We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
CAPITAL STRUCTURE - THEORIES
Theory Year Brief Description Assumptions Advantages Limitations
Propounders 1 Net Income David Suggests that the value of the - Cost of debt is lower Encourages higher use of debt to Unrealistic assumptions: (NI) Approach 1952 Durand firm increases as the proportion than cost of equity. - maximize firm value, lowering constant cost of debt and of debt in the capital structure Cost of debt and equity overall cost of capital. equity, ignoring the financial increases due to cheaper debt. remain constant distress and bankruptcy risks. regardless of leverage. 2 Net David States that capital structure is - Cost of equity Simple approach focusing on Ignores the tax benefits of Operating 1952 Durand irrelevant to the value of the firm. increases as debt operations rather than financial debt, assuming market Income (NOI) The firm’s value depends only on increases. - WACC structuring. efficiency and no risk of Approach operating income and the overall remains constant at all default. WACC. levels of debt. 3 Traditional Ezra Advocates that there is an - At low levels of debt, Recognizes both debt and equity Difficult to estimate the exact Approach 1958 Solomon optimal capital structure, with a WACC decreases due to impacts and suggests an optimal point at which the firm's mix of debt and equity that the lower cost of debt. capital structure exists. capital structure becomes minimizes WACC and maximizes - Beyond a certain "optimal." the firm’s value. point, WACC rises as risk increases. 4 Modigliani Franco Argues that in a perfect market, - No taxes, transaction Simple, foundational theory for Ignores real-world factors and Miller 1958 Modigliani & the capital structure is irrelevant costs, or bankruptcy understanding capital structure. like taxes, bankruptcy costs, (M&M) Merton to the value of the firm. The firm's costs. - Investors can and market imperfections. Proposition I Miller value depends only on its earning borrow at the same (Without power and risk of its underlying rate as firms. Taxes) assets. 5 Modigliani Franco Incorporates corporate taxes and - Same as Proposition I, Highlights the tax advantage of Ignores financial distress and and Miller 1963 Modigliani & concludes that the value of the but includes tax debt and explains the benefits of agency costs, focusing solely (M&M) Merton firm increases with debt due to benefits. - No leveraging. on tax benefits of debt. Proposition II Miller the tax shield on interest bankruptcy or agency (With Taxes) payments. costs considered. 6 Trade-off Kraus and Argues that firms aim to balance - Firms make a trade- More realistic by accounting for Difficult to quantify the point Theory 1977 Litzenberger the tax benefits of debt (interest off between tax savings both tax benefits and financial where the costs of distress tax shield) with the costs of and bankruptcy costs. - distress risks. outweigh the benefits of debt. potential financial distress and Optimal debt level bankruptcy. varies by firm. 7 Pecking Order Stewart C. Firms prefer internal financing, - Internal financing Explains why profitable firms tend No clear optimal capital Theory 1984 Myers & followed by debt, and issue equity preferred over debt to use less debt and how financing structure, assumes firms do Nicholas as a last resort due to asymmetric and equity. - Managers decisions reflect information not target a specific debt-to- Majluf information and signaling effects. have better information asymmetry. equity ratio. about firm value than investors. 8 Agency Cost Jensen and Suggests that the capital - Agency costs exist Addresses real-world challenges of Difficult to measure agency Theory 1976 Meckling structure is influenced by agency due to conflicts of conflicts in financial decisions costs and their influence on costs arising from conflicts interest between between management and capital structure decisions. between shareholders, debt different stakeholders. investors. holders, and managers. - Firms aim to minimize these costs.
DIVIDEND THEORY
Theory Year Propounders Brief Description Assumptions Advantages Limitations
Irrelevance 1961 Modigliani & Suggests that dividend No taxes, perfect Simplifies the valuation model, Unrealistic assumptions; ignores Theory Miller policy has no effect on a capital markets, stressing that internal investment taxes and real-world frictions. firm’s value or stock price; no transaction or decisions drive value. the value is determined by flotation costs. earning power. Bird-in-the- 1963 Myron Gordon States that investors prefer Investors are Addresses investor preferences for Ignores tax implications and Hand Theory & John Lintner dividends now over risk-averse, certainty and dividend payouts. assumes investors are universally uncertain future capital preferring certain risk-averse. gains. dividends over uncertain growth. Tax Preference 1977 Litzenberger & Proposes that investors Differential Explains investor behavior based on Assumes all investors have the Theory Ramaswamy prefer capital gains over taxation between tax advantages, favoring retained same tax profile and ignores non- dividends because capital dividends and earnings. tax factors. gains are taxed at a lower capital gains. rate than dividends. Clientele Effect Various Suggests that different Investors sort Explains why firms may attract Assumes that investors can Theory 1970s Economists investors prefer different themselves into different groups of investors based seamlessly switch firms without dividend policies based on firms based on on payout strategies. transaction costs. their individual tax or income preferred preferences. dividend policies. Signaling Stephen Ross Posits that dividend changes Managers use Explains why firms may increase Can lead to misinterpretations or Theory 1980s convey information to the dividend policy dividends to signal strength to excessive focus on dividends for market about the firm’s to signal private investors. signaling purposes. future earnings and financial information health. about the firm. Residual 1956 Donaldson Firms should only pay Firms have Prioritizes investment opportunities Inconsistent dividends; can make Dividend dividends from residual access to over dividends, potentially investors uncertain about income Theory earnings after all profitable profitable maximizing growth. reliability. investments have been investment financed. opportunities and aim to maximize shareholder value through reinvestment. Agency Cost Michael Jensen Dividend payments reduce Managers may Aligns managerial actions with Could limit firm’s flexibility for Theory 1980s the agency costs between waste excess shareholder interests by reducing investment and create financial shareholders and managers cash; paying free cash flow. strain. by limiting the cash available dividends forces to managers. better capital discipline.
Test Bank for Marketing: Real People, Real Choices, 10th Edition, Michael R. Solomon Greg W. Marshall Elnora W. Stuart - Download Now And Start Reading The Complete Content