Scribd
Upload
254 views3 pages

Westgard Rules and Corrective Actions

The document discusses Westgard rules, which are quality control rules used to determine if laboratory test results are reliable. It defines 10 different rules and explains what each rule indicates, how to interpret the results, and what corrective actions should be taken. The document was last reviewed in August 2023 with no changes.

Uploaded by

hamidnedai
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
254 views3 pages

Westgard Rules and Corrective Actions

The document discusses Westgard rules, which are quality control rules used to determine if laboratory test results are reliable. It defines 10 different rules and explains what each rule indicates, how to interpret the results, and what corrective actions should be taken. The document was last reviewed in August 2023 with no changes.

Uploaded by

hamidnedai
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

University of Texas Medical Branch Effective Date: Aug 92

Pulmonary Function Clinic Revised Date: Oct 05


Policy 04-10 Westgard Rules Review Date: Aug 23

Westgard Rules
________________________________________________________________________
Audience All personnel in the Pulmonary Function Clinics.
________________________________________________________________________
Purpose To explain the Westgard Rule Control Rules of quality control in detail.
________________________________________________________________________
Rule 1-2s Definition: The 1-2s Control Rule indicates one control result has
exceeded the established mean +/- 2SD range. This is a “warning rule,”
which does not indicate an “out-of-control” condition, but is intended to
initiate further testing.

Interpretation: If no other control rule is violated, then the warning is


attributed to normal random error. Patient results are acceptable.

Corrective Action: No corrective action is required. However, the


“warning” suggests a system error may be in the development. A
comprehensive check of the routine maintenance schedule and review of
the quality control ampoule handling and sampling technique is
recommended.
________________________________________________________________________
Rule 1-3s Definition: The 1-3s Control Rule indicates one control result has
exceeded the established mean +/- 3SD range. This is a “rejection rule,”
which is sensitive to random error.

Interpretation: Excessive random error exists. The analyzer is “out-of-


control.” Patient results are not acceptable and should be re-analyzed after
corrective actions have solved the problem.

Corrective Action: Rerun the quality control level that is in question,


emphasizing proper technique. If the repeated level is within +/- 2SD
range then the problem can be attributed to random error. If the repeated
level exceeds the +/- 2SD range, then further corrective action should be
conducted. The following are probable causes:

 Inadequate or wrong +/- 2SD range.


 Improper storage temperature correction of quality control results.
 Improper technique when handling the quality control.
 Change of quality control batch.
 Inadequate maintenance of the instrument.
_______________________________________________________________________
Rule 2-2s Definition: The 2-2s Control Rule indicates that two consecutive control
results have exceeded the same mean +/- 2SD limit. This is a “rejection
rule,” which is sensitive to systematic errors.

______________________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3
University of Texas Medical Branch Effective Date: Aug 92
Pulmonary Function Clinic Revised Date: Oct 05
Policy 04-10 Westgard Rules Review Date: Aug 23

Interpretation: A systematic error exists. The analyzer is “out-of-control.”


This may be an early indicator for a “shift” in the mean value. Patient
results are not acceptable and should be re-analyzed after corrective action
has solved the problem.

Corrective Action: To resolve systematic errors, corrective action should


be conducted to address the following probable causes:

 Inadequate or wrong +/- 2SD range.


 Improper technique when handling the quality control.
 Improper storage temperature correction of the quality control
results.
 Change of the quality control batch.
 Inadequate maintenance of the instrument.
________________________________________________________________________
Rule R-4s Definition: The R-4s Control Rule indicates that one result has exceeded
the mean +/- 2SD limit and the adjacent result has exceeded the mean +/-
2SD limit. This is a “rejection rule,” which is sensitive to random error.

Interpretation: Excessive random error exists. The analyzer is “out-of-


control.” Patient results are not acceptable and should be re-analyzed after
corrective action has solved the problem.

Corrective Action: See Rule 1-3s.


_______________________________________________________________________
Rule 4-1s Definition: The 4-1s Control Rule indicates four consecutive control
results have exceeded the same mean +/- 1SD limit. This is a “rejection
rule,” which is sensitive to systematic errors.

Interpretation: A systematic error exists. The analyzer is “out-of-control.”


This may be an early indicator for a “shift” in the mean value. Patient
results are not acceptable and should be re-analyzed after corrective action
has solved the problem.

Corrective Action: See Rule 2-2s.


______________________________________________________
Rule 10-x Definition: The 10-x Control Rule indicates ten consecutive control results
have fallen on the same side of the mean. This is a “rejection rule,” which
is sensitive to systematic errors.

Interpretation: A systematic error exists. The analyzer is “out-of-control.”


Patient results are not acceptable and should be re-analyzed after
corrective action has solved the problem.

Corrective Action: See Rule 2-2s.

______________________________________________________________________________________
Page 2 of 3
University of Texas Medical Branch Effective Date: Aug 92
Pulmonary Function Clinic Revised Date: Oct 05
Policy 04-10 Westgard Rules Review Date: Aug 23

This form documents the approval and history of the policies and procedures for the
Pulmonary Function Laboratory. The Medical Director signs all policies verifying
initial approval. Annually thereafter, the Director and/or designee may approve
reviews and revisions.

Date Approved by: Signature


11/07 V. Cardenas, MD
Medical Director Pulmonary Laboratory

6/09 V. Cardenas, MD
No changes to the policy

7/10 V. Cardenas, MD
No changes to the policy

2/12 A. Duarte, MD
Medical Director Pulmonary Laboratory
No changes to the policy

04/14 A. Duarte, MD
Medical Director Pulmonary Laboratory
No changes to policy

08/16 A. Duarte, MD
Medical Director Pulmonary Laboratory
No changes to policy

11/17 A. Duarte, MD
Medical Director Pulmonary Laboratory
No changes to policy

8/19 A. Duarte, MD
Medical Director Pulmonary Laboratory
No changes to policy

8/21 A. Duarte, MD
Medical Director Pulmonary Laboratory
No changes to policy

8/23 A. Duarte, MD
Medical Director Pulmonary Laboratory
No changes to policy

______________________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 3

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy