RK Notes - IPR
RK Notes - IPR
Q2)What is Copyright ?
Ans) Copyright is a form of intellectual property protection granted under the Indian
Copyright Act 1957 (Section 14 of the Act)to the creators of original works of authorship such
as literary works (including computer programmes, tables and compilations), dramatic,
musical and artistic works, cinematographic films and sound recordings. As per the Copyright
Act, 1957 of India, copyright refers to a bundle of exclusive rights vested in the owner of
copyright by virtue of Section 14 of the Act. These rights can be exercised only by the owner
of copyright or by any other person who is duly licensed in this regard by the owner of
copyright.
Q7) Name some international organizations that play a key role in the protection and
enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
Ans)There are several international organizations that play a key role in the protection and
enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR):
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): WIPO is a specialized agency of the
United Nations that is dedicated to developing a balanced and accessible international
intellectual property system.
World Trade Organization(WTO): The WTO is an international organization that deals with
the global rules of trade between nations. It administers the Agreement on Trade-Related
Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), which sets down minimum standards for many
forms of intellectual property regulation as applied to nationals of other WTO Members.
These organizations work together to ensure that intellectual property rights are respected
and enforced, promoting innovation and creativity globally.
Duration: A copyright in case of literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works lasts for the life
of the artist, plus 60 years after the artist’s death.
Rights: If you own the copyright in an artwork, you have exclusive rights over certain uses of
that work. These rights fall into two categories: economic rights and moral rights. Economic
rights relate to copying, licensing, renting, lending, performing, showing the work to the
public, making an adaptation of the work or translating a work.
Q15)What are the classes of work in which copyright subsists as per section 13 of copy
right act?
Ans)As per Section 13 of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957, copyright subsists throughout India
in the following classes of works:
a) Original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works: This includes novels, plays, songs,
paintings, etc.
b) Cinematograph films: This includes movies and other audiovisual works.
c) Sound recording: This includes recordings of music, spoken words, or other sounds.
Copyright societies assure the creative author of the commercial management of their works.
They are authorized to watch out for copyright infringement and take appropriate legal action
against the infringer. They help in enforcing copyright with benefits to the parties mentioned
above. It also aids copyright owners by increasing their revenues and the general public by
providing them with a convenient destination to obtain licenses from multiple right holders.
b)Collect Fees: Copyright societies can collect fees in relation to licenses. They can also
distribute these fees among authors or other owners, provided that they had kept the money
for their expenses.
c)Locate Infringement: Copyright societies are authorized to watch out for copyright
infringement and take appropriate legal action against the infringer.
Q21) Who is author? Explain the concept of author and owner of copyright? What are the
rights of copyright owner?
Ans) In the context of copyright law, an “author” is generally considered to be the creator of
an original work. The specific definition can vary depending on the type of work and the
jurisdiction, but it typically includes the following:
a) In relation to a literary or dramatic work, the author is the person who created the work.
b) In relation to a musical work, the author is the composer.
c) In relation to an artistic work other than a photograph, the author is the artist. d) In relation
to a photograph, the author is the person who took the photograph. e) In relation to a
cinematograph film or sound recording, the author is the producer.
f) In relation to any literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work which is computer- generated,
the author is the person who causes the work to be created.
These rights are designed to ensure that creators can control how their work is used and
distributed, and that they can receive financial compensation for their creations. The specifics
can vary by jurisdiction, but these principles are widely recognized in international copyright
law.
a) Distinctiveness: A good trademark should be unique and not similar to any trademark that
is already popular or registered.
b) Simplicity: The trademark should be easy to recognize, speak, and spell so that the masses
can acknowledge it quickly.
c) Short and Memorable: Shorter trademarks are easier to remember, while people find it
hard to remember long ones.
d) Reflective of the Product’s Quality: An ideal trademark should have the potential to reflect
the quality of the product.
Q25) Explain doctrine of honest and concurrent user in trade marks act?
Ans)The doctrine of honest and concurrent use is provided under section 12 of Indian Trade
Marks Act, 1999. This doctrine allows for the registration of a trademark that is identical or
similar to an already registered trademark, under certain conditions.
