Chapter 2
Chapter 2
Concrete
2.1 Introduction
Concrete is essentially a mixture of cement, aggregates and water. Other
materials added at the mixer are referred to as ‘admixtures’. Materials based on
cement have the following general attractions:
Low cost.
Flexible of application – for example, mortars, concretes, grouts, etc.
Variety of finishes obtainable.
Good compressive strength.
Protection of embedded steel.
http://www.cement.org/tech/index.asp
2.2 Cements
Why is it called "Portland" cement?
Manufacture
Portland cements are made by heating a finely divided mixture of clay or shale
and chalk or limestone in a kiln to a high temperature – around 1500 oC, such
that chemical combination occurs between them. About 5 per cent gypsum
(calcium sulphate) is added to the resulting clinker in order to prevent ‘flash’
setting and the final stage involves grinding to a fine powder.
Composition
Although the familiar grey powder may appear to have a high degree of
uniformity, it is important to appreciate that Portland cement is a complex
combination of the minerals contained originally in the clay or shale and the
Clay or shale
Limestone or chalk
The properties of Portland cements vary markedly with the proportions of the
four compounds, reflecting substantial differences between their individual
behaviour. The proportion of clay to chalk (usually approximately 1 : 4 be
weight) must be very carefully controlled during manufacture of the cement,
since quite small variations in the ratio produce relatively large variations in the
ratio of dicalcium silicate to tricalcium silicate. A greater proportion of chalk
favours the formation of more of the latter, since it is richer in lime. This would
lead to cement with more rapid early strength development. The tricalcium
aluminate and the tetracalcium aluminoferrite contribute little to the long-term
strength or durability of Portland cements but would be difficult to remove and,
in any case, are useful in the manufacturing process. They act as fluxes,
assisting in the formation of the silicate compounds, which would otherwise
require higher kiln temperatures.
The properties of cement are dependent not only on its composition but also on
its fitness. This is because cement grains have very low solubility in water. This
could be demonstrated by mixing a small amount of cement with water in a
beaker and leaving for some hours, stirring occasionally. There will be no visible
change in the appearance of the cement. Cements hydrate by a surface reaction
and the rate of reaction, and hence setting and hardening, therefore increase as
the surface area of grains increases- that is, as they become finer. Fineness is
measured by the term ‘specific surface’, which is defined as:
The units of specific surface are m2/kg, that of ordinary Portland cement (OPC)
being required by earlier editions of BS 12 to be not less than 225 m2/kg, though
in practice it is usually in the range 350-380 m2/kg. The current edition of BS 12
(1996) does not specify a minimum fineness for OPC; indeed the standard,
which has been produced with the developments in European standards in mind,
does not use the term ‘ordinary Portland cement’ though the term is still used by
cement manufacturers to describe Portland cements of strength class 42.5N as
described in the standard. This strength is based on mortar cube tests.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-Pr1KTVSXo
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4mv6d_zoom-into-concrete_tech
1. Fineness
2. Soundness (BS EN 196-3)
3. Consistency
4. Initial And Final Setting Time Of Cement (BS EN 196-3)
5. Compressive Strength (BS EN 196-1)
Fineness
The fineness of cement has an important bearing on the rate of hydration and
hence on the rate of gain of strength and also on the rate of evolution of heat.
Finer cement offers a greater surface area for hydration and hence faster the
development of strength. The fineness of grinding has increased over the years.
But now it has got nearly stabilised. Different cements are ground to different
fineness. The disadvantages of fine grinding are that it is susceptible to air set
and early deterioration. Maximum number of particles in a sample of cement
should have a size less than about 100 microns. The smallest particle may have
a size of about 1.5 microns. By and large an average size of the cement particles
may be taken as about 10 micron. The particle size fraction below 3 microns has
been found to have the predominant effect on the strength at one day while 3-
25 micron fraction has a major influence on the 28 days strength. Increase in
fineness of cement is also found to increase the drying shrinkage of concrete. In
commercial cement it is suggested that there should be about 25-30 per cent of
particles of less than 7 micron in size.
a) By sieving.
b) By determination of specific
surface (total surface area of
all the particles in one gram
of cement) by air-
permeability apparatus.
Expressed as cm2/gm or
m2/kg. Generally Blaine Air
permeability apparatus is
used.
1. Sieve Test :
Weigh correctly 100 grams of cement and take it on a standard IS Sieve No. 9
(90 microns). Break down the air-set lumps in the sample with fingers.
Continuously sieve the sample giving circular and vertical motion for a period of
15 minutes. Mechanical sieving devices may also be used. Weigh the residue left
on the sieve. This weight shall not exceed 10% for ordinary cement. Sieve test is
rarely used.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44yrGm2fxfU&feature=related
This method of test covers the procedure for determining the fineness of cement
as represented by specific surface expressed as total surface area in cm2/gm. of
cement. It is also expressed in m2/kg. Lea and Nurse Air Permeability Apparatus
is shown. It can be used for measuring the specific surface of cement. The
principle is based on the relation between the flow of air through the cement bed
and the surface area of the particles comprising the cement bed. From this the
surface area per unit weight of the body material can be related to the
permeability of a bed of a given porosity. The cement bed in the permeability
cell is 1 cm. high and 2.5 cm. in diameter. Knowing the density of cement the
weight required to make a cement bed of porosity of 0.475 can be calculated.
