Company Law LLM Project PDF
Company Law LLM Project PDF
SUBMITTED BY
VINAYKUMAR M SHETTY
SUBMITTED TO
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that MR. VINAYKUMAR M SHETTY of I Semester LL.M in Corporate Law
bearing UUCMS No.:P02KU23L001029 has satisfactorily completed the assignment on
COMPANY LAWS IN REGULATING MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS for the subject
LAW RELATING TO ORGANISATION OF COMPANIES AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE assigned by the Course Teacher for the partial fulfillment of the I Semester of
the 1 Years LL.M Course for the Academic Year 2023-24.
Recent examples:
Snapdeal and Freecharge ($400 million)
Flipkart and Myntra ($300 to 330 million)
Ola and TaxiForSure ($200 million)
3. TYPES OF MURGERS
3.1 Horizontal Merger – This takes place when companies selling or manufacturing
similar products in the same market gets merged. They share same competition and
products. The main objective is to gain the economic share, reduce competion and
achieve monopoly status (that is when Competition Act 2012 – comes in the
picture).
Examples:
Facebook and Instagram
Diageo and United Spirits
HUL and Horlicks
3.2 Vertical Merger - merger between companies in the same industry, but at
different stages of production process. In another words, it occurs between companies
where one buys or sells something from or to the other.
Examples
Lupin Limited and Gavis
HUL and Aquagel Chemicals
HLL and Kothari Foods (Nescafe)
4.2 Tender offer - One company offers to purchase the outstanding stock of the
other firm at a specific price. The acquiring company communicates the offer directly
to the other company's shareholders.
Johnson & Johnson made a tender offer in 2008 to acquire Omrix
Biopharmaceuticals for $438 million.
4.3 Acquisition of assets - In a purchase of assets, one company acquires the assets of
another company. The companies, whose assets are being acquired, obtain approval
from its shareholders. The purchase of assets is typical during bankruptcy
proceedings, where other companies bid for various assets of the bankrupt company,
which is liquidated upon the final transfer of assets to the acquiring firm(s).
Indian e-commerce major Flipkart acquired the Indian wing of eBay. The transaction
was announced in April 2017 and completed in August 2017. eBay and Flipkart have
also entered into an agreement for cross border sale. In exchange of equity stake in
Flipkart, eBay had made cash investment of $500 million and sold its eBay.in
business to Flipkart. As a result, Flipkart customers get expanded product choices
with the wide array of global inventory available on eBay while eBay customers
will have access to a more unique Indian inventory from Flipkart sellers.
5. LAWS GOVERNING MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS IN
INDIA
Companies Act, 20131 lays down explicit provisions governing the mergers and
acquisitions of companies and body corporates, including that with foreign
companies. Relevant sections that deal with mergers and acquisitions include sections
230 to 240. Apart from this, the companies should also adhere to the Companies
(Compromises, Arrangements, and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016.
The Companies Act is the primary legislation in India that governs the incorporation,
management, and operation of companies. It provides a legal framework for
mergers, acquisitions, and combinations in India, which are often used as a
strategy for corporate growth or restructuring.
The Companies Act sets out the procedures for mergers and acquisitions,
including the approval of shareholders and regulatory authorities, the valuation of
shares, and the treatment of minority shareholders.
Approval of Shareholders: Before a merger or acquisition can take place, the proposal
must be approved by the shareholders of each company involved. The Companies Act
requires that at least 75% of the shareholders present and voting must approve the
proposal.
Approval of Regulatory Authorities: The Act also requires approval from various
regulatory authorities, including the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), the
Competition Commission of India (CCI), and the Securities and Exchange Board of
India (SEBI). The NCLT and CCI evaluate the impact of the proposed merger or
acquisition on competition and ensure that the rights of minority shareholders are
protected.
Valuation of Shares: The Companies Act also sets out rules for the valuation of
shares, which is necessary for determining the share exchange ratio between
the companies involved in the merger or acquisition. The valuation must be done by
an independent valuer appointed by the company’s board of directors.
Treatment of Minority Shareholders: The Companies Act also provides protection
for minority shareholders. The Companies Act requires that the shares of minority
shareholders be treated on par with the shares of the majority shareholders. Minority
shareholders have the right to object to the merger or acquisition and can ask for
the fair value of their shares to be determined by an independent valuer.