The main contention to prove honest concurrent use is that the applicant has been using the
mark in a bonafide manner and/or didn’t know about the earlier registered trademark.
The main features of this doctrine are:
a) Concurrent use: This is when users have identical or similar marks on similar or non-similar
goods.
b) Honest use: The applicant has been using the mark in good faith and/or didn’t have the
knowledge of the earlier registered trademark.
c) Association with the product or service: The applicant also has the burden to prove that
the relevant customers associate their mark with their product or service.
d) Discretion of the Registrar: The section also provides that the registration of such a mark
is at the subjective discretion of the Registrar.
Obligations of a Patentee:
➢Duty to Disclose: The patentee must fully disclose their invention.
➢Duty to Request for Examination : After applying for a patent, the patentee must request
an examination.
➢Duty to Respond to Objections: If any objections are raisedduringthe examination of the
patent application, the patentee must respond to them.
➢Duty to clear all Objections : The patentee must address and resolve all objections to their
patent application.
➢Duty to Pay Statutory Fees: The patentee is responsible for paying all required fees.
SHORT NOTES
Secondary infringement, on the other hand, occurs when unauthorized dealings take place,
such as selling or importing pirated books. It happens if someone facilitates another person
or group in infringing on a copyright. It can be further classified into contributory
infringement and vicarious infringement.
1) Contributory infringement takes place when a person induces or instigates another
person to materially contribute to copyright infringement. For example, if a professor
instructs students to get a copy of the textbook from a photocopy shop, the professor will
be liable for contributory infringement.
2) Vicarious infringement occurs when a person or entity gets benefitted because of the
copyright infringement done by the primary infringer. For example, the photocopy shop in
the previous example will be liable for both vicarious infringement and secondary
infringement.
B-Moral Rights:
1) The Right to Paternity: This right allows the copyright owner to claim authorship of the
work.
2) The Right to Integrity: This right allows the copyright owner to prevent any distortion,
mutilation or other modification of their work that would be prejudicial to their honor or
reputation.
3) These rights give the copyright owner the ability to control how their work is used and
distributed, and they provide the legal basis for the owner to seek compensation if their
rights are infringed.
Owner: The “owner” of a copyright is typically the person who has the legal rights to the work.
This can be the author themselves, or it can be another person or entity to whom the author
has transferred their rights. For example, an author might sell their copyright to a publisher,
in which case the publisher becomes the owner. The owner has the right to reproduce the
work, to distribute it, to display or perform it publicly, and to create derivative works.
It’s important to note that while the author and owner might often be the same person, they
don’t have to be. The author is always the original creator of the work, but the owner is the
one who holds the legal rights.
Q8) Deceptive Similarity.
Ans)“Deceptive similarity” is a concept in trademark law. It refers to a situation where a
trademark is so similar to an existing trademark that it could deceive or confuse the public.
The concept of deceptive similarity is defined under Section 2 (h) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999
in India. It states: "A mark shall be deemed to be deceptively similar to another mark if it so
nearly resembles that other mark as to be likely to deceive or cause confusion."
similar to another. If it closely resembles another mark, there’s a high chance that it could
deceive the general public or cause confusion in their minds.
According to Section 11 (1) of the Trademark Act, 1999, a trademark cannot be registered if it
is deceptively similar, or identical, with an existing trademark and goods and services, that is
likely to create confusion in the mind of the public at large.
The primary purpose of a Mareva injunction is to prevent a risk of dissipation of assets by the
defendant for ulterior purposes before judgment. It is designed to prevent the defendant
from rendering a decree against him worthless by removing his assets from the court’s
jurisdiction.
To obtain a Mareva injunction, the plaintiff must usually establish that:
a) There exists a strong prima facie case against the defendant.
b) It will suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not issued.
c) The balance of convenience favors the issuing of the injunction.
d) The cause of action lies within the jurisdiction of the Court which the Mareva injunction is
sought.
e) It has a “good arguable case” on the merits of the cause of action.
Term and Validity: The term of a patent of addition is equal to that of the main patent. It
remains in force as long as the main patent is valid. If the main patent expires or is revoked,
the patent of addition ceases to exist.
b) Inventions contrary to public order or morality (Section 3(b)): An invention, the primary
or intended use of which would be contrary to law or morality or injurious to public health
This includes inventions that cause serious prejudice to human, animal or plant life or health,
or to the environment. For instance, terminator gene technology cannot be patented as it
severely threatens animal and plant life and the environment.
d) Invention Relating to Atomic Energy: The provisions regarding the patent of inventions
related to atomic energy in India are outlined in Section 4 of the Patents Act, 1970. This section
states that no patent shall be granted for inventions that are considered by the Central
Government to be useful for or related to atomic energy. This includes the production, control,
use, or disposal of atomic energy or any prescribed substance or radioactive substance as
defined under Section 20 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962.
f) Mere discovery of a new form of a known substance (Section 3(d)): This does not result
in the enhancement of the known efficacy of that substance. For example, new uses of the
plant neem cannot be patented as per this clause.
The specifications are submitted in Form-2 as prescribed under the Patent Act, 1970, and the
Patent Rules, 2003. The first page of Form-2 should contain the title of the invention, the name,
address, and nationality of each of the applicants, and a preamble to the description.
For a complete specification, the preamble should state: "The following specification
particularly describes the invention and the manner in which it is to be performed." Meeting
these requirements is essential for the grant of a patent, as the specification forms the basis
of the patent grant and defines the extent of patent protection.
These rights are crucial for maintaining the integrity of a brand and ensuring that the goodwill
associated with a trademark is not diluted by unauthorized use. It’s important to note that
while registration is not compulsory, it offers significant advantages and legal protections for
the trademark owner.
Q21) Who can oppose patents and what are the grounds for opposing patents? What is
the procedure for opposing patents?
Ans) I) The Grounds for opposition to the grant of Patent (Section 25 (1) to (4)): Opposition
to the grant of patent may be made, once the Controller has accepted the complete
specifications, and it is advertised in the Official Gazette giving reasons for such acceptance.
It is thrown open to the public to oppose the grant, if there are any reasonable grounds for
the same. Within 4 months from the date of advertisement of the acceptance of the complete
specifications, any person interested, may give notice to the Controller, stating his opposition
to the grant of patent.
"Any Person Interested" "Person interested" includes a person engaged in, or promoting,
research in the same field as that of the invention.
Thus, he can establish “locus standi” on the following grounds:
i) He has in his possession, patents relating to the same subject matter.
ii) Bona fide manufacturer of an article or based on a similar process as that of the invention.
iii) Trading interest.
II Grounds for Opposition :
The provisions relating to grounds of opposing patents are given in Section 25 of Patents Act.
An application for a patent may be opposed by any person interested, on one or more of
the following grounds:
a)Invention wrongfully obtained.
b) Prior publication in any Indian specification, or prior publication in any other document in
India or elsewhere.
c)Prior claim in a concurrent application.
d)Prior public use or public knowledge in India. e)Obviousness and Lack of Inventive step.
f)Invention not patentable under the Act.
g)Insufficient description of the invention.
h)Failure to disclose information relating to foreign application.
i)In the case of convention application not made within the prescribed time.
III) The procedure for opposing patents in India involves several steps, and it can be
divided into two types: pre-grant opposition and post-grant opposition.
Pre-Grant Opposition:
a) Filing of Opposition: Any person can file a pre-grant opposition after the patent application
is published but before the patent is granted.
b) Submission of Evidence: The opponent must submit evidence and documents supporting
their opposition.
c) Controller’s Examination: The Controller of Patents examines the opposition and the
applicant’s response.
d) Decision: The Controller decides whether to grant the patent, require amendments, or
refuse the patent application.
Post-Grant Opposition:
a) Filing of Notice: An ‘interested person’ can file a notice of opposition within one year from
the date of publication of the grant of the patent.
b) Constitution of Opposition Board: The Controller constitutes an Opposition Board
consisting of three members to examine the patent.
c) Examination Report: The Opposition Board submits their examination report to the
Controller.
d) Hearing: Both parties are given an opportunity to be heard.
e) Controller’s Decision: Based on the hearing and the Board’s report, the Controller decides
on the opposition.
f) Appeal: Parties dissatisfied with the decision can appeal to the Intellectual Property
Appellate Board (IPAB). This process ensures that any third party can challenge the validity of
a patent application or a granted patent, maintaining the integrity of the patent system.
SITUATIONAL PROBLEMS
Q1) Government of India starts manufacturing a drug which is patented by PACTO
Pharma Ltd. The drug is distributed to government medical colleges and hospitals.
PACTO Pharma Ltd. files a suit of infringement against the government.
a) Will PACTO Pharma Ltd. succeed in the suit ?
b) Which provisions of the Patents Act will be applicable in this scenario ?
Ans) In the scenario where the Government of India begins manufacturing a drug patented
by PACTO Pharma Ltd. and distributes it to government medical colleges and hospitals, the
outcome of PACTO Pharma Ltd.'s infringement suit against the government would depend on
several factors, including the specific provisions of the Indian Patents Act and any exceptions
or compulsory licensing provisions that may apply.
a)The success of PACTO Pharma Ltd. in the suit would largely hinge on whether the
government’s actions fall under any of the exceptions to patent infringement outlined in the
Patents Act. For instance, the government may invoke Section 47, which allows for the
government use of patented inventions for its own purposes without constituting an
infringement.
b)Additionally, under Section 100, the government can authorize the use of a patented
invention for the purposes of its own services.
c) Moreover, if the government’s actions are deemed to be in the public interest, particularly
in scenarios like a public health crisis, it could potentially invoke the compulsory licensing
provisions under Sections 84-92, which allow for the manufacturing and distribution of a
patented drug without the consent of the patent holder under certain conditions.
d) Thus, in the above scenario, the provisions of section 47, 100, 84-92 may be applicable and
under such circumstance the suit of PATCO pharma may not be succeed.
Q2) Mr ‘T’ invents a topography of integrated circuits and applies for a patent for the
same. i. Will Mr. ‘T’ succeed in getting a patent? ii.What is the provision of law regarding
the invention of topography of integrated circuits ?
Mr. ‘T’ may be able to protect his invention of the topography of integrated circuits, but not
through a traditional patent. Instead, this type of intellectual property is typically protected
under a sui generis system, which is a unique category of rights separate from patents.
In India, for example, the Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-Design Act, 2000, governs
the protection of layout designs of integrated circuits. Registration is a prerequisite for
protection under this Act. For Mr. ‘T’ to succeed in protecting his layout designs (topographies)
of integrated circuits, the design must be original, resulting from his intellectual effort, and
not merely a copy of another layout design. It should also not have been commercially
exploited before. The protection for such a layout design is usually for a period of 10 years,
starting from the date of filing the application or from the first commercial exploitation,
whichever is earlier.
Q3) Being inspired by the Web series ‘Maharani’, Shashi Khanna - a fiction author wrote
a biography of Smt. Rabri Devi named ‘ RANIDEVI’ without her consent. Smt. Rabri Devi
sought an injunction on the sale of the said book. But the controversy led to heavy public
demand of the book. Mohan Trivedi made a pirated copy of this book and began to sell
it all over India. i. What remedies would have been available to the author, if there was
no injunction against his book? ii. What are the remedies available to Smt. Rabri Devi ?
If there was no injunction against Shashi Khanna’s book ‘RANIDEVI’, the author would have
had several remedies available under Indian law for the infringement of copyright by Mohan
Trivedi’s pirated copies:
Remedies for the Author :
a) Civil Remedies: The author could seek damages for the losses incurred due to piracy. This
includes compensatory damages for the loss of sales and profits.
b) Criminal Remedies: The author could file a criminal complaint against the infringer.
Copyright infringement is a criminal offense under the Copyright Act, 1957, which can lead to
imprisonment and fines.
c) Administrative Remedies: The author could approach the Copyright Board for certain
administrative actions against the infringer.
It’s important to note that the remedies would depend on the specifics of the case, including
the nature of the content in the book and the extent of the infringement or violation of rights.
Q4) In 2003, Famous Camera Ltd. Invents and adopts the trade mark ‘THADAX’ in relation
to cameras and obtains registration of the same THADAX. THADAX becomes a very
popular brand in most Asian Countries in a short while. In 2005, Super Cakes Private Ltd.
launches its cakes under the trade name THADAX.
(i) Can Famous Cameras Ltd. take action against Super Cakes Ltd for restraining Super
Cakes Ltd from using the trade mark THADAX ?
(ii) Can Famous Camera Ltd. Succeed in the action against Super Cakes Ltd., if the trade
mark was popular only in Mumbai?
In the given scenario, Famous Cameras Ltd. has several legal avenues to address the
trademark infringement by Super Cakes Private Ltd.:
a) Action Against Super Cakes Ltd.: Famous Cameras Ltd. can indeed take legal action
against Super Cakes Ltd. for using the trademark ‘THADAX’. The action can be based on
trademark infringement, which occurs when a trademark that is identical or confusingly
similar to a registered trademark is used without permission, leading to confusion among
consumers. Since ‘THADAX’ is registered for cameras, its use by another company for cakes
could potentially dilute the distinctiveness of the trademark or cause confusion that the cakes
are associated with or endorsed by Famous Cameras Ltd.
b) Success in the Action in Mumbai: The success of Famous Camera Ltd. in the action against
Super Cakes Ltd. would depend on several factors, including the extent of the reputation of
the ‘THADAX’ trademark. If the trademark ‘THADAX’ is well-known in Mumbai and is associated
with Famous Cameras Ltd., the company may argue that the use of the same trademark by
Super Cakes Ltd. is likely to cause confusion or deception among the public, even if the
trademark’s popularity is limited to Mumbai.
The concept of ‘trans-border reputation’ and ‘passing off’ could also be relevant in such cases,
where a trademark is well- known in a particular region and enjoys a reputation.
It’s important to note that the specifics of the case, including evidence of the trademark’s
popularity and consumer confusion, would be crucial in determining the outcome of any legal
action.
Q5) Venugopal is a manufacturer of tennis racquets and wants to use the name "Rocket"
as his trademark. He applies for a trademark registration to the Registrar of
Trademarks.
i. Will Venugopal succeed to register the name "Rocket" as a trademark for his goods?
ii. State and explain the provisions of the law involved.
Ans)Whether Venugopal will succeed in registering “Rocket” as a trademark for his tennis
racquets depends on several factors. The Trademarks Act, 1999, governs the registration of
trademarks in India and stipulates that a trademark must be distinctive, not deceptive, and
not similar to existing trademarks for related goods or services. If “Rocket” is deemed
distinctive enough and does not conflict with existing trademarks in the same category,
Venugopal may succeed in his application. The provisions of the law involved are primarily
from The Trademarks Act, 1999. The key provisions that would be considered in Venugopal’s
case include:
➢Section 9: Absolute grounds for refusal of registration,which includes trademarks that lack
distinctiveness or are descriptive of the goods.
➢Section 11: Relative grounds for refusal of registration, which involves refusal if the
trademark conflicts with or is similar to an earlier trademark and may cause confusion.
➢Section 18: Application for registration, which outlines the process of applying for a
trademark and the examination by the Registrar.
The Registrar will examine the application to ensure that the trademark “Rocket” meets the
necessary criteria, including distinctiveness and non-conflict with prior trademarks. If it passes
the examination and there’s no opposition, Venugopal may be granted the registration. It’s
advisable for Venugopal to conduct a thorough trademark search and possibly consult with a
trademark attorney to navigate the registration process effectively.
Q6) Kamya Drugs make a herbal tea for cold and cough treatment using traditionally
well-known actives.
i. Will they be able to get a patent for the herbal tea in India?
ii. What are the steps for filing a patent application in India?
Kamya Drugs may face challenges in obtaining a patent for the herbal tea in India if the tea is
made using traditionally well-known actives. According to Indian patent law, an invention
must be novel, involve an inventive step, and be capable of industrial application to be
patentable. Since the actives are traditionally well-known, they may not meet the novelty
requirement. Additionally, herbal formulations based on traditional knowledge are generally
not considered patentable unless they involve a new process, formulation, or synergistic effect
that is not obvious.
ii. The steps for filing a patent application in India are as follows:
a) Patent Search: Conduct a worldwide patent search to determine the novelty of the
invention.
b) Drafting Patent Specification: Prepare a detailed description of the invention, including
claims that define the scope of the patent sought.
c) Patent Application Filing: File the patent application with the appropriate IndianPatent
Office, either online or at a physical location.
d) Patent Publication: The application is published 18 months after filing to allow for public
opposition.
e) RequestingPatentExamination:After publication,request a substantive examination of
the patent application.
f) Responding to Objections: Address any objections raised by the patent examiner.
g) Patent Grant: If the application meets all requirements, the patent will be granted.
ii. Copyright infringement is the use or production of copyright-protected material without the
permission of the copyright holder. This includes any reproduction, distribution, performance,
public display, or creation of derivative works without authorization. In the context of a film
adaptation, if the producer does not have the rights to the book, any production based on it
would be an infringement of the author’s copyright.
Q8) Scientist 'A' working in B.A.R.C. and involved in atomic energy research, discovers a
scientific principle. His collegue, Scientist 'B' uses the principle and invents' a novel,
inventive, and useful working device based on the principles.
a) Will Scientist 'A' be granted a Patent for his discovery? Why?
Ans) No, Scientist 'A' will not be granted a Patent for his discovery. Under Section 4 of the
Patents Act, 1970, inventions relating to atomic energy are not patentable. Inventions related
to atomic energy fall under the non-patentable category in India. According to Section 4 of the
Indian Patents Act, no patent shall be granted for inventions related to the control, production,
disposal, or use of atomic energy. This includes inventions that the Government of India
considers pertinent to atomic energy operations. The exclusion is in place because the
government maintains strict control over atomic energy due to its strategic importance and
potential risks.
b) Will Scientist 'B' be granted a Patent for his invention? Why?
Answer: No, Scientist 'B' will not be granted Patent for his invention, as his invention is related
to the principles of atomic energy which is not patentable.
c) What will be your answer to b) above, if the invention is not related to atomic energy
? Why?
Answer: In such a case, the Scientist will be granted Patent if his invention is not related to
atomic energy and ifhis invention isnovel and innovative.
Q9) Dr. Singh has written a book on Intellectual Property Law. The book has been
published by Western Law House.
b) A journalist uses extracts of the book in the review of the book published in a
magazine. Will this amount to infringement? Why?
Answer: No, this will not amount to infringement as extracts can be used for review purpose,
under Section 52 of the Copyright Act, 1957, certain acts does not amount to infringement of
copyright.
c) A student extensively quotes from Dr. Singh's book in his law examination. Will this
amount to infringement? Why?
Answer: No. this will also not amount to infringement, under Section 52 of the Copyright Act.
1957, certain acts not to be infringement of copyright.
d) Shyam makes 10 photocopies of the book and distributes them amongst his friends.
Will this amount to infringement? Why?
Answer: Yes, this will certainly amount to infringement, because, under Section 51 of
Copyright Act, 1957, making photocopy of the book and distributing the same amounts to
infringement of copyright.
Q10) Anil a research scientist, discovers a new phenomenon in physics. Using principles
underlying this new discovery, Anil and Amit invent a product having substantial
commercial potential. Anil and Amit have come to you for advice.
a) Would you advise Anil to obtain a patent in respect of his discovery ? Give reasons
either way.
Answer: No, Anil would be advised against making any effort to obtain a patent in respect of
the said discovery. Under the Patents Act, 1970, only inventions are capable of securing
patents and Section 3 of the said Act also discusses "what are not inventions"
Section 3 (c): - mere discovery of a scientific principle of the formulation of or the discovery of
any living thing or non-living substance occurring in the nature cannot be consider as
inventions. Since Anil's work clearly falls under Section 3 (c), the same would not be granted a
patent.
b) Would Anil and Amit together, be eligible for a patent? If no, who amongst them
would have a better right?
Answer: Yes, Anil and Amit would be eligible for applying for a patent grant in respect of the
product developed by them.
c) The inventor(s) would like to file a Complete Specification, but their claims are not yet
ready. What advice would you give them under the circumstances?
