Week 6
Week 6
Renunciation of citizens
• However, some contemporary penal instruments blurring the distinction between ‘us’
and ‘them’ just described
• Citizens being treated as foreigners by being excluded from their polities
• This form of punishment distinctive from other forms of punishment as it undermines
penal principles (similarly to crimmigration offences)
• (Ab)use of criminal law for other purposes?
• Why? Communitarianism (racism) or liberalism (different values)?
• Effects: individual and social
Citizens or foreigners?
• How should countries respond when their citizens ‘break’ the common bonds? What
behaviour amounts to a break of ties?
• Are they victims or offenders? Both? None?
• Is exclusion ever legitimate? Or should such individuals be prosecuted and
reintegrated?
• What role is played by race, religion, ethnicity in deciding on appropriate response?
Revision questions
• Given the instances of denationalization, does citizenship still serve its protective
function?
• What should we do about people who have gone abroad to fight?
• Where should the boundary between citizens and non-citizens be drawn? Think about
the Leonora – what makes her (or does not make her) a German citizen?
Problems
• Local specificities, different needs, experiences, and abilities; different approaches to
doing ‘things right’
• Actors: UN, IMF, World Bank, EU, foreign governments, NGOs
• Tools: assistance, support, humanitarianism, cooperation
• Motives: imperialism/neo-colonialism? Financial? Protection of Western countries?
Continuation of pathways of dependency
• Outcomes: negation of local and cultural specificities, prolongation of dependency and
unequal development
What is different?
• History and past experiences (dependency, colonialism, conflict)
• Social context (social and economic relations, culture, religion, politics, pathological
levels of internal conflict)
• Values
• Needs and capacities
Knowledge
• Who produces knowledge?
• Who is excluded from production?
• Who ‘uses’ knowledge? How do they use it?
• Is knowledge transferable? What is the danger of transferring it?
• The importance of alternative outlooks
• But: no complete ‘Southern’ outlook, emphasis/focus on some particular issues,
patchy
• Reasons to be optimistic: rising scholarship, rising awareness and reflection, localized
justice initiatives ‘imported’ from the south
Revision questions
• Being critical to criticism – can things be done differently or are some things
inevitable?
• Do the Southern spaces have agency: how do they change, respond, modify?
• What are some of the most important lessons that you are taking away from this
lecture?