12-Watershed Image Segmentation Algorithm
12-Watershed Image Segmentation Algorithm
SUN Hui-jie
College of Computer Science and Information Engineering
Harbin Normal University
Harbin Heilongjiang 150025,
China
Sunh858@163.com
watershed
minimum value
(a) pepper
minimum value
[10.12]
segmentation , such as regional segmentation of image (b) contrast ratio
contrast, regional internal uniformity, they are classical and
commonly for image segmentation quality evaluation
099
criterion.
098
094
number of R, ,we define the normalized coefficient below:
093
(3)
(c) homogeneity
Fig2 The change of uniformity and contrast
In order to get more accurately measure of
(4)
segmentation, we must ensure that the connected region of
segmentation algorithm is not too big and not too small, the
result of algorithm accords with the human visual
C r is the biggest variance for connecting component of characteristics, the internal region of the segmentation
image, and Dr is the biggest average difference between contrast and uniformity of extreme measure (maximum
the connecting part for adjacent grayscale. Write as:
52
entropy and minimum entropy) are a part of the judging According to below formula:
standard, and form the objective function as follows: X/O)=[randx(B-A)/M +(B-A)/Mx(j-l)+A] (12)
"
A. The Influence of The Parameter for the Result of the (a) lena Convergence (b) pepper Convergence
Experiments
The parameters of the algorithm in this paper is shown :
M is the population size, Vmax is the maximum speed of
particles, T range is growth parameters threshold, 1max is the
number of iterations and L is critical value.
53
" ,---"":;:::========:" [3] Ng H.P. Ong S.H. Foong K.W.C. et al. Masseter segmentation
using an improved watershed algorithm with unsupervised
"
classification [1]. Computers in Biology and Medicine,2008,38: 171-
"
1 84.
"
[41 Rao A.R, Srinivas V.V. Regionalization of watersheds by fuzzy
" cluster analysis [1]. Journal of Hydrology,2006,3 1 8: 57-79.
[5] Zhang M,Zhang L and Chen H.D. A neutrosophic approach to image
segmentation based on watershed method [1]. Signal Processing, 201 0,
: O�7-�,�O�"�����r-���"r-,�O�,,.
( C) house Convergence
t �O�'--�lO�"�����"r-,�,�"�,,.
(d) brain Convergence
[6]
90:1 510-1 51 7.
Flores F.C, Lotufo R.A. Watershed from propagated markers: An
interactive method to morphological object segmentation in image
Fig.4 Convergence for lena,pepper,house and brain images
sequences [1]. Image and Vision Computing, 2009,
doi:I0.1 01 6/j.imavis.2009.06.01 5.
B. Compared with Existing Algorithms
[7] Jung c.R. Combining wavelets and watersheds for robust multiscale
The image of figure 3(a) is segmented by the improved image segmentation [1]. Image and Vision Computing, 2007, 25: 24-
watershed algorithm. Figure5 (a) is the results of Lena image 33.
segmentation with improved watershed algorithm of [8] Wang X P. Morphological image analysis principle and
references [16], the Lena image is divided into 464 area, application[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua university press. 2008.
more traditional watershed and gradient had greatly [91 Wang D. A multiscale gradient algorithm for image segmentation
using watershed [1]. Pattern Recognition,1 997,30(12): 2043-2052.
improved watershed algorithm. Figure 5 (b) is the
[1 0] Zhang Y.J. A classification and comparison of evaluation techniques
segmentation results of Lena image in this paper, it is for image segmentation [1]. China Journal of Image and Graphics,
divided into 23 area, its results is better than traditional 1 996,1 (2):1 51 -1 58.
watershed algorithm, gradient watershed segmentation [II] Polak M, Zhang H, Pi M.H. An evaluation metric for image
[16] segmentation of multiple objects [1]. Image and Vision Computing,
algorithm and the algorithm mentioned in the literature
2009,27:1 223-1 227.
they have been improved greatly, and the segmentation result
[1 2] Cordenesa R, Luis-Garcia R and Bach-Cuadrab M. A
is consistent with the person's intuitive visual. Figure 5 (d) is
multidimensional segmentation evaluation for medical image data [1].
the segmentation results in this paper, the segmentation Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2009, 96(2):108-
results of figure 5 (c-e) of the divider is superimposed on the 1 24.
original good segmentation results, figure 5(t) is the use of [1 3] Wang K.J, Guo Q.c. Image segmentation algorithm based on the
[16] PSO and improved Snake model [1]. CAAI Transactions on
literature the mentioned algorithm segmentation, it can be
Intelligent Systems, 2007, 2(1):53-58.
seen that this algorithm of segmentation results more in line
[1 4] Eberhart R.C, Kennedy 1. A new optimizer using particle swarm
with the intuitive visual. theory [1]. Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and
Human Science,1 995, (3):39-43.
[1 5] Clerc M. The swarm and queen: towards a deterministic and adaptive
particle swarm optimization [1]. IEEE International Congress on
Evolutionary Computation,1 999, (3): 1 951 -1 957.
[1 6] Luis Patino. Fuzzy relations applied to minimize over segmentation in
watershed algorithms[1]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2005,(26):819-
�
828.
(d) (e)
>� (f)
Fig5 Comparison of results of different segmentation methods
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
REFERENCES
[II Digabel H, Lantuejoul C. Iterative algorithms [1]. Proc 2nd European
Symp Quantitative Analysis of Microstructures in Material Science,
Biology and Medicine, Sturrgart West Germany: Riederer Verlag,
1 978: 85-99.
[2] Vincent L, Soille P. Watersheds in digital spaces: an efficient
algorithm based on immersion simulation [1]. IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1 991 ,1 3 (6): 583-598.
54