FACILITATING AND MONITORING THE SUBMISSION OF THE

CITY/MUNICIPAL ACTION PLAN

With the overall goal of improving the level of well-being of more than 1.2 million Pantawid
households for 2024, the Program must harness and mobilize the support of various stakeholders
from the government, civil society and private organizations. Complementary support and
interventions that shall be provided by Program partners must be relevant and responsive to the
priority needs of the Pantawid households. Aligned with this purpose, the Program set two major
priorities, which include ensuring functional convergence at all levels and facilitating sustainable
and strategic partnerships with CSOs and Private Sector.
The City/Municipal Action Plan (C/MAP) was identified as an indicator in achieving functional
convergence. The C/MAP outlines a comprehensive set of interventions directed towards the
Pantawid beneficiaries based on their assessed needs. It includes programs, projects and
activities committed by the Local Government, agencies, and other partners and stakeholders in
the city/municipality for the improvement of the well-being of Pantawid households. The C/MAP
has been part of the Department’s convergence strategy since 2015 anchored on the SWDI
results and is led by the Local Government Units with support from the DSWD.
The monitoring of the C/MAP is crucial in keeping track of actual complementary support provided
by the city/municipality. This is to ensure that these programs are made available and accessible
to Pantawid households.
The following are general guidelines in facilitating and monitoring the C/MAP anchored on the
previously implemented C/MAP under the Department’s convergence program. The C/MAP is
also part of the requirements in the DILG and DSWD Joint Memorandum Circular 2022-001
implemented that aims to enjoin the LGUs in supporting the Program’s implementation.
Regional Performance Indicator and Rating
The FO is guided by the following performance indicator anchored on the Pantawid priorities on
functional convergence and sustained and strategic CSO and Private Sector partnerships.
Indicator
All Cities / Municipalities should have One (1) 3 to-5 year local (City/Municipal) Action Plan,
comprehensive and accurately captures the programs issues and concerns based on SWDI gaps
and needs of beneficiaries submitted to 4Ps NPMO by end of June 2024.
Rating Guide

Quantity Quality Timeliness

5 100% 100% of accomplished city/municipal action Submitted to 4Ps NPMO

accomplished plans capture the program issues and 9 days before 30 June
concerns based on SWDI gaps and needs of 2024
beneficiaries

4 76-99% 76-99% accomplished of accomplished Submitted to 4Ps NPMO

accomplished city/municipal action plans capture the 5 to 8 days before 30
June 2024
 program issues and concerns based on SWDI
gaps and needs of beneficiaries

3 51-75% 51-75% of accomplished city/municipal action Submitted to 4Ps NPMO

accomplished plans capture the program issues and 4 days before or on 30
concerns based on SWDI gaps and needs of June 2024
beneficiaries

2 26-50% 26-50% of accomplished city/municipal action Submitted to 4Ps NPMO

accomplished plans capture the program issues and 1 to 14 days after 30
concerns based on SWDI gaps and needs of June 2024
beneficiaries

1 25% and 25% and below of accomplished Submitted to 4Ps NPMO

below city/municipal action plans capture the 15 days after 30 June
accomplished program issues and concerns based on SWDI 2024
gaps and needs of beneficiaries

General Reminders in Facilitating the Development of the C/MAP

• The development of the C/MAP shall be guided by the existing C/MAP manual.
• C/MAP formulation is led by partner LGU through the C/MSWDO with the assistance of
the City/Municipal Link.
• Program interventions identified in the C/MAP should anchor on the results of the SWDI.
• The attached C/MAP planning template can be enhanced by the FOs as they deem
fit ensuring alignment with the objectives and purpose of the C/MAP.
• The reporting template includes minimum requirements in ensuring C/MAP
adequacy aligned with the scorecard indicator.
• The submission of the C/MAP is on 30 June 2024.

Tasks, Roles and Outputs in Monitoring the C/MAP

Monitoring and reporting on C/MAP shall be led by the following focal persons:

Submitted Tools/
Level Actors Role Outputs
to Reference
City C/MSWDO Facilitate the Approved C/MAP Local Chief SWDI data
/Municipal development and Executive
Level approval of and C/MAP
C/MAP members of planning
the template
MAC/MIAC
C/ML C/MAP
PSWDOs Manual
may be
provided with
copy for
reference
 Submitted Tools/
Level Actors Role Outputs
to Reference
and support
services

