Discourse Analysis-Assignment (4 June 2024)
Discourse Analysis-Assignment (4 June 2024)
Resume:
The passage highlights the multifaceted nature of political speeches. It argues that
these speeches go beyond just the spoken words (verbal mode) and incorporate various
elements to deliver meaning. These additional elements, like vocal tone, gestures, and the
environment (non-verbal modes), act like additional ingredients in a recipe. Analyzing a
video recording, which captures all these elements, provides a richer and more complete
understanding of the speech compared to just reading a transcript (focusing solely on the
verbal mode) (Bonsignori and Camiciottoli (2017)). Interestingly, the text points out that
research using multimodal discourse analysis to study political speeches, especially those
by populist leaders, is still a developing field.
Theory:
- Jewitt, Bezemer and O’Halloran (2016) define MDA (Multimodal Discourse
Analysis) studies how different communication elements, like words, images, and
sounds, work together to create meaning. It analyzes the rules behind these
elements, similar to how grammar works for languages. By examining how these
elements interact, MDA helps us understand the overall message being conveyed.
- As explained by O’Halloran, MDA breaks away from just studying language to
encompass all the tools we use to communicate. This includes things like
gestures, pictures, sounds, and even symbols. The key idea is that meaning isn't
created by words alone, but by the interplay of all these elements together. MDA
doesn't just identify all the different ways we make meaning, it also explains how
these methods work together to create a complete message (2013).
In analyzing commercial, the structure of the text can resonate with the customer
to trigger consumption based on several studies of discourse in multimodal analysis that
were focused on static texts like newspapers and magazines (Zhang, 2007), print
advertisements and posters (Yu, 2013), textbooks, and dynamic ones like Public Service
Advertisement (Wang, 2012; Qian, 2014), forensic texts (Guo, 2014) and movies (Luo,
2010). Using systemic functional linguistics approach (SFL) to non-verbal modes,Kress
and van Leeuwen (1996) proposed Visual Grammar.
Theory:
- In Rhetoric of the Image, R. Barthes (1977) has discussed multimodal discourse in
the interaction of language and image to express meanings.
- According to Yang (2007), advertising discourse creates social meanings as well
as symbolic value through various channels, influencing social-culture and social
relationships.
- Kress and van Leeuwen introduced the concept of Visual Grammar in 1996, based
on semiotic school's theories that were initially developed for linguistic texts.
Based on Halliday’s theory, they use different terms for the same subjects:
representational (ideational), interactive (interpersonal) and compositional
(textual). Representational meaning refers to how images depict relationships and
interactions between the individuals or objects being portrayed. Interactive
meaning centers around social interactions and how individuals perceive and react
to themselves and others in the context of the represented world in the text.
Compositional meaning interrelated representational and interactive meanings
each other using three systems: