth centuries.
An excellent example of Vauban’s siege method came into use at the end of
the American Revolution. The siege of Yorktown lasted from 28 September until
the town’s surrender on October 17, 1781. The British general Cornwallis held the
village of Yorktown after allowing his army to become trapped on a narrow
peninsular between the York and James Rivers. When a combined force of 16,000
American and French troops arrived on the evening of 28 September, General
Washington ordered an immediate advance upon the British outer defenses
consisting of a series of earthworks thrown up around the town. As the British
consolidated their forces closer to the town, the colonial army using Vauban’s
system, dug a series of parallels each closer than the last from which their artillery
could subject Yorktown to intense bombardment. With the British fleet bottled up
by the French fleet blockading the entrance to Chesapeake Bay, and with no hope
of escape, Cornwallis surrendered thus bringing the Revolutionary War to a close.
Sieges were costly in time, money and life. They were notoriously gruesome
affairs, often with massive casualties in dead and wounded. The nature of a siege
favored the attacking force, which could vary its resources in men and ammunition,
while the besieged could not. After blockading the fort to prevent the relief of men,
food and supplies from the outside, the typical siege advanced to the trenching
stage. The etiquette of warfare at that time dictated that once the artillery had
blasted a hole in the fortification that was considered breachable, it was deemed the
honorable thing to call upon the commander to surrender. Such a surrender was
considered no disgrace when further resistance would lead only to additional
needless loss of life. In the event the commander did not yield to this humane
practice, tradition dictated that no quarter would be given to the garrison or the city
resulting in the plundering of the unfortunate town.
With the advent of better artillery and different tactics the military engineers
were unable to adequately protect fortresses; thus siege warfare, over time, became
less significant. However, this did not keep the warring powers from lavishly
expending money and labor on fortifying their strategic places.
The longer the siege, the more desperate the circumstances of the besieged
became. Defenses turned into semi-permanent fortifications as the siege wore on.
Purely military fortifications could not withstand a siege of any length, while a
large fortified town or place could do so. While such a place could not continue to
function as a town, it could still maintain an existence devoted to purely military
ends. It was only while under protracted siege that the necessity for siege money
arose.
Idealized view of a typical seventeenth century siege. Artillery has succeeded in breaching the
bastion's outer defenses in preparation for the “forlorn hope”, a general assault upon the
fortification.
Are these items coins or paper money? The controversy could go on forever.
Being a paper money enthusiast, I prefer to view them as paper money, and offer in
support of my thesis the dictionary definition of a “coin”. Trusty Mr. Webster
defines a coin as: “ a flat round piece of metal issued by government authority as
money”, or, “metal money”. Since these “coins” are not metal, they must be
considered “paper”, or so my logic goes!
Metalic siege money of Leyden (left), struck in 1574 from a round coin die onto a diamond
shaped silver planchet. As the supply of silver available for coinage dried up during the siege,
Leyden continued to mint coins made from paper torn from prayer books. These cardboard
“notes” became the first paper money to appear in the Western world. Prior to this only the
Chinese used paper money.
A cardboard coin struck during the Spanish siege of Leyden in 1574 may be seen at right. The
arms consist of a rampant lion with shield and sword. Note the counterstamp located at six
o'clock. By order of Prince William of Orange, provincial counterstamps were added to all coins
in excess of 1/10 daalder. This act increased the value of the coinage in circulation by one eighth,
which was then used as a war contribution.
Inasmuch as we are dealing in this article only with paper siege notes, I will
touch on the metallic siege coins only briefly. These metallic coins were
emergency issues of cities under the Dutch United Provinces, which had been under
revolt from their Spanish rulers since 1568. The Leyden siege coins are known to
the Dutch as “klippes” or otherwise as “obsidional” coins, an obsidional coin being
defined as “a piece of money issued for use during a siege”. Interestingly, this
definition would seem to cover both metallic and paper issues.