This quantity of cement is placed in the permeability cell in a standard manner.
Slowly pass on air through the cement bed at a constant velocity. Adjust the
rate of air flow until the flow meter shows a difference in level of 30-50 cm.
Read the difference in level (h1) of the manometer and the difference in level
(h2) of the flow meter. Repeat these observations to ensure that steady
conditions have been obtained as shown by a constant value of h1/h2. Specific
surface Sw is calculated from the following formula:
where,
ξ = Porosity, i.e., 0.475
A= Area of the cement bed
L= Length (cm) of the cement bed
d = Density of cement, and
C= Flow meter constant.
Fineness can also be measured by Blain Air Permeability apparatus. This method
is more commonly employed in India.
Soundness
It is very important that the cement after setting shall not undergo any
appreciable change of volume. Certain cements have been found to undergo a
large expansion after setting causing disruption of the set and hardened mass.
This will cause serious difficulties for the durability of structures when such
cement is used. The testing of soundness of cement, to ensure that the cement
does not show any appreciable subsequent expansion is of prime importance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqxAabDdmTE
The unsoundness in cement is due to the presence of excess of lime than that
could be combined with acidic oxide at the kiln. This is also due to inadequate
burning or insufficiency in fineness of grinding or thorough mixing of raw
materials. It is also likely that too high a proportion of magnesium content or
calcium sulphate content may cause unsoundness in cement. For this reason the
magnesia content allowed in cement is limited to 6 per cent. It can be recalled
that, to prevent flash set, calcium sulphate is added to the clinker while grinding.
The quantity of gypsum added will vary from 3 to 5 per cent depending upon
C3A content. If the addition of gypsum is more than that could be combined with
C3A, excess of gypsum will remain in the cement in Free State. This excess of
gypsum leads to an expansion and consequent disruption of the set cement
paste. Unsoundness in cement is due to excess of lime, excess of magnesia or
excessive proportion of sulphates. Unsoundness in cement does not come to
surface for a considerable period of time. Therefore, accelerated tests are
required to detect it. There are number of such tests in common use. The
apparatus is shown in figure. It consists of a small split cylinder of spring brass
or other suitable metal. It is 30 mm in diameter and 30 mm high. On either side
of the split are attached two indicator arms 165 mm long with pointed ends.
Cement is gauged with 0.78 times the water required for standard consistency
(0.78 P), in a standard manner and filled into the mould kept on a glass plate.
The mould is covered on the top with another glass plate. The whole assembly is
immersed in water at a temperature of 27°C – 32°C and kept there for 24 hours.
Measure the distance between the indicator points. Submerge the mould again
in water. Heat the water and bring to boiling point in about 25-30 minutes and
keep it boiling for 3 hours. Remove the mould from the water, allow it to cool
and measure the distance between the indicator points. The difference between
these two measurements represents the expansion of cement. This must not
exceed 10 mm for ordinary, rapid hardening and low heat Portland cements. If
in case the expansion is more than 10 mm as tested above, the cement is said
to be unsound.
The Le Chatelier test detects unsoundness due to free lime only. This method of
testing does not indicate the presence and after effect of the excess of
magnesia. Indian Standard Specification stipulates that cement having a
magnesia content of more than 3 per cent shall be tested for soundness by
Autoclave test which is sensitive to both free magnesia and free lime. In this test
Consistency
For finding out initial setting time, final setting time and soundness of cement,
and strength a parameter known as standard consistency has to be used. It is
pertinent at this stage to describe the procedure of conducting standard
consistency test. The standard consistency of a cement paste is defined as that
consistency which will permit a Vicat plunger having 10 mm diameter and 50
mm length to penetrate to a depth of 33-35 mm from the top of the mould
shown in figure. The apparatus is called Vicat Apparatus. This apparatus is used
to find out the percentage of water required to produce a cement paste of
standard consistency. The standard consistency of the cement paste is some
time called normal consistency (CPNC).
The following procedures are adopted to find out standard consistency. Take
about 500 gms of cement and prepare a paste with a weighed quantity of water
(say 24 per cent by weight of cement) for the first trial. The paste must be
prepared in a standard manner and filled into the Vicat mould within 3-5
minutes. After completely filling the mould, shake the mould to expel air. A
standard plunger, 10 mm diameter, 50 mm long is attached and brought down
to touch the surface of the paste in the test block and quickly released allowing
it to sink into the paste by its own weight. Take the reading by noting the depth
of penetration of the plunger. Conduct a 2nd trial (say with 25 per cent of water)
and find out the depth of penetration of plunger. Similarly, conduct trials with
higher and higher water/ cement ratios till such time the plunger penetrates for
a depth of 33-35 mm from the top. That particular percentage of water which
allows the plunger to penetrate only to a depth of 33-35 mm from the top is
known as the percentage of water required to produce a cement paste of
standard consistency. This percentage is usually denoted as ‘P’. The test is
required to be conducted in a constant temperature (27° + 2°C) and constant
humidity (90%).
