DC and RF Analysis of Vertical 3D P-Type Silicon Nanotube FET For Low Power Applications
DC and RF Analysis of Vertical 3D P-Type Silicon Nanotube FET For Low Power Applications
To cite this article: Josephine Anucia. A, Gracia. D & Jackuline Moni D (2021): DC and RF
analysis of Vertical 3D p-type Silicon Nanotube FET for low power applications, International
Journal of Electronics, DOI: 10.1080/00207217.2021.1941288
Article views: 13
DOII: 10.1080/000207217.20
021.19412888
DC and RF analysis
a of Verticall 3D p-typ
pe Silicon
n Nanotub
be FET fo
or
low power ap
pplication
ns.
Depaartment of Electronics
E and Commuunication Engineering,
E , Karunya IInstitute of
Techhnology andd Sciences, Coimbatore
C e-641114, Tamil
T Nadu, India.
Correesponding auuthor: Dr. D.
D Jackulinee Moni,
Proffessor, ECE D
Department,
Karu
unya Institutte of Technollogy and Sciences,
Coim
mbatore-641 114, Tamil Nadu,
N India.
email: monni@karunya.eedu
Josephine Anucia. A did her B.Tech in Eleectronics andd Communication
ng and M.Tecch in VLSI Design
Engineerin D at Kaarunya Instituute of Techn
nology
and Sciences, coimbaatore. She iss currently pursuing thhe PhD degrree at
Karunya Institute of T
Technology and Sciencees, Coimbato
tore. Her ressearch
interests in
nclude semiiconductor device
d modeelling and L
Low Power VLSI
Design.
Gracia. D did her B.T
Tech in Electrronics and Communicati
C ion Engineerring at
Karunya In
nstitute of T
Technology and
a Sciencess, Coimbatorre. She comp
pleted
her M.E in
n VLSI Dessign at SSN college of Engineeringg, Chennai. She
S is
currently pursuing
p her PhD degreee in Nano Devices at Kaarunya Institute of
Technolog
gy and Sciiences, Coiimbatore. Her
H researchh area inccludes
semicondu
uctor device modelling, Low
L Power VLSI
V Designn and Testin
ng and
Verificatio
on.
1. Introduction
The conventional MOSFETs suffer by the short channel effects when it is scaled
down to nanometer regime. Reliability and drivability of the device are affected by the
short channel effects (SCEs) (Taur, 2002). To overcome the problems in the
conventional MOSFETs, the 3D devices with multi-gates have been created (Dixit et
al., 2005). Multigate devices, Gate-all-around (GAA) devices, underlap FET, FinFETs,
Tunnel FETs, Nanowires, and Nanotubes (NT) are created to meet the low power ITRS
requirements. (Kranti & Armstrong, 2007a, 2007b; Nandi et al., 2013; Wang et al.,
2007),(Buddharaju et al., 2007).Double Surrounding Gate (DSG) FET provides more
gate control and also enhances the reliability of the device compared with the single and
double gate FETs (Goel et al., 2019, 2020b, 2020a; Rewari et al., 2019b, 2019a).
Shallow Extension with dual metal gate structure reduces the Gate-Induced Drain
Leakage (GIDL) (Goel et al., 2020b). Shallow extension with dual material gate not
only minimizes the leakage current but also enhances the noise margin (Goel et
al., 2019). High-K spacer with junctionless dual metal gate reduces the poly
depletion effect, channel resistance and improves the ION/IOFF ratio (Goel et al.,
2020a).
Nanowire is providing good immunity to SCEs effect (Hamedi-Hagh & Bindal,
2008; Zhang et al., 2018). Compared with planar DG FETs, silicon nanowire FET (Si-
NWFET) provides low leakage current and high capacitive-coupling ratio(Lim et al.,
2017).The GAA Si-NWFET has risen as a suitable device structure for scaled down
device, due to its high packaging density and good control over the gate(Lu et al., 2008;
Sharma et al., 2016). However GAA Si-NTFET suffers due to its steep series resistance
which occurs because of the abrupt junction development between the heavily doped
source/drain region and lightly doped silicon body (Liu et al., 2013; Shih et al.,
2011).An array of nanowires is required to attain the reliability, hence the area gets
increased (Sahay & Kumar, 2017).An array of nanowires will improve the drive current
but increase the leakage current. In order to overcome this problem, nanotubes have
been created by Tekleab et.al(Tekleab et al., 2012; Tekleab, 2014). A few researchers
have inspected the silicon nanotube FET (Si-NTFET), junctionless silicon nanotube
FET (JL-Si-NTFET) and stated that Si-NTFET surpasses the Si-NWFET in terms of
drive current and transconductance. Through an analytical modelling, the L-BTBT
impact on DM-JAM-TFET (Dual-Metal Junctionless Accumulation nanotube
FET) is investigated and linearity of the device is also analysed. It shows DM-
JAM-TFET produces low leakage and used for high linearity RFIC applications.