There were more than thirty instances during the Dutch War of Liberation,
which necessitated the issuance of this type of emergency money. The typical siege
coin was struck from coin dies onto square silver planchets. By the year 1573 the
Dutch defenders were running out of funds with which to support their cause. To
alleviate this situation and enable continued resistance against the Spanish, the
states of Holland and Zeeland raised funds for the war by increasing the value of
silver coinage by 1/8th as a war contribution. Commencing in 1573, every coin in
excess of 1/10th daalder was counter-stamped by order of William Prince of Orange
with an oval coat-of-arms of its respective province. Later, the tide of war turned
against the Spanish. In the year 1578 the Spanish, in turn, found themselves
besieged by the Dutch at Amsterdam. The Spanish governor of Amsterdam then
authorized the striking of silver obsidional coins for use during the siege.
Leyden in 1574 was the second largest town in Holland, after Amsterdam. It
was the capital of the cloth trade where weaving establishments dominated the
city’s industries. It is most famous, however, for its brave defense while under
siege by the Spanish army during the period May to October 1574. When all of
their frontal attacks failed, the Spaniards decided to starve the city into submission.
It was at this point that Philip, William of Orange, ran out of funds. An outside
observer noted at the time that “It appears that men who are fighting for their lives,
their firesides, their property and their religion are content to receive rations only,
without receiving pay”. After months under siege, during which time they endured
hunger, illness and starvation, the ravaged citizens of Leyden still refused to
surrender. On the verge of capitulation, Leyden was relieved from siege on the
third of October 1574 by the quick action of Dutch insurgents who cut the dykes,
flooding the city, thereby enabling their ships to carry provisions to the starving
inhabitants. The third day of October is still celebrated in Leyden when the
townspeople eat the same food that was furnished their besieged ancestors: herring,
white bread and hutspot.
There are eight known specimens of Leyden cardboard money made from
coinage dies. They range in value from 5 to 30 stuivers. All are dated 1574. Some
bear countermarks while others do not. A listing of these pieces follows:
Mainz is a river port in Germany located at the point where the Main River
meets the Rhine. Its French name is Mayence. One of the great historical cities of
Germany, it grew up on what was once the site of a Roman camp called
Maguntiacum, founded in the first century B.C. The city was later given over in the
year 746 to a succession of German archbishops who ruled as princes of the Holy
Roman Empire. Serving as electors they had much influence in crowning the
German kings. Mainz flourished under the rule of the archbishops-electors, growing
rapidly as a commercial and cultural center. Mainz is also famous as the residence
of Johann Gutenberg (1397-1468), the inventor of movable type used in printing.
After that invention, the city quickly became the principal European printing center.
Burdened by the needs of the military, the government was forced to borrow
heavily.
The events unfolding in France had a profound influence upon the rest of
Europe. Revolutionary clubs were formed and there were demonstrations in the
During the French Revolution the German city of Mainz, on the Rhine, was occupied by the
revolutionists. Known to the French as Mayence, the fortress and garrison were put under siege
by the Prussian army. Mayence held out for nine months before capitulating. During this period
two issues of siege notes appeared. The first series consisted of various handwitten amounts on
the reverses of French royal assignats. Shown here are the 20 livres (pound) and 50 livres
assignat notes. All Mayence siege notes carry a round authenticating stamp dated Mai 1793.
streets. These actions were looked upon with alarm by Europe’s royalty. As the
revolution was quietly being exported to the rest of Europe, supporters of the
revolution found themselves persecuted, leading France to declare war upon
Austria and Prussia in April 1792. These powers, seeing their own dynasties
threatened, wished to restore Louis XVI to his former position. After suffering
defeats by the Austrian-Prussian army, which was advancing upon Paris, the
peasants, fearing they had been betrayed, imprisoned the royal family in the
Tuileries where they were later massacred. On September 21, 1792 France was
declared a republic.