An arbitrary division has been made for the setting time of cement as initial
setting time and final setting time. It is difficult to draw a rigid line between
these two arbitrary divisions. For convenience, initial setting time is regarded as
the time elapsed between the moments that the water is added to the cement,
to the time that the paste starts losing its plasticity. The final setting time is the
time elapsed between the moment the water is added to the cement, and the
time when the paste has completely lost its plasticity and has attained sufficient
firmness to resist certain definite pressure.
The Vicat Apparatus shown in figure is used for setting time test also. The
following procedure is adopted. Take 500 gm. of cement sample and gauge it
with 0.85 times the water required to produce cement paste of standard
consistency (0.85 P). The paste shall be gauged and filled into the Vicat mould in
specified manner within 3-5 minutes. Start the stop watch the moment water is
added to the cement. The temperature of water and that of the test room, at the
time of gauging shall be within27°C ± 2°C.
Needle may penetrate only to a depth of 33-35 mm from the top. Lower the
needle (C) gently and bring it in contact with the surface of the test block and
quickly release. Allow it to penetrate into the test block. In the beginning, the
needle will completely pierce through the test block. But after some time when
the paste starts losing its plasticity, the between the time when water is added
to the cement and the time at which the needle penetrates the test block to a
depth equal to 33-35 mm from the top is taken as initial setting time.
Replace the needle (C) of the Vicat apparatus by a circular attachment (F) shown
in the figure. The cement shall be considered as finally set when, upon, lowering
the attachment gently cover the surface of the test block, the centre needle
makes an impression, while the circular cutting edge of the attachment fails to
do so. In other words the paste has attained such hardness that the centre
needle does not pierce through the paste more than 0.5 mm.
Go to the following video clips to see a demonstration of how the initial set time
and final set time and consistency of cement experiment is conducted.
Consistency of cement
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrwAjLwycN8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Hh8i0lpuCs&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZvcKWUo1tg&feature=related
Compressive Strength
The current test for compressive strength of cements relates to samples of size
40 × 40 × 160 mm, made from a 3 : 1 sand/cement mortar with a water/cement
ratio of 0.5. The sample is first tested in flexure and then the broken pieces are
tested in compression using a special 40 × 40 mm jig. The test employs a
standard CEN sand of specified grading, the particle sizes being between 1.6 mm
and 80 m. A sand/cement ratio of 3 : 1 is employed with a water/ cement ratio
of 0.4. Standard sands such as Leighton Buzzard sand should be checked
against the EN 196 specification before being used. The mortar is prepared by
mechanical mixing. Requirements for the compressive strength of mortar cubes
are given in the following table.
Note that an extra letter is added after the strength class to denote the rate of
early strength development. Most common cements are given the letter ‘N’
corresponding to normal development, while the letters ‘L’ and ‘R’ are used to
denote low and rapid rates of development respectively.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Gq3bzLRWtM
http://www.almatis.com/download/technical-
papers/High%20Calcium%20Aluminate%20Cements_and_Chemical_Binders.pdf
There may be other reasons for which ‘special’ aggregates would be employed;
for example:
Larger aggregates result in a lower sand requirement. This reduces the specific
surface of the aggregate overall and consequently reduces water and cement
requirements. The resulting concrete should therefore be more economical and
exhibit lower shrinkage for a given strength.
There are, of course, constraints on the maximum size that can be employed;
first the maximum aggregate size should not exceed approximately one-fifth of
the minimum dimension in the structure, consideration also being given to
spacing between reinforcing bars. Secondly, the aggregate chosen will need to
be a size that is readily available. The standard sizes, together with typical
applications are given in table 5.
Aggregates which are largely retained on a 5mm mesh sieve are described as
coarse aggregates. These may comprise uncrushed natural gravels which result
from the natural disintegration of rock or crushed stones and crushed gravel,
produced by crushing hard stone and gravel respectively. Aggregates that
largely pass a 5mm sieve are referred to as sands. (The current edition of
BS882, 1992, uses the term ‘sand’ in preference to ‘fine aggregate’ though the
latter term is retained in the latest edition of the DoE method of mix design. The
term ‘fines’, is reserved for material such as silt or clay, passing the 75 m
sieve.) Sands may comprise natural sands; that is, sands resulting from natural
disintegration of rock or crushed stone, or crushed gravel sands.
Figure 2: Polished section of concrete, viewed with a scanning electron microscope, showing a chert aggregate particle
with extensive internal cracks due to ASR (Alkali Silica Reaction). The cracks extend from the aggregate into the nearby
concrete (arrowed).
Both crushed and uncrushed natural gravels have naturally continuous gradings,
but to comply with BS 882, the gradings must be within certain limits. Gradings
are determined by passing aggregates through a set of standard sieves, the
particular sieves used depending on the maximum aggregate size. The grading is
then defined by the percentage of the total sample used which passes each
sieve. Table 6 shows the sieves used for concreting sands, together with
specimen results.
These are plotted in the following figure; note that the sieve sizes are not plotted
to a linear scale, successive sizes being spaced equally instead, and points are
joined by straight lines. This figure shows also the limits of BS 882 grading F into
which this particular sand fits.
Figure 3: Sand grading corresponding to sieve analysis results (red line). The F grading envelope into which this sand fits
is also indicated.
Figure 4: This table was taken from BS 882 and shows the maximum and minimum permissible amount of sand
according to size
should comply with gradings C or M if being used for heavy duty concrete floor
finishes.
Concrete aggregates are not assigned grading ‘zones’, since the range of particle
size is, in general, smaller than that of sands. They should, however, fit into a
BS grading envelope for that particular size and type.
Most aggregates comprise a mass of solid material containing air pores which
may or may not be accessible to water. The term which describes the density of
the solid material itself is relative density (formerly called specific gravity) or
density relative to that of water, though several definitions are possible
according to the way in which accessible pores are treated.
( )
Relative density could be defined in other ways – for example, by taking the
mass of dry aggregate with the same volume as given above. (This is referred to
as the oven dry relative density and gives a lower result because the mass in
the numerator of the equation does not include the mass of water as
previously.)
In the case of most natural aggregates, void contents are small, so that
differences between the various definitions of relative density are
correspondingly small. The term ‘solid density’ will be taken to mean 1000 ×
relative density (say, on a saturated surface dry basis), normally having the
units kg/m3.
When aggregates are loosely packed together or stockpiled, large volume of air
are trapped between particles – usually many times the volume of air present
within particles. This is referred to as ‘bulking’ and for coarse aggregates it
amounts to between 30 and 50 per cent of the total space occupied. The extent
of bulking of sands depends very much on their moisture content. The void
content of dry sand may be quite small – say, 20 per cent since the particles of
different sizes exhibit a void filling action. This can increase to 40 per cent when
5-10 per cent moisture is present, thereafter decreasing as further moisture
tends to assist particles to consolidate. The bulking at intermediate moisture
contents is the result of thin water films increasing friction between sand
particles. The situation is illustrated in fig. 5.
Lightweight aggregates comprise highly porous particles and are widely used in
the construction industry. They have the advantage that:
Figure 7: Ground granulated blast furnace slag powder; is Figure 8: Expanded shale or slate allows excess water to
used to make durable concrete structures in combination drain away. This natural rock is kiln-fired to form small
with ordinary Portland cement and/or other pozzolanic pockets on its surface that hold air, moisture, and
materials. nutrients, making them available for plants.
Figure 9: Pumice is basically lava froth, an extrusive rock frozen as its dissolved gases come out of solution. It looks solid
but often floats on water.
There are certain situations in which high-density concretes are required – for
example, for radiation shielding for nuclear reactor vessels. Such concretes are
produced by use of high-density aggregates such as:
1
For more info go to the following site: http://www.concretebasics.org/articlesinfo/fa1.php
Metallic aggregates may result in concrete having over twice its normal density.
Sands are likely to contain more silt than coarse aggregates and a rapid
estimate of the silt/clay content of sands (other than crushed stone sands) can
be made by a ‘field settling test’. The test involves shaking a measuring cylinder
containing a 1 per cent salt and sand mixture. The salt helps to separate the silt
into a separate layer whose volume can be measured after being allowed to
stand for three hours. (See next figure). If the amount is more than
approximately 8 per cent by volume, separate tests are necessary to determine
whether the material passing the 75 m sieve by weight is in excess of the BS
882 limit of 4 per cent for natural sand and crushed gravel sand or 16 per cent
for crushed rock sand. Coarse aggregates can be checked for silt and clay by
visual inspection. When in doubt, the test of BS 812: Part 103.1 should be used
to ascertain whether the silt content is in excess of BS 882 limits.
Aggregate stockpiles are normally wet, assuming that they are replenished
regularly, though the surface may dry, especially in warm windy weather. In this
situation there may be quite large variations in moisture content from place to
place, requiring additional care when batching.
The principles of three types of test are given below and in each case the aim
will be to obtain the free-water content of the aggregates since no adjustment is
necessary in mixing water for moisture which is absorbed within aggregate
particles.
Drying Methods
In these a sample of damp aggregate is carefully weighed (Mw) and dried until it
reaches a saturated surface dry condition. A suitable method is by hairdryer,
sand being dried uniformly until it is just free flowing. Coarse aggregate should
be dried until all traces of surface moisture have disappeared. A frying pan on a
gas or electric ring may alternatively be used (though care is necessary to
ensure uniform heating of the sample). The aggregate is then weighed again
(Md). The moisture based on wet weight is then given by:
( )
Siphon can
This relies on the fact that the volume of an accurately measured mass of
aggregate of given density depends on the amount of moisture in it, water
having a density of only approximately 40 per cent that of most natural
aggregates. Hence the greater the moisture content, the greater the volume of a
given mass (normally 2kg). A sample of dried aggregate is necessary for the
test. To give the free-water content this should be in the saturated surface
dry condition. Accurate weighing of dry and damp samples is necessary in this
method, which is suitable for both coarse aggregate and sand.
Cement 310 kg
Sand 650 kg
Coarse Aggregate 1190 kg
Water 180 litres
Moisture content of sand and coarse aggregates is 4.5 and 1.5 per cent
respectively, based on wet weight.