5.1.1 Sec 230.2 Power to compromise or make arrangements with creditors and
members.— (1) Where a compromise or arrangement is proposed— (a) between a
company and its creditors or any class of them; or (b) between a company and its
members or any class of them,
It lays down the procedure whereby the company can enter into any compromise or
arrangement between creditors and members. The procedure shall be equally
applicable for the company entering into merger and acquisition arrangements
1
Companies Act, 2013
2
ibid
In case of a merger between the company and its creditors or members, the tribunal
shall order a meeting of the creditors and members on the application of creditors,
members, or the company. The application shall be made in Form No. NCLT-1.
If the company makes the application to the tribunal for the conduct of the meeting, it
shall make the following disclosures to the tribunal by affidavit:
1.All material facts relating to the company
2.Reduction of share capital, if any
3.The scheme of corporate debt restructuring that is consented to by not less than 75%
of the creditors in value
The notice of the meeting shall be sent to all the creditors, members, and debenture
holders of the company. The notice shall be in Form No. CAA-2 and shall be
accompanied by a statement containing the details of the compromise or arrangement,
a copy of the valuation report, etc.
The notice shall also be placed on the website of the company and the documents
shall be sent to SEBI where the securities of the company are listed for placing on
their website as well as published in the newspaper.
Further, the notice shall also be sent to the following authorities in Form No. CAA-3
to invite their representations within 30 days of receipt of the notice, failing which it
shall be presumed that there are no representations to be made by these regulators:
The Central Government
RBI
Income Tax Authorities
Registrar
Official Liquidator
Competition Commission of India
Any other sectoral regulator.
In the meeting, the majority of the persons (more than 50% in numbers) representing
3/4th in value (75% in value) of the creditors and members, voting in person or by
proxy, shall agree to the merger. If the merger is sanctioned by the tribunal, then an
order of sanction shall be issued in Form No. CAA-6 and it shall be binding all the
company, creditors, members, liquidator, and contributors.
The merger shall not be sanctioned unless a certificate from the company’s auditors
has been filed with the tribunal that the accounting treatment proposed in the merger
scheme conforms to the accounting standards prescribed under section 133.
The order of the tribunal shall be filed with the registrar within 30 days of receipt of
the order.
The tribunal may dispense with calling of the meeting of the creditors if more than
90% of creditors in value agree to the scheme of merger by an affidavit.
5.1.4 Following are the compliances that shall be undertaken for the merger of
the companies
5.1.4.1 The application for merger or amalgamation of companies shall be filed with
the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Form No.- NCLT-1. After receiving
the application, the tribunal shall order the conduct of a meeting of the creditors and
members (as discussed in Section 230).
5.1.4.2. The companies shall conduct a meeting as ordered above and circulate the
following:
5.1.4.3 A draft of the proposed terms of the scheme of merger or amalgamation.
A confirmation that the draft has been filed with the registrar.
Report adopted by the directors of the merging companies.
Report of valuation by an expert.
Supplementary accounting statement.
5.1.4.4. The tribunal may sanction the amalgamation by order after being satisfied that
the procedure has been followed.
5.1.4.5. The companies shall file a certified copy of the order with the registrar within
30 days of receipt of the same.
5.1.4.6. Until the completion of the scheme, the companies shall file a statement
indicating whether the scheme of merger or amalgamation has been carried out in
accordance with the order of the tribunal. The statement shall be filed with the
registrar after being certified by a Chartered Accountant, Cost Accountant, or a
Company Secretary in practice.
4
Supra note 01
5
ibid
6
(1968) 38 comp cas 197, 204(Mad)
It was observed that "The word 'amalgamation' has not been defined in the Act. The
ordinary dictionary meaning of the expression is 'combination'. Judging from the
context and from the marginal note of Section 394 which appears in Chapter V
relating to arbitration, compromises, arrangements and reconstructions, the primary
object of amalgamation of one company with another is to facilitate reconstruction of
the amalgamating companies and this is a matter which is entirely left to the body of
shareholders, (and) essentially an affair relating to the internal administration of the
transferor company. The decision of the body of the shareholders ought not to be
lightly interfered with." 7
5.1.5.5.If the registrar or official liquidator does not have objections, the Central
Government shall approve the scheme. However, in case the registrar or official
liquidator has objections, they shall file the same with the Central Government. If the
Central Government feels that the scheme is not in the public interest, then it may file
objections with the tribunal.
