0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views7 pages

Mix Design AC20.-2

mix design

Uploaded by

emmanuel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views7 pages

Mix Design AC20.-2

mix design

Uploaded by

emmanuel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

JOB MIX FOR AC 20

CONSULTANT CLIENT CONTRACTOR SUPPLIER


Stirling Civil Engineering Ltd

JOADAH MASAKA MUNICIPALITY TRAMINCO

Rehabilitation of Edward Avenue (0.630km), Buddu Street (0.645km), Jethabai Street (0.320km) and Ssese Street Drainage (0.275km )

Sample description AC 20 ASPHALT MIX DESIGN

DATE 26-9-2017

PROPOTIONAL MIXES
AGRREGATE SIZE PERCENTAGES IN THE MIX
BEFORE BITUMEN

BUTIMEN - 4.5

14/20 30.0 28.7

10/14 10.0 9.6

6/10 10.0 9.6

0/6 45.0 43.0

FILLER 5.0 4.8

100 100.0
Remarks:

For the Consultant For the Contractor For the Supplier

Lab. Technician Lab. Technician Lab. Technician

Materials Engineer Materials Engineer Materials Engineer


CONSULTANT CLIENT CONTRACTOR SUPPLIER
Stirling Civil Engineering Ltd

MASAKA
JOADAH
MUNICIPALITY
TRAMINCO
Stirling
Rehabilitation of Edward Avenue (0.630km), Buddu Street (0.645km), Jethabai Street (0.320km) and Ssese Street Drainage (0.275km)

A/C 20 ASPHALT MIX DESIGN


SUMMARY OF A/C 20 JOB MIX TEST RESULTS

BITUMEN CONTENT 4.5

MARSHALL MIX TEST RESULTS


AGGREGATE TESTS ACHIEVED SPECIFIED AFTER MIX ACHIEVED SPECIFIED

Coating and Stripping >95 >95% MARSHALL FLOW 3.0 2—4

Sodium Soundness 0.1 <12% MARSHALL STABILITY 75BLOWS 13.6 9-18

Water Absorption 0.5 < 2% MARSHALL AIR VOIDS 75BLOWS 4.6 3—5

TFV Dry 239.6 >110kN VOIDS IN MINERAL AGGREGATES 14.1 >14%

TFV Soaked Wet/Dry ratio 96% >75% VOIDS FILLED WITH BINDER 67.4 65—75%

INDIRECT TENSILE STRENGTH @


Flakness Index 19.5795 < 25% 25C 823 >800kpa

INDIRECT TENSILE WET


Plastic Index N/P < 4% STRENGTH 706 >80% of dry

AIR VOIDS AT REFUSAL DENSITY


(PRD) 3.2 >3%

BITUMEN CONTENT AFTER


LAA 18.3 EXTRACTION 4.5 ±0.3

RATIO
ACV 17.3 STABILITY/FLOW 4.7 >2.5

AIV 16.7

WITH OUT
TEST ON MATERIAL ACHIEVED SPECFIED WITH BITUMEN %
BITUMEN %

BITUMEN TESTS 14/20 30 28.7

PENETRATION 64 60-70 10/14 10 9.6

SOFTENING POINT 50.1 49-56 6/10 10 9.6

SPECIFIC GRAVITY 1.03 1.01-1.06 0/6 45 43.0

FILLER 5 4.8

BITUMEN CONTENT 4.8

_________________________ ______________________________ _________________________________


For the Consultant For the Contractor For the Supplier
CONSULTANT CLIENT CONTRACTOR SUPPLIER

Stirling Civil Engineering Ltd

MASAKA
JOADAH
MUNICIPALITY
TRAMINCO
Stirling
PROJECT
Rehabilitation of Edward Avenue (0.630km), Buddu Street (0.645km), Jethabai Street (0.320km) and Ssese Street Drainage (0.275km)
JOB ASPHALT MIX DESIGN

LOCATION MUKONO LAB JOB MIX GRADING COMPOSITION

SUPPLIER HOTBIN

DATE 26/9/2017

MATERIAL AC 20 INDIVIDUAL GRADATION


Theoretical
14/20MM 10/14MM 6/10MM 0/6MM FILLER actual
TARGET SPEC
30.0 10.0 10.0 45.0 5.0 100.0 GRADING
28 100.0 30.0 100.0 10.0 100.0 10.0 100.0 45.0 100.0 5.0 100 100 100
20 97.3 29.2 100.0 10.0 100.0 10.0 100.0 45.0 100.0 5.0 99 90 80—100
14 20.3 6.1 90.0 9.0 100.0 10.0 100.0 45.0 100.0 5.0 75 70 60—80
10 0.7 0.2 24.5 2.5 59.1 5.9 100.0 45.0 100.0 5.0 59 60 50—70
5 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.0 2.6 0.3 85.6 38.5 100.0 5.0 44 46 36—56
2.36 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.0 2.2 0.2 61.3 27.6 100.0 5.0 33 36 28—44
1.18 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.0 2.0 0.2 43.6 19.6 99.8 5.0 25 27 20—34
0.6 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.0 1.7 0.2 24.9 11.2 97.5 4.9 16 21 15—27
0.3 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.0 1.3 0.1 13.7 6.1 88.2 4.4 11 15 10—20
0.15 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.0 1.0 0.1 7.2 3.2 69.3 3.5 7 9 5—13
0.075 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.1 3.8 1.7 46.6 2.3 4 4 2—6

100 COMBINED GRADATION CURVE

90

80

70

60

50
PERCENTAGE PASSING

40

30

20

10

0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100

SIEVE SIZES (mm)

For the Consultant For the Cotractor For the Supplier

_____________________ Lab. _________________________ ________________ Lab. _________________________ ____________________ ___________________


Technician Materials Engineer Technician Materials Engineer _ Lab. Technician Materials Engineer
CONSULTANT CLIENT CONTRACTOR SUPPLIER
STIRLING

JOADAH MASAKA MUNICIPALITY TRAMINCO Stirling


PROJECT: Rehabilitation of Edward Avenue (0.630km), Buddu Street (0.645km), Jethabai Street (0.320km) and Ssese Street Drainage (0.275km)
Field Ref. No.:
Location MUKONO LABORATORY Sampling date: 26/Sep/17

Testing Date 26/Sep/17


Sample
Description: AC 20 JOB MIX
Techician lab team

Particle Size Distribution

SAMPLE 1 SAMPLE 2

Sieve (mm) Mass Retained % Retained % passings Sieve (mm) Mass Retained % Retained % passings
28 0.0 0.00 100 28 0 0.0 100
20 7.3 0.46 100 20 2.1 0.2 100
14 300.4 19.12 80 14 239.7 21.4 78
10 316.6 20.16 60 10 236.8 21.2 57
5 262.4 16.70 44 5 190.9 17.1 40
2.36 187.1 11.91 32 2.36 114.4 10.2 30
1.18 120.1 7.65 24 1.18 84.4 7.5 22
0.60 99.7 6.35 18 0.60 66.2 5.9 16
0.300 92.4 5.88 12 0.300 57.8 5.2 11
0.150 59.4 3.78 8 0.150 40.8 3.6 8
0.075 62.1 3.95 4 0.075 35 3.1 5
Total filler 63.2999999999998 Total filler 50.5
Bot. Pan 7.7 Bot. Pan 4.30
Extr. filler 55.5999999999998 Extr. filler 46.2

Sum of extracted
Sum of extracted 1571 1118.6
Aggregates
Aggregates

100 100

90 90

80 80

70
70

60
% Passing
% Passing

60

50
50

40
40

30
30

20
20

10
10

0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 0
Diameter(mm)
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Diameter(mm)

Remaks:

FOR CONSULTANT FOR CONTRACTOR FOR SUPPLIER

_______________ __________________ _______________ __________________ _______________ __________________

Lab Technician Materials Engineer Lab Technician Materials Engineer Lab Technician Materials Engineer
Consultant: Client:
Contractor: Supplier:
STIRLING

JOADAH MASAKA MUNICIPALITY TRAMINCO Stirling

Rehabilitation of Edward Avenue (0.630km), Buddu Street (0.645km), Jethabai Street (0.320km) and Ssese Street Drainage (0.275km)
Field Ref. No.: Lab. no. Chainage sample 1: PLANT TRIAL MIX Sampling date: 27-Sep-17 Test Type Done by Test Type Done by
Sample grade: AC 20 Compaction: 75 blows Chainage sample 2: Testing date: 27-Sep-17 B.R.D lab team B.C/Grad. lab team
Sample Description: PARAMETERS AT OPTIMUM BITUMEN CONTENT(ASPHALT PLANT PRODUCTION) T.M.R.D. lab team Stab. & Flow lab team

ASTM D2726 - Standard Method for Bulk Specific Gravity and Density of Non-Absorptive ASTM D6927Standard Method for Marshall Stability and Flow
Compacted Bituminous Mixtures. ASTM D 2172- Standard Test Method for Quantitative Extraction of
Sg of water 0.9952 Stability (KN) Bitumen from Asphalt Mixtures
Flow Ratio
Marshall Mass in Mass in Saturated % % Av. Hgt Corr. (mm) (Stab./Flow) Mass (g)
Marshall Heights (mm) Measured Adjusted Sample 1 Sample 2
specim. air Water surface Bulk S.G Unit Wt. % VMA VFB (mm) Factor
Dry in air (Gmb) (Kg/m3) Air Voids
1 1193.0 698.50 1197.00 2.393 2.382 3.9 13.3 70.3 64.4 64.1 64.7 64.4 0.98 15.9 15.63 2.77 5.642 Bowl 234.2 353.1
2 1190.5 690.00 1195.50 2.355 2.344 5.5 14.7 62.7 64.2 64.5 64.3 64.3 0.98 12.4 12.14 2.79 4.352 Bowl + Asphalt 1875.5 1523.9

3 1183 688.50 1188.00 2.368 2.357 4.9 14.2 65.2 64.1 65.3 64.3 64.6 0.97 20.7 20.07 3.11 6.453 Asphalt 1641.3 1170.8

4 1187.5 692.50 1193.50 2.370 2.359 4.9 14.1 65.5 63.3 64.4 64.1 63.9 0.99 11.4 11.26 1.65 6.824

5 1196 697.50 1199.50 2.382 2.371 4.4 13.7 68.0 64.6 64.4 64.2 64.4 0.98 12.6 12.33 3.60 3.426

6 1184 692.00 1191.50 2.370 2.359 4.9 14.1 65.6 63.5 63.4 64.4 63.8 0.99 12.4 12.27 2.33 5.265

7 1183 694.00 1193.00 2.371 2.359 4.8 14.1 65.6 66.6 66.4 66.6 66.5 0.93 15.4 14.29 2.68 5.333

8 1191.5 698.50 1201.00 2.371 2.360 4.8 14.1 65.7 66.3 66.1 66.1 66.2 0.94 13.6 12.74 2.25 5.662 Filter paper before extraction 28.1 27.7

Average Sample 1 2.373 2.3613 4.8 14.0 66.1 Average Sample 1 64.8 1.0 14.3 13.8 2.6 5.4 Filter paper + Filler After extracti 31.0 30.6

2.9 2.9
- - - - - - Recovered Filler
Oven dry extracted Mtl (dry) 1567.9 1115.7
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Oven dry extr. mtl + filler 1570.8 1118.6


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bitumen 70.5 52.2
Average Sample 2 - - - - - Average Sample 2 - - - - - - % of Bitumen 4.3 4.5

Average Sample 1 & 2 2.373 2 4.8 14.0 66.1 64.8 1.0 14.3 13.8 2.6 5.4 Av. % of Bitumen 4.4
Average Sample 1 & 2
ASTM D2041- Standard Test Method for Theoretical Maximum Specific gravity and Density of Bituminous Smp1 JMF
Mixtures Smp2 Mass Av. Mass % Av. % Av.
Sieve (mm) Mass
retained retained Retained passing
SAMPLE 1 SAMPLE 2 retained Lower Upper
100
28 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 100 100
(Pycnometer with Water) (Pycnometer with Water)
20 7.3 2.1 4.7 0.3 100 80 100 90

Temperature of water (Oc) 25oC Temperature of water (Oc) 25oC 14 300.4 239.7 270.0 20.1 80 60 80
80
in pycnometer in water bath in pycnometer in water bath 10 316.6 236.8 276.7 20.6 59 50 70
Test No- 1 2 Test No- 1 2 5 262.4 190.9 226.6 16.9 42 36 56
70
Asphalt 1352.2 Asphalt 1317.5 - 2.36 187.1 114.4 150.8 11.2 31 28 44

% Passing
60
Pycn. + Water Pycn. + Water 1.18 120.1 84.4 102.3 7.6 23 20 34
7360 7360 -
Pycnometer + Asph. Pycnometer + Asph. +
0.600 99.7 66.2 83.0 6.2 17 15 27 50
+ Water 8166.8 Water 8146.2 -
Volume of asphalt Volume of asphalt 0.300 92.4 57.8 75.1 5.6 12 10 20
545.4 531.3 - 40

Gmm 2.479 Gmm 2.480 - 0.150 59.4 40.8 50.1 3.7 8 5 13


30
0.075 62.1 35.0 48.6 3.6 4 2 6
Av. Gmm 2.479 2.480
2.480 Total filler 63.3 50.5 56.9
Av. Gmm (Kg/m3) Sample 1& 2 20

Comment: Bot. Pan 7.7 4.30 6.0


10
Extr. filler 55.6 46.2 50.9
Sum of
1570.8 1118.6 1344.7
extr. Agg 0
Materials Engineer: Materials Engineer: Materials Engineer: 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Diameter(mm)
For Consultant For Contractor For Supplier
CONSULTANT CLIENT CONTRACTOR SUPPLIER

STIRLING

JOADAH MASAKA MUNICIPALITY TRAMINCO


Stirling

PROJECT
Rehabilitation of Edward Avenue (0.630km), Buddu Street (0.645km), Jethabai Street (0.320km)
and Ssese Street Drainage (0.275km)
PERCENTAGE REFUSAL DENSITY TEST (BS 594)
4.4
BITUMINOUS MIXTURE SAMPLED ON: 29/09/2017 sg of water 0.9952 GMM 2.480 Bit.content,%

THICKNESS Compacted material parameters

Weight of
SAMPLE NO. Weight of Core in
Av. Weight of Core in GMM (maximum
HEIGHT 1 HEIGHT 3 Core in Air (g) SSD Volume of Core Bulk Density VIM, AIR VOIDS (%) =100*(F-E)/F
HEIGHT 2 (mm) Thickness Water (g) theoretical density)
(mm) (mm) A condition (cc) D=(C-B) (g/cm3) E=(A/D) spec min 3.0% G
(mm) B (g/cm3) F
(g)
C

LOCATION :

1 51.3 52.2 53.4 52.3 2170.0 1280.0 2176.0 896.0 2.410 2.480 2.8
2 52.2 54.3 54.3 53.6 2200.5 1297.5 2209.0 911.5 2.403 2.480 3.1
3 54.1 54.2 55.2 54.5 2176.0 1291.0 2192.5 901.5 2.402 2.480 3.1
4 53.6 53.1 53.3 53.3 2200.0 1296.5 2215.5 919.0 2.382 2.480 3.9
5 54.3 54.3 54.4 54.3 2191.5 1295.5 2208.0 912.5 2.390 2.480 3.6
6 54.1 53.4 53.2 53.6 2190.5 1297.5 2201.5 904.0 2.411 2.480 2.7

3.0

Remarks:

FOR CONSULTANT FOR CONTRACTOR FOR SUPPLIER

_______________ __________________ _______________ __________________ _______________ __________________

Lab Technician Materials Engineer Lab Technician Materials Engineer Lab Technician Materials Engineer
CONSULTANT CLIENT CONTRACTOR SUPPLIER

STIRLING

JOADAH MASAKA MUNICIPALITY TRAMINCO (U)

PROJECT Rehabilitation of Edward Avenue (0.630km), Buddu Street (0.645km), Jethabai Street (0.320km) and Ssese Street Drainage (0.275km)
INDIRECT TENSILE STRENGTH
BITUMINOUS MIXTURE TESTED ON: 30/09/2017 102 GMM 2.480 Bit.content,% 4.4 Sg water 0.9952

THICKNESS Compacted material parameters

SAMPLE NO. Weight of Core in GMM (maximum


Weight of Core in Weight of Core in SATURATED VOLUME OF DEGREE OF VIM, AIR VOIDS (%)
HEIGHT 1 HEIGHT 2 Av. Thickness SSD condition Volume of Core Bulk Density theoretical VOLUME OF AIR
HEIGHT 3 (mm) Air (g) Water (g) SPECIMEN WATER SATURATION =100*(F-E)/F spec min 7.0%
(mm) (mm) (mm) (g) (cc) D=(C-B) (g/cm3) E=(A/D) density) (g/cm3) H=(G/100)*D
A B I J=I-A K=(J/H)*100 G=((F-E)/F)*100
C F

LOCATION :

WET

1 66.4 67.5 68.1 67.3 1184.0 682.0 1195.5 513.5 2.295 2.480 38.281 1212.0 28.000 73.143 7.5
3 69.1 68.4 69.1 68.9 1193.5 691.0 1208.0 517.0 2.297 2.480 37.968 1221.5 28.000 73.746 7.3
5 69.3 69.2 69.4 69.3 1182.0 686.5 1198.5 512.0 2.298 2.480 37.584 1211.5 29.500 78.491 7.3
7 68.3 67.2 67.2 67.6 1189.0 689.5 1201.5 512.0 2.311 2.480 34.774 1216.5 27.500 79.082 6.8
DRY

2 68.3 67.3 68.5 68.0 1194.0 691.5 1207.5 516.0 2.303 2.480 36.767 7.1
6 68.3 69.1 69.1 68.8 1187.0 684.0 1199.5 515.5 2.292 2.480 39.077 7.6
4 68.5 68.3 69.1 68.6 1188.5 686.5 1199.0 512.5 2.308 2.480 35.683 6.9
8 66.1 65.4 65.1 65.5 1183.5 679.5 1189.0 509.5 2.312 2.480 34.482 6.8

INDIRECT TENSILE STRENGTH

DRY WET
WET/DRY
GAUGE LOAD RING SINGLE TENSILE AVERAGE TENSILE SINGLE TENSILE
MAXIMUM LOAD,P GAUGE READING LOAD RING FACTOR MAXIMUM LOAD,P AVERAGE TENSILE STRENGTH,St
READING FACTOR STRENGTH,St STRENGTH,St STRENGTH,St
SPECIMEN No. SPECIMEN No.

div kn/div kn spec min 800 kPa div kn/div kn kPa kPa spec 80%
2 391 0.024 9.5 867.7 1 340 0.024 8.2 762.4

St =2P/∏tD where
6 341 0.024 8.3 748.0 3 308 0.024 7.5 675.2 P= maximum
load(N) t=specimen
thickness(mm)

4 388 0.024 9.4 853.5


823.1
5 319 0.024 7.7 695.0
706 D=specimen
diameter(mm)
86

0.024 9.3 887.0 7 310 0.024 7.5 692.7


8 385

Lab Technician Materials Engineer Lab Technician Materials Engineer Lab Technician Materials Engineer

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy