Ch2 Understanding How Economic Effects Business
Ch2 Understanding How Economic Effects Business
LEARNING GOAL 1 *
What Is Economics?
LEARNING GOAL 2
Imagine a world where kings and other rich landowners had most of the
Wealth, and the majority of the people were peasants. The peasants had many
Children, and it may have seemed a natural conclusion that if things went on
As usual there would soon be too many people and not enough food and other
Resources. Economist Thomas Malthus made this argument in the late 1700s.
The Foundations of Capitalism
1. The right to own private property. This is the most fundamental of all
Rights under capitalism. Private ownership means that individuals can
Buy, sell, and use land, buildings, machinery, inventions, and other
Forms of property. They can also pass the property on to their children.
Would farmers work as hard if they didn’t own the land and couldn’t
Keep the profits from what they earned?
2. The right to own a business and keep all that business’s profits. Recall
From Chapter 1 that profits equal revenues minus expenses (salaries,
Materials, taxes). Profits act as important incentives for
Business owners.
Perfect competition exists when there are many sellers in a market and
None is large enough to dictate the price of a product.
Demand refers to the quantity of Products that People are willing to buy at different
pricesbusinesspeopletime.
• What is capitalism?
The four basic rights under capitalism are (1) the right to private property,
(2) the right to own a business and to keep all of that business’s profits after
Taxes, (3) the right to freedom of competition, and (4) the right to freedom
Of choice. President Franklin D. Roosevelt felt that other economic free—
Doms were also important: the right to freedom of speech and expression,
The right to worship in your way, and freedom from want and fear.
• How does the free market work?
The free market is one in which buyers and sellers negotiating prices for
Goods and services influence the decisions about what gets produced and
In what quantities. Buyers’ decisions in the marketplace tell sellers what
To produce and in what quantity. When buyers demand more goods, the
Price goes up, signalling suppliers to produce more. The higher the price,
The more goods and services suppliers are willing to produce. Price is the
Mechanism that allows free markets to work.
LEARNING goal 3 *
UNDERSTANDING SOCIALISM
Socialism is an economic system based on the premise that some, if not most,
basic businesses (e.g, steel mills, coal mines, and utilities) should be owned
by the government so that profits can be more evenly distributed among the
people.
• Socialism
also work fewer hours, with longer vacations. The major disadvantage of
socialism is that it lowers the incentive to start a business or to work hard.
Socialist economies tend to have a higher unemployment rate and a slower
growth rate than capitalist economies.
Socialism may create more equality than capitalism, but it takes away some per people’s
government-government example, tax rates in some nations once
reached 83 and per cent.!7 Today, doctors, lawyers, business owners, and others
who earn a lot of money pay very high tax rates.
UNDERSTANDING COMMUNISM
LEARNING goal 5
Gross domestic product (GDP) is the total value of final goods and services
produced in a country in a given year. The unemployment rate refers to the
percentage of civilians at least 16 years old who are unemployed and tried
to find a job within the most recent four weeks. The consumer price index
(CPI) measures changes in the prices of about 400 goods and services that
consumers buy.
LEARNING goal 6
Contrast fiscal policy and monetary policy, and explain how each affects
the economy.
Fiscal policy refers to the federal government's efforts to keep the economy
stable by increasing or decreasing taxes or government spending.
Productivity in the United States
An increase in productivity means a worker can produce more
goods and services than before in the same time period, us-
ally thanks to machinery or other equipment. Productivity in the
United States has risen because computers and other technol.
fogy have made production faster and easier: The higher produced-
tidily, the lower the costs of producing goods and services, and
the lower prices can be. Therefore, businesspeople are eager to
increase productivity. Remember, however, that high productiv.
its can lead to high unemployment.
1. I understand the importance of competition in both private and public sectors. It plays
a crucial role in driving efficiency, fostering innovation, and ultimately leading to
better outcomes. While private companies strive for market dominance and profits,
public organizations compete for funding and public support. It's important to
recognize the differences in goals and constraints between the two sectors. Finding the
right balance is key to effectively leveraging competition in both areas, ensuring that
it contributes positively to the overall welfare of stakeholders.
2. There are several public functions that could potentially benefit from increased
competition, including competition from private firms in some cases. Healthcare is
one such area, where introducing more competition between public and private
providers, as well as between different private insurance plans, could spur innovation,
improve service quality, and provide more consumer choice. Similarly, in the field of
education, while primary/secondary education is often publicly provided, there may
be opportunities to introduce competition through charter schools, voucher programs,
or public-private partnerships, incentivizing public schools to improve and giving
families more schooling options. Additionally, there may be scope for private firms to
compete for contracts in the infrastructure sector, traditionally dominated by public
monopolies, such as roads, bridges, and utilities. Social services, including welfare
and job training programs, are often government-run, but contracting some of these
services out to private and non-profit providers could foster competition and
potentially lead to better outcomes. Moreover, in public transit, private companies
could potentially compete to provide bus, rail, or ride-sharing services, improving
efficiency and responsiveness. It’s crucial to find the right balance and scope for
competition based on the specific public service, whether it’s a fully competitive
market, a hybrid public-private model, or regulated competition. The goal should be
to harness the benefits of competition while ensuring universal access, equity, and the
provision of public goods. Careful analysis, experimentation, and stakeholder
engagement would be required to determine where increased competition could be
most beneficial for public services. Nonetheless, the potential rewards in terms of
innovation, efficiency, and responsiveness to citizen needs make it a worthwhile area
to explore further.
A. The issue at hand is complex, with valid arguments on both sides. To find a middle
ground, it is suggested to recognize the contributions of both the private and nonprofit
sectors. Businesses provide employment, generate wealth, and fund social initiatives,
while nonprofit organizations play a crucial role in addressing neglected issues.
Emphasizing complementarity and collaboration is essential, as both sectors can
partner to achieve greater societal impact. Encouraging social entrepreneurship and
hybrid models, as well as facilitating cross-sector dialogue and partnerships, can
further this collaboration. Additionally, government support is crucial in creating an
enabling environment for effective cross-sector collaboration and social impact
initiatives. Ultimately, by acknowledging the unique contributions of both sectors and
promoting complementarity and collaboration, a more integrated and synergistic
approach to addressing societal challenges can be achieved.
B. The ideas of Adam Smith can be applied to show how businesses and nonprofits can
work together to achieve greater social impact. Smith's concepts, such as the
"invisible hand" and the division of labor, can help illustrate the complementary roles
of these sectors. This, combined with appropriate government support, can lead to a
more effective approach to improving people's lives.