The spring of 1793 again saw the Austrian-Prussian army advancing upon
Paris. While the principal French army invaded Holland in the north the Prussians
crossed the Rhine driving the defending force under Custine back toward Paris,
exposing Mainz to siege by the Prussians. Custine had left a garrison of 2,900
soldiers behind to defend Mayence. The combined Austrian-Prussian force chose
to stop their advance at the Rhine in order to invest Mainz instead of pushing on to
Paris. After a protracted siege lasting from 21 October 1792 to 22 July 1793, during
which time the French forces suffered great damage, the fortress at Mainz
capitulated. The French garrison put up stiff resistance, eventually obtaining an
honorable capitulation from the Austrians and Prussians. They marched out of the
besieged fortress on 23 July having lost the fort and 237 guns to the enemy.
The defenders of Mayence issued two distinct series of paper money during
the siege. The first series of notes consisted of handwritten amounts written on the
backs of French royal assignats dated 1791 and 1792. The written amounts were
double that of the face value of the original assignat; i.e., vingt livres (twenty
pounds) on an assignat of 10 livres, cincquante livres (fifty pounds) on a twenty-
five livre note, etc. A total of three notes were put into circulation during the siege
in this way. These notes were in the amounts of 20 sous, and 20 and 50 livres. The
handwritten endorsement read: “ Nr. ____, Assignat Monnaie de Siege Vingt
Livres Remboursables in Especes” (Number ____, Assignat Siege Money of twenty
pounds reimbursable in cash)”. All assignat siege notes were handsigned by six
authorizing officials. In addition to the handwritten values and signatures all carried
a round vermilion stamp which read: “SIEGE DE MAYENCE - MAY 1793 - DE
LA REP. FRANC”.
A second issue of Mayence siege notes was printed in the city while it was
under siege. These square notes were made of durable cardboard and are uniface.
They were issued in denominations of 5 and 10 sous and 3 livres. The text reads: “
No.____ Monnoye de Siege Cinq Sous a echanger contre Billon ou monoye de
metal de siege” (This five sous siege note is exchangeable for 5 sous in metallic
money) together with the value shown as “5 Sols”, etc. below, all enclosed within a
simple black border. These notes have but three signatures, either printed or
handwritten. The same vermilion hand-stamp as that used on the royal assignats
appears in the lower left corner of the note.
The second series of Mayence emergency money consisted of small cardboard, uniface notes in
denominations of 5, 10 sous and 3 livres. These values helped facilitate trade within the city
while under siege. The notes state that they may be exchanged for metallic money.
Several variants of the three notes exist which include notes without a series
designated and those bearing series “A” or “B”. Some notes were hand signed
while others have facsimile signatures. Finally, a printing error occurs on some
notes, which would indicate that two different plates were used. The error consists
of the word “echanger” misspelled as “echarger”. The assignat issue is rare;
however, the notes of the second issue occasionally surface to this day.
The French city of Lyon is situated at the confluence of the Rhone and Saone
Rivers. The city dates from 43 B.C. when the Romans built their town of
Lugdunum on the hill overlooking the two rivers. After the defeat of the Gauls,
Lyon became a transportation and communications center with roads radiating from
it to far-flung parts of Europe. Faithful to the French crown during the Hundred
Years War, Lyon’s wealth increased until it became the leading financial center of
France. By the time of the French Revolution this prosperity had been lost due to a
succession of religious wars, thus precipitating an economic crisis.
Unlike Mainz, whose fortress was defended by the revolutionaries, the siege of Lyon pitted
republicans against the defending royalists. After the fortress of Mayence fell to the Prussians,
the French garrison was allowed to march out of the fort with honor. Lyon's defenders were not
so lucky, however. After the peasant army destroyed the city, 2000 royalists were put to death by
guillotine. Shown here is a Lyon siege note for 25 sous.
Money of necessity issued during the Siege of Lyon. These 5 and 20 livres notes were prepared
in August 1793 from paper manufactured originally for use by the “Caisse Patriotique de Lyon”.
The left-over paper used for the 20 livres contained a fleur-de-lis royal watermark in the lower
right corner. The 20 livres note is always found sans watermark which was removed by clipping.
Both notes state that they may be exchanged against 400 livres in assignats of the Republique
Francais. A single “Galloz” signature (one of several used) appears on the 5 livres, while all 20
livres notes bear the signatures of monsieurs Choppin and Quittous.
This 400 livres assignat, dated 21 November 1792, was one of the first notes released under the
French Republic. The portrait of Louis XVI has been removed in favor of the fasces and liberty
cap, symbols of the revolution. This is the note referred to as being exchangeable for the siege
money of Lyon.
Quite a few notes have survived from the siege of Lyon. Denominations
consist of 25 and 50 sous and 5 and 20 livres, printed on heavy off-white paper.
Considerable effort went into the production of these notes. The notes are uniface.
All notes carry the caption “SIEGE DE LYON” together with the phrase
“Subvention Civique” which translated can mean “municipal subsidy” or “civic
grant”. The 25, 50 sous and 5 livre notes have but one handwritten signature while
the 20 livre note has two. More than one individual was employed in signing the
lower denomination notes as the different signatures attest.
The notes were further authenticated by the addition of dry seals bearing the
arms of Lyon; one on 25, 50 sou and 5 livre notes whereas two seals are found on
the 20 livres specimen. All have ornamental black borders containing floral, fleur-
de-lis or diamond designs. The phrase “Bon pour VINGT-CINQ Sous”, etc.
appears at the center beneath which are a variety of qualifying statements such as
“A echanger par somme de 400 livres contre Assignats” (Exchangable up to the
sum of 400 livres in assignats). The 400 livre assignat dated 21 September 1792
was at that time the largest banknote in circulation in the French Republic.
The livre notes were hand numbered, whereas the sous were not. The twenty
livres notes were printed on watermarked paper, each sheet bearing the words
“Caisse Patriotique de Lyon” (Patriotic Bank of Lyon). When cutting the sheet
only one word would appear on each note, therefore some watermarks read
“Patriotique”, some “de Lyon” and others “Caisse”. All surviving examples of the
twenty livre siege note have been cancelled with shears thereby removing the lower
right hand corner of the note.
It was during the French Revolution that the promising French officer,
Napoleon Bonaparte, rose through the ranks of the army. He was named a general
in 1793. From that point onward Bonaparte’s power grew rapidly. The French
executive body, known as the Directory, hoped to end the war on the continent by
an advance upon Vienna. They created the Army of the Alps and the Army of Italy
to play a secondary role by attempting the conquest of Piedmont and Lombardy,
thereby forcing Austria out of the war. Napoleon Bonaparte was given command of
the Army of Italy. He proved to be a military genius with great ambition. By May
1796 he had conquered all of Lombardy as far as Mantua, whereupon he set up the
Lombard Republic. Pushed eastward, the Austrians abandoned their defensive line
along the Mincio River, retiring to the strong fortress of Mantova. Their departure
from the field allowed Napoleon’s army to release 40,000 men with which to invest
the Austrians at Mantova. The siege commenced on August 27, 1796.
Four attempts were made by the Austrians to relieve the French siege of
Mantova’s fortress. On their fourth attempt they were defeated at the battle of
Rivoli. The fortress and its 14,000 defenders then surrendered thereby ending the
siege on 2 February 1797. Total Austrian casualties were 7,000 killed and 6,000
wounded.
After Mantova fell, the French entered the Papal States on their march to
Rome. After the Dukes of Parma, Modena and the King of Naples had all
During Bonaparte's Italian campaign in 1796, the Austrian garrison at Mantova was besieged by
French forces. While under siege, the Austrians issued a series of notes to sustain their economy.
Shown here is the 18 lire note bearing Austria's arms. The date is depicted as “6 Ottobre 17
novanta sei”.
purchased truces with large payments from their treasuries, the Pope then hastily
concluded the Treaty of Tolentino with Napoleon, saving Rome at the cost of
ceding the northern provinces to France. Mantova was eventually retaken by the
Austrians in 1815, and returned to Italy in 1866.
Mantova siege notes are uniface and printed on white paper. All have two
red Austrian imperial seals above the text which reads: “Cedola di (Dieciotto)
Moneta di Mantova spendibile come effectivo danaro in ogni Cassa, e da ogni
persona a norma dell ‘Editto di questo giorne. 6 Octobre 17novanta sei.” ( Coupon
of {18} lire in Mantova emergency money spendable by all persons everywhere in
the fortress, by regulations published this day. 6 October, 1796).
The notes were issued in denominations of 10 soldi and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 45,
and 135 lire, which were comparable to those in use in the Papal States at the time.
All are hand signed and numbered.
The impending conflict found the old fort at Colberg ill prepared. It’s
ramparts held only eighty-six pieces of antiquated artillery. Artillerymen were in
such short supply that each piece was manned by a single soldier. The garrison, of
one thousand soldiers were of such poor quality that they were deemed unfit to
serve with the regulars.
In past wars, Colberg had come under three separate attacks, each one
successfully repulsed. This was because in times of strife, the citizens of the town
had volunteered to man the walls along with the soldiers, an act which had become
a tradition in Colberg. As the French advanced, an old seaman named Nettelbeck
called together his volunteer militia, presenting them to the fortress Commandant.
The Commandant, who had little use for civilian militia, sent them home
whereupon Nettlebeck began working behind his back to prepare the town for the
struggle that would surely overwhelm them. Taking an inventory of the available
food supplies, Nettlebeck quickly discovered that they were insufficient for a
protracted siege. When bringing this information to the Commandant’s attention,
he was insulted and again sent away.
When the French arrived before the fortress on March 15, 1807, they sent a
flag of truce to the Commandant to discuss surrender. The secret meeting between
the Commandant and the French lasted many hours. Suspecting treachery,
Nettlebeck hurriedly sent a letter to Frederick Wilhelm informing him of the
situation, whereupon the king promised to send a leader with more mettle to defend
Colberg. While the Commandant was walking in the marketplace a few weeks
later, some bombs exploded harmlessly nearby. The commander of the fort
stammered “If this continues we shall have to surrender”! Upon hearing this,
Nettlebeck drew his sword and accused the Commandant of treason. In turn the
Commandant ordered Nettlebeck arrested.
The siege grew more difficult for the defenders as the French crept closer and
closer as each new parallel was dug. The bombarding artillery inflicted great harm
to the town as barely a house could be found with a window-pane intact. Before a
truce was announced on July 3, 1807, the siege had claimed 2,000 men killed or
wounded.
Colberg, a Prussian fortress, was besieged by the French at the height of Napoleon's conquests.
The note seen here is an 8 groschen specimen dated 1807. The king's seal on the reverse reads:
“Kon. Preuss. Gourernement zu Colberg”. All notes were completely handwritten. A total of
13,000 two groschen; 7,400 four groschen and 8,650 eight groschen notes were issued.
Two issues of siege notes were issued at Colberg during the siege. The first
of these were known as “Kommissions Kupons”, so named as they were authorized
by the Prussian Coin Commission. The notes are entirely handwritten on
cardboard, serially numbered, and contain five signatures. Denominations were for
2, 4, and 8 groschen. All are dated “Colberg 1807”. The reverse of each note
The assault upon Edelsberg at the height of Napoleon's campaign in 1809. Here French troops
attempt to force the bridge approach to the Austrian fortified town.
carries an oval seal, which bears the inscription “”Kon. Preuss. Gouvernement zu
Colberg”.
The second issue was known as “Meinecke Kupons”, named after the
Counselor of War and Crown Lands. They contain only three signatures and are in
all other respects the same as the first.
