QMS 105 GRP Ass 8
QMS 105 GRP Ass 8
SCHOOL OF BUSSINES
(SOB)
PROGRAMME : BAF-BS
STREAM : BAF-BS 1C
GROUP NUMBER : 8
PARTICIPANTS
(a) Ibrahim spins a ‘Spinning Malima’ at a fair. When the wheel stops, the shorter
distance of an arrow measured along the circumference from Ibrahim is denoted by C.
What is the distribution of C?
Since the wheel is symmetric and the arrow can stop at any point along the
circumference with equal probability, is uniformly distributed over the interval, the
distribution of C would be uniform. This is because the arrow is equally likely to land at
any point along the circumference of the wheel. Therefore, the probability of the arrow
landing within any given segment of the circumference is proportional to the length of
that segment.
1
Pdf = f(x) = x, 0 ≤ X ≤ 4
8
Find;
()
2 x
1 t
8 2 0
()
2 x
1 1 t
×
8 2 1 0
1 2 2
( x −0 )
16
1 2
CDF F(X) = x, 0 ≤ X ≤4
16
A graph of Y= F(x)
2
1
Below is the Table for graph Y= F(x) = X , 0 ≤ X ≤4
16
X 0 1 2 3 4
Y = F(x) 0 1 1 9 1
16 4 16
A GRAPH OF Y = F(x)
Y = f(x) -axis
2
1
1 F(x) = X
16
9
16
1
4
1
16
0 1 2 3 4 X - axis
1 2
Therefore the cumulative distribution function is CDF F(X) = x, 0
16
≤ X ≤ 4 and its graph above
SOLUTION
1
Given = f(x) = x, P(0.3 ≤ X ≤ 1.8)
8
1.8
∫ 18 x dx
0.3
( )
2 1.8
1 x
8 2 0.3
( )
2 1.8
1 1 x
×
8 2 1 0.3
1
( 1.8 2−0.32 )
16
1
( 3.15 )
16
0.196875
1
Given f(x) = x, 0 ≤ X ≤ 4
8
∫ x f ( 18 x ) dx
0
∫ 18 x 2 dx
0
( )
3 4
1 x
8 3 0
8 3( 1 )
3 4
1 1 x
×
0
1 3 3
( 4 −0 )
24
1
( 64 )
24
64
Mean = = 2.666
24
Median
1
Set f(x) =
2
SOLUTION
∫ 12 X dx
0
( )
2 4
1 x
2 2 0
( )
2 4
1 1 x
×
2 2 1 0
1 2 2
( 4 −0 )
4
1 16
( 16 ) = =4
4 4
SOLUTION
From IQR = Q3 - Q1
1
Q1 = SET f(x) =
4
∫ 14 X dx
0
( )
2 4
1 x
4 2 0
4 2( 1 )
2 4
1 1 x
×
0
1 2 2
( 4 −0 )
8
1 16
( 16 ) = =2
8 8
Q1 = 2
3
Q3 = SET f(x) =
4
SOLUTION
∫ 34 X dx
0
( )
2 4
3 x
4 2 0
4 2( 1 )
2 4
3 1 x
×
0
3 2 2
( 4 −0 )
8
3 48
( 16 ) = =6
8 8
Q3 = 6
Hence IQR = Q3 - Q1
IQR = 6 -2 = 4
QUESTION (02)
a) The following are importance of estimation theory with application on
different field;
A higher level of significance (25% or 30%) would increase the probability of rejecting
a true null hypothesis, leading to false positives. This means we would be more likely to
conclude that there is a significant effect when there is actually none. Lower levels of
significance (1% or 5%) provide a stronger evidence threshold, reducing the risk of
false positives and ensuring more reliable conclusions.
REFERENCES
S.P. Gupta (2010). Business statistics (16th edition); Educational publisher, New Delhi.