FM Ii
FM Ii
TYPES OF DIVIDEND
Dividend theories
2.5 + 𝑃1
15 =
1.2
2.5 + P1 = 15 × 1.2
P1 = 18 – 2.5
P1 = Br. 15.50
0 + 𝑃1
15 =
1.2
0 + P1 = 15 X 1.20
P1 = Br. 18
Walter has evolved a mathematical formula for determining the value of market share.
Exercise
From the following information supplied to you, ascertain whether the firm is following an
optional dividend policy as per Walter’s Model?
Total Earnings Br. 2,00,000
No. of equity shares (of Br. 100 each 20,000)
Dividend paid Br. 1,00,000
P/E Ratio 10
Return Investment 15%
The firm is expected to maintain its rate on return on fresh investments. Also find out what
should be the E/P ratio at which the dividend policy will have no effect on the value of the share?
Will your decision change if the P/E ratio is 7.25 and interest of 10%?
Solution
𝐸𝑎𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 200000
EPS = 𝑛𝑜.𝑜𝑓shares = = 10 Br. i.e P/E ratio = 10
20000
1 1
Ke = P/E ratio = 10 = 0.1
0.15
5+ (10−5)
0.10
P=
0.10
5+7.5
= = Br.125
0.10
𝐷𝑃𝑆 5
Dividend Payout = 𝐸𝑃𝑆 X 100 = 10
X 100 = 60%
r >Ke therefore by distributing 60% of earnings, the firm is not following an optional dividend
policy. In this case, the optional dividend policy for the firm would be to pay zero dividends and
the Market Price would be:
The term net working capital can be defined in two ways. In the first place it is the difference
between current assets and current liabilities; and alternatively, it can be the portion of current
assets which is financed with long-term funds.
Net working capital is commonly defined as the difference between current assets and current
liabilities. This definition is considered as the measure of liquidity by analysts.
Need for Working Capital
The need for gross working capital (current assets) is unquestionable for smooth
operation of firms. Given the objective of financial decision making to maximize the
shareholders’ wealth, it is necessary to generate sufficient profits.
Phase – RECEIVABLES
Phase - 2
CASH
INVENTORY
Phase 1
Profitability vs Liquidity
Conservative Strategy (A) Long – term financing source is used to meet fixed asset
requirement as well as peak working capital requirement. implies greater liquidity and lower
Aggressive (B) Long – term financing is used to meet fixed asset requirement and permanent
working capital requirement. An aggressive policy indicates higher risk and poor liquidity. high
investment in current assets, increased profitability, reduced liquidity and increased risk of
insolvency
Moderate (C) Long- term financing is used to meet fixed asset requirements, permanent
working capital requirement, and a portion of fluctuating working capital requirement.
Estimation of Working Capital Amounts
Examples suppose the following data for Astedu Company for the year 2008 shows the
following information. Raw material cost of Br. 248,000, total conversion cost of Br. 194,400,
total production cost of Br.968,000, annual sales of Br. 1,448,000, and fixed investment of Br.
1,600,000.
Astedu wants to use one of the three approaches to determine the amount of working capital
required and has the following additional information to do so. With regard to the first approach,
inventory is one month’s supply of each of the raw materials, semi-finished goods (fully
completed material and half completed conversion cost) and finished goods. Receivables are one
month’s of sales. And operating cash is to be one month’s total cost.
Under the second approach, the amount of working capital required is to be 25 – 35 percent of
annual sales And the third approach considers a 10-20 percent of fixed capital investment. Show
the result of the three approaches for the total working capital needed.
Solutions
Raw materials for one month’s supply = 248,000/ 12 = Br. 20,667
Semi-finished or work-in-process (WIP) inventory for one month’s supply = [Br. 20,667 +
194,400 / 12 = Br. 36,867.
Finished goods inventory for one month’s supply = 968,000/ 12 = Br. 80,666
So that the total inventory needed by Astedu Company is Br. 20,667 + Br.36, 867 + Br.
80,666 = Br. 138,200.
