08 - Soil Fabric and Structure
08 - Soil Fabric and Structure
While the engineering importance of fabric has been recognized for many decades,
the difficulty of measurement and of defining meaningful measures has put fabric
almost in a category of afterthought, and it is only recently that marked changes
in soil behavior have been observed that have brought fabric to a microscopic
center-stage.
Such studies often reveal a preferred horizontal orientations of pores and flat or
elongated grains. More recent studies indicate vertical stacking of grains on top of
one another, which is in contrast to the widely hypothesized close-packing
arrangements that are analogous to crystal structure.
Clay fabric is directly observed under a scanning electron microscope, but the
requisite vacuum dehydrates the clay and can change its structure. Freeze-drying
in which a sample is first frozen and then evacuated for a long period of time can
help to preserve the structure.
Soil mixtures containing both granular and cohesive components combine both
elements of fabric, but normally one will dominate. The transition occurs at about
25 to 30 percent clay, which is sufficient to separate and prevent contact between
larger soil particles.
Figure 8.1
Single-grain soil
structures that
influence
engineering
properties.
Flat or elongated particles deposited from flowing water often become arranged
like shingles in what geologists refer to as ‘‘imbricate structure.’’ This is illustrated
in Fig. 8.1(c), where the arrow indicates the direction of fluid flow. Horizontal
bedding as in Fig. 8.1(d) is common as a result of changing sedimentation
conditions and can create horizontal zones that are stronger and weaker than the
average.
Stacking is illustrated in Fig. 8.1(g) and has been confirmed by other studies, but
remained a bit of a mystery until it was found to be related to sedimentation.
Figure 8.2 shows a stacking structure resulting from dropping two different sizes of
particles at random positions along a line as those landing on top of one another
tend to stack instead of sliding off. The same tendency was confirmed with
photoelastic studies of plastic disks (Mitchell, 1993; Santamarina et al., 2001).
Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.digitalengineeringlibrary.com)
Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website.
Soil Fabric and Structure
Figure 8.2
Simulated random
sedimentation of
spherical particles
tends to create
a stacking
arrangement and
vertical orientation
of voids, resulting
in low lateral stress
and high horizontal
compressibility.
Figure 8.3
(a) Clay bridges
add cohesive
strength to
granular soils,
but (b) grain
separation occurs
at about 25 to
30 percent clay.
The molding sand studies showed that with an increasing clay content there
becomes a point where the coarser grains no longer are in contact, and the soil
behaves more like clay than a sand or silt. That percentage varies depending on
the gradation of the coarse material, but usually is about 25–30 percent clay as the
sand changes from granular to cohesive. The separation of sand particles is
illustrated in Fig. 8.3(b).
Loess Studies
Loess is almost entirely silt and clay, with the clay content gradually increasing
with distance from a source. Loess containing less than 16 percent 0.002 mm clay
has over a 90 percent probability of being collapsible, which is a phenomenon that
is limited to low-density granular soils, but if the clay content exceeds 32 percent
the soil is very unlikely to be collapsible but behaves as a moderately expansive
clay (Handy, 1973).
Figure 8.4
Two-dimensional
representations of
flocculated and
dispersed clay
structures.
Figure 8.5
Simulated random
settlement of clay
flocs creating a
‘‘honeycomb’’
structure.
Even though clay particles are too small to be individually resolved in a light
microscope, a parallel orientation can be inferred from viewing vertically oriented
thin sections in a polarizing microscope. Clay mineral grains become dark when
their optical axes are aligned with the polarizing axes of the microscope, so the
degree of preferred orientation can be obtained by measuring light transmission as
the stage is rotated.
Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.digitalengineeringlibrary.com)
Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website.
Soil Fabric and Structure
Figure 8.6
A blocky ‘‘B
horizon’’ structure
that is transitional
to a columnar
structure with
depth. Soil above
the dotted line is
fill. The soil color
is a mottled gray
and brown color
indicating wet
conditions prior to
exposure by
erosion and
sliding.
‘‘clay skins,’’ technically called ‘‘argillans,’’ that cover surfaces of the individual
blocks or peds.
8.4 SENSITIVITY
Thixotropic behavior explains the ‘‘setup factor’’ that occurs from pile driving in
cohesive soils, such that if driving stops for a few hours penetration cannot easily
be restarted. After a day or so the pile-bearing capacity commonly is increased by
a factor of two, so load tests normally are conducted after sufficient time has
elapsed to allow thixotropic setting.
Muddy streams and rivers usually supply sufficient agitation to keep clays
dispersed. They then can slowly settle out in quiet water such as in a lake. This is
in contrast to settling in salt water, where the clay is flocculated and quickly
settles. Deltas in freshwater lakes therefore are sandy while those in sea water
contain more clay.
Sensitivity also can be quickly measured in the field with the vane shear test.
In this test, two vertical blades arranged to make an X are pushed into soil and
twisted. The torque to cause failure is measured, and twisting continued to obtain
a residual shear strength and strength ratio.
Dispersed clays can remain dispersed in a laboratory flask for months or years
without settling out, but opposing forces of gravity and Brownian motion
eventually cause the suspension to develop a density gradient. There normally
is no discrete X-ray diffraction spacing because the clay particles are randomly
separated and too thin.
Naturally dispersed clay can occur in alkaline playa lakes where the clay mineral is
sodium-saturated smectite. This is the most expansive of naturally occurring
expansive clays. Drying draws particles together and results in shrinkage cracks,
and wetting re-expands the clay.
Quick clay is clay that has been deposited and flocculated in salt water, usually in
estuaries, and then leached of excess salt so that the flocculated structure becomes
Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.digitalengineeringlibrary.com)
Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website.
Soil Fabric and Structure
Figure 8.7
Mudslide in quick
clay annexing the
town of Nicolet,
Quebec. (National
Research Council,
Canada.)
A quick clay can be stable for decades and then, when sharply vibrated, as by an
explosion, ground tremor, or when a truck goes by, can suddenly become a
rapidly flowing liquid mudslide, as shown in Fig. 8.7.
Another test for dispersive clay uses the hydrometer test described in the
preceding chapter both with and without a chemical dispersing agent. The soil
Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.digitalengineeringlibrary.com)
Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website.
Soil Fabric and Structure
8.5.1 Overview
Macro means large, and mega implies larger by a factor of a million or so. For the
present purpose macrostructure may be defined as soil or rock structure that is
large but far enough apart that it may be missed by soil borings. Pockets of clay
such as shown in Fig. 3.3 come under this definition of macrostructure, whereas
the sink in Fig. 3.4 may be considered megastructure. Megastructure such as a
cavern or landslide should not be missed by borings so long as they are correctly
interpreted.
Figure 8.8
Teton Dam,
Idaho, 5 June
1976, the highest
dam in the world
to fail, so far.
(Photo ß Mrs.
Eunice Olson,
used with
permission.)
Some common descriptive terms for soil macrostructure are listed in Table 8.2.
The engineer will be familiar with these terms and know their significance.
Problems
8.1. Whereas the soil fabrics shown in Figs. 8.1 and 8.3(a) show grains touching,
in an actual cross-section obtained by sawing across a soil specimen only a
few will touch. Explain.
8.2. What is the meaning and significance of thixotropy?
8.3. Give an example of a mechanically dispersed clay and a chemically
dispersed clay.
8.4. What is the X-ray diffraction spacing of a sodium smectite dispersed in
water? Of a flocculated calcium smectite in water?
8.5. What is the difference between a quick clay and a dispersive clay? Which
might be most likely to influence a landslide? The stability of a levee? Of a
retaining wall where pressure is lowered as soil is partly restrained as a
result of its internal shearing resistance?
8.6. Explain the geography of quick clay, taking into account that sea level rose
over 100 m from melting of continental glaciers.
8.7. Explain why the last of a convoy of military vehicles passing over wet soil is
more likely to get stuck than the first vehicles in the convoy.
8.8. What is meant by overcompaction?
8.9. Muddy water is observed flowing from a leak on the downstream face of a
large earth dam. Consider and discuss consequences from the following
options:
(a) Run for high ground.
(b) Try to seal the leak by boring and grouting.
(c) Draw down the reservoir.
(d) Dump soil into the cavity eroded by the leak.
(e) Dump coarse granular material into the cavity.
(f) Inform the authorities and warn of the possible consequences.
(g) Have a beer to calm the nerves while you wait and see what happens.
(h) Write a letter to the newspaper pointing out that operations and
maintenance of the dam are not your responsibility.
8.10. Assign grades A through F to the macrostructures in Table 8.2 in
accordance with their potential impact on engineering uses.
Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.digitalengineeringlibrary.com)
Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website.
Soil Fabric and Structure
References
Handy, R. L. (1973). ‘‘Collapsible Loess in Iowa.’’ Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 37(2),
281–284.
Handy, R. L. (1994). ‘‘A Stress Path Model for Collapsible Loess.’’ In Derbyshire, ed.,
Genesis and Properties of Cohesive Soils. NATO ASI Series, Kluwer, Dordrecht,
The Netherlands, pp. 33–49.
Mitchell, J. K. (1993). Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons,
New York.
Oda, M. (1978). ‘‘Significance of Fabric in Granular Mechanics.’’ Proc. U.S.-Japan
Seminar on Continuum Mechanics and Statistical Approaches in the Mechanics of
Granular Materials, pp. 7–26.
Santamarina, J. C., Klein, K. A., and Fam, M. A. (2001). Soils and Waves. John Wiley &
Sons, New York.
Sherard, J. L., Dunnigan, L. P., Decker, R. S., and Steele, E. F. (1976). ‘‘Pinhole Test for
Identifying Dispersive Soils.’’ ASCE J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 102(GT1), 69–85.
Sherard, J. L. (1987). ‘‘Lessons from the Teton Dam Failure.’’ Enging. Geol. 24, 239–256.
Also in G. A. Leonards, ed., Dam Failures, Elsevier, Amsterdam.