The junctionless FET decreases the problems caused by the junction resistance
(Goel et al., 2020c; Rewari et al., 2016).The short channel effects in Si-NTFETs are
minimal when compared with the NWFET. Si-NTFET achieves the same output current
with very less area occupied (Ambika & Srinivasan, 2016; Fahad et al., 2011; Fahad &
Hussain, 2012, 2013; Hur et al., 2016)(Apoorva et al., 2020) (Jayakumar & Srinivasan,
2017).At very low voltage (VDS), nanotubes attain high drive current and
transconductance. The core gate drives the appreciable increment in the gate
capacitance of Si-NTFETs; the architecture of the Si-NTFET enhances the drive current
compared with Si-NWFETs(Sahay & Kumar, 2017). Si-NTFET hollow cylindrical
shape contributes eventual electrostatic controllability to the gates. The Si-NTFET has
attracted attention due to its structure, high drive current, suitability for scaled down
devices and helps to overcome the problem raised in nanowires (Tekleab, 2014). The
use of inner/outer core-shell gates of Si-NTFETs leads to higher drive current and
excluding the need of array requirement. In Si-NTFET architecture the outer gate act as
a NWFET while the inner gate operate as an additional gate which helps to enhance the
charge control over the channel. This exhibits notable charge control benefitting scaling
roadmap to extend beyond GAA(Singh, Chaudhury, et al., 2019; Singh, Pandey, et al.,
2019).
In this work, 3D vertical p-type Si-NTFET has been proposed based on the
structure described in (Tekleab, 2014). There is a limited reported data available on a p-
type NTFET compared with the n-type NTFET. The input and output characteristics,
capacitance and transconductance analysis of the simulated device are discussed. In
Section 2 the structure of device and parameters used for the simulation are discussed.
In section 3 p-type Si-NTFET device with different outer gate length, output
characteristics, transconductance, cut off frequency and capacitance analysis are
investigated. Section 4 gives conclusion followed by reference.
(a) (b)
Figure.1 (a) Vertical p-type Si-NTFET (b) Cross - sectional view of p-type Si-NTFET
A Sentaurus TCAD tool was used to simulate and analyse the device. For
creating the 3D vertical silicon nanotube FET device with the gate, source and drain
contacts and doping and meshing generation, Sentaurus Structure Editor was used. For
DC aand RF anaalysis of creeated p-typee Si-NTFET
T device, th
he Sentauruus Device Editor
E
was uused. The work
w functio
on of inner and outer gate
g is 4.8eV
V. The innerr and outer gates
of the device plaay an imporrtant role inn reducing th
he SCEs. Th
his structuree design helps to
overccome the SCEs probleem in the sccaled down devices. Th
he source aand drain reegions
are hheavily dopeed. The exteension of thhe source an
nd drain reg
gions are heeavily doped
d like
sourcce/drain reggion in order to minim
mize the seeries resistan
nce. The chhannel is liightly
dopeed to reducee the dopantt fluctuationn. The sourcce and drain
n extensionns are surrou
unded
by thhe spacer which
w is esseential for veertical nano
otube structu
ures, so Si3N 4 is used as
a the
spaceer material((Chen & Tan, 2014; F
Fahad et al., 2011; Krranti & Arm
mstrong, 20
007a).
Figurre 2 showss the suggeested devicce fabricatio
on process flow of S i-NTFET(S
Singh,
Panddey, et al., 2019).
2
SOI WWafer
Mesa F Formation
Sacrificcial sidewall
NT outter side formaation
Outer GGate Oxide
Outer GGate
Spacerr Deposition
Sacrificcial layer deposition
Selectiive etching of spacer
Epitaxiial growth of insitu
doped silicon
Trenchh creation & inner
i gate
stack ddeposition
Metal contacts, patterning
&depoosition
Diellectric
Sacrrificial Oxide
Burried Oxide
Siliccon Layer
Hanndle/Back Silicon
Siliccon-di-Oxide
Figure.2 Fabrication process flow of a Si-NTFET(Singh, Pandey, et al., 2019)
The other parameters used for this device simulation is listed in Table 1.To improve the
reliability and drivability of the devices, models such as field and doping-dependent
mobility degradations, Shockley-Read-Hall (SRH), effective intrinsic density and
Hurkx model are used.