City/ Orient LGU on the LGU’s buy-in to the C/MSWDO, SWDI data
Municipal C/MAP C/MAP process LCE
Link Present SWDI Inputs to the C/MAP C/MAC/MIAC C/MAP
data as basis in Manual
C/MAP
C/MAP
development
planning
Assist the template
C/MSWDO in
facilitating C/MAP
development
Monitor C/MAP C/MAP Monitoring 1. Pantawid C/MAP
development and Report Provincial Report
implementation M&E and Template for
2. Provincial C/ML
Link
Provincial Provincial Consolidate and 1. Provincial Provincial C/MAP
Level M&E Officer assess C/MAP Monitoring Report Link Report
Monitoring report on C/MAP Template
from C/ML capturing the (Provincial)
Provincial Review and needed TA support Regional
Link endorse M&E and
Provincial C/MAP 2. List of Identified Program
Report to RPMO needs and gaps Coordinator
that will need
partnership support
at the Provincial
Level

3. Priority needs and

gaps endorsed to
appropriate
partners and
discussed in
Provincial Advisory
Council
Regional Regional Consolidate and National Monitoring Regional C/MAP
Level M&E assess C/MAP Matrix on C/MAP with MCCT focal Report
Monitoring report assessment Template
from PL. (Regional)
Regional Identify regional Regional level Regional
MCCT level treatment treatment and Program
and intervention intervention plan. Coordinator
on C/MAP results.
 Submitted Tools/
Level Actors Role Outputs
to Reference
Refer to Concerned
concerned focals focals (RCM,
based on IPD, etc.)
assessment and
identified gaps.
Regional Assess and 1. List of partners/ Regional Resource
IPDO identify stakeholders to Program Map/
partnership gaps provide the Coordinator Stakeholders
based on CMAP needed Map/
reports intervention and
Facilitate new support services
partnerships/ 2. Policy
engagements recommendations
anchored on the to strengthen
needs indicated in collaboration
the report 3. Include in the
agenda items in
the NAC, NTWG
4. New partnerships
engaged

National Social Consolidate, National Monitoring NPMO

Level Services assess, and Matrix on C/MAP with Concerned
Development provide assessment Division
and recommendations
Management on the C/MAP
Division Monitoring report
(SSDMD) from the RPMO
Refer to
concerned focals
/ division the
identified gaps
based on the
assessment of
C/MAP

Institutional Match the 1. List of partners/ National Resource

Partnership endorsed needs stakeholders to Program Map/
Division and partnership provide the needed Manager Stakeholders
gaps vis-à-vis the intervention and Map/
resource/ support services
stakeholders map 2. Proposed policies OUS
Identify and to strengthen
propose policies collaboration Partners
that will help 3. Include in the
support local agenda items in
level the NAC, NTWG
convergence 4. New partnerships
Facilitate new engaged
 Submitted Tools/
Level Actors Role Outputs
to Reference
partnerships/
engagements
anchored on the
needs indicated in
the report
 ATTACHMENT A

CITY / MUNICIPAL ACTION PLAN TEMPLATE

Actionable Identified Gaps Intervention/Projects Targets Fund Sources Adaptive

Indicators (assessed (Committed programs, projects, (No of Pantawid HHs targeted Allocation (Source of Response
(Itemize here priority gaps/needs based convergence initiatives that address SWDI for the interventions) (Amount of Funds to (Strategies,
indicators from SWDI on on SWDI/PP gaps) Intervention) implement measures to
livelihood, employment Database) PPAs) address
and education) challenges in
addressing gaps)

ECONOMIC SUFFICIENCY

A. Employable Skills Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

No of Pantawid HHs DSWD

needing skills
training/upskilling LGU

NGA

CSO

OTHERS

B. Employment

No of Pantawid HHS DSWD

who are unemployed
LGU

NGA

CSO

OTHERS

C. Income

DSWD
No of Pantawid HHs LGU
with income below
poverty threshold NGA
- > 1500
- 1600-3,000 CSO
- 3,001-5,000
- 5,001-6,000 OTHERS

No of Pantawid HHs DSWD

needing livelihood
assistance LGU

NGA

CSO

OTHERS

D. Social Security and Access to

Financial Institutions

No of Pantawid HHs DSWD

without insurance
coverage LGU

NGA

CSO

OTHERS

SOCIAL ADEQUACY

A. Health

1. Availment of health services

No of PP HHs who do DSWD

not have access to
basic health services LGU
 NGA

CSO

OTHERS

Health supply side DSWD

gaps (lack of health
facilities, medicines, LGU
medical personnel,
etc.,) NGA

CSO

OTHERS

2. Nutrition

No of PP HHs with DSWD

malnourished children
aged 0-5 years old LGU

NGA

CSO

OTHERS

Number of meals the DSWD

family had in a day)