Petersberg Citadel in Erfurt had been an imposing fortress since June 1665
when its cornerstone was laid. It took only three years for Italian laborers, working
under master stonemasons, to complete the structure. The fort consisted of four
mighty bastions with a massive baroque portal. From its inception the fortress
served as a place of worship, as the site of a castle, a monastery, and a place of
refuge in time of trouble.
The fortress at Erfurt, showing a baroque entrance gate. The French occupying forces were
besieged there in 1813 by the advancing Prussian army.
Soon after his catastrophic invasion of Russia in 1812, which ended with the
French Army in full retreat from Moscow, Napoleon directed that the citadel be
strengthened. Under the supervision of the French master builder, Vauban, an
additional four bastions were added and other reinforcements made. These
improvements were put to the test on only one occasion. After the siege in 1813,
the victorious Prussians further reinforced the fort to accommodate a new
guardhouse, a defensive barracks, gunpowder stores, wells and a bombproof bake
house. Today Petersberg fortress is one of the few citadels whose important
structures have been preserved thus affording us an opportunity to study siege craft
design from the 17th-19th century period.
Erfurt had been under French domination since 1806. The Prussian
proclamation of war against France initiated a general uprising in northern
Germany against Napoleon. The French forces at Erfurt were then besieged by the
Prussians from November 1813 to May 1814. The besiegers vastly outnumbered
the French garrison in the fort. As the Prussians and Russians chased Napoleon
back across the Rhine, one city after another fell. Leipzig, Dresden, Stettin and
Danzig all succumbed; however Erfurt remained in French hands until the
conclusion of peace with the signing of the First Treaty of Paris on May 30, 1814.
Napoleon renounced his imperial position and was banished to the island of Elba
the following month, thus ending the Napoleonic war era.
Of all the siege notes the Erfurt series display the best design and
workmanship. All notes carry the inscription “BLOKADE VON ERFURT” as a
heading. These notes have elaborate border designs, some floral and some
geometric. Other features include dry authenticating seals and elaborate
counterfoils at the left of the note. A few notes contain the printer’s name, that of
Johann Immanuel Uckermann, beneath the right border.
In 1804 the French republic gave way to the First Empire. Napoleon was
declared emperor for life by the Senate, taking the title Napoleon I. He declared
himself King of Italy the following year. After the defeat of the Austrians at the
battle of Austerlitz, Napoleon’s greatest triumph, Austria was forced to cede
The French garrison at Erfurt found themselves besieged by the advancing Prussian army after
Napoleon's retreat from Moscow, making an issue of siege notes necessary. The fortress was
besieged from November 1813 until May 1814 when the Prussians finally prevailed. Shown here
are the 3 groschen and 2 thaler siege notes. Erfurt's money of necessity is of a superior
workmanship and design, which suggests that complete printing facilities must have been
available to the besieged forces.
all lands acquired earlier from the Venetian Republic to the Kingdom of Italy.
Only two Zara siege notes are known, both extremely rare, if not unique.
They are in the amount of 1 and 2 francs. Undated they are printed in black on
white paper bearing a brownish-red seal. The notes state that they may be
exchanged for Venetian lire.
The new fortress arose on the sight of an old village named Palmada, and
was named Palmanova in remembrance of this ancient place. The project was
overseen by a group of military engineers and architects who worked for the
Venetian Fortifications Office. Under their direction, a double barrier defense
system was erected around the star shaped city. These outer defenses included
ramparts, moats and ravelins so designed as to shelter the city’s three access gates.
Founded in October 1593, the fortress of Palmanova was dedicated on the twenty-
second anniversary of the Venetian naval victory at Lepanto, a decisive Venetian
victory over the Turkish fleet. Today Palmanova stands as one of the few
remaining intact examples of a fortified town to be found in Europe.
The fortress remained under Venice’s control until the decline of the
Venetian Republic in 1797, whereupon the Austrians occupied the city, retaining
possession until 1805. The fortress’s downfall came about in an interesting way.