Answer
Again this amount must be added to the quantity of coarse aggregate, giving
To obtain the batch quantity of water, the water contents above are subtracted
from the given batch quantity:
It may be argued that the above method is inaccurate, since the extra material
added to sand and coarse aggregates also contains water, which should be
allowed for. Strictly speaking this is true, but the errors in percentage terms are
small enough to be ignored and the actual errors would normally be smaller than
the tolerances in batching equipment. The above method is given on the account
of its simplicity.
http://training.ce.washington.edu/wsdot/Modules/03_materials/03-
2_body.htm#durability_soundness
Perhaps the most important single term in understanding how mix parameters
affect concrete properties is the water/cement ratio.
Note that the free-water/cement ratio is the most important ratio since it is this
that affects strength and durability. Free-water/cement ratio would be based on
the free-water content of the mix – that is, water absorbed in the aggregates is
disregarded.
For most concrete mixes the aggregate/cement ratio would be in the range 4-
10, small ratios indicating rich, expensive mixes and high ratios lean, cheaper
mixes. Although mortars are still commonly specified in terms of aggregate
(sand)/cement ratios the richness of concrete mixes is now more commonly
specified in terms of cement content per cubic metre. For example, an
aggregate/cement ratio of 4 would correspond to about 450 kg of cement per
cubic metre while an aggregate/cement ratio of 10 would correspond to about
200kg of cement per cubic metre. One advantage of expressing the richness of
mixes in terms of cement content is that the cost of the concretes of varying
richness can be relative easily compared, cement being the most costly item.
Workability
(Note that the new BS EN 206 uses the term consistence instead of workability,
though the latter term will be retained here in view of its current continued use
in the industry.)
Workability may be measured by the slump test, compacting factor test and
Vebe test (BS 1881: Parts 102-104), for which brief details of each will be given.
For each test it is essential that a representative sample of concrete be obtained.
Details of how to obtain such samples are given in BS 1881: Part 101.
In the slump test concrete is placed into a special cone in three layers of equal
height, each layer being compacted in a standard manner. On removing the
cone the concrete ‘slumps’, the slump being equal to the difference between the
height of the cone and the highest point of the concrete. (See figure 12). When
the concrete slumps evenly, a ‘true slump is said to occur. In less cohesive
concretes, collapse may occur on an n inclined shear plane, producing a ‘shear’
slump. A wet mix of low cohesion may produce a ‘collapse’ slump. Slumps may
vary from zero for dry concrete mixes, through 50-70 mm for medium
workability concretes to 150mm or more for wet or harsh mixes. The test is
widely used as an on-site check, though it is not suitable for dry mixes which
tend to give low or zero slumps.
Figure 12:Types of slump: (a) collapse slump, (b) shear slump, (c) true slump
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W64uhS5TBn0&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHPvFRhwO2c&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTK1RXs0ULc&feature=relmfu
In the compacting factor test concrete is first gently loaded into a hopper, is
then allowed to fall vertically into a similar lower hopper and finally into a
cylinder, by the action of gravity. The concrete in the cylinder is then struck off
level and weighed. The cylinder is emptied and refilled, this time with fully
compacting the concrete. The ratio
is known as the ‘compacting factor’. The value will approach unity for wet mixes
(for which the test is not suitable) and may be as low as 0.65 for very dry
mixes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRo2vYw_QPI
The third test, the Vebe test utilises a slump cone in a cylindrical container fixed
to a small vibrating table. A slump test is first carried out and a Perspex disc
attached to a vertical guide is allowed to rest gently on the concrete. The table is
then made to vibrate and the time taken for the underside of the Perspex disc to
become completely covered in concrete is measured in seconds. The time may
vary from a few seconds for wet mixes (for which the test is not suitable) to over
20 seconds for dry concretes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n2wpCwYtq4&feature=related
From the descriptions given above it will be evident that the slump test is the
most suitable for the measurement of medium to high workability. The test has
the advantage that the equipment is simple, portable and does not require an
electrical supply.
The compacting factor test is sensitive to medium and low workability, though its
use is not included in the current DoE design document Design of normal
concrete mixes since ‘it is not possible to establish consistent relationships
between it and the slump or Vebe tests’. The compacting factor test may
nevertheless be useful as a control test for drier concretes and is used in civil
engineering applications.
The Vebe test has the disadvantage of requiring mains electricity, though it is
very sensitive to changes in the water content of dry mixes, this providing the
main basis for its use.
It is important to appreciate that all the above tests are used to check the
workability of the concrete, once mixed; and that, since design methods rarely
give a very accurate water batch quantity, even with moisture content
correction, there is a need to be able to judge the workability of the concrete
while in the mixer. The mixer operator may well be able to do this, for example,
by the appearance of the concrete, the sound made by the concrete within the
drum, or the sound of the engine or motor which is used to drive the mixer,
since drier mixes may increase the power consumption. Hence an experienced
mixer operator is a very useful part of the construction team in producing
concrete of consistently correct workability.
Workability requirements
The workability of concrete for a given situation should be the minimum value
that will ensure full compaction with the plant available, due consideration being
given to difficulties that may arise from access, congested reinforcement or
depth of pour. The following table gives the main workability categories and
applications.