5.1.5.6.The tribunal may either direct to consider the scheme as per Section
232(normal merger) or it may confirm the merger as per this scheme of fast-track
merger.
5.1.5.7.The order of the tribunal confirming the scheme shall be communicated to the
registrar of the transferee company. Such registrar will issue a confirmation which
shall then be forwarded to the registrar of the transferor company.
7
ibid
8
Supra note 1
5.1.6 Sec 234. Merger or amalgamation of company with foreign company. 9— (1)
The provisions of this Chapter unless otherwise provided under any other law for the
time being in force, shall apply mutatis mutandis to schemes of mergers and
amalgamations between companies registered under this Act and companies
incorporated in the jurisdictions of such countries as may be notified from time to
time by the Central Government: Provided that the Central Government may make
rules, in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, in connection with mergers and
amalgamations provided under this section.
The expression “foreign company” means any company or body corporate
incorporated outside India whether having a place of business in India or not,10
A foreign company incorporated outside India may merge with an Indian company
with the prior approval of RBI. It shall comply with the requirements of Section 230
to 232 of companies’ act 2013 and related rules.
The transferee company shall ensure that the valuation is carried out by the valuers
being the members of the recognized professional body in the jurisdiction of the
transferee company. The valuation shall be as per the internationally accepted
principles on accounting and valuation. A declaration to this effect shall be attached
with the application for prior approval of RBI.
The company shall file the application with the tribunal as per Section 230-232 after
obtaining the approval of RBI.
5.1.8 Sec 235. power to acquire shares of shareholders dissenting from scheme or
contract approved by majority.12— (1) Where a scheme or contract involving the
transfer of shares or any class of shares in a company (the transferor company) to
another company (the transferee company) has, within four months after making of an
offer in that behalf by the transferee company, been approved by the holders of not
less than nine-tenths in value of the shares whose transfer is involved, other than
shares already held at the date of the offer by, or by a nominee of the transferee
company or its subsidiary companies, the transferee company may, at any time within
two months after the expiry of the said four months, give notice in the prescribed
manner to any dissenting shareholder that it desires to acquire his shares.
9
ibid
10
ibid
11
The Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016.
12
Supra note 1
Explanation: - A company may propose a scheme or contract to another company for
transfer of its shares or any class of shares. The company proposing is Transferor
Company and the other is Transferee Company. Four months time is available for
approval of the proposal. It has to be accepted by shareholders with nine-tenth
shareholding in value. Within two months of the expiry of four months the transferee
can give a notice in the prescribed manner to any dissenting shareholder that it desires
to acquire his shares. After service of such notice, the transferee company becomes
entitled and also bound to acquire those shares on the terms on which under the
scheme or contract, the shares of the approving shareholders are to be transferred to
the transferee company.
Explanation: - When the shares of company have been acquired to the extent of
90per cent or more, the acquirers have to notify the company of their intention to buy
the remaining equity shares. The acquirers have to offer to the shareholders the price
for their shares on the basis of valuation by a registered valuer in accordance with
prescribed rules. Alternatively, the minority shareholders may offer to the majority
shareholders to purchase their shareholding at a price to be determined in accordance
with prescribed rules. The amount of consideration has to be deposited in bank
account at the hands of the transferor company for one year to enable it to disburse the
amount to the shareholders entitled to it. The transferor company has to act as the
transfer agent for receiving and paying the price, for taking delivery of those shares
for transferring it to acquirers.
13
Supra note 1
14
(2004) 1 BCLC 352 (Ch D),
5.1.10 Sec 237. Power of Central Government to provide for amalgamation of
companies in public interest.15— (1) Where the Central Government is satisfied that
it is essential in the public interest that two or more companies should amalgamate,
the Central Government may, by order notified in the Official Gazette, provide for the
amalgamation of those companies into a single company with such constitution, with
such property, powers, rights, interests, authorities and privileges, and with such
liabilities, duties and obligations, as may be specified in the order.
5.1.12 Sec 239. Preservation of books and papers of amalgamated companies. 18—
The books and papers of a company which has been amalgamated with, or whose
shares have been acquired by, another company under this Chapter shall not be
disposed of without the prior permission of the Central Government and before
granting such permission, that Government may appoint a person to examine the
books and papers or any of them for the purpose of ascertaining whether they contain
any evidence of the commission of an offence in connection with the promotion or
15
Supra note 1
16
(1998) 30 CLA 21 (CLB)
17
Supra note 1
18
Ibid
formation, or the management of the affairs, of the transferor company or its
amalgamation or the acquisition of its shares
19
ibid
Indian company without prior
notification and approval of the
Competition Commission. On
the other hand, a foreign company with
turnover outside India of more than
USD 1.5 billion
(or in excess of Rs. 4500 crores) may
acquire a company in India with sales
just short of Rs.
1500 crores without any notification to
(or approval of) the Competition
Commission being
required.
• Section 6 of the Competition Act,
2002 states that, no person or
enterprise shall enter into a
combination which causes or is
likely to cause an appreciable
adverse effect on competition
within the relevant market in India and
such a combination shall be void.
All types of intra-group combinations,
mergers, demergers, reorganizations
and other similar transactions
should be specifically exempted
from the notification procedure and
appropriate clauses should be
incorporated in sub-regulation 5(2) of
the Regulations. These transactions do
not have any competitive
impact on the market for assessment
under the Competition Act, Section 6.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) act 1992 20 is the primary
regulatory body for the securities market in India. Its objective is to protect the
interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of the securities
market in India. One of the ways SEBI achieves this is by regulating the process of
M&A in the Indian securities market. The Securities and Exchange Board of India
(SEBI) Act, 1992 as well as the rules and regulations issued there under, regulate the
securities markets in India, including acquisitions involving companies listed on stock
exchanges in India.
SEBI regulations require companies to disclose information about M&A
transactions to the stock exchanges and to their shareholders. This is to ensure that
all relevant information is made available to investors so that they can make informed
decisions about their investments. The information that must be disclosed includes
the terms and conditions of the proposed merger or acquisition, the valuation of the
companies involved, and any potential risks or benefits associated with the
transaction.
SEBI also specifies the procedures for obtaining approval from the stock exchanges
for mergers and acquisitions. The companies involved in the M&A transaction must
submit a draft scheme of the merger or acquisition to the stock exchanges for
approval. The scheme must include details about the companies involved, the share
exchange ratio, and the benefits and risks of the transaction. The stock exchanges will
20
SEBI Act, 1992
then review the scheme and provide their approval if they find that it is in compliance
with SEBI regulations.
In addition to the above, SEBI also requires companies to obtain approval from
their shareholders for M&A transactions. The companies must hold a general
meeting of their shareholders to obtain approval for the transaction. Shareholders
must be provided with all relevant information about the transaction and must be
given the opportunity to ask questions and express their views.
Overall, SEBI regulations aim to ensure that M&A transactions in the Indian
securities market are conducted in a fair and transparent manner, with all relevant
information made available to investors and with the approval of the stock exchanges
and shareholders.
5.2.4 SEBI (Delisting of Equity Shares) Regulations, 2009 24: They are applicable
where an acquisition may involve delisting of a listed company.
This act is designed to regulate the activities and operation of combinations. This
includes Mergers, Amalgamation and Acquisition. If the combinations exceed the
threshold limit are prevented they will or are likely to cause adverse effects on the
economy. But If CCI wants then they tell them to modify the same and then go ahead
with the scheme. The threshold limit is decided by the turnover and assets of the
company.
21
SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011
22
SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (Listing Regulations)
23
5.2.3 SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015 (Insider Trading Regulations)
24
SEBI (Delisting of Equity Shares) Regulations, 2009
25
Competition Act, 2002
5.3.1 Section 3 of the act talks about anti-competitive practices. It restricts any kind of
compromise, arrangement, acquisition which will cause or likely cause an adverse
effect on the economy.
5.3.2 Section 4 talks about the abuse of dominant power. when two or more powerful
companies come together and start creating a dominant position in the market and
customers have no choice other than going them. The reason may be the product value
or geographical location. But this exploits the customers a lot.