Receivables one month’s of total sales forecasted = Br. 1,448,000/ 12 = Br. 120,667
Operating cash need as one month’s of total cost = Br. 968,000/12 = Br. 80,667
Thus the total working capital needed is Br. 138,200 +Br.120,667+Br.80,667 = Br.339,533
Under the second approach:
The average ratio can be taken to determine the amount (i.e., (25+35)/ 2 =30 percent) of
working capital needed. Therefore, 0.3 X Br. 1,448,000 = Br.434,400
The last method results in working capital of 240,000 (i.e., 1,600,000 x 0.15). The rate 15
percent is the average of 10- 20 percent. (10+20)/2 = 15 percent
CHAPTER 3: CASH AND LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT
50% of credit sales are realized in the month following the sales and the remaining 50% in the
second month following. Creditors are paid in the month following the month of purchase. Cash
at the bank on 1st April 2008 is Br. 30,000. Wages are paid at beginning of following month of
accrual.
Bank facilities required by the firm are Br. 46,000 and Br. 159,000 for May and June
respectively.
Cash Management Strategies
Cash management strategies are intended to minimize the operating cash balance requirement.
The basic strategies that can be employed include:
A. Stretching accounting payables
B. Efficient inventory-production management
C. Speedy collection of accounts receivables, and
D. Combined cash management strategies
The most know marketable securities are: treasury bills, negotiable certificate of deposits,
commercial papers, bankers’ acceptance, repurchase agreements and inter-corporate deposits.
Chapter four: RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT
Meaning and Objective of Receivables Management
Meeting Competition
Benefits There are two pronounced benefits of credit provisions: expansion of sales and retention
of existing customers.
Costs The major categories of costs associated with the extension of credit and account
receivable are:
Capital Costs
Collection Costs
Delinquency costs The cost arises out of the failure of the customers meet their obligations
when payments on credit sales become due after the expiry of the credit period.
Default Costs Finally, the firm may not be able to recover the over dues because of the inability
of the customers.
Level of Sales
Credit Policies The term credit policy refers to those decisions variables that influence the
amount of trade credit i.e., the investment of receivables. These variables include the quality of
accounts receivables, trade accounts to be accepted, the length of the credit period to be
extended, cash discounts to be given and any special term to be offered depending upon
particular circumstances of the firm and the customers.
Terms of Credit The size of receivables is also affected by the terms of trade offered by the
firm. The two important components of the credit terms are credit period and cash discount.
Credit Period is in terms of the duration of time for which trade credit is extended and over due
amount to be paid by the customers. Cash discount which the customer can take advantage of
the discount given and the overdue amount will be reduced by this amount.
The management of receivables involves three crucial decisions in three areas: i) Credit policies
ii) Credit terms iii) collection policies
The effect of lenient Collection Policy will be just the opposite effect.
FACTORING RECEIVABLES
The basic functions of a factor include finding the customer, and collects sales proceeds and
remit the same to the client. Other secondary functions of factor includes:
Sales ledger administration: Full credit services are provided by factor to client, like
advising about credit extension or reduction, maintenance of accounts receivables,
information related to market trends, competitors, and so on.
Credit collection and protection: a factor performs all the actions related to the collection
of debts. In additions too the collection, factor also provides protection from debts like
partial or full protection from bad debts.
Financial assistance: A factor has provides facilities like advancing the debts to the clients. Thus
factor provides various services like managing debts and financing them
for a return called as factor service commission with or without reserve commission to
cover bad debts losses.
The factoring facilities can be broadly classified into two groups. They are (1) full service
non-recourse factoring and (2) full service recourse factoring.
Illustration 3: A firm has annual sales of $ 20 millions. 80 percent of sales are on 60-day credit.
Average collection period is given as 75 days. Based on the past performance bad debts costs
are estimated as 1 percent on credit sales. The firm has credit collection cost of $ 75,000 per
annum. A factor offers 1.75 % service charges for collection of receivables. Factor also
provides finance facility of 80 percent of amount sold to him within 10 days of sale. Interest cost
on borrowings is given to you as 6 %. Should the firm go for factoring service?
Sol:
Factor commission
It can be concluded that the total expenses with factoring services is lower than the expenses
with own collection policy, therefore it advisable to the firm to go for factor service for
collection of receivables.
Introduction
5.1 Nature of Inventories
The various forms that inventories exist in a manufacturing company are normally classified into
three categories. The first category is raw material. The second type of inventory is work-in-
progress, The third final type of inventory is finished goods, that is, products ready for shipment
or for sale. They are completely manufactured products.