Answer: The inventors should draft and file the 'provisional specifications' in respect of the
patentable invention. They are not required to file their claims at this stage; however, the
applicants must file the complete specifications within one year from the filing of the
provisional specifications.
d) Further, the inventor(s) would like to discuss the discovery and the product at a
scientific conference. What advice would you give them?
Answer: Since the discovery is not the subject matter of the patent, the scientist can discuss
the same at the scientific conference. However, they are advised not to make any mention of
the product, unless they have filed at least a provisional specification in respect of the
invention embodied in the product.
Q11) Dhoni has been granted a patent, by the Indian Patents Office on 31 st December,
2007
a) For how long will Dhoni have the patent over his invention?
Answer: Under Section 53 (1) of the Act, the term of every patent granted, after the
commencement of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, and the term of the patent which has
not expired and has not deceased to have effect on the date of such commencement, under
this Act, shall be 20 years from the date of filing of the application for the patent.
b) If Ganguly wants to challenge the patent, in which Court has he to file a suit ?
Answer: A suit has to be instituted in a District Court or in appropriate cases, the High Court.
c) Can Dhoni file an action for infringement against manufacturer who is making the
invention in Nepal? Why?
Answer: No, because, the patent is not registered in Nepal. If Nepal is a convention country,
then only the infringement action can be initiated.
d) Can Dhoni get a patent in England in respect of the same invention, if he applies in
2008? Why?
Answer: Yes, provided, that no other similar invention has already been granted a patent.
e) If Dhoni had initially applied under the PCT then, would he have gained any
advantage?
Answer: The advantage would be the crystallizing of the priority date for the same invention
in multiple countries simultaneously.
Q12) A detective agency wants to register the trademark "I Section I Section I" for its
firm. The Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks has refused to grant
trademark on the plea that it sounds similar to the trademark ICICI.
(a) if there is likelihood of confusion caused to the public including the likelihood of association
with an earlier trademark by virtue of its identity with the earlier trademark and similarity of
goods or services caused by the earlier trademark,
(b) if the earlier trademark is well- known trademark in India and the later mark would take
unfair advantage of the earlier mark or would be detrimental to the distinctive character or
repute of the earlier trademark.
Q13) Sanchit and Sagar filed patent application with provisional specification on the
same date for the same invention. After that, Sanchit filed a complete specification
much earlier to Sagar, both filed within the allowed period. Examine the status of the
patent applications filed by both, Sanchit, and Sagar.
ii) Both Sanchit and Sagar are honest independent inventors conducting their own
separate experiments.
Answer: As Sanchit has filed a complete Specification much earlier to Sagar; Sanchit will have
exclusive right to make or use the patented article or use of the patented process. But if Sagar
has discovered new process other than Sanchit's experimental process, Sagar can get patent
on his new process; which will be improvement in Sanchit's patented process, but Sagar have
to get consent and permission from Sanchit, because, Sanchit has filed complete Specification
much earlier to Sagar. So, Sanchit is the exclusive owner (i.e. First Inventor) of patented
process.
Q14) ‘A' launches a new hand bag in the market under the brand name "Orange". The
unique feature of this bag is it is made of orange peels with a very innovative technology
and is in shades of orange. 'A' also wants to get the colour Orange as a trade mark. i.
Identify the IPR involved in the given case. ii. Will 'A' be entitled to use Orange as a trade
mark ?
i) The IPR involved in the given situation is Trademark. Trademarks are used to protect
symbols, names, and slogans used to identify goods or services. The brand name “Orange”
and potentially the unique shade of orange used for the handbags could be registered as
trademarks
ii) Regarding the color orange as a trademark, it is possible to trademark a color if it has
acquired distinctiveness and is not functional to the product. In India, a color can be
trademarked under Section 2 (1) of the Trademarks Act of 1999 if it is distinctive and can be
graphically represented. However, ‘A’ would need to prove that the color orange has become
distinctive of their handbags in the eyes of consumers and does not serve a merely decorative
or utilitarian purpose.
So, ‘A’ may be entitled to use the color orange as a trademark if these conditions are met and
if the color has become associated with their brand in the minds of consumers.