Parameter Value
Inner Gate Length (LIG) 130 nm
Outer Gate Length (LOG) (60 nm -14 nm)
Inner Gate Diameter (DIG) 20 nm
Outer Gate Diameter (DOG) 32 nm
Source/Drain Length (LS /LD) 15 nm
Source/Drain Extension Length (LSxtn /LDxtn) 33 nm
Oxide Thickness (TOX) 0.5 nm
Doping Concentration in Source/Drain Region 2×1020cm-3 (P+)
Doping Concentration in Source/Drain Extension 1×1020cm-3 (P+)
Table 2. Comparison table of our work with the similar reported work
The output characteristics (ID-VDS) curves with different gate voltages are
plotted in Figure 4. The ID (drain current) increases as the drain to source voltage (VDS)
sweeps from 0V to -0.3V.For low voltage the barrier width is wider so low ION value is
obtained at linear regime. As gate voltage (VGS) increases from -1.1 to -1.5 V, the
barrier width is reduced so drive current is increasing gradually at saturation regime.
Figure 4. ID-VDS characteristics of p-type Si-NTFET for gate voltage (VGS)varies
from -1.1V to -1.5V
The capacitance and voltage charactersticssuch as gate capacitance (CGG), gate
to drain capacitance (CGD) of the simulated p-type Si-NTFET are shown in Figure 5&
Figure 6respectively. The gate capacitance is extorted from the device and analysis has
been made for different drain voltage (VDS) which is varied from -0.5V to 0V. The gate
capacitance decreases slightly as gate voltage (VGS) is varied from -1.5V to 0V. This is
due to a limit in carrier density through the Schottky contacts. The gate-drain
capacitance (i.e. miller capacitance) is reverse transfer capacitance. The miller
capacitance effect removes the gate charge when drain voltage fall rapidly. This will
affect the switching of the device. Gate to drain capacitance and gate to source
capacitance contributes partly of the overall gate charge in linear region. During the
saturation region, miller capacitance becomes insignificant because of high potential
barrier between channel and drain region. As the gate voltage increases from -1.5 V to
0V, CGD reduces gradually (Mookerjea et al., 2009).
Figure 5. C-V (CGG) characteristics as a function of VGS for VDS
Figure.8. Cut off frequency (ft) of p-type Silicon Nanotube FET for different outer gate
length (LG)
Figure7illustrates transconductance characteristics as a function gate voltage for
varies outer gate length at VDS=-0.3V. The transconductance is not a constant; it is the
ௗூವ
derivative of which depends linearly on VGS. The transconductance quantifies the
ௗಸೄ
drain current variation with the VGS variation while keeping the VDS constant. By
increase the control over gate i.e. increasing the gate voltage is enhancing the
transconductance. Maximum transconductance values are obtained between VGS=–0.95
V and VGS=–1.3 V and it describes high potential towards low power and high speed
applications. A figure 8 shows the cut off frequency curves as a function gate voltage
for varies outer gate length. Cut off frequency (ft) is directly proportional to
transconductance so as transconductance increases ft also increases. The high
transconductance of the (14nm outer gate length) p-type Si-NTFET device facilitates it
to attain the high cut off frequency. Cut off frequency can be expressed as (1)
gm
ft = (1)
2πC GG
4. Conclusion
In this paper, DC and RF performances of the 3D vertical p-type Si-NTFET
device are discussed. To improve the drivability of the device the analaysis
areperformed in p-type Si-NTFET with different outer gate length. The output
characterstics of the simulated device is studied. The gate capacitance as a function of
gate voltage has been studied.The miller capacitance (gate to drain capacitance) effect is
reduced. For the simulated p-type device the transconductance and cut off frequency
analysis have been done for different outer gate length.
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank the management and higher authorities of Karunya
Institute of Technology and Sciences for providing us very good VLSI lab facilities to
carry out this research work.
Reference
Ambika, R., & Srinivasan, R. (2016). Analysis of independent gate operation in Si nano
tube FET and threshold prediction model using 3D numerical simulation. Journal
of Computational Electronics, 15(3), 778–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10825-
016-0822-5
Apoorva, Kumar, N., Amin, S. I., & Anand, S. (2020). Design and Performance
Optimization of Novel Core-Shell Dopingless GAA-Nanotube TFET with
Si0.5Ge0.5-Based Source. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 67(3), 789–
795. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2020.2965244
Buddharaju, K. D., Singh, N., Rustagi, S. C., Teo, S. H. G., Wong, L. Y., Tang, L. J.,
Tung, C. H., Lo, G. Q., Balasubramanian, N., & Kwong, D. L. (2007). Gate-all-
around Si-nanowire CMOS inverter logic fabricated using top-down approach.
