CBRPNK Core Rules PlainText
CBRPNK Core Rules PlainText
Content Warning This game touches sensitive topics like racial stigma, class segregation, large-scale disaster, violence and substance abuse. Because of that, it is
intended for mature players, with mutual trust and safety tools in place (e.g. the X-card, Lines & Veils and Open Door).
This work is based on Blades in the Dark , product of One Seven Design, developed and authored by John Harper, and licensed for our use under the Creative
Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
Long-Shot (Campaign Mode) rules adapted from Sean Nitter’s Broken Spire campaign setting for Blades in the Dark.
CBR+PNK IS A FORGED IN THE DARK GAME FOR ONE-SHOT SESSIONS OF CINEMATIC CYBERPUNK ACTION.
PLAYER Characters (PCs) are RUNNERS —mercs, criminals, rebels, living on the edge and running in the shadows of a gritty, ultraviolent world. In each game they are
brought to life as a team, ready to make huge compromises to score their angle by going on one LAST RUN .
Their fixer is known simply as OPERATOR , an anonymous flat voice over the comlink who sees them as nothing more than disposable assets.
The SPRAWL can be any overcrowded megacity consumed by high tech, class struggle, intrusive advertising, corporatocracy, automated services of poor quality,
climate crash, the futile search for humanity amongst all this, and so on.
The GRID is made up of servers across the globe through which data flows frantically. On the surface level are public records, media streams, everyday apps.
Sensitive information is protected by ICP (Intrusion Countermeasure Protocols). Megacorps and obscenely wealthy individuals run their own private servers, accessed
only from terminals inside well-secured facilities.
The GAME MODERATOR (GM) refers to the game rules to establish a dynamic world around the PCs. They help organize the conversation so it’s pointed toward
interesting elements of play.
Game Setup
In order to play you will need the GM Guide and a Runner File for each player.
A game of CBR+PNK revolves around our characters’ LAST RUN —a high-stakes operation with a clear OBJECTIVE , best suited for veteran RUNNERS.
As a GM, you can prepare Run outlines in advance or generate them on the spot using the prompts found in the FRAMEWORK brochure. Players can also come up with
their own Run outlines, possibly setting up for their PCs’ ANGLES and eventual HUNTED statuses.
After selecting the Run, ask the Players to file their Runners (build their PCs).
On your end, write a couple of LOCATIONS , potential ASSETS and make a list with 3-6 obstacles that may be encountered.
Do not overprepare: this is a type of game where you PLAY TO FIND OUT what happens.
When everyone is ready, recap the Run’s OBJECTIVE and let the players select their ENGAGEMENT PLAN (their main course of action) and answer the follow-up
question.
They don’t have to detail every step of the plan—the nitty-gritty of it happens off-screen. Ask them to select their LOAD and cut straight to the action.
1 / COMING IN HOT
Describe the LOCATION and circumstances the PCs start in based on their ENGAGEMENT PLAN. They’ve already successfully dealt with minor inconveniences and
now engage with the first significant obstacle: a shoot out, chase, checkpoint, etc. Go around the table asking each Player to introduce their Runner while dealing with
the trouble in their own way—possibly triggering some ACTION ROLLS.
2 / ERROR 417: EXPECTATION FAILED
Build up on their actions and, as they get closer to the objective, you should have enough to put them in a spot. Reveal a twist, possibly challenging the PCs’ priorities
or interests—maybe the data they were stealing is the first known awakened AI; The rogue synthetics show empathy towards their creators; This gig’s client is
revealed to be the Runners’ common enemy; Some shady organization is also interested in the target.
The FINAL OBSTACLE can be a resourceful individual, a resilient machine, a difficult choice.
When the Run’s OBJECTIVE is concluded (successfully or not), wrap it up and fast forward to the epilogues.
3 / LOGOFF
The runners have received their reward (or bad news, if they’ve failed) and now we see how they leverage it to score their Angle.
ANGLE ROLL
On their turn, a player declares what APPROACH they will employ to pull off their Angle and gathers the corresponding dice. They also get:
-1D if the chosen Approach is GLITCHED (don’t add Glitch dice for this roll).
-1D for each marked DEBT.
-1D if they overlooked or failed to comply with one or more critical requirements: time constraints, quality, integrity etc. Or -2D if they abandoned the mission.
+1D for each marked CRED : captured a bounty, extracted and sold corporate secrets, found a stash of untraceable credsticks, did a solid for Mx. Smith.
⚠ If ending up with zero or less dice: roll 2 dice and keep the lowest.
Player rolls and describes what happens to their character (5 min per player should be enough).
If they don’t like the outcome, they can step up the result at a huge cost: something/someone they love, their ideals, themselves.
6,6: You succeeded remarkably. After all other players are done, choose who you offer a hand to—improve their result by one step. Describe together how this
works in the fiction.
6: You got out of it mostly intact, but why it doesn’t feel like a win?
4/5: You did it, but you know it won’t last. How do you prepare?
1-3: You’ve failed. How do your actions only manage to set you back even further?
Action Roll
When a Player Character faces a risky or troublesome situation, the outcome is determined by the ACTION ROLL :
1. The player describes what they want to accomplish and what Approach , Skill , and any other factor (gear, augment, environmental aspect) they will employ to
do so. There is no “wrong” Approach to a situation, but some may be less effective or result in more severe consequences, prompting the Player to rethink
their course of action to improve their positioning.
2. The GM assesses the risk and tells them what are the probable Consequences. If any or both sides have Edges on distinct aspects of the situation, they will
then inform what Threat and Effect Levels can be expected—otherwise use the standard Level 2.
3. The Player can then raise both Threat and Effect simultaneously to improve their Effect at the cost of a worse Consequence or vice-versa.
4. Player gathers their dice:
5. The Player rolls their dice and reads the single highest result, judging the outcome by the table below.
Player and GM work together narrating the action, but the latter has the final say over the outcome and is the one declaring eventual Consequences.
6,6: Critical. They succeed and gain an extra benefit (Increase Effect, uncover a secret, improved position, pinpoint a bounty).
6: Success. It goes as well as intended.
4/5: Partial Success. They succeed, but it comes with a Consequence.
1-3: Failure. Things go bad as they fail and also suffer a Consequence.
GLITCH DICE
Each GLITCHED factor used on an Action Roll replaces a normal die with a __GLITCH die__—use a die that’s easily discernible from the rest.
After judging the outcome as usual, read the lowest GLITCH separately. On a 1-3 , it triggers a further Level 2 Consequence that can’t be Resisted; on a 4/5 , the
additional Consequence can be Resisted normally.
Threat Level (T) informs the danger posed by the situation and what/how much the PC can lose on a partial success or failure. Effect Level (E) gauges how much is
accomplished on a success. They are both set to LEVEL 2 by standard and go up to Level 4.
In a conflict, each side may have an EDGE from how they are using gear, tactics, environment, or opposition weaknesses to their advantage—only the most significant
factors should be considered. Edges can Increase or Reduce either levels in the respective side’s favor:
If the OPPOSITION has an Edge allowing them to respond more effectively, Increase Threat. If their Edge improves their defenses or diminishes the PC’s
efforts would Reduce Effect.
If the RUNNER has an Edge that can avoid or mitigate retaliation from the Threat, Reduce Threat. An Edge that increases their effectiveness might give
Increased Effect.
Using an Expertise , they can trade a die for an Edge.
They can choose to Push themselves for Increased Effect.
Consequences
Inflicted by enemy actions, bad circumstances, or the outcome of a roll. informs the Harm level, the ticks on a Track, the severity of the Complication, etc
Reduced Effect: their action falls short and causes Reduced Effect.
Harm: lasting condition or injury. Requires time or treatment to recover.
Complication: compromise assets (e.g. cyber becomes GLITCHED), deplete resources (e.g. ammo), start and/or advance a troublesome Progress Track.
Threat Escalation: they lose control of the situation, take away an Edge or safeguard to Increase Threat.
Lost Opportunity: circumstances shift, they must find a new approach.
Combine these as the fiction dictates. E.g. a Runner facing a Threat 3 enemy rolls a Failure. As a Consequence, the GM could deal a level 3 Harm or a level 1 Harm
and have the enemy disarm them.
Each Harm Level implies a penalty to pertinent Action Rolls (may be disregarded later by Taking a Breather). When a PC takes Harm of a Level already filled, it moves
on to a greater Level. If they take Harm but there is no slot left to fill, it’s Time to Die.
Therefore, Level 4 harm is FATAL if not Resisted and should be inflicted only when the stakes are clear.
Progress Tracks
Assign Progress Tracks of 4, 6, or 8 segments when a situation is complex and you need to track ongoing effort or progress over time—otherwise, resolve the result of
an action with a single roll. Even more complex obstacles might feature layered Tracks to represent the multiple steps needed to overcome it.
When PCs make progress towards an objective, tick a number of segments in the Progress Track equal to their Effect Level. When progress is made by an opposition,
tick a number of segments equal to the Threat Level.
Mark progress on a task: the endurance of an enemy; a system’s integrity. The task is completed when the Progress Track fills up.
Set up a countdown: reinforcements’ arrival; a time bomb. Trouble ensues when the Track fills up.
Represent a race: a hacker infiltrating a network while security closes in. Set two opposed Tracks, they don’t even have to be the same size.
Adversary Skill
Adversaries’ capabilities manifest through Progress Tracks, the severity of the Consequences they deal (as a result of fictional standings), and ultimately, their Skill
level.
When Regular adversaries are involved, the PCs’ Action Rolls determine the outcome for both sides simultaneously. A single roll tells us how their actions interact and
which Consequences result.
When Skilled adversaries act, they are about to accomplish something. How the Runners respond—and their rolls—determine how effective the adversary was.
By taking the initiative, when Elite adversaries act they can inflict a Consequence that must be Resisted before the Runners also have a chance to act.