A merchandizing enterprise will have a very high level of finished goods inventory and no raw
material and work- in- process inventory.
2 AxR
Q = EOQ CC
limitations of EOQ Model The EOQ Model is limited from the following angles.
The assumption of constant consumption and the instantaneous replenishment of
inventories are of doubtful validity.
There may be an unusual and unexpected demand for stocks. To meet such
contingencies, firms have to keep additional, inventories which are known as Safety
Stocks.
Another weakness of EOQ model is that the assumption of a known annual demand
for inventories is doubtful.
In additional to above all, there are some computational problems involved.
Illustration
The following details are available in respect of Elen Company
1) Annual requirement of inventory is 40,000 units
2) Cost per unit (other than carrying and ordering costs) is Br. 16
3) Carrying costs are likely to be 15per cent of cost per unit per year
4) Cost of placing order is Br. 480 per order
What is the Economic Order Quantity level of Elen Company?
Solution
2 x 40,000x 480
4,000 units
EOQ= 2.4
C = Br.16 x 0.15 = 2.40
Stock Levels
Stock levels should be fixed in such a way that there is no over-stocking, so the loss due to
damage, deterioration in quality, risk of obsolescence, etc is minimum and capital is not blocked
or interest on borrowed funds is not paid unnecessarily. Again, there shall not be under-stocking
or stock-out situation which may cause production hold-ups and loss of sale and profit.
The production planning and control or material control department controls stock by fixing
maximum, minimum, reordering level and reorder quantity for each stock item. These levels
are noted in the bin card and the storekeeper sends requisition to the purchases department for
It is a point between the maximum level and the minimum level of stock holding at which the
storekeeper initiates purchases requisition for fresh supplies of materials. The reorder level is
slightly more than the minimum level of stock to guard against possible disruption in suppliers,
increase in consumption due to changing demand and other factors. This level depends upon
various factors, e.g., maximum consumption during lead time, unexpected delay in receiving
fresh supply, cost of placing order, cost of storage, EOQ; minimum level and so on. In case of
abnormal delay, the stock should not reach zero level. Lead time means the time required to
obtain delivery of material from date of order. The formula which is generally used to calculate
reorder level is given below:
Average Stock Level This is the average of the maximum and the minimum. It is computed by
using the formula:
Solution
a) Reorder level = maximum usage x maximum reorder period
For component A: 75x 6 = 450 units
For component B: 75x 4 = 300 units
b) Minimum level = reorder level – (Normal usage x average reorder period)
For component A: 450 units – (50 units x 5 weeks) = 200 units
For component B: 300 unit – (50 units x 3 weeks) = 150 units
c) Maximum level = Reorder level + reorder quantity – (minimum usage x minimum
reorder period)
For component A: 450 units + 300 units– (25units x 4 weeks) = 650 units
For component B: 300 unit + 500unit – (25 units x 2 weeks) = 750 units
d) Average Stock Level = Minimum Stock Level + ½ (Reorder quantity)
For component A: ½(200+ 650) = 425 units
For component B: ½(150+ 750) = 450 units
Safety Stock
The economic order quantity and the reorder point are explained with assumptions like constant/
fixed requirement of inventory and instantaneous replenishment of inventory. These assumptions
are, however, of questionable validity in actual situations. For instance, the demand for inventory
is likely to fluctuate from time to time. In particular, at certain point of time the demand may
exceed the anticipated level. Similarly, the receipt of inventory from suppliers may be delayed
beyond the expected lead time. The delay may arise from strikes, floods, transportation, and
other bottlenecks.
Thus, a firm would come across situations in which the actual usage of inventory is higher than
the anticipated level and/or the delivery of the inventory from suppliers is delayed.
The effect of slower delivery may be a shortage of inventory. That is the firm would face stock-
out situations. This in turn would disrupt the production schedule and alienate the customers. The
firm would, therefore, have to keep a sufficient safety margin by having additional inventory to
guard against stock-out situations. Such stocks are called safety stocks. Safety stocks are the
minimum additional inventory to serve as a safety margin or buffer to meet unanticipated
increase in usage resulting from an unusually high demand and/or an uncontrollable late receipt
of incoming inventory (Khan and Jain, 2000).