5.3.3 Section 5 deals with the regulation of combinations. It has exempted certain
companies from this section if they fulfil certain criteria. However, these exempted
companies don’t have any competitive impact on assessment under section 6 of the
act
5.3.4 Section 6 talks about void combinations, this combination will cause or is likely
to cause an adverse effect on the economy. If any company wishes to go ahead and
follow the combination need to give prior notice to CCI. After that procedure for
investigation takes place which is given under Section 29 of the act. And company
need to go ahead as per the orders of the commission which is given under Section 31.
26
Contract Act, 1872
27
Specific Relief Act, 1963
28
The Indian Income Tax Act, 1961
5.7 Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 29
The concept of Cross border mergers is dealt with by FEMA. It means any merger,
amalgamation, or arrangement between Indian and Foreign companies. FEMA
regulations provide that any transaction taken with respect to cross-border will take
place through RBI, as per the 25th rule of CAA Rules, 2016. Amendment of 2017 in
companies act added Section 234 to the act which talks about cross border merger. In
2018 RBI notified in the official gazette about inviting stakeholders for regulations.
They will have a major role as they will keep an eye on the market situation. Before
1999 we had FERA 1973 i.e., Foreign Exchange Regulating Act. As the name
suggests it was a regulatory body. They had no power of enforcing rules and make
changes in the act. It couldn’t cope with the policy of LPG. There was an urgent need
to repeal the act and form such an act that actually has an impact on the economy and
people start taking it seriously.
29
Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999
6. Conclusion
We can see that there are many ways a company can restructure itself, with Mergers
and Acquisitions being one of the ways to do so. These forms of inorganic growth
may be chosen by a company to improve upon its current working, operations and
generations of profits, to reach a bigger market and increase their customer base etc.,
there are numerous drawbacks to this as well. each and every category and method
seems well explained and accounted for, but practically, we can see that if company
synergies are not in sync, if the two companies have completely different work
cultures, if the acquired management is resistant to change or are not made to feel
comfortable in the new organization, if there is mistrust between the parties to the
merger or acquisition or any other factor that increases the differences between the
two entities, the situation becomes hostile and ultimately leads to a demerger. Also,
every Merger and Acquisition is an expensive affair and companies end up taking
huge loans to fund the same. A lack of good strategy will decrease the chances for
increasing profits of the resulting company. This may eventually lead to accumulation
of loans against the company and if the company is unable to pay back the loans, it
may be declared as a Non- Performing Asset (NPA). The end- goal of any merger and
acquisition is to enhance the business and profitability of the resulting organization.
Of course, it is natural for clashes to happen, but with proper due diligence and open
communications and negotiations between the companies prior to this step will lead to
a greater understanding of the arrangement and will in turn minimize the risk of
resorting to a demerger in the future. It is completely understandable that the
management of any company works hard to attain a certain level of goodwill in the
market and having to work together with a company having an entirely different set of
ethics, work culture and synergy may be overwhelming post a merger or an
acquisition. In all attempts to ensure harmony, both the parties to the merger or
acquisition should try to incorporate the positive aspects of each other and should try
to do away with practices that have impacted the business negatively in the past.
There should be open dialogue between the companies leading to a greater
understanding. There is no substitute for conducting a proper and detailed due
diligence along with drawing up the right strategy before resorting to such a step. The
compliances should be properly followed as laid down by the respective legislations.
All necessary disclosures should be made by the companies as well.
7.BIBLIOGRAPY
7.3.1www.nhrc.ac.in
(Visited on 10.03.2024)
7.3.2www.articlebase.com
(Visited on 18.03.2024)
7.3.3www.indiankanoonkhoj.or
g (Visited on 29.03.2024)
7.3.4http://www.nhrc.nic.in/Documents/Publications/NHRCinda
(Visited on 30.03.2024)
7.3.5www.legal.service.india.com/legal/articals.
(Visited on 02.04.2024)
7.3.6WWW.HEINONLINE.ORG
(Visited on 15.04.2024)
7.5 LEGISLATURES
,2002
Following provisions of the
Competition Act, 2002 deals with
mergers of the company: -
• Section 5 of the Competition Act,
2002 deals with “Combinations” which
defines combination by
reference to assets and turnover
o exclusively in India and
o in India and outside India.