LGU

NGA

CSO

OTHERS
3. Water and Sanitation

No. of PP HHs with no DSWD

access to safe water
supply LGU

NGA

CSO

OTHERS

No of PP HHs with no DSWD

access to sanitary
toilet facilities LGU

NGA

CSO

OTHERS

No of PP HHs who do DSWD

not practice proper
garbage disposal LGU

NGA

CSO

OTHERS

B. Housing

No of PP HHs living in DSWD

makeshift dwellings
LGU

NGA

CSO
 OTHERS

No of PPs HHs who DSWD

reside in hazardous
areas LGU

NGA

CSO

OTHERS

Tenure status of DSWD

housing unit
LGU

NGA

CSO

OTHERS

No. of PP HHs with no DSWD

access to lighting
facility LGU

NGA

CSO

OTHERS

C. Education

No. of PP HHs aged 6- DSWD

12 not in elementary
school LGU

NGA

CSO
 OTHERS

No. of PP HHs aged DSWD

13-16 not in secondary
school LGU

NGA

CSO

OTHERS

No. of PP HHs aged DSWD

17-18 not in senior
high school LGU

NGA

CSO

OTHERS

Functional literacy of DSWD

family members aged
10 years old above LGU

NGA

CSO

OTHERS

Educational supply DSWD

side gaps (itemize
gaps in terms of LGU
classroom, teachers,
etc.) NGA

CSO

OTHERS
D. Role Performance

No. of PP family
members who are not
regularly attending
FDS and other similar
activities

No of PP HH members
who are not member in
at least one legitimate
people’s organizations

No of PP HH who do
not participate in
community
development projects

Submitted by: Reviewed by: Approved by:

MSWDO MPDC/BUDGET OFFICER LOCAL CHIEF EXECUTIVE

ATTACHMENT B

CITY / MUNICIPAL ACTION PLAN REPORT TEMPLATE

(MUNICIPAL LEVEL)
Municipality: ______________ Date of submission: ____________

C/MAP Submission

Y N Details/ Facilitating Hindering

Indicators Description factor Factor

1. C/MAP Approved by the MAC/MIAC

2. C/MAP based on SWDI gaps and Program needs

3. Identified Interventions and Programs based on SWDI needs

4. Identified resources to implement C/MAP

Overall Assessment:

Recommendations and Next Steps:

Submitted by: Reviewed and Approved by:

CITY/MUNICIPAL LINK SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER III

ATTACHMENT C

CITY / MUNICIPAL ACTION PLAN REPORT TEMPLATE

(PROVINCIAL LEVEL)

Number of submitted C/MAP: ______ (out of __ LGU)

C/MAP SUBMISSION

City/ Number of 1 2 3 4 Level of Hindering Facilitating

Municipality LGU C/MAP C/MAP based Identified Identified C/MAP Factors Factors
Submitted Approved by on SWDI Interventions resources to Adequacy
the MAC/ gaps and and Programs implement
C/MAP (over MIAC Program based on C/MAP
total LGU) needs SWDI needs

Y N Y N Y N Y N Total Y

Municipality 1

Municipality 2

Total

Overall Assessment:
• Number of submitted C/MAP versus total number of expected C/MAP submission
• Assessment on the level of adequacy based on indicators, which indicators are not usually met, why?
• Summary and assessment of hindering and facilitating factors
• Are there SWDI needs and gaps not adequately addressed at the municipal level? How can the Provincial level help address these gaps?

Recommendations and Next Steps:

Submitted by: Reviewed and Approved by:

PROVINCIAL M&E OFFICER PROVINCIAL LINK

ATTACHMENT D

CITY / MUNICIPAL ACTION PLAN REPORT TEMPLATE

(REGIONAL LEVEL)

Number of submitted C/MAP: ______ (out of __ LGU)

C/MAP SUBMISSION

Province Number of 1 2 3 4 Level of Hindering Facilitating

LGU C/MAP C/MAP based Identified Identified C/MAP Factors Factors
Submitted Approved by on SWDI Interventions resources to Adequacy
the MAC/ gaps and and Programs implement
C/MAP (over MIAC Program based on C/MAP
total LGU) needs SWDI needs

Y N Y N Y N Y N Total Y

Province 1

Province 2

Total

Overall Assessment:
- Number of submitted C/MAP versus total number of expected C/MAP submission
- Assessment on the level of adequacy based on indicators, which indicators are not usually met, why?
- Summary and assessment of hindering and facilitating factors
- Are there SWDI needs and gaps not adequately addressed at the municipal level? How can the Regional level help address these gaps?

Recommendations and Next Steps:

Submitted by: Reviewed by: Approved by:

REGIONAL M&E OFFICER REGIONAL MCCT REGIONAL PROGRAM COORDINATOR