HANYANA IEAL ESTAIE NEGUIATORY AIJII{ORIIY

*HARERA
eunuennM Eftqrw A dr<t Eftqrqd qlfudtq, 'fFlrq
-d$- d {l'E h r'F r h? a+a

PROC[EDINGS OT THE DAY

Day and Date ThuBdav and 11.01.2024

CR/4224/2022 Case titled as Anirudh

Kaushik and AdiBa Kaushik Vs REVITAL
REALIry PyT LTD

Anrrudh Kaushrkand Adrrya Kaush,k

Represented tbrough 5hn Rahul Tharela AdvoLite

REVITAL REALITY PV']' LTD

Respondent Represented through Shri Bhrigu Dham, Advocate

30.11.2023

Proceeding Recorded by Naresh Kumariand HR lvlehta

Proc€€dtngs
On the last date of hearing, the counsel lor th€ complainant was directed to
seruice the copy ofthe af,idavit to the respondenL The same was filed in the
Authorityon 21.11.2023 and placed on nl€
The preseni complaint wa s received ol 22.06 2022 and the reply on behalf of
respondent was received on 27 07-2023
succinct facts olthe case as per the pl€adingand annexures are as under:
Details

1 "Supertech Bas€ra' sector 79&798,

Cunrgram

2
't2.lOerea

Afro.dabte Croup Ho'xing Pro,€ct

 HARYANA IEAI. ESIATE REGUTAIORY AUTHOIIIY
HARERA
E GURUGRAIV
rrm,Hmt fr O.r".n. RnIlRR
reglsrereu/trot tEgBr€rEdrft rd-ra. toS nf zoarared
24.OA.2077

RERA registration valid 31.01.2020

14 0t 2020 dated 22.06.2020

7 RERA extens,on valid upro 31.01.202 L

L 163 of 2014 dated 164 oi2014 dated

12.09.2074 1,2.09.ZO L4

11 09 2019 1r.09.2019

Revital Reality Private Limited and

9. Date of approlal ofbuildinS 19.12.2074

plans
las p€r information obtained by the
plannins branchl

10. Date of grant of 22.07.2076

€nvir.nment cleamnce
(As per page no.26 ofthereplyl

11. 0703, 7sfloor, tower/block- 3,

[Pase no. 24 of th€ complaint)

12. 495 sq. ft.

(carpet area)

97 sq. ft.

(Balcony ar€a)

(Page no. 24 of the complaint)

 HAIYANA IIAT ESIAIE IEGUIATOIY AIJTHORIIY
tffHRnen4
$- eunuennv <ftqr,fl

-E:r22075.-
fPase n0.18 ofthe complaint]

14. Date of exeation of flat 01.03.2016

(Page no.23 ofthe complaint)

15.

Subject .'
lorce mojeurc circunstonces,
inteNention oJ Stotutoty Authonties
receipt oJ occupation cemlcote and
Allofiee/Buyer hoving timely conptietl
with oll its obligations fornohties, or
docu entation, as Pre$dbed bY the
Developer ond not being in deloult under
oiy part hercoJ and FtotauYer\
Ag.eenent, including but not limited to
the tinely poyment ol instolnents oI the
other charges as Per PoYment Plan,
Stonp Duty and registranon charges, the
Developers Proposes to ofer posse*ion
ol the soid Flat b r\e Allottee/Buyer
taithin o period of4 (lour) yeo$ Jron
the date ol apryovol ol buildhg plans
ot grant ol environnent cleoronce,
Oereinoftet relened to asthe
'Commercement Date") . whichever is
lloter. The Devetoper also ostees ta
lcompensate the Attoftee/?uYer @
E ol
Rs.5.00y' (Five tupe?s ontY) Per sq.
Ithe oreo ol the lat pet nonth lor ont
ldeloy in handing over posseston ot the
Flot beyon.l the gtven ptom$ed perioa
I plus rh? gruce
penod ol6 months ana
I upto ofrer tener ol Possession o'
ocatol Dhrsical possession whichevet
I rs eorlier.
 HAIYANA NEAI ESTATI IECI]TATOIY AI]INOiITY
ffHARERA
S- eunuenll,l
ff.q.t. ffr! Ti hftc F+i ].ry,llrm
tPrgfio.27dfth?-omll.ffq
16. Not allowed

The promoter has proposed to hand

over the possession of the said flat
within a period of4 years from the date
of approval of building Plans
(r9.12.2014) or grant of environment
clearance, (22.01.2016) (hereinafter
referred to as the "Commencement
Date'), whichever is later and has
soughtfurtherextensioD of a period of 6
months [after the expiry ofthe said time
period of 4 year) but there is no
provisio. in relation to grace period in
Affordable Group HousinS Policy, 2013
As such in absence of any Provision
related to grace period, the said grace
period ot six months as sought by the
respondent promoter is disauowed in

17. Due date ofpossession 22.O1.2020

lNot€: - the due date of possession can

be calculaled by the 4 yea.s from
approval ofbullding plans (19 12 2014)
or from the date of environment
clearance [22.01.2016) whichever is
later.l

18. Total saleconside.ation Rs.20,28,500/-

(As perpayment plan page no.26 ofthe

complaint)

19. Total amou.t paid by the Rs.21,17 ,840 L

 REGUIATORY AUINORIIY
*HARERA
{l- cunuemvr Eftqrw A-{ir(I

no.7 ofthe complaint)

Occupahon certiflcate

The counsel for the respondent has filed a copv of ctrstomer statement
acknowledsins the receipt of amount of Rs.21,17,881/' and requests ior
reduction oi tu.5477l_ credited on account of early pavment discount and thus,
the netamount paid by the allottee comes to Rs 21,12,404/' Thecomplainant
is seeking refu;d of the deposited amount and is placing a copv of ihe pe
no*essim accounr shtemenl issued bv the respondent dated 0310'2021
ionfirming the totalre(eived amount as on drte comes lo Rs'21 40,022l_ rnd
requesB f;r retund of this amount alongwith interest as the project is not yet
complete and n€ither oC is obtained nor possession is ofered and seeking

The respondent is directed to retund the deposited amount :longwith

ores(rib;d rare otinterest r.e. 10 85% Per annum frcm the date oledch depoer
irll iL! realizalton withrn d period of90 days. No thrrd party righls in respefl of
unit ofthe complainatrt shallbe cr€ated bv the r€spondent tillrealization ofthe
amount paid by the comPlainant

Detailed order will follow. Matt€r stands disposedoff

yJ
-Zz-2
Viiay Kumar Golal

11_07.2024

M q# tu -o lffilu (nr@Mn md DTho6' u )0'6

^"tud-on&tukd