Module-5 7 Hours

Negotiation - Resolving Disputes: Dispute Settlement Negotiation (DSN) and Deal Making
Negotiation (DMN), importance of BATNA (Best alternative to a negotiated agreement) and ZOPA
(Zone of possible agreement) in Dispute Settlement, Negotiation Strategy and tactics for integrative
negotiation, negotiation strategy and planning. Finding and using negotiation power, sources of
power, Implications of Negotiation on Policy making, Ethics in negotiation.

Resolving Disputes: Dispute Settlement Negotiation (DSN) and Deal-Making Negotiation (DMN)
Dispute Settlement Negotiation (DSN) and Deal-Making Negotiation (DMN) are two distinct yet closely
related forms of negotiation, each serving a unique purpose in conflict resolution and agreement formation.

Dispute Settlement Negotiation (DSN):

DSN typically arises in situations where parties are in conflict, often due to breaches of contract, unmet
expectations, or conflicting interests.

• Focuses on resolving conflicts or disputes between parties where relationships might be

strained or adversarial.
• The primary goal is to find a mutually acceptable resolution to the dispute, often involving
compromise.
• DSN often occurs when parties are deadlocked or have conflicting interests, and the
negotiation is aimed at settling these disputes to avoid further escalation or litigation.

Stages of DSN

• Preparation: Understanding the conflict’s roots, identifying the interests of both parties, and
establishing the BATNA.
• Opening Discussions: Parties present their perspectives on the dispute. This phase often sets the
tone for the negotiation.
• Exploration: Both parties explore possible solutions. The focus is on finding common ground.
• Bargaining: Parties negotiate the terms of the settlement, making concessions and trade-offs.
• Closure: Agreement is reached, formalized in writing, and implemented. If no agreement is reached,
alternative dispute resolution methods, such as arbitration, may be considered.

DSN often results in a compromise where neither party gets everything they want, but both avoid the costs
and risks of litigation.

Deal-Making Negotiation (DMN):

This type of negotiation is often proactive, aimed at creating value through new contracts, partnerships, or
business ventures.

• Involves creating new agreements, contracts, or deals between parties.

• The primary goal is to establish terms that benefit all parties involved, often through
collaborative and integrative approaches.

Prof. Immaculate Joseph Kirthika, AIT BENGALURU 1

 • DMN is typically less adversarial than DSN, focusing on mutual gains and long-term
relationships.

Stages of DMN

• Initiation: Identifying opportunities for a deal and determining the strategic importance of the
potential agreement.
• Development: Building rapport, setting negotiation agendas, and exploring interests to align goals.
• Negotiation: Exchanging proposals, negotiating terms, and making trade-offs to maximize mutual
gains.
• Finalization: Drafting the agreement, ensuring clarity on all terms, and securing commitment from
all parties.
• Implementation: Monitoring the execution of the agreement and managing any issues that arise
post-deal.

DMN aims for win-win outcomes where both parties perceive value and the relationship is strengthened,
leading to future opportunities.

Importance of BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement)

BATNA

o BATNA is the most advantageous course of action a party can take if negotiations fail and an
agreement cannot be reached.
o It serves as a benchmark against which any proposed agreement should be measured.

Importance

o Negotiation Leverage: A strong BATNA gives a party more power in negotiations, allowing
them to walk away from a bad deal confidently.
o Decision-Making: Knowing your BATNA helps in making informed decisions, preventing the
acceptance of unfavorable terms.
o Negotiation Strategy: A well-understood BATNA allows for better preparation and the ability
to push for terms that are at least as good as the alternative.

Importance of ZOPA (Zone of Possible Agreement)

ZOPA: ZOPA is the range within which an agreement is satisfactory to both parties involved in the
negotiation. It represents the overlap between the lowest offer a seller is willing to accept and the highest offer
a buyer is willing to pay.

Importance

Determining ZOPA:

• Seller’s Reservation Point: The lowest price or terms a seller is willing to accept.
• Buyer’s Reservation Point: The highest price or most favorable terms a buyer is willing to offer.
• Overlap Identification: The ZOPA exists where the seller’s minimum and the buyer’s maximum
overlap. If there’s no overlap, negotiation becomes challenging unless new value can be created.

Strategies Within ZOPA:

Prof. Immaculate Joseph Kirthika, AIT BENGALURU 2

 • Maximizing Value Within ZOPA: Once the ZOPA is identified, each party should aim to negotiate
towards their ideal outcome within this range. The goal is to claim as much value as possible without
pushing the other party out of the ZOPA.
• Expanding ZOPA: Parties can work to expand the ZOPA by introducing new variables or interests
into the negotiation. For example, offering non-monetary compensation can widen the ZOPA.

Using ZOPA Effectively

• Focus Negotiation Efforts: By concentrating on the ZOPA, negotiators can avoid unproductive
arguments over non-negotiable positions and instead work towards finding a mutually acceptable
agreement.
• Flexibility Within ZOPA: While it’s important to aim for the best possible outcome, negotiators
should remain flexible within the ZOPA to ensure a deal is reached.

Negotiation Strategy and Tactics for Integrative Negotiation

Integrative Negotiation: Also known as "win-win" negotiation, where the focus is on mutually beneficial
solutions rather than competing interests.

Key Strategies:

• Interest-Based Bargaining: Focus on underlying interests rather than positions, aiming to

meet the core needs of all parties.
• Expanding the Pie: Look for ways to create value for both parties, often by exploring
creative solutions or adding new elements to the deal.
• Trade-Offs and Concessions: Make concessions on less critical issues in exchange for
gains on more important ones, ensuring both sides feel satisfied.
• Collaborative Problem-Solving: Work together to identify solutions that satisfy the
interests of both parties, fostering trust and long-term relationships.

Tactics:

• Active Listening: Encourage open communication, showing genuine interest in the other
party’s perspective.
• Information Sharing: Disclose relevant information that can help both sides reach a better
agreement, while keeping strategic information confidential.
• Joint Brainstorming: Collaborate on generating options before deciding on a final
agreement, allowing for a broader range of solutions.

Negotiation Strategy and Planning

Preparation:

• Research: Gather information about the other party’s needs, goals, and constraints, as well as
the market or context in which the negotiation occurs.
• Setting Objectives: Define clear goals, including your ideal outcome, acceptable
compromises, and deal-breakers.
• BATNA Analysis: Evaluate your BATNA to ensure you understand your alternatives and can
leverage them effectively.

Planning the Process:

Prof. Immaculate Joseph Kirthika, AIT BENGALURU 3

 • Agenda Setting: Establish the order of issues to be discussed, focusing on simpler or less
contentious issues first to build momentum.
• Timing: Choose the right moment to negotiate, considering deadlines, external pressures, and
the readiness of both parties.
• Negotiation Style: Decide whether to adopt a competitive, cooperative, or mixed approach
based on the situation and relationship with the other party.

During the Negotiation:

• Flexibility: Be prepared to adapt your strategy as the negotiation progresses, responding to

new information or changes in the other party’s stance.
• Building Rapport: Foster a positive relationship with the other party to facilitate open
dialogue and reduce tensions.
• Managing Concessions: Offer concessions strategically, ensuring they are reciprocated and
lead towards a favorable outcome.

Finding and Using Negotiation Power

Sources of Power:

• Information Power: Knowledge and expertise relevant to the negotiation give a party
leverage, as they can shape the discussion and influence outcomes.
• Positional Power: The authority or role a party holds can impact their ability to dictate terms
or influence the other party’s decisions.
• Relationship Power: Strong relationships or alliances can provide leverage by creating a sense
of obligation or by enabling coalition-building.
• Resource Power: Control over resources, such as finances, goods, or services, gives a party
the upper hand in negotiations.
• BATNA Power: A strong BATNA increases power by providing a viable alternative to an
agreement, allowing a party to reject unfavorable offers.

Using Power Effectively:

• Balance Power Dynamics: Understand the power balance in the negotiation and seek to
equalize it, if necessary, through alliances, information gathering, or other means.
• Avoid Overuse of Power: While power can be effective, overreliance on it can damage
relationships and lead to suboptimal agreements.
• Ethical Use of Power: Ensure that power is used responsibly and ethically, maintaining
integrity and trustworthiness throughout the negotiation.

Implications of Negotiation on Policy-Making

1. Influencing Policy Decisions:

o Negotiations can shape the outcomes of policy decisions by aligning the interests of different
stakeholders, including governments, organizations, and the public.
o Successful negotiations can lead to more inclusive and sustainable policies that reflect the
needs and interests of a broader range of stakeholders.

2. Balancing Competing Interests:

Prof. Immaculate Joseph Kirthika, AIT BENGALURU 4

 o Policy negotiations often involve balancing the interests of various parties, such as economic
considerations, social justice, and environmental sustainability.
o Negotiators must navigate these competing interests to develop policies that are both effective
and acceptable to all involved.

3. Long-Term Impact:

o The outcomes of policy negotiations can have long-term effects on society, influencing
economic growth, social equity, and public trust in institutions.
o Effective negotiation strategies can lead to policies that are adaptable and resilient, capable of
addressing future challenges and opportunities.

Ethics in Negotiation

Ethical Principles:

o Honesty: Being truthful in communication, avoiding deception or misrepresentation of facts.

o Fairness: Striving for outcomes that are just and equitable, considering the interests of all
parties involved.
o Integrity: Maintaining consistency between words and actions, upholding commitments made
during the negotiation.
o Respect: Treating the other party with dignity and consideration, even in adversarial situations.

Ethical Challenges:

o Misrepresentation: The temptation to exaggerate or withhold information can lead to ethical

dilemmas, impacting trust and the integrity of the negotiation.
o Manipulation: Using psychological tactics or power imbalances to coerce the other party
raises ethical concerns and can damage relationships.
o Conflicts of Interest: Negotiators must be vigilant in identifying and managing conflicts of
interest that could compromise their impartiality or fairness.

Promoting Ethical Negotiations:

o Establishing Clear Standards: Set clear ethical guidelines and expectations for all parties
involved in the negotiation.
o Transparency: Encourage openness and transparency in the negotiation process to build trust
and ensure accountability.
o Accountability: Hold parties accountable for unethical behavior, ensuring that there are
consequences for actions that violate ethical standards.

Prof. Immaculate Joseph Kirthika, AIT BENGALURU 5