An Austrian major had gained entrance to the fort by deception, opening it from
within to a thousand armed soldiers who were waiting out of sight outside the gate.
When France declared war on the Venetian Republic her troops occupied
most of the country. After the Austrian defeat by Napoleon at Austerlitz, a truce
was signed in 1805 ceding Palmanova to France. The French garrison immediately
set about strengthening and enlarging the fortifications. Napoleon personally
directed the destruction of three towns adjacent to the fort, which could have served
as vantage points for a besieger. This denied cover to the enemy during artillery
cannonading while enabling the engineers to construct a third external circle of
defenses around the fortress. The French occupation of Palmanova lasted from
1805 to 1814.
In 1813 Austria formed an alliance with Russia, seized upon the opportunity
presented by the Napoleonic army’s resounding defeat and subsequent retreat from
Moscow, and re-entered the war against France. During the Austrian siege of
1813-1814 Palmanova proved to be a storm proof fortress. The defending French
garrison and Napoleon’s far-sighted renovations had proven too great an obstacle
for the besiegers. Following Napoleon’s banishment to the island of Elba,
Palmanova again reverted to Austrian rule under which it remained until Italian
independence in 1866.
The second siege of Palmanova has left us with several numismatic rarities.
In 1848, the patriot defenders issued a series of siege notes in denominations of 25
and 50 centesimi and 1, 2, 3 and 6 lire. All are printed on heavy white watermarked
paper. The lire values carry the inscription “Carta Monetata per lire una (1), due
(2)”, etc. The issuing authority is stated as “Commissione di Finanza della
Fortezza” (Board of Finance of the Fortress). An oval hand-stamped seal
completes the design. It was applied by the “Commissionedi Finanza Palmanova
Instato d’Assidio – 1848” ( Finance Commission for the Palmanova Siege – 1848).
Four hand signatures attest to the notes authenticity.
Perhaps the most interesting feature of the 1848 Palmanova issue is their
tricolor appearance. The notes were printed in black, the values in red and the date
in green, thus necessitating three trips through the printing press. The production of
these notes in red and green printed on white paper made a patriotic statement also.
Siege notes from the Italian War of Independence. When the Italian patriots rebelled
against Austria in 1848, northern Italy was overrun, forcing the Austrians to abandon their
fortifications. The forts at Palmanova and Osoppo were then occupied by the patriots, who were
in turn besieged by the Austrian army. Necessity money was issued, while besieged, for the
garrisons at Palmanova (above) and Osoppo (below). Both fortresses capitulated seven months
later.
Little is known of the fortress at Osoppo other than its location at the
foot of the Alps in Italy’s most northeastern province. It too was one of the
fortresses abandoned by the Austrians in order to consolidate their inferior forces at
Mantua and Verona. The Italian patriots took over the unoccupied fortress in
March 1848, remaining there under siege for seven months before capitulating.
During the time the Austrians laid siege to the fortress at Osoppo the Italians
released a total of seven siege notes. These were denominated 50 centesimi, 1, 2, 3,
6, 50 and 100 lire. Undated, the notes were completely handwritten except for
three black hand-stamps, including one of the Commander of Artillery and one for
the Commandant of the Fort. Osoppo siege notes are exceedingly rare.
In Part II of this article we shall shift our focus from Europe to Africa, where
all but one of the remaining sieges under discussion, were located. It is interesting
to note that the art of siege warfare, developed in the Old World, soon followed
European expansion into their new colonies. Only the places listed in Part II issued
money of necessity to alleviate the hardships brought about by siege, however. In
Part II we shall discuss the siege of Khartoum where General Gordon's forces were
annilhilated on the Upper Nile, the Boer War sieges of Koffyfontein, O'okiep and
Mafeking – the latter chronicling Colonel Baden-Powell's successful stand of 217
days before being relieved by a British column, and finally the last known siege
involving the issue of paper money at Scutari, in present day Albania.