0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views4 pages

Homework

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views4 pages

Homework

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

MAT 603; Abstract Algebra: Homework set 1

Taffohouo Nwaffeu Yves Valdez

Problem 1 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20

Recquired to prove that a Ring without unity can be embedded in a ring without unity

black!10 Subproblem 1

Let (R, +, ·, 0) be a system satisfying all the requirements for a ring except the existence of a
multiplicative identity. Prove that there is a ring (R0 , +, ·, 0, 1) in which (R, +, ·, 0) is an ideal.
[Hint: On R0 = R × Z define addition and multiplication by (r, n) + (s, m) = (r + s, n + m) and
(r, n) · (s, m) = (rs + mr + ns, nm).]
To prove that there is a ring (R0 , +, ·, 0, 1) in which (R, +, ·, 0) is an ideal, we can use the Cartesian
product construction on the set R0 = R × Z, where Z represents the set of integers. We will define
addition and multiplication on R0 = R × Z as follows:
1. Addition: ∀ (r, n) and (s, m) ∈ R0 = R × Z, we define their sum as (r, n) + (s, m) = (r + s, n + m),
where the addition on the right-hand side of the equation is the addition of integers.
2. Multiplication: ∀ (r, n) and (s, m) ∈ R0 = R × Z, we define their product as (r, n) · (s, m) =
(rs + mr + ns, nm), where the multiplication on the right-hand side of the equation is the multiplication
of integers.
Now, let’s demonstrate that this construction indeed forms a ring (R0 , +, ·, 0, 1):
1. Closure under addition: - ∀ (r, n) and (s, m) ∈ R0 = R × Z, we have (r, n) + (s, m) = (r + s, n + m).
Since R is a ring, the addition of r and s is also an element of R, and the addition of n and m is an
element of Z. Therefore, (r + s, n + m) ∈ R × Z. Hence, the closure under addition is satisfied.
2. Associativity of addition: The associativity of addition in R × Z follows directly from the asso-
ciativity of addition in R and Z.
3. Identity element for addition: The element (0, 0) serves as the identity element for addition in
R × Z since (r, n) + (0, 0) = (r + 0, n + 0) = (r, n) ∀(r, n) ∈ R × Z.
4. Inverse elements for addition: - ∀ element (r, n) ∈ R × Z, the inverse element with respect to
addition is (−r, −n), since (r, n) + (−r, −n) = (r − r, n − n) = (0, 0).
5. Closure under multiplication: - ∀ (r, n) and (s, m) ∈ R × Z, we have (r, n) · (s, m) = (rs + mr +
ns, nm). Since R is a ring, the product rs + mr + ns is also an element of R, and the productnmis
an element of Z. Therefore, (rs + mr + ns, nm) is an element of R × Z. Hence, the closure under
multiplication is satisfied.
6. Distributivity: The left and right distributive properties hold in R×Z, derived from the distributive
properties in R and Z.
Next, we will define the additional elements 0 and 1 in R × Z to form the complete ring (R0 , +, ·, 0, 1):
- The element 0 is defined as (0, 0) ∈ R × Z. It serves as the additive identity in the ring (R0 , +, ·, 0, 1).
- The element 1 is defined as (1, 0) in R×Z. It serves as a multiplicative identity in the ring (R0 , +, ·, 0, 1).
Finally, we need to show that (R, +, ·, 0) forms an ideal in the ring (R0 , +, ·, 0, 1). To prove this, we need
to verify two conditions:
1. Closure of (R, +, ·, 0) under addition: ∀ (r, n) and (s, m) ∈ R × Z, we have (r, n) + (s, m) =
(r + s, n + m). Since R forms an ideal, the element r + s ∈ R, and the element n + m ∈ Z. Therefore,
(r + s, n + m) ∈ R × Z, which implies closure under addition.
2. Absorption property: ∀ (r, n) ∈ R × Z and (s, m)inR, we have (r, n) · (s, m) = (rs + mr + ns, nm).
Since the product rs + mr + nsis in R, and the productnmis in Z, the element (rs + mr + ns, nm)
is in R × Z. This shows the absorption property, ensuring that the ideal (R, +, ·, 0) is closed under
multiplication by elements of R.
Therefore, we have proven that there exists a ring (R0 , +, ·, 0, 1) in which (R, +, ·, 0) is an ideal, using
the Cartesian product construction on R × Z.