Solid State Device Research Conference, 2007. ESSDERC 2007. 37th European.
100, 303–306.
Chen, X., & Tan, C. M. (2014). Modeling and analysis of gate-all-around silicon
nanowire FET. Microelectronics Reliability, 54(6–7), 1103–1108.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2013.12.009
Dixit, A., Kottantharayil, A., Collaert, N., Goodwin, M., Jurczak, M., & De Meyer, K.
(2005). Analysis of the parasitic S/D resistance in multiple-gate FETs. IEEE
Transactions on Electron Devices, 52(6), 1132–1140.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2005.848098
Fahad, H. M., & Hussain, M. M. (2012). Are nanotube architectures more advantageous
than nanowire architectures for field effect transistors? Scientific Reports, 2, 2–8.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00475
Fahad, H. M., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). High-performance silicon nanotube tunneling
FET for ultralow-power logic applications. IEEE Transactions on Electron
Devices, 60(3), 1034–1039. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2013.2243151
Fahad, H. M., Smith, C. E., Rojas, J. P., & Hussain, M. M. (2011). Silicon nanotube
field effect transistor with core-shell gate stacks for enhanced high-performance
operation and area scaling benefits. Nano Letters, 11(10), 4393–4399.
https://doi.org/10.1021/nl202563s
Goel, A., Rewari, S., Verma, S., & Gupta, R. S. (2019). Shallow Extension Engineered
Dual Material Surrounding Gate (SEE-DM-SG) MOSFET for improved gate
leakages, analysis of circuit and noise performance. AEU - International Journal of
Electronics and Communications, 111, 152924.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2019.152924
Goel, A., Rewari, S., Verma, S., & Gupta, R. S. (2020a). High-K Spacer Dual-Metal
Gate Stack Underlap Junctionless Gate All Around (HK-DMGS-JGAA) MOSFET
for high frequency applications. Microsystem Technologies, 26(5), 1697–1705.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-019-04715-6
Goel, A., Rewari, S., Verma, S., & Gupta, R. S. (2020b). Modeling of shallow
extension engineered dual metal surrounding gate (SEE-DM-SG) MOSFET gate-
induced drain leakage (GIDL). Indian Journal of Physics.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-020-01704-8
Goel, A., Rewari, S., Verma, S., & Gupta, R. S. (2020c). Physics-based analytic
modeling and simulation of gate-induced drain leakage and linearity assessment in
dual-metal junctionless accumulation nano-tube FET (DM-JAM-TFET). Applied
Physics A: Materials Science and Processing, 126(5).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-03520-7
Hamedi-Hagh, S., & Bindal, A. (2008). Spice modeling of silicon nanowire field-effect
transistors for high-speed analog integrated circuits. IEEE Transactions on
Nanotechnology, 7(6), 766–775. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNANO.2008.2004409
Hur, J., Lee, B. H., Kang, M. H., Ahn, D. C., Bang, T., Jeon, S. B., & Choi, Y. K.
(2016). Comprehensive Analysis of Gate-Induced Drain Leakage in Vertically
Stacked Nanowire FETs: Inversion-Mode Versus Junctionless Mode. IEEE
Electron Device Letters, 37(5), 541–544.
https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2016.2540645
Jayakumar, G. D., & Srinivasan, R. (2017). SET analysis of silicon nanotube FET.
Journal of Computational Electronics, 16(2), 307–315.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10825-017-0982-y
Kranti, A., & Armstrong, G. A. (2007a). Design and optimization of FinFETs for ultra-
low-voltage analog applications. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 54(12),
3308–3316. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2007.908596
Kranti, A., & Armstrong, G. A. (2007b). Source/drain extension region engineering in
FinFETs for low-voltage analog applications. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 28(2),
139–141. https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2006.889239
Lim, C. M., Lee, I. K., Lee, K. J., Oh, Y. K., Shin, Y. B., & Cho, W. J. (2017).
Improved sensing characteristics of dual-gate transistor sensor using silicon
nanowire arrays defined by nanoimprint lithography. Science and Technology of
Advanced Materials, 18(1), 17–25.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2016.1253409
Liu, B., Zhan, C., Yang, Y., Cheng, R., Guo, P., Zhou, Q., Kong, E. Y. J., Daval, N.,
Veytizou, C., Delprat, D., Nguyen, B. Y., & Yeo, Y. C. (2013). Germanium
multiple-gate field-effect transistor with in situ boron-doped raised source/drain.
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 60(7), 2135–2141.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2013.2262135
Lu, W., Xie, P., & Lieber, C. M. (2008). Nanowire transistor performance limits and
applications. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 55(11), 2859–2876.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2008.2005158
Mookerjea, S., Krishnan, R., Datta, S., & Narayanan, V. (2009). Effective Capacitance
and Drive Current for Tunnel FET (TFET) CV/I Estimation. IEEE Transactions on
Electron Devices, 56(9), 2002-2008.
Nandi, A., Saxena, A. K., & Dasgupta, S. (2013). Design and analysis of analog
performance of dual-k spacer underlap N/P-FinFET at 12 nm gate length. IEEE
Transactions on Electron Devices, 60(5), 1529–1535.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2013.2250975
Rewari, S., Nath, V., Haldar, S., Deswal, S. S., & Gupta, R. S. (2016). Improved analog
and AC performance with increased noise immunity using nanotube junctionless
field effect transistor (NJLFET). Applied Physics A: Materials Science and
Processing, 122(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-0583-9
Rewari, S., Nath, V., Haldar, S., Deswal, S. S., & Gupta, R. S. (2019a). Hafnium oxide
based cylindrical junctionless double surrounding gate (CJLDSG) MOSFET for
high speed, high frequency digital and analog applications. Microsystem
Technologies, 25(5), 1527–1536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-017-3436-3
Rewari, S., Nath, V., Haldar, S., Deswal, S. S., & Gupta, R. S. (2019b). Novel design to
improve band to band tunneling and gate induced drain leakages (GIDL) in
cylindrical gate all around (GAA) MOSFET. Microsystem Technologies, 25(5),
1537–1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-017-3446-1
Sahay, S., & Kumar, M. J. (2017). Comprehensive Analysis of Gate-Induced Drain
Leakage in Emerging FET Architectures: Nanotube FETs Versus Nanowire FETs.
IEEE Access, 5, 18918–18926. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2751518
Sharma, S. K., Raj, B., & Khosla, M. (2016). A Gaussian approach for analytical
subthreshold current model of cylindrical nanowire FET with quantum mechanical
effects. Microelectronics Journal, 53, 65–72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2016.04.002
Shih, C. H., Liang, J. T., Wang, J. S., & Chien, N. D. (2011). A source-side injection
lucky electron model for schottky barrier metal-oxide-semiconductor devices.
IEEE Electron Device Letters, 32(10), 1331–1333.
https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2011.2162577
Singh, A., Chaudhury, S., Pandey, C. K., Sharma, S. M., & Sarkar, C. K. (2019).
Design and analysis of high k silicon nanotube tunnel FET device. IET Circuits,
Devices and Systems, 13(8), 1305–1310. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cds.2019.0230
Singh, A., Pandey, C. K., Chaudhury, S., & Sarkar, C. K. (2019). Effect of strain in
silicon nanotube FET devices for low power applications. EPJ Applied Physics,
85(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap/2018180236
Taur, Y. (2002). CMOS design near the limit of scaling. IBM Journal of Research and
Development, 46(2–3), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.462.0213
Tekleab, D. (2014). Device performance of silicon nanotube field effect transistor. IEEE
Electron Device Letters, 35(5), 506–508.
https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2014.2310175.
Tekleab, D., Tran, H. H., Sleight, J. W., & Chidambarrao, D. (2012). Silicon nanotube
MOSFET (U.S. Patent No. 0217468) U.S.Patent Application Publication.
Wang, R., Zhuge, J., Huang, R., Tian, Y., Xiao, H., Zhang, L., Li, C., Zhang, X., &
Wang, Y. (2007). Analog/RF performance of Si nanowire MOSFETs and the
impact of process variation. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 54(6), 1288–
1294. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2007.896598
Yu, E., & Cho, S. (2016). Design and analysis of nanowire p-type MOSFET coaxially
having silicon core and germanium peripheral channel. Japanese Journal of
Applied Physics, 55(11). https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.55.114001
Zhang, Q., Yin, H., Meng, L., Yao, J., Li, J., Wang, G., Li, Y., Wu, Z., Xiong, W.,
Yang, H., Tu, H., Li, J., Zhao, C., Wang, W., & Ye, T. (2018). Novel GAA Si
Nanowire p-MOSFETs with Excellent Short-Channel Effect Immunity via an
Advanced Forming Process. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 39(4), 464–467.
https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2018.2807389