For a given aggregate type and size, workability is highly sensitive to changes of
water content – for example, in the case of 20mm uncrushed aggregate, a water
content of 160 litres per cubic metre would result in low workability, while a
water content of 200 litres would result in high workability.
Aggregate shape
Cohesion
Strength
(Note that the European Standard (BS EN 206) will refer to cylinders also, which
in general give lower strength results for a given concrete mix than cube test
results. When specifying strength it is therefore important that the type of test
required is included in the description. All references made to strength below will
be to compressive cube strength.)
Free-water/cement ratio
Aggregate properties
Cement type
Durability
The arguments determining durability are similar to those given under strength,
low water/cement ratios resulting in greatest durability. To illustrate this,
concretes of free water/cement ratio 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 would result in very good,
moderate and poor durability respectively in concrete subject to average
exposure. It is not always easy to measure the free-water/cement ratio in
production, so that durability is sometimes specified alternatively by means of
minimum cement content on the basis that, for a given workability, the water
content would be constant; hence, by specifying cement content, one is
effectively specifying a water/cement ratio. Another way of specifying durability
indirectly is by specifying strength, though the correlation depends on aggregate
properties.
Nominal mixes
This is the simplest and least rigorous way of specifying concrete. For oversize
concrete or strip foundations it may be sufficient to specify ratios such as
The aggregate size and workability should also be stated. It may be satisfactory
to batch concrete by volume (for example, using gauging boxes) for such mixes.
They may produce perfectly adequate concrete, but offer little control over
variations and so would not be acceptable where structural concrete is specified.
Standard mixes
Examples of these can be found in BS 5328. The next table gives batch
quantities for one cubic metre of concrete for 20 mm aggregate. The quantities
shown will ‘normally’ give characteristic strengths stated in the table. Volume
batching is permitted for mixes ST1, ST2 and ST3. This procedure permits a
simple approach to specifying structural concrete, albeit of limited strength-
maximum characteristic value 25 N/mm2. Note the simple numerical differences
between the figures in the table. Cube testing is not required but might be
specified as a quality control tool.
28 day
125
Standard Characteristic 75 mm
Constituents mm
mix strength slump
2 slump
(N/mm )
Cement (kg) 210 230
ST1 7.5
Total aggregate (kg) 1940 1880
Cement (kg) 240 260
ST2 10.0
Total aggregate (kg) 1920 1860
ST3 15.0 Cement (kg) 270 300
Designated mixes
These are recommended mixes for specific applications. BS 5328, for example,
defines a ‘GEN 1’ concrete suitable for a range of applications including
In all the above applications standard mix ST2 is identified with workability
appropriate to application. Hence designated mixes provide a simple way of
specifying concrete for common applications.
Tables of densities of each material can be found from the internet. But
make sure that the data is reliable. For calculation purposes it is sufficient
to use such tables but to calculate the exact value one should rely on
testing directly the material.
The figures are tabulated as in the following table, and, to simplify them,
all figures are divided by the mass of cement, giving masses which would
correspond to 1 kg of cement.
Mass ratio
Relative Volume
Material Mass (kg) (per kg of
density (litres)
cement)
Coarse
965 2.681 2.70 0.993
aggregate
The mass ratio of water is find by direct proportion with those of cement.
i.e.
Hence the volume of water was found by using the standard density
equation. i.e. .
In this case
Then, the concrete density can be found by dividing the total mass by the
total volume. i.e.
Or, to the nearest 10kg/m3 = 2400 kg/m3. (Note; 1000 litre = 1m3)
Figure 16: Estimated wet density of fully compacted concrete. (crown copyright)
To obtain the batch quantities for 400 m3 of concrete, the batch quantities
per m3 are simply multiplied by 400. If, as may be the case, mass ratios
only are given, the ratios are multiplied by the appropriate factor:
to give batch quantities per cubic metre. The procedure is then as before.
If the presence of air is to be allowed for in calculating density (as, for
example, in air-entrained concrete, used to increase frost resistance), this
is easily done by increasing the total volume of concrete (but not the
mass) by the percentage of air that is expected.
Exercise
Calculate the concrete density of the following mixture:
Answer
Mass ratio
Relative Volume
Material Mass (kg) (per kg of
density (litres)
cement)
Coarse
845 2.641 2.60 1.016
aggregate
Q1. Compare these results with figure 1 as see whether they match.
What do you conclude from these results and figure 1?
Cement content
Cover to steel reinforcement
Compaction
Curing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ee0HGlwKvMY&feature=related
The need to keep water out of structures, or to take special care where this is
not feasible, cannot be overstated. The action of water may be two-fold:
The mechanism of attack has long been attributed to the 10% expansion of
absorbed water on freezing, though it is now known that further damage can
result from movement of water within concrete on cooling below 0oC. Ice builds
up in large pores and cracks and may cause very large expansion in such
positions, while other areas become dryer (desiccation). Perhaps the extreme
example of this is frost heave, as found in soils where large ice lenses can be
obtained. Frost damage in concrete is exaggerated as follows:
Most of the measures required to avoid frost attack will be evident from the
above, though it should be added that use of air-entraining agents has been
found to be particularly effective in avoiding damage to surfaces at risk. It is
important to appreciate that new concrete with its incomplete hydrate structure
and high permeability is particularly at risk from frost, and must be protected by
an insulating material until it has sufficient maturity to resist frost.