black!10 Subproblem 2

1
Show that any homomorphism defined from R −→ R0 is an isomorphism.

To deduce that any ring without unity can be embedded in a ring with unity by defining an isomorphic
map from R’ to R, we can utilize the construction discussed in the previous response.
Let (R, +, ·, 0) be a ring without a multiplicative identity, and let (R0 , +, ·, 0, 1) be the ring constructed
by extending R using the set R0 = R × Z with the operations defined as:
Addition: (r, n) + (s, m) = (r + s, n + m) ∀(r, n), (s, m) ∈ R0 . Multiplication: (r, n) · (s, m) =
(rs + mr + ns, nm) ∀ (r, n), (s, m) ∈ R0 .
We can show that there exists an isomorphism between R0 and a subring of R with a multiplicative
identity.
We will define the map φ : R0 longrightarrowR as φ(r, n) = r + (n − 1)r, ∀ (r, n) ∈ R0 .

Just like in the previous proof, we need to show that φ is an isomorphism:

1. Well-Defined: Since φ(r, n) = r + (n − 1)r ∀ (r, n) ∈ R0 , the mapping is well-defined.

2. Homomorphism: Let (r, n), (s, m) ∈ R0 , then we have:

φ((r, n) + (s, m)) = φ(r + s, n + m)


= (r + s) + ((n + m − 1)(r + s))
= r + (n − 1)r + s + (m − 1)s
= (r + (n − 1)r) + (s + (m − 1)s)
= φ(r, n) + φ(s, m)
φ((r, n) · (s, m)) = φ(rs + mr + ns, nm)
= (rs + mr + ns) + ((nm − 1)(rs + mr + ns))
= rs + mr + ns + (nm − 1)(rs + mr + ns)
= rs + mr + ns + nmr + mrs + nrs − rs − mr − ns
= nmr + mrs + nrs
= r(n − 1)m + r(m − 1)s + r(n − 1)s
= r(n − 1)m + r(m − 1)s + r(n − 1)s
= (r + (n − 1)r)(m + (s − 1)m) + (r + (n − 1)r)(s + (n − 1)s)
= φ(r, n) · φ(s, m)

Therefore, φ preserves addition and multiplication, making it a homomorphism.

3. Injectivity: If φ(r, n) = φ(r0 , n0 ) for some (r, n), (r0 , n0 ) ∈ R0 , then r + (n − 1)r = r0 + (n0 − 1)r0 . By
comparing the components, we obtain r = r0 and n = n0 .

4. Surjectivity: f orall r ∈ R, we can choose (r, 1) ∈ R0 . Then φ(r, 1) = r, which shows that φ is
surjective.

5. Preservation of the Zero Element: φ(0, 0) = 0, which implies that the zero element in R0 is
mapped to the zero element in R.

From the above properties, we conclude that φ is a bijective homomorphism, which means it is an
isomorphism.

Since R0 is isomorphic to R via the map φ, we can consider R0 as a subring of R where R now has a
multiplicative identity.

Hence, any ring without a multiplicative identity can be embedded in a larger ring where the larger ring
has a multiplicative identity, achieved by defining an isomorphic map from R0 to R.

Problem 2 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20

2
   
Z R Z 0
Let R = denote a ring and S = denote a non-empty subring of R. We must
0 Z 0 Z
determine whether S is an ideal of R or not.

black!10 Subproblem 1
We must check whetherS is a left ideal of R or not  
a1 0 b1 0
Suppose A = , where a1 , a2 ∈ Z and B = with b1 , b2 ∈ Z we notice that;
0 a2 0 b2
 
a1 − b1 0
A−B = ∈S
0 a2 − b2
 
c1 r
Let C = , where r ∈ R and c1 , c2 ∈ Z, thus
 0 c2    
c1 r a1 0 c1 a1 ra1
CA = = , where ra2 ∈ R and c1 a1 , c2 a2 ∈ Z
0 c2  0 a 2 0 c2 a2
Z R
Therefore CA ∈ =R
0 Z
Hence S cannot be a left-ideal of R

black!10 Subproblem 2
We must check whether S is a right ideal of R or not
   
a1 0 b1 0
Suppose A = , where a1 , a2 ∈ Z and B = with a1 , a2 ∈ Z we notice that;
0 a2 0 b2
A − B is ofcourse 
verified insubproblem1
 above
a1 0 c1 r a1 c1 a1 r
AC = = , where ra2 ∈ R and a1 c1 , a2 c2 ∈ Z
0 a2  0 c 2 0 a2 c2
Z R
Therefore AC ∈ =R
0 Z
Hence S cannot be a right-ideal of R

Problem 3 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20 black!20

Show that the set of endomorphisms End(G):=f |f : G −→ G, where f (x) = f (x) · f (y) where G is
additive abelian forms a ring

black!10 Subproblem 1
To show that the set of endomorphisms End(G) forms a ring, we need to verify that it satisfies the
properties of a ring: addition, multiplication, associativity, distributivity, and the presence of an additive
identity and additive inverses.
Let G be an additive abelian group. We want to show that the set of endomorphisms of G, denoted
End(G), forms a ring. For an endomorphism f : G → G, we define f (x+y) = f (x)+f (y) for all x, y ∈ G.

To prove that End(G) forms a ring, we need to establish the following properties:

1. Closure under Addition: For f, g ∈ End(G), we define (f + g)(x) = f (x) + g(x) for all x ∈ G.
Then (f + g) is also an endomorphism since (f + g)(x + y) = (f + g)(x) + (f + g)(y) for all x, y ∈ G.
That is;
item (f + g)(x + y) = (f )(x + y) + (g)(x + y) addition of functions
= f (x) + f (y) + g(x) + g(y) homomorphism of both
= f (x) + g(x) + f (y) + g(y) End(G) is abelian
= (f + g)(x) + (f + g)(y) addition of functions

2. Closure under Multiplication: For f, g ∈ End(G), we define (f ◦ g)(x) = f (g(x)) for all x ∈ G.

3
Then (f ◦ g) is also an endomorphism since (f ◦ g)(x + y) = (f ◦ g)(x) + (f ◦ g)(y) for all x, y ∈ G.
item (f ◦ g)(x + y) = (f )(g(x + y)) composition of functions
= f (g(x) + g(y)) homomorphism of g
= f (g(x)) + f (g(y)) homomorphism of f
= (f ◦ g)(x) + (f ◦ g)(y)
3. Associativity: Addition and multiplication in End(G) are associative since they inherit this
property from the underlying group G.
4. Distributivity: For f, g, h ∈ End(G), we have (f + g) ◦ h = f ◦ h + g ◦ h, thus fulfilling the
distributive property.

5. Additive Identity: The zero endomorphism, denoted as 0, serves as the additive identity since
(f + 0)(x) = f (x) for all f ∈ End(G) and x ∈ G.
6. Additive Inverses: For any endomorphism f ∈ End(G), its additive inverse −f is defined as
−f (x) = −f (x) for all x ∈ G, thus satisfying the property of additive inverses.

With all these properties established, we conclude that the set of endomorphisms of an additive abelian
group G, denoted End(G), forms a ring.

Based on the above arguments, we can conclude that the set of endomorphisms End(G) of an additive
abelian group G forms a ring, as it satisfies the properties of a ring: addition, multiplication, associativity,
distributivity, presence of an additive identity, and additive inverses.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy