Us Ent Supply Chain Pov
Us Ent Supply Chain Pov
Contents
Introduction 3
Current supply chain landscape 3
How can blockchain help? 4
Potential benefits of using blockchain in supply chain 4–6
Key challenges for using blockchain in the supply chain 6–7
Stakeholder buy-in and adoption 7
Case studies: Three Deloitte-led blockchain projects 8–9
Conclusion 10
Authors and Contributors 11
Endnotes 12
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic gave the world a close-up
view of the key factor determining the effectiveness of
an organization—its supply chain management. Using
blockchain can improve both supply chain transparency
and traceability as well as reduce administrative costs.
Current supply
chain landscape
Until COVID struck in 2020, consumer expectations revolved around Enhancing these three drivers can help executives and their
a two-hour delivery model. But when the pandemic disrupted enterprises achieve transparency, track provenance and compliance,
that model, consumers soon discovered the implications of the and enhance brand loyalty. For many organizations seeking to
term “supply chain” as they confronted delays in the delivery of master their supply chains, this is where blockchain enters the
household goods — everything from toilet paper, mobile phones, picture. Blockchain is a record of transaction data that relies on a
and entertainment equipment to gaming consoles and home office shared ledger. This ledger is inherently tamper-evident and provides
furniture. With knowledge comes new expectations. And now a trusted shared and reliable way to record, validate, and view
both consumers and organizations alike are looking to technology transactions across a complex system with many participants, some
to enhance supply chains and alleviate, or at least mitigate, any of whom may not inherently trust each other.
bottlenecks in the system. Nevertheless, technology is no silver
bullet. Supply chains are often hostage to a host of factors including In the past, supply chain leaders had to rely on redundancy to
geopolitical tensions, cyberattacks, inflation, droughts that disrupt mitigate supply chain disruptions. While some redundancy may
shipping by lowering water levels, and critical product stockouts, as always be necessary—especially for critical materials—solutions
well as the many unforeseen effects of global warming. like blockchain can help companies proactively detect and mitigate
supply chain risks before any severe impact occurs. For example,
Given all these disruptions, many companies, and those responsible to increase transparency and traceability, companies in resource-
for supply chain effectiveness, are rethinking their lean and intensive industries have turned to blockchain solutions to help
just-in-time planning as well as issues related to source, make, control Scope 3 emissions.2 Finally, because global supply chains
deliver, and return processes and systems. Moreover, supply chain involve many discrete entities that are frequently separated by
executives are increasingly required to predict, and proactively several degrees in terms of their interests, the quality and opacity of
mitigate, vulnerabilities in the supply chain. For that reason, these information invariably degrades trust among parties. Technologies
executives are focusing their strategic investments on three key like blockchain can help offset such detrimental effects by ensuring
effectiveness drivers:1 the authenticity of information and transparency during
upstream transactions.
1. Predicting supply chain risk
How can
Reduced risk
The issue: Most supply chain risks fit within one of four categories—
blockchain help?
sourcing, transport, facility, or distribution. Each potential risk arises
at a different step in the traditional source, make, and deliver process.
Potential benefits
This, in turn, can allow businesses to better anticipate the possibility
and extent of delays.
of using blockchain
Within the different facilities of a business, participants can reduce
specific facility risks by leveraging satellites, IoT devices, and
cellular networks connected to the blockchain. This allows them to
in supply chain
monitor and provide real-time alerts about inventory levels and any
disruptions at key inbound or outbound handoff points to upstream
and downstream partners. Blockchain captures the collected
data points as immutable records, which managers can access
to trace and identify points of disruption and plan any necessary
product reroutes. Blockchain also helps mitigate potential insurance
As noted earlier, blockchain has the potential to unlock significant
disputes between parties by embedding insurance policies
value for organizations by reducing supply chain risk, increasing
within smart contracts that will automatically execute their terms
visibility, and enhancing trust across a complex ecosystem.
when triggered by a given event (e.g., weather-related disasters,
Additionally, since blockchain does not displace a company’s legacy
cybersecurity attacks).
systems, blockchain technology can serve as an add-on enterprise
solution that increases value while still maintaining existing Finally, downstream, blockchain can help mitigate distribution risk.
enterprise resource planning (ERP) software systems or other It allows organizations to build digital inventories that are accurate
current systems. Let’s consider three examples of how blockchain and immutable by implementing AI to obtain real-time insights into
can deliver tangible benefits. demand shifts, patterns, and potential disruptions. All that helps
companies make informed planning and inventory management
decisions and more effectively manage the flow of goods down to chain visibility can be particularly effective in industries involving
the last mile. materials prone to unethical sourcing such as “conflict diamonds.”
The mining of these rare stones often occurs in countries with
Real-life example: Multiple entities within the Mitsubishi Group corrupt or weak regimes, where there is a significant risk of human
decided to explore the value of blockchain for various stages of rights abuses, including forced labor and child labor.
their supply chain. As the world’s largest producer of methacrylates
(a basis for the polymers used in the manufacture of a wide range In the case of diamonds, it is, therefore, important for consumers
of medical equipment, from intravenous tubes to heart valves), to be able to trace the origin of their purchase to ensure that it has
Mitsubishi Chemical Group conducted a pilot project. Its goal? To been ethically sourced. Another case in point is lithium batteries.
enhance sourcing capabilities and provide both the enterprise Given their huge global demand, they are prone to counterfeiting.
and consumers with trustworthy data on the true origins of all its But thanks to blockchain, manufacturers can counter that by
products.4 The pilot provided the group with the ability to trace assigning barcodes to products and by generating unique tokens
the full chain of custody and distinguish between the origins of the (i.e., digital twins). Each token contains cryptographic seals that
material (conventional versus recycled materials) through the use of denote the certification, originator, registry, and other data that
colorized tokens (red versus green). As a result, Mitsubishi was able prove the authenticity of each battery.9
to assemble the necessary evidence in cases where the materials
received did not meet contractual standards.5 Real-life example: De Beers, one of the largest diamond producers
in the world, has implemented a blockchain-based tracking system
Meanwhile, Mitsubishi Logistics also implemented its ML called Tracr. Tracr allows De Beers to track diamonds from the point
Chain platform. It allows the entity to sustainably manage where they are mined, through the cutting and polishing process,
facility, transportation, and distribution risks for its outsourced and ultimately to the end consumer. This technology provides
pharmaceutical shipments. It also provides clients with quality tamper-proof source assurance at scale, encourages consumers’
assurance guarantees that products are stored under proper confidence in the ethical sourcing of their diamonds, and helps to
conditions (e.g., proper temperatures) during transport from combat the trade in conflict diamonds.10
pharmaceutical factories and logistics hubs to wholesalers. The
platform’s distributed ledger technology helps ensure that data is Improved trust
tamper-proof and easily accessible to Mitsubishi Logistics’ client
The issue: In a large, global supply chain that encompasses many
base so all parties can flag potential issues at their source of origin
parties, anchor companies may find it difficult to trust their upstream
along the blockchain.6
counterparts. Visibility and trust recede rapidly for most companies,
Enhanced visibility even after the second tier of relationships. Such lack of trust has
been warranted in the past, given counterfeit and gray market trade,
The issue: Many companies struggle with a lack of end-to-end the mistreatment of workers, and inconsistencies in sustainability
visibility and transparency in their supply chains.7 Despite the practices among partners in the supply chain.11
growing ESG expectations of consumers and governments
alike, many organizations are still unable to provide irrefutable Opportunity for blockchain: By recording all supply chain transactions
information regarding provenance and chain of custody. That’s on a shared and immutable ledger, blockchain provides a level of
especially true of large organizations with complex, multitiered trust previously impossible. Importantly, it offers this level of trust
supply chains. It can be particularly difficult for anchor companies to all participants (big and small) in the network. It does so by giving
(i.e., large global businesses with a lot of market power and a high- them access to the same information passed along the supply chain
profile brand) at the downstream end of a supply chain to ensure (thereby reducing fraud), by potentially minimizing communication
that small businesses (i.e., companies that are more than 10 tiers or data transfer errors, by allowing businesses to maintain oversight
upstream) are treated fairly and ethically. on outsourced manufacturing contracts, and, ultimately, by saving
businesses time previously spent validating data.12 Finally, it is
Opportunity for blockchain: By implementing a blockchain-based worth noting that smart contracts provide yet another mechanism
supply chain, businesses can effectively digitize physical assets for enhancing trust. By automatically executing a verifiable code
and create a decentralized, immutable record of all transactions that implements contract terms and conditions, smart contracts
across the end-to-end value stream.8 Paired with IoT devices and guarantee that participants in the supply chain adhere to the terms
radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags, participants can monitor defined in their contract. That helps radically reduce the risk of
the real-time conditions and movements of both perishable (e.g., incorrect or inconsistent contract execution.13
vaccines and agricultural products) and non-perishable goods
(e.g., gold and diamonds) on the blockchain thereby making it Real-life example: FedEx developed a prototype system to enable
possible to track a product from origin to delivery … all the way to real-time tracking and monitoring of shipments. The blockchain-
consumption. The blockchain creates an irrefutable product history based system provides a secure, tamper-proof, and decentralized
that anchor companies can use to enforce ethical and sustainable database that records every step of the shipment process—from
business practices upstream more effectively. Enhanced supply the point of origin to the final delivery destination. The system uses
using blockchain in
internal IT functions, can explore a variety of possible scaling solutions.
For public chains, popular solutions include high-capacity layer 1
blockchains and scaling solutions such as layer 2 blockchains. High-
the supply chain capacity layer 1s are chains that allow high throughput of transactions;
however, they may make compromises on decentralization. Layer 2s
are scaling solutions that build on top of existing layer 1s to bundle
transactions before posting them back to layer 1. That way, they retain
decentralization as they still rely on the base layer’s security.
Beyond potentially enhancing supply chain resilience and
For private chains, scalability is less of a concern. That’s because the
viability, blockchain technology also presents several challenges
permissioned participants can choose to rely on high-performing
that supply chain enterprises should consider during the
hardware and lighter-weight consensus mechanisms to support
decision-making process.
transactions throughout the network. Each industry needs to decide
Interoperability on what best suits its needs based on the nature of its supply chain
network. If it needs to rely on a public chain, however, then it can use
Overview: As blockchain technology continues to mature, its various layer 1 and layer 2 protocols depending on their ability to
networks will require universal interoperability standards.15 Those scale appropriately. If it needs to deploy a permissioned chain, then it
will help ensure compatibility across different types of blockchain should forecast network usage as accurately as possible to determine
platforms and decentralized applications, as well as existing hardware requirements and the appropriate consensus mechanism.
legacy technological ecosystems. These measures will enable
cross-communications and verification of end-to-end transactions Security and privacy
throughout the supply chain networks.
Overview: Every technological solution presents a set of potential
security and privacy risks. Enterprises should bear these in mind
Potential mitigation: Currently, “bridges” help achieve cross-chain
across the exploration, design, adoption, and implementation phases
interoperability. They are typically a combination of on-chain smart
of the solution life cycle. For blockchain technology, these security and
contracts and off-chain “relayers” that work in tandem to transmit privacy risks exist across four high-level categories: confidentiality,
information from one chain to another. While this facilitates integrity, consensus mechanism, and smart contracts.18
interoperability, it may present certain trade-offs depending on
the nature of the bridges. Ideally, the off-chain relayers should Potential mitigation: Supply chain and enterprise leaders should be
be decentralized. And on-chain smart contracts should auto- sure to incorporate their IT and cybersecurity partners into strategic
validate all the transferred information to eliminate the need to discussions early and often throughout the entire solution exploration,
adoption, and implementation life cycle. By doing so, they can help
trust any intermediaries. However, this on-chain validation can
educate supply chain network participants on the best practices,
be resource-intensive and prohibitively expensive. To offset that,
key technological risks, and potential workarounds. Additionally,
certain trusted entities can be permitted to transfer information this collaboration facilitates the development of comprehensive
(instead of utilizing a decentralized network of relayers). While this IT strategic plans that can help mitigate potential risks as early as
can help mitigate the resource issues, it does require that all the possible. Figure 1 provides an overview of security and privacy risks
participants trust the bridge relayers. Ecosystem participants need along with an example of a risk evaluation matrix across different
to assess these matters collectively to arrive at common standards types of blockchain.19
based on acceptable levels of risk, performance, and trust among
the participants.
Cybersecurity risk
Risk overview Public permissionless Private permissioned
area
Medium risk
The immutable nature of blockchains
Low risk
protects data integrity by design;
Private chains typically have fewer
however, smaller-sized blockchains with
Integrity Most prominent public chains have a nodes and a need for robust access
fewer nodes are more prone to data
high number of nodes measures to participate in the
compromises if a malicious actor gains
network
access to a majority of the nodes.
Source: Adrien Ogée et al., Inclusive deployment of blockchain for supply chains: Part 5 – A framework for blockchain cybersecurity, World Economic Forum, December 2019.
Stakeholder buy-in
and adoption
Overview: For global supply chain networks, the adoption of Potential mitigation: Supply chain leaders should facilitate
blockchain is still in its infancy. To spark further investment and discussions with internal and external stakeholders within the
encourage organizational buy-in, supply chain leaders should clarify organization and across supply chain networks. That way, they
the direct business value of blockchain technology to the C-suite can collectively explore the potential value-add of blockchain
of their enterprises. Leaders must also support further discussion technology and conduct cost-benefit analyses that can inform
on industry standardization of blockchain as well as the allocation future investment decisions.21
of resources to develop critical internal blockchain expertise. Only
then will leaders be in a position to advise on potential solutions,
implementation, and integration with existing ERP systems and
frameworks20 so they can minimize operational disruption.
Case studies:
Three Deloitte-led
blockchain projects
digital supply networks to delivery services; however, data is often tied to a specific company
that manages the delivery chain. Valuable insights from collected
address tomorrow’s challenges data often end up in a centralized repository. But that limits their
availability for analysis by multiple parties and represents a lost
and opportunities. This section opportunity to optimize the management of the supply chain.
APPROACH
provides three examples of
Deloitte worked with a client to develop real-time shipment tracking.
how Deloitte teams helped To do that, Deloitte teams brought together a common blockchain
platform—Hyperledger Fabric—which underpins Deloitte’s supply
clients tackle some of their most chain prototype “Track and Trace,” together with Thingstream, a
real-time positioning tracker, and AWS technology. Strapped on to
complex supply chain issues a pallet, a sensor records the location of a shipment over any GSM
network, internationally. By tracking all data on a single ledger, the
using blockchain. sender, shipper, and receiver can build a trusted and immutable
history of the shipment’s life cycle.
IMPACT
The complexity of biological sample (biosample) collection and A large pharmaceutical and biotechnology corporation had relied
management raises many challenges for clinicians who lead trials on paper-based manual processes, disparate systems, and external
and who need to guarantee patients’ consent throughout the process. organizations to transport drugs being developed in clinical
trials. These disjointed processes and systems lacked real-time
APPROACH transparency and end-to-end auditability of data.
Conclusion:
Future outlook
for blockchain in
supply chains
Imagine a world where you can replace the currently fragmented
tracking of your supply chain with an interoperable solution, one
that can significantly reduce the risk of unethical sourcing, shipping Liked what you read?
delays, inadequate storage, or ineffective distribution of your goods.
Imagine a world where you can provide visibility into your supply Subscribe here to get
chain to your customers and regulators and furnish irrefutable proof notified of new
that you are meeting supply chain standards and expectations. And
imagine a world, where, by addressing these considerations, you insights and reports
foster deeper trust and efficiency among all the stakeholders within about Blockchain and
your supply chain.
Digital Assets.
Blockchain can help address some of the key challenges that the
supply chain industry faces today. While some technological and
operational challenges remain in implementing blockchain solutions,
Deloitte continues to work with enterprises to overcome these
roadblocks and deliver the robust and effective solutions they
need to forge superior supply chains. Given the current economic
headwinds, and as corporations and consumers alike entertain high
expectations of supply chains with fewer risks, greater visibility and
transparency, and enhanced trust, Deloitte encourages enterprises
to consider blockchain solutions as a possible antidote to their
supply chain challenges.
Authors
Wendy Henry Rachana Kathawate
Global & US Consulting Senior Consultant
Blockchain & Digital Assets Leader Deloitte Consulting LLP
Deloitte Consulting LLP rkathawate@deloitte.com
wehenry@deloitte.com
Contributors
Supreet Gupta Cici Sobin
Manager Senior Consultant
Deloitte Consulting LLP Deloitte Consulting LLP
suprgupta@deloitte.com csobin@deloitte.com
Endnotes
1. Bill Lam, Rafael F. Calderon, and Christopher Entrup, “Intelligent enterprise fueling the supply chain of the future,” Deloitte Insights, November 28, 2022.
2. Poulomi Sengupta, “How blockchain technology can unlock climate solutions,” Morningstar Sustainalytics, July 27, 2022.
3. Vishal Gaur and Abhinav Gaiha, “Building a transparent supply chain,” Harvard Business Review, May–June 2020.
4. Mitsubishi Chemical Group, “Making supply chains circular,” accessed May 2023.
5. Claudius Kormann et al., Material traceability for increased circularity in the chemical industry: A blockchain-based mass balance approach using GreenToken
by SAP, GreenToken by SAP in collaboration with BASF, Mitsubishi Chemical, and SCG Chemicals, 2022.
6. Ryosuke Matsui, “Mitsubishi Logistics builds blockchain tracker for drug deliveries,” Nikkei Asia, November 28, 2022.
7. Margareta Teodorescu and Elena Korchagina, “Applying blockchain in the modern supply chain management: Its implication on open innovation,” Journal of
Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 7, no. 1 (March 2021): p. 80.
8. Weili Yin and Wenxue Ran, “Theoretical exploration of supply chain viability utilizing blockchain technology,” Sustainability 13, no. 15 (July 2021): p. 8231.
9. Sarah K. Rathke, “Supply chain dispute resolution in the US,” Practical Law, 2015.
10. Tasneem Bulbulia, “De Beers introduces pioneer blockchain-backed diamond source platform at scale,” Mining Weekly, May 5, 2022.
11. Jim Kilpatrick and Carey Oven, “Supply chain strategies: For many companies, the traditional balance is shifting,” On the board’s agenda, Deloitte, October 2022.
12. Omar Ali et al., “A comparative study: Blockchain technology utilization benefits, challenges and functionalities,” IEEE Access 9 (2021): pp. 12730–49;
Teodorescu and Korchagina, “Applying blockchain in the modern supply chain management: Its implication on open innovation.”
13. Ali et al., “A comparative study: Blockchain technology utilization benefits, challenges and functionalities”; Muhammad Nasir Mumtaz Bhutta et al., “A survey
on blockchain technology: Evolution, architecture and security,” IEEE Access 9 (2021): pp. 61048–73; Teodorescu and Korchagina, “Applying blockchain in the
modern supply chain management.”
14. Dan Robitzski, “FedEx wants to track packages on the blockchain, so you’ll know exactly who dropped your stuff,” Futurism, May 5, 2018.
15. David Piesse, “De-risking the supply chain with blockchain technology and data integrity,” International Insurance Society, June 2021.
16. Ali et al., “A comparative study”; Bhutta et al., “A survey on blockchain technology: Evolution, architecture and security”; Sohail Jabbar et al., “Blockchain-
enabled supply chain: Analysis, challenges, and future directions,” Multimedia Systems 27 (2021): pp. 787–806.
17. Teodorescu and Korchagina, “Applying blockchain in the modern supply chain management”; Yin and Ran, “Theoretical exploration of supply chain viability
utilizing blockchain technology.”
18. Ali et al., “A comparative study”; Adrien Ogée et al., Inclusive deployment of blockchain for supply chains: Part 5 – A framework for blockchain cybersecurity, World
Economic Forum, December 2019.
19. Ogée et al., Inclusive deployment of blockchain for supply chains: Part 5 – A framework for blockchain cybersecurity.
20. Yin and Ran, “Theoretical exploration of supply chain viability utilizing blockchain technology”; Jabbar et al., “Blockchain-enabled supply chain: Analysis,
challenges, and future directions.”
21. Yin and Ran, “Theoretical exploration of supply chain viability utilizing blockchain technology.”
Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who
relies on this publication.