For ground water containing up to 1.4 g/litre of SO4 ions, OPC can be used
provided a cement content of at least 330kg per cubic metre is used with water
cement ratio not higher than 0.5.
At higher sulphate levels, or when high magnesium levels are found, the use of
sulphate-resisting Portland cement in conjunction with a waterproof coating
would be essential.
The concrete has a very high pH value (over 12) resulting from presence,
in quite small quantities, of sodium and potassium alkalis originating from
the oxides of these elements if present in the cement (high-alkali
cements).
Aggregates contain reactive forms of silica such as found in opal,
tridymite, some flints and cherts.
The presence of water.
The reactive components of the aggregates form a gel, leading to expansion and
disruption of the concrete, often producing ‘map’ cracking. The reaction is slow
and the cracking usually takes 10-20 years to become evident. There is a
‘pessimum’ level of reactive aggregate of about 2 per cent since smaller
quantities do not form sufficient gel while larger quantities ‘swamp’ the excess
alkali present. Once formed, cracks admit further water, accelerating the rate of
deterioration. ASR can be avoided by applying one or more of the following:
Use of low-alkali cements. For example, low alkali versions of OPC (BS 12)
containing less than 0.6 per cent alkali, expressed as Na2O equivalent.
Alternatively, pozzolanic additions are known to be beneficial in reducing
ASR.
Avoidance of reactive aggregates. Some types, such as granite or
limestone, are unlikely to be reactive. In areas of doubt, expansion tests
can be carried out on samples of concrete made from the aggregates in
question placed in water at 38oC for some weeks.
Exclusion of water. Most structures affected to date have been severely
exposed; for example, concrete bridges or buildings near the sea. The risk
to interior concrete is very small except in swimming pools or other damp
The types of attack referred to above are summarised in the following table.
Figure 17: Map cracking due to ASR in concrete. This is sometimes called 'Isle of Man' cracking because cracks meet in
groups of three.
The rate of attack and hence the depth of penetration of this ‘carbonation’
reaction depend chiefly on the permeability of the concrete. Well-compacted, low
water/cement ratio concretes have low permeability such that carbonation would
only reach perhaps 5 mm depth – much less than the depth in normal steel
reinforcement over many years. In lower quality concretes, much higher
carbonation depths of 25mm or more may occur, putting steel at risk. The need
to fix steel accurately in position at the time of construction in order to give
consistently adequate cover will be apparent.
The steel must be fixed at a depth greater than the 'minimum' depth by a
margin which is sufficient ensure adequate cover at all positions.
Where chlorides are present – for example, from admixtures used in the
concrete, or de-icing salts – the corrosion risk is greatly increased since chloride
ions have a de-passivating effect; that is, they reduce the ability of an alkaline
environment to protect the steel from corrosion. They also increase the electrical
conductivity of the concrete and their use is now strictly controlled in structural
concrete.
Figure 18: Phenolphthalein test on precast concrete post used in the prefabricated housing; the alkaline areas are
darker.
The best means of achieving longevity, nevertheless, remains the use of good-
quality concrete with careful supervision to ensure that cover to steel is always
adequate.
The use of admixtures has increased greatly in recent years and there are many
instances in which marked improvements in properties for specific applications
are obtainable. However, careful precautions regarding their use are advised for
the following reasons.
Doses are usually very small, often less than 1 per cent by weight of
cement, hence careful batching is necessary, the use of special dispensers
being recommended.
Effects are sometimes very sensitive to variations in dose; hence, good
supervision is essential.
Typical water reductions are in the region of 5-15 per cent when used in items 1
or 3 above. Side effects include air entrainment and retardation of set, though
these are only slight at normal doses. Plasticisers are relatively cheap and form
an economical means of improving concrete quality if used in 1 above. However,
when used in 3 above, the reduced cement content could lead to durability
problems.
2.11.2 Retarders
The object of these would normally be to retard the set (rather than the strength
development) of the concrete. Hence, their effect should last only a few hours.
They are normally based on lignosulphonates, hydrocarboxylic acids or sugars.
They act mainly on those compounds in cement which are responsible for setting
and early strength; that is, C3A and C3S. Uses include the following:
To reduce the setting rate when concreting in hot weather. In many cases
the retarder can improve long-term strength when used in this way, since
slower hydration of cement leads to an improved ‘gel’ structure.
In very large pours – for example, in mass concrete foundations in order
to produce monolithic (structurally continuous) concrete despite a
prolonged placing period.
A large overdose (which may still only be 0.5 per cent by weight of
cement) will ‘kill’ the set. Retarders can be used, for example, to avoid
hardening of concrete in the drum of a ready-mix agitator truck which has
broken down.
2.11.3 Accelerators
These are designed to accelerate the early strength development of concrete.
They are traditionally based on calcium chloride, which increases the hydration
rate of the calcium silicates and, to some extent, the C3A in the cement.
Substantial improvements can be obtained between the ages of 1 day and 7
days, especially in cold weather; for example, the 3-day strength of concrete
may be doubled at a temperature of 2oC. Long term strength is unaffected by
the use of calcium chloride. Most important are the side effects of the material.
(These chloride ion contents are equivalent to approximately 50 per cent greater
percentages of anhydrous calcium chloride by weight.)
Since fewer raw materials are involved, it may be argued that lightweight
concretes help to conserve materials resources.
A number of lightweight aggregates are produced from what are otherwise
waste materials – for example, pulverised fuel ash and blast-furnace slag.
Foundation loads are reduced, hence foundation size can be decreased.
Higher lifts can be cast for a given formwork system, since formwork
pressures are lower; hence, the number of construction joints can be
reduced.
Some lightweight concretes, such as precast aerated blocks and no-fines
concrete provide an excellent key for rendering and plastering.
Fixings are often more easily made than with dense concretes. Some
lightweight concretes can be nailed (using cut nails).
Thermal insulation is improved compared with dense aggregate concrete.
Fire resistance of lightweight concretes is superior to that of most dense
concretes.
High-frequency sound absorption is better than that of dense concrete.
Lightweight precast blocks are much easier to handle and cut than dense
concrete equivalents.
There are three main methods of producing lightweight concretes, each method
producing concrete with characteristic properties and applications.
Conventionally cured aerated concretes would have high shrinkage but this can
be reduced by high-pressure steam curing (autoclaving). Hence many
commercial precast blocks are autoclaved and these would also normally contain
a pozzolanic material, such as pulverised fuel ash, which contributes to strength.
In producing no-fines concrete, great care should be taken to obtain the correct
water content, since a low value would result in uneven distribution of cement,
while a high value would cause settlement of the cement paste fraction to the
base of the concrete. Only minimal vibration should be used for compaction.
No-fines concrete was formerly used as an in-situ walling material for low-rise
dwellings. It is also manufactured in the form of lightweight precast blocks.
The DoE method of mix design can be used to produce high-strength concrete
by the use of one or more of the following modifications:
Preferred finishes have, to some degree, been a matter of fashion at the time of
construction. For example, in the 1970s, sawn board finishes were often
favoured. However, they were very expensive since they required solid sawn
timer for formwork, and labour costs in fixing were also high. The final finish also
tends to attract dirt, producing a predominantly dull effect, especially if used in
large areas.
Current practice tends to avoid large areas of plain concrete;instead the finish
can be textured, for example:
Figure 3.25 shows a close view of a building, now 10 years old, in which several
techniques have been combined.
The precast, smooth finish, light coloured sill units have weathered well,
except in a recess where dirt has gathered.
The exposed aggregate precast concrete blocks (comprising an integral
insulating backing) have shed the dirt very effectively.
The bush-hammered in situ-concrete (buttress) has a rust stain due to
corroding reinforcement on one arris, and has darkened due to damp near
ground level.
The exposed aggregate paving is affected by moss growth (little exposure
to the sun on the north side of the building).
http://www.monash.edu.au/lls/llonline/writing/artdesign/writing/3.5.xml
1. The physical form of concrete can make handling and recycling difficult,
especially if reinforced. Heavy machinery is essential for separating steel
and for crushing the concrete. For this reason, recycling is restricted to
situations where such plant is accessible. The initial stages of recycling
concrete containing steel involve breaking up in-situ frames and then
reducing columns and beams to a more manageable size by large scissor-
action machines which cut through the concrete and steel. These produce
material which is easier to handle and transport. Mobile crushers are
available but transport costs restrict their applications to situations in
which large quantities of concrete are involved.
2. Pure crushed concrete (for example, from highways works) may
occasionally be available but demolition waste is normally contaminated
by brick and other waste, which may not be acceptable for some
applications.
3. Unless extensive stockpiling facilities are available, demand for the
recyclate must be roughly matched to the supply of concrete waste.
Pure crushed concrete may well satisfy requirements for use in sub-bases but
compositional limits of such specifications are not usually satisfied by demolition
waste. However, there is evidence that acceptable behaviour can be obtained for
sub-bases application and there is perhaps the need for additional flexibility to
be built in (for example, by concentrating on performance rather than
composition) to permit maximum reuse in lower performance applications such
as housing estate roads.
One Dutch specification that has been used succesfully for some years requires
at least 50 per cent of the material to be crushed concrete or equivalent, but up
to 50 per cent to be other crushed masonry of density at least 1600 kg/m3 (the
latter density range includes crushed brick). There are also particle-grading
requirements and limits to organic materials such as plastics (1 per cent by
mass) and perishable materials such as paper (0.1 per cent by mass).
The labour and plant requirements for the process are evident and it is therefore
best carried out on a relatively large scale.
RECYCLED CONCRETE
The above suggest that unless uniform sources are available, the use of
construction waste should focus upon non-structural applications and those
without demanding exposure requirements. There are, however, many such
Figure 22: Recycled concrete reused to create a stair case outside a building
All the notes in this chapter were taken from the following book and modified